Alemtuzumab induction and triple maintenance immunotherapy in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death

Twelve Thousand Kidney Transplants Over More Than 55 Y: A Single-center Experience

Background

Kidney transplant outcomes have dramatically improved since the first successful transplant in 1954. In its early years, kidney transplantation was viewed more skeptically. Today it is considered the treatment of choice among patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Methods

Our program performed its first kidney transplant in 1966 and recently performed our 12 000th kidney transplant. Here, we review and describe our experience with these 12 000 transplants. Transplant recipients were analyzed by decade of date of transplant: 1966-1975, 1976-1985, 1986-1995, 1996-2005, 2006-2015, and 2016-2022. Death-censored graft failure and mortality were outcomes of interest.

Results

Of 12 000 kidneys, 247 were transplanted from 1966 to 1975, 1147 from 1976 to 1985, 2194 from 1986 to 1995, 3147 from 1996 to 2005, 3046 from 2006 to 2015, and 2219 from 2016 to 2022 compared with 1966-1975, there were statistically significant and progressively lower risks of death-censored graft failure at 1 y, 5 y, and at last follow-up in all subsequent eras. Although mortality at 1 y was lower in all subsequent eras after 1986-1995, there was no difference in mortality at 5 y or the last follow-up between eras.

Conclusions

In this large cohort of 12 000 kidneys from a single center, we observed significant improvement in outcomes over time. Kidney transplantation remains a robust and ever-growing and improving field.

The use of lymphocyte-depleting antibodies in specific populations of kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recommendations of the use of antibody induction treatments in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are based on moderate quality and historical studies. This systematic review aims to reevaluate, based on actual studies, the effects of different antibody preparations when used in specific KTR subgroups.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL and selected randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies looking at different antibody preparations used as induction in KTR. Comparisons were categorized into different KTR subgroups: standard, high risk of rejection, high risk of delayed graft function (DGF), living donor, and elderly KTR. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven RCT and 99 observational studies were finally included. Compared to anti-interleukin-2-receptor antibodies (IL2RA), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) reduced the risk of acute rejection at two years in standard KTR (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.61-0.89) and high risk of rejection KTR (RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.43-0.72), but without decreasing the risk of graft loss. We did not find significant differences comparing ATG vs. alemtuzumab or different ATG dosages in any KTR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many studies carried out on induction treatment in KTR, their heterogeneity and short follow-up preclude definitive conclusions to determine the optimal induction therapy. Compared with IL2RA, ATG reduced rejection in standard-risk, highly sensitized, and living donor graft recipients, but not in high DGF risk or elderly recipients. More studies are needed to demonstrate beneficial effects in other KTR subgroups and overall patient and graft survival.

Standardized, risk-adapted induction therapy in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The choice of induction therapy in kidney transplantation is often non-standardized and centre-specific. Clinicians can choose between depleting and non-depleting antibodies, which differ in their immunosuppressive capacity and the concomitant risk of infection. We herein present a standardized risk-stratified algorithm for induction therapy that might help to balance the risk of rejection and/or serious infection.

METHODS

Prior to kidney transplantation, patients were stratified into low-risk, intermediate-risk or high-risk according to our protocol based on immunologic risk factors. Depending on their individual immunologic risk, patients received basiliximab (low risk), antithymocyte globulin (intermediate risk) or low-dose alemtuzumab (high risk) for induction therapy. We analysed the results after 3 years of implementation of our risk-stratified induction therapy protocol at our kidney transplant centre.

RESULTS

Between 01/2017 and 05/2020, 126 patients were stratified in accordance with our protocol (low risk/intermediate risk/high risk: 69 vs. 42 vs. 15 patients). The median follow-up time was 1.9 [1.0-2.5] years. No significant difference was observed in rejection rate and allograft survival (low risk/intermediate risk/high risk: 90.07% vs. 80.81% vs. 100% after 3 years (p > 0.05)) among the groups. The median eGFR at follow-up was (low risk/intermediate risk/high risk) 47 [33-58] vs 58 [46-76] vs 44 [22-55] ml/min/1.73 m2. Although the rate of viral and bacterial infections did not differ significantly, we observed a higher rate of opportunistic fungal infections with alemtuzumab induction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our strategy offers facilitated and individualized choice of induction therapy in kidney transplantation. We propose further evaluation of our algorithm in prospective trials.

Duration of delayed graft function and outcomes after kidney transplantation from controlled donation after circulatory death donors: a retrospective study

The impact of the duration of delayed graft function (DGF) on graft survival is poorly characterized in controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor kidney transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed on 225 DCD donor kidney transplants between 2011 and 2016. When patients with primary nonfunction were excluded (n = 9), 141 recipients (65%) had DGF, with median (IQR) duration of dialysis dependency of 6 (2-11.75) days. Longer duration of dialysis dependency was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, and a higher rate of acute rejection. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of DGF was associated with lower graft survival (log-rank test P = 0.034), though duration of DGF was not (P = 0.723). However, multivariable Cox regression analysis found that only acute rejection was independently associated with lower graft survival [HR (95% CI) 4.302 (1.617-11.450); P = 0.003], whereas the presence of DGF and DGF duration were not. In controlled DCD kidney transplantation, DGF duration itself may not be independently associated with graft survival; rather, it may be that acute rejection associated with prolonged DGF is the poor prognostic factor.

Impact of Desensitization on Antiviral Immunity in HLA-Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients

Viral infections represent significant morbidity and mortality factors in kidney transplant recipients, with CMV, EBV, and BKV infections being most common. Desensitization (DES) with IVIg and rituximab with/without plasma exchange followed by kidney transplantation with alemtuzumab induction increased successful transplant rates in HLA-sensitized patients but may represent an increased risk for viral infections due to severe lymphocyte depletion. Here, we report on the posttransplant viral infection status in 372 DES versus 538 non-DES patients. CMV and EBV viremia were significantly lower in DES patients, while BKV viremia was similar. This trend was observed primarily in CMV sero(-), EBV sero(+), and sero(-) patients. No patient developed PTLD. The incidence of BKAN, allograft, and patient survival was similar in both groups. These viral infections were not associated with subsequent allograft rejection which occurred within 6 months after the infection. Conclusions. The IVIg + rituximab desensitization combined with alemtuzumab induction with triple immunosuppression maintenance does not increase the risk for CMV, EBV, and BKV infections. Possible factors include, in addition to posttransplant antiviral prophylaxis and PCR monitoring, presence of memory T cells and antibodies specific to CMV and likely EBV, NK cell-mediated ADCC despite lymphocyte depletion, elimination of EBV and CMV reservoirs by rituximab and alemtuzumab, and use of IVIg with antiviral properties.

Use of polyclonal/monoclonal antibody therapies in transplantation

INTRODUCTION

For over thirty years, antibody (mAb)-based therapies have been a standard component of transplant immunosuppression, and yet much remains to be learned in order for us to truly harness their therapeutic capabilities. Current mAbs used in transplant directly target and destroy graft-destructive immune cells, interrupt cytokine and costimulation-dependent T and B cell activation, and prevent down-stream complement activation. Areas covered: This review summarizes our current approaches to using antibody-based therapies to prevent and treat allograft rejection. It also provides examples of promising novel mAb therapies, and discusses the potential for future mAb development in transplantation. Expert opinion: The broad capability of antibodies, in parallel with our growing ability to synthetically modulate them, offers exciting opportunities to develop better biologic therapeutics. In order to do so, we must further our understanding about the basic biology underlying allograft rejection, and gain better appreciation of how characteristics of therapeutic antibodies affect their efficacy.

Interleukin-2 receptor antagonist compared with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction therapy using the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) under a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death.

METHODS

It was a single-centre, retrospective, cohort study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-2RA vs. ATG induction therapy in adult renal transplant recipients from donors after cardiac death. The primary end-point was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 6 months, and the secondary end-point included the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), the renal function, and the patient and graft survival at 6 months. The safety end-point was the incidence of infectious complications.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (n = 37 in the IL-2RA group and n = 95 in the ATG group) were enrolled from March 2013 to April 2014. The BPAR at 6 months was similar between the two groups (IL-2RA vs. the ATG group, 5.4% vs. 12.6%, respectively, p = 0.228). There were no differences in the DGF, renal function at 1 and 3 months, and the patient and graft survival at 6 months between the two groups, but the renal function at 6 months in the IL-2RA group was superior to that of the ATG group (p = 0.02). The IL-2RA group experienced less infection than the ATG group (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of IL2-RA and ATG induction under a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen in low-risk DCD transplantation did not differ, but the safety of the IL2-RA induction was better than that of the ATG induction.

Extended pancreas donor program - the EXPAND study rationale and study protocol

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK), pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) or pancreas transplantation after kidney (PAK) are the only curative treatment options for patients with type 1 (juvenile) diabetes mellitus with or without impaired renal function. Unfortunately, transplant waiting lists for this indication are increasing because the current organ acceptability criteria are restrictive; morbidity and mortality significantly increase with time on the waitlist. Currently, only pancreas organs from donors younger than 50 years of age and with a body mass index (BMI) less than 30 are allocated for transplantation in the Eurotransplant (ET) area. To address this issue we designed a study to increase the available donor pool for these patients.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a prospective, multicenter (20 German centers), single blinded, non-randomized, two armed trial comparing outcome after SPK, PTA or PAK between organs with the currently allowed donor criteria versus selected organs from donors with extended criteria. Extended donor criteria are defined as organs procured from donors with a BMI of 30 to 34 or a donor age between 50 and 60 years. Immunosuppression is generally standardized using induction therapy with Myfortic, tacrolimus and low dose steroids. In principle, all patients on the waitlist for primary SPK, PTA or PAK are eligible for the clinical trial when they consent to possibly receiving an extended donor criteria organ. Patients receiving an organ meeting the current standard criteria for pancreas allocation (control arm) are compared to those receiving extended criteria organ (study arm); patients are blinded for a follow-up period of one year. The combined primary endpoint is survival of the pancreas allograft and pancreas allograft function after three months, as an early relevant outcome parameter for pancreas transplantation.

DISCUSSION

The EXPAND Study has been initiated to investigate the hypothesis that locally allocated extended criteria organs can be transplanted with similar results compared to the currently allowed standard ET organ allocation. If our study shows a favorable comparison to standard organ allocation criteria, the morbidity and mortality for patients waiting for transplantation could be reduced in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registered at: NCT01384006.

BK virus replication and nephropathy after alemtuzumab-induced kidney transplantation

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is a recognized cause of graft failure in kidney transplant recipients. There are limited data on the epidemiology of BK virus (BKV) infection after alemtuzumab induction. By clinical protocol, the kidney transplant recipients at our center were screened with BKV plasma PCR monthly for the first 4 months posttransplant then every 2-3 months for 2 years. A single center retrospective cohort study of all kidney transplant recipients from January 2008 to August 2010 was conducted to determine incidence and outcomes of BKV infection. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. Of 666 recipients, 250 (37.5%) developed viruria, 80 (12%) developed viremia and 31 (4.7%) developed BKVN at a median of 17, 21 and 30 weeks, respectively. Induction with alemtuzumab did not significantly affect incidence of BKVN. Increased recipient age, African American race, acute graft rejection and CMV infection were significantly associated with the development of BKVN in multivariate analysis. The incidence of BK viruria, viremia and nephropathy was not significantly different among kidney transplant recipients who received alemtuzumab induction compared to patients receiving less potent induction.

Influence of induction modality on the outcome of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients discharged on steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Over last several years, alemtuzumab induction has been increasingly used in kidney transplantation especially in patients maintained on steroid-free immunosuppression. It is unclear which induction agent is associated with better graft and patient outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Using Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database, graft and patient survivals were compared with multivariate analysis for deceased donor kidney transplant recipients from January 2000 to December 2008 who received induction with rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), alemtuzumab, or an interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor blocker and were discharged on a calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolate mofetil/steroid-free immunosuppression.

RESULTS

When compared with r-ATG (n=5348), adjusted graft survival was inferior with alemtuzumab (n=2428, hazards ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.43, P=0.001) and IL-2 receptor blocker (n=1396, HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.39, P=0.04) inductions and patient survival was inferior with alemtuzumab (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.55, P=0.006). Alemtuzumab induction was associated with higher adjusted graft failure risks in patients with panel reactive antibody more than 20% (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.68, P=0.04), recipients of expanded criteria donor kidneys (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.23-2.02, P<0.001), and kidneys with cold ischemia time more than 24 hr (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.65, P=0.02) and higher patient death risks in recipients of expanded criteria donor kidney (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.20-1.30, P=0.002) and kidneys with cold ischemia time more than 24 hr (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-2.00, P=0.03). Adjusted graft survival rates were similar for different induction agents in the low-immune risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with alemtuzumab and IL-2 receptor blocker, r-ATG induction seems to be associated with superior outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients maintained on calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolate mofetil/steroid-free regimen.

Alemtuzumab induction in deceased donor kidney transplantation

PURPOSE

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD52, is a lymphocyte-depleting agent currently being evaluated as an induction agent in solid organ transplantation. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes and effects on peripheral blood lymphocyte subset counts in adult deceased donor renal transplant recipients who received an alemtuzumab-based induction protocol.

METHODS

Eleven kidney alone or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients received 20 mg alemtuzumab on postoperative days 0 and 1, followed by calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression after postoperative day 5. We collected 1-year data including recipient and donor demographic features, renal function and adverse events including endocrine impact, incidence of acute rejection episodes, infections or malignancies as well as hematologic and late immunologic parameters for correlation with patient or graft survival.

RESULTS

Mean HLA mismatch was 3.6 and 8/11 deceased donors were of the extended criteria type. Only 2 (18%) recipients displayed delayed graft function with a failure of the serum creatinine to decrease by 25% on the first day; however, their long-term outcomes were similar to other nonaffected patients. Serious adverse events were absent; there was no hyperlipidemia or new-onset diabetes. We failed to observe an acute rejection. The 3 (27%) recipients with infectious complications experienced pericardial tuberculosis, urinary tract infection, or invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Two (18%) cases of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease were diagnosed in this study during the follow-up. Overall patient and graft survival rates were both 91%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that preconditioning with antibody-depletion using alemtuzumab was efficient with satisfactory patient and graft survivals at 1 year. Alemtuzumab induction was safe even for recipients of extended criteria donor renal transplantation.

Kidney transplantation with minimized maintenance: alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy--an open label, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplantation which reduce the long-term burden of immunosuppression are attractive, but little data are available to judge the safety and efficacy of the different strategies used. We tested the hypothesis that the simple, cheap, regimen of alemtuzumab induction combined with tacrolimus monotherapy maintenance provided equivalent outcomes to the more commonly used combination of interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody induction with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil combination maintenance, both regimens using steroid withdrawal after 7 days.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-three live or deceased donor renal transplant recipients were randomized 2:1 to receive alemtuzumab/tacrolimus or daclizumab/tacrolimus/mycophenolate. The primary endpoint was survival with a functioning graft at 1 year.

RESULTS

Both regimens produced equivalent, excellent outcomes with the primary outcome measure of 97.6% in the alemtuzumab arm and 95.1% in the daclizumab arm at 1 year (95% confidence interval of difference 6.9% to -1.7%) and at 2 years 92.6% and 95.1%. Rejection was less frequent in the alemtuzumab arm with 1- and 2-year rejection-free survival of 91.2% and 89.9% compared with 82.3% and 82.3% in the daclizumab arm. There were no significant differences in terms of the occurrence of opportunistic infections.

CONCLUSION

Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus maintenance monotherapy and short-course steroid use provides a simple, safe, and effective immunosuppressive regimen for renal transplantation.

Induction therapy: why, when, and which agent?

The long-term outcome of paediatric transplantation has improved over the last decade with an increase in the armamentarium of immunosuppressive agents. However, the battle against the hostile immune response at the time of and after transplantation continues. Induction therapy can reduce early injury, to optimize the long-term allograft survival. The goal of induction immunosuppression in paediatric transplantation is to permit the use of lower doses of maintenance immunosuppressive agents without increased rates of acute allograft rejection and chronic allograft damage. The aim of this review is to summarize the current literature relating to the use of antibody agents for induction in paediatric solid organ transplantation.

Immunosuppression in high-risk transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasingly, transplant clinicians are faced with providing candidates with increased risks for poorer outcome with donor grafts that also carry higher risks of failure. Understanding the role of immunosuppressive management in these combinations of higher risks remains important for optimizing results.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few immunosuppressive protocols have been rigorously tested in the high-risk renal transplant setting. The two main risk categories accounted for in the trials are those ones that confer increased risks to renal function, usually carried by the donor organs, and those protocols defined by increased risk for immunological failure, mostly determined by recipient characteristics. The studied protocols generally involve reduction or avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs in the first case and use of lymphocyte-depleting agents in the case of increased immunological risk. In both scenarios, acceptable short-term results have been achieved. However, long-term results for high-risk transplants defined either by donor or recipient factors have yet to be reported.

SUMMARY

The lack of long-term data for optimizing the right immunosuppressive regimen for a given donor/recipient risk profile remains an ongoing challenge for researchers and clinicians alike.

A randomized trial of alemtuzumab versus antithymocyte globulin induction in renal and pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND.: Alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) are commonly used for induction of immunsuppression for kidney and pancreas transplantation, but the two agents have not been compared directly. METHODS.: We conducted a prospective randomized single-center trial comparing alemtuzumab and rATG induction in adult kidney and pancreas transplantation in patients treated with similar maintenance immunosuppression. RESULTS.: Between February 1, 2005, and September 1, 2007, 222 patients randomly received either alemtuzumab (n=113) or rATG (n=109) induction; 180 (81%) underwent kidney alone, 38 (17%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney, and 4 (2%) pancreas after kidney transplants. Of 180 kidney-alone transplants, 152 (84%) were from deceased donors, including 61 (34%) from expanded criteria donors. Retransplantation, human leukocyte antigen match, antibody titer, expanded criteria donors, race, cytomegalovirus status, delayed graft function, and immunologic risks were similar between the two induction groups. With a median follow-up of 2 years (minimum 1 year), overall patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 96%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. Survival, initial length of stay, and maintenance immunosuppression (including early steroid elimination) were similar between alemtuzumab and rATG groups, but biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) episodes occurred in 16 (14%) alemtuzumab patients compared with 28 (26%) rATG patients (P=0.02). Late BPAR (>12 months after transplant) occurred in 1 (8%) alemtuzumab patient and 3 (11%) rATG patients (P=NS). Infections and malignancy were similar between the two induction arms. CONCLUSION.: Alemtuzumab and rATG induction therapies were equally safe, but alemtuzumab was associated with less BPAR.

The alphabet soup of kidney transplantation: SCD, DCD, ECD--fundamentals for the practicing nephrologist

There is significant variability in the quality of deceased-donor kidneys that are used for transplantation. The quality of the donor kidney has a direct effect on important clinical outcomes such as acute rejection, delayed graft function, and patient and allograft survival. Expanded-criteria donors (ECDs) refer to older kidney donors (> or =60 yr) or donors who are aged 50 to 59 yr and have two of the following three features: Hypertension, terminal serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl, or death from cerebrovascular accident. By definition, ECD kidneys have a 70% greater likelihood of failure compared with one from a 35-yr-old male donor who died from a motor vehicle accident. Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is a small but rapidly growing fraction of donors. An ECD kidney transplant recipient has a projected average added-life-years of 5.1 yr compared with 10 yr for a kidney recipient from a standard-criteria donor. Kidney transplantation from DCD seems to have similar allograft and patient survival compared with kidney from donation after brain death; however DCD transplantation has a 42 to 51% risk for delayed graft function (need for at least one dialysis treatment during the first week after transplantation) compared with 24% in an standard-criteria donor kidney transplant. Familiarity with the comprehensive allocation rules governing different categories of deceased-donor kidneys by the nephrologists and dialysis team providers is essential to maximizing patient autonomy and to improve the outcomes of kidney transplantation.

Calcineurin inhibitor minimization protocols in liver transplantation

Liver transplant recipients are at increasingly high risk for suffering from impaired renal function and probable need of renal replacement therapy. Extended criteria organs and transplantation of patients with higher model for end-stage liver disease scores further increase this problem. Acute and chronic nephrotoxicity are the trade-off in immunosuppression with potent calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). As a good renal function is associated with better graft and patient survival, CNI minimization protocols have been developed. Current strategies to overcome CNI toxicity include reduction or withdrawal of CNIs concurrently with switching over to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimens. This strategy caused an improvement in renal function in a significant number of liver transplantation patients according to several studies. However, total CNI avoidance seems to result in higher rejection rates. To prevent chronic renal dysfunction in patients prone to or with acute renal failure, CNI delay - with induction therapy for bridging - followed by low-dose CNI in combination with MMF are proven strategies without risking higher rejection rates. An individualized, tailor-made immunosuppressive regime, with a special focus on renal function is recommended. This review gave an overview on CNI minimization protocols in liver transplantation also focusing on recently analyzed studies.

Treatment for BK virus: incidence, risk factors and outcomes for kidney transplant recipients in the United States

There has been a notable rise of BK virus among kidney transplant recipients. Single-center reports have identified risk factors for development of BK virus. However, there has not been an assessment of risk factors and incidence of this complication at a national level. This study utilized newly collected follow-up information from the national SRTR database to investigate incidence, risk factors and outcomes for solitary kidney transplant recipients associated with treatment for BK virus (TBKV) from 2004 to 2006. Logistic and Cox models were utilized to assess risk factors and evaluate graft survival associated with TBKV. Incidence of TBKV was 1.6% at 6 months and 2.6% at 1 year following transplantation. Patients with and without TBKV at 6 months had 79% and 90% 3-year overall graft survival respectively. Risk factors included advanced donor age, pediatric, African American and male recipients, human leukocyte antigen-mismatching and tacrolimus and thymoglobulin induction as baseline immunosuppression. Acute rejection episodes were more frequent prior to and following TBKV. TBKV is a common and rising incidence, varies based on transplant characteristics and should be included as a safety endpoint in studies investigating immunosuppressive protocols. Careful monitoring and further understanding of disease etiology and treatment strategies are needed.