Chromatin intact human sperm recovery is higher following glass wool column filtration as compared with density gradient centrifugation

Glass wool column filtration for stallion sperm selection: A comparative analysis with the single-layer colloid centrifugation

Glass wool column filtration (GWCF) selects human, bull, boar, dog and buffalo spermatozoa, but reports in the horse are scarce. Single-layer colloid centrifugation with Androcoll-E™ is currently the standard procedure to select good-quality equine sperm. This study was designed to assess GWCF (50 and 75 mg columns; GWCF-50 and GWCF-75, respectively) efficacy to select good-quality sperm from fresh and frozen-thawed equine semen, and to compare its performance with Androcoll-E™ colloid centrifugation. Percentage total motile (TM), progressively motile (PM), morphologically normal (MN), osmotically competent (HOS+) and acrosome-intact/osmotically competent (AI/HOS+) sperm were determined. In studies done with fresh semen samples (n = 17), suspensions subjected to GWCF-50 showed an improvement (p < .05) in PM and HOS+ sperm after selection. With GWCF-75, an increase (p < .05) in PM, MN and HOS+ sperm was observed. Results with GWCF were comparable or better than with Androcoll-E™ selection. Sperm recovery was similar between procedures for all semen parameters. Total sperm count recovery was lower after GWCF-75 (GWCF-50 = 60.0; GWCF-75 = 51.0; Androcoll-E™ = 76.0 million sperm; median; p = .013), but results on total progressive sperm count were similar (GWCF-50 = 23.0; GWCF-75 = 27.0; Androcoll-E™ = 24.0 million sperm; median; p = .3850). Using frozen-thawed semen samples (n = 16), an improvement (p < .05) in TM, PM, NM, HOS+ and AI/HOS+ sperm was observed in GWCF-75 filtrates. Results were comparable to Androcoll-E™ centrifugation, except HOS+ that increased (p < .05) only after GWCF-75. Recovery was comparable for all parameters in frozen samples. GWCF is a simple and low-cost procedure that selects equine sperm with a quality comparable to colloid centrifugation with Androcoll-E™.

Sperm selection strategies and their impact on assisted reproductive technology outcomes

The application of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has revolutionised the treatment of human infertility, giving hope to the patients previously considered incapable of establishing pregnancy. While semen analysis is performed to access whether a sample has an adequate number of viable, motile and morphologically normal sperm cells able to achieve fertilisation, sperm selection techniques for ART aim to isolate the most competent spermatozoon which is characterised by the highest fertilising potential. Based on the semen analysis results, the correct sperm selection technique must be chosen and applied. In this review, different sperm selection strategies for retrieving spermatozoa with the highest fertilising potential and their impact on ART outcomes are discussed. In addition, advantages and disadvantages of each method and the best suited techniques for each clinical scenario are described.