Do ureteral catheterisation procedures affect sexual functions? A controlled prospective study

Prospective randomized study to evaluate and compare the post-procedural sexual function in patients undergoing semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy for distal ureteric stones in three different operating room settings

Objective

To evaluate and compare the effect of semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy on post-procedural sexual function with three different operating room settings.

Methods

In this prospective randomized study, consecutive sexually active patients with normal pre-operative sexual function undergoing uncomplicated semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy for distal ureteric stones were randomized into three groups, with three different operating room settings. Procedure-related anxiety and sexual function were assessed pre-operatively using Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale and Brief Sexual Function Inventory (in males) and Female Sexual Function Index-6 (in females), respectively. All the participants were stented following the procedure, and the stent was removed after 3 weeks. Post-procedural sexual function and general discomfort were assessed and compared between three groups at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 12 weeks. The effect of surgery-related anxiety, preoperative sexual function, age, and general discomfort (including stent-related discomfort) on post-procedural sexual function were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Totally, 327 eligible patients were randomized into three groups. The group of patients who underwent the procedural with a screen separating the operating area from the patient vision, while the patient could watch the endoscopy through a separate monitor, had better post-procedural sexual function compared to those who had total vision of the operating area as well as to those whose eyes were blocked. This difference was statistically significant. This post-procedural reduction in sexual function could not be attributed to in situ stent alone.

Conclusions

Our study showed that semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy can have significant negative effect on sexual function, which can be reduced with proper preoperative counseling and an ideal operating room settings.

Sexual dysfunction in patients after double-J catheterisation: A cross-sectional, prospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to examine sexual dysfunction in patients after double-J catheterisation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive, cross-sectional and prospective study was conducted in a research and training hospital from June 2020 to February 2021. The data were collected from patients who visited the emergency clinic and were hospitalised in the urology clinic because of renal calculi. The study was completed with 192 patients. The data were collected using a patient introductory form, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and the 5-item Turkish version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Then data were collected before double-J catheterisation, 1 month after catheterisation and a month after the catheter was removed. The data were evaluated using means, numbers, percentile distributions and the paired samples t test.

RESULTS

The patients' sexual function was negatively affected by double-J catheterisation, and this negative effect persisted for a month after removal of the double-J catheter. The differences in the patients' mean IIEF scores and sub-dimension scores before and after double-J catheterisation were statistically significant (P ˂ 0.001). A month after the double-J catheter was removed, the difference between their mean IIEF-5 scores was statistically significant (P ˂ 0.001). No erectile dysfunction was found in 50.0% of the patients before double-J catheterisation. A month after the catheter was removed, erectile dysfunction was found at different levels in 88% of the patients, and severe erectile dysfunction was found in 60.9% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

This study found that double-J catheterisation negatively affects patients' sexual function. Patients experience sexual dysfunction while the double-J catheter is in place and for a month after it is removed.

The Effect of Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Male and Female Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Proximal Ureteral Stones

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate the effects of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment for proximal ureteral stones on the sexual functions of patients of both genders.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 30 female and 72 male patients who had received SWL treatment for proximal ureteral stones in our clinic between August 2019 and October 2020 were evaluated. CT, creatinine, urinary analysis, and culture were performed during the initial consultation for all patients. Information regarding the age, BMI, and stone burden of the patients was recorded. Male patients answered the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire, and female participants answered the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) 3 times: pre-procedural and post-procedural first and third month. CT was repeated on the first month, and any residues were noted.

RESULTS

The mean IIEF-5 scores of the male patients were 23.11 ± 8.11 prior to surgery, and it decreased to 19.74 ± 7.65 in the first month and 23.88 ± 9.23 in the third, p = 0.001. The mean FSFI scores of female patients were 18.2 ± 9.9, which decreased to 12.8 ± 6.12 in the first month and 17.8 ± 8.66 in the third, p = 0.001. Univariate analysis revealed that the patients' age (male: p = 0.004 and female: p = 0.008) and BMI (male: p = 0.044 and female: p = 0.027) were related to the poorer scores for both genders. However, there were not any significant findings regarding stone burden (male: p = 0.054 and female: p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

The possibility of developing temporary sexual dysfunction should be taken into account for patients who are candidates for SWL treatment. As the patient's age and BMI increase, SWL-related sexual dysfunction becomes more severe.

The Effect of Ureteric Stenting on Female Sexual Function: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background and objective Urolithiasis is a highly prevalent disease worldwide, with Pakistan belonging to the stone belt of Asia. The usage of the double J (DJ) stent is highly effective when it comes to the management of urolithiasis. However, studies investigating the side effects of DJ stent placement on sexual function in individuals are scarce. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of DJ stent placement on sexual function in women. Methods After obtaining ethical approval, a prospective study was conducted at a university hospital from June 2018 to September 2019. All sexually active women requiring semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) or flexible URS [retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)] were enrolled. Women with DJ stent placement (Group A) were compared to women who did not require DJ stent (Group B). The outcome variable was to assess temporary sexual dysfunction after DJ stent placement using the standardized Female Sexual Functionality Index (FSFI) in English or its validated vernacular version. The FSFI was completed at four weeks, and again at three months, following URS/RIRS. Results Of the 106 sexually active women initially included in the study, 69 were found to be eligible for final analysis. In Group A, the mean FSFI score at the initial presentation was 31.54 ±4.37. The mean FSFI score at four weeks was lower compared to the baseline score (0 time): 13.96 ±5.5 (p<0.05). At three months, the mean FSFI score returned to near baseline at 32.053 ±5.35 with no significant difference (p=0.65). In comparison to women in Group B, the mean FSFI score at four weeks was significantly lower in Group A (28.87 ±6.59 vs. 13.96 ±5.49; p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the mean FSFI scores at any of the three time points within Group B. Conclusion DJ stent insertion results in transient postoperative sexual dysfunction in women, which resolves spontaneously within a span of three months after stent removal.

Sexual dysfunction in Indian men undergoing Double J ureteral stenting following ureteroscopy-A prospective analysis

This prospective study was aimed to evaluate the impact of an indwelling ureteral double-J stent on the sexual health of Indian men undergoing ureteroscopy. The first phase of the study included 30 men who were not counselled prior to stenting about possible sexual dysfunction, while in the next phase, 60 men were counselled about this. These 60 patients were assessed by a 6-point questionnaire: five questions from the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and an additional 6th question to assess pain during erection/ejaculation. Patients answered the questionnaire prior to ureteroscopy, at the time of stent removal and then 4 weeks after stent removal. A higher proportion of men in the second phase attempted sexual activity (68.3% vs. 26.7%; p < .001). Significant changes were noted in the total IIEF-5 score (mean 23.16 before vs. 15.65 after, p < .001) and individual IIEF-5 components: erection confidence (4.59 vs. 2.76, p = .017), maintenance ability (4.67 vs. 2.43, p = .006) and intercourse satisfaction (4.61 vs. 2.31, p < .001) and also the 'pain' question (2.83 post-stenting vs. 0.37 pre-stenting, p < .001). Most patients had a recovery of scores at 4 weeks after stent removal. Thus, ureteral DJ stenting leads to significant but temporary sexual dysfunction and patients need to be counselled regarding this.

Impact of Endourological procedures with or without double-J stent on sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endourological procedures are widely used to treat benign urinary disorders and the double-J stent is routinely used. However, its potential impact on sexual function remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a quantitative systematic review to determine the relationship between endourological procedures with or without double-J stent and post-operative sexual function.

METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 2018 for studies that compared sexual function before and after endourological procedures. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). We performed subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. A random effects model was used to combine the results.

RESULTS

Five prospective studies involving 485 sexually active participants were identified. Pooled results showed that, in patients without a double-J stent, the change in sexual function after endourological procedures was not significant in men (mean difference [MD]: - 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 1.43 to 0.22, p = 0.148) or women (MD: 0.53, 95% CI: - 0.52 to 1.57, p = 0.322). However, in patients with indwelling double-J stent, sexual function scores significantly declined after the procedure in both men (MD: -4.25, 95% CI: - 6.20 to - 2.30, p < 0.001) and women (MD: -7.17, 95% CI: - 7.88 to - 6.47, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that indwelling double-J stent after endourological procedures could be a crucial factor causing temporary sexual dysfunction post-operatively. Our results may be used to provide evidence-based advice to patients.

Evaluation of sexual function in patients submitted to ureteroscopic procedures

Objective:

We aimed to evaluate the possible effects of ureteroscopic procedures on the sexual function of both genders.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 102 sexually active cases (60 male, 42 female) undergoing ureteroscopic procedures were included in this study. Sexual function has been evaluated in detail by using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in male and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) forms in female cases both before and 1-month after the procedures. Pre-and postoperative data were evaluated in a comparative manner.

Results:

The pre-and postoperative mean IIEF scores were 57.86±2.26 and 54.57±2.48 (p=0.19) in males and the mean FSFI scores were 13.58±1.46 and 14.46±1.52 (p=0.41), respectively in females. Evaluation of these values showed that regarding the effects of this procedure on male cases although the total scores for sexual function were not influenced it was observed a significant reduction in the intercourse satisfaction sub-domain (IIEF-IS) in males (p<0.05). In female cases however, unlike the male cases no statistically significant alterations with respect to these scores were noted (p=0.418).

Conclusion:

Ureteroscopic interventions could have some adverse effects on the sexual function particularly in male cases. However, it is clear that further prospective studies in both genders with large population of cases are certainly needed in order to outline this unresolved but important subject.