Ovine suppurative epididymo-orchitis caused by Histophilus ovis

Epidemiological observations in a Corriedale flock affected by Brucella ovis

Brucellosis in sheep, caused by Brucella ovis, is primarily a chronic infectious disease of rams with epididymitis as its most characteristic lesion. Six hundred rams from an infected farm were clinically and serologically examined once a year, over a 3-year period. An increase from 2.1% to 6.3% in the prevalence of animals serologically positive to B. ovis occurred over the 3 years. However, the prevalence of rams with lesions in the reproductive tract declined from 14.2% to 6.5% in the third year following one year of strict culling of clinically affected and rams that were serologically positive for B. ovis. Clinical lesions found in the 179 affected rams fell into two main categories: rams with epididymitis and rams with affected lymph nodes. These results suggest that the prevalence of the disease relates mainly to the sexual activity of the animal and not to age in itself. A single cull based on the results of clinical examination and serological test results was unable to decrease the prevalence of B. ovis in an extensive Corriedale sheep flock.

Trials with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of subclinical genital infections in rams caused by Histophilus ovis and Actinobacillus seminis

The performance of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was evaluated in the serological diagnosis of subclinical genital infection in 6 naturally infected ram flocks and 2 experimentally infected ram hoggets. The test employs lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigen prepared by autoclaving from Actinobacillus seminis and Histophilus ovis. A total of 193 sheep (118 unmated virgin rams and 75 mature breeding rams) were examined clinically, serologically (by ELISA) and bacteriologically (semen bacteriology) at the same time. Serum samples from all animals were also tested by an ELISA employing LPS antigen prepared from Brucella ovis in the same way. Shedding of A. seminis and H. ovis did not show close correlation with serological positivity (Table 1), as only 9 (15.0%) out of the 60 A. seminis shedders were ELISA seropositive at the same time. As regards H. ovis only 10 (19.2%) out of the 52 H. ovis shedders were ELISA seropositive at the same time. The results indicate that, when used alone, the ELISA employing LPS antigen is unsuitable for diagnosing subclinical genital infection caused by H. ovis and A. seminis in rams. The authors discussed shortly the employing fields of this ELISA test in the diagnostic work.