Revisiting 1:1 and 2:1 clinical placement models: Student and clinical educator perspectives

Exploring alternative practice placement models in occupational therapy and physiotherapy: perspectives and experiences of learners and practice educators: a qualitative systematic review

Within physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice placements, there is a predominance of the one-to-one supervision model which creates limitations for placement capacity expansion. Alternative placement models must be explored to meet training requirements for these professions and ensure the availability of a future workforce. The aim of this review is to explore the experiences and perceptions of practice educators and learners regarding alternative placement models, to inform future planning and the adoption of these opportunities. This qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO), covering the period from January 2010 to December 2022. Meta-aggregation was used to synthesise the findings from the included studies. A total of 16 articles were included within this review. The learner voice was represented in 14 categories aggregated to five synthesised findings: professional growth and development, personal and psychological adaptation, alliances within collaborative learning, educational and learning process, and managing professional relationships. The practice educator voice was represented in 11 categories aggregated into four synthesised findings: providing the right support; professional identity; peer relationships and levels of satisfaction. This review highlights positive aspects associated with skill development, personal growth, and the formation of professional identity following alternative placement experiences. However, it also reveals concerns including uncertainty and anxiety related to role clarity, expectations, and the structure within these environments. This understanding of the perceptions and experiences of both learners and practice educators can inform the development of targeted support and guidance from universities, addressing these challenges and enhancing overall satisfaction. Further adoption of alternative placement models has the potential to expand practice placement capacity for learners offering a promising environment for healthcare education. These models provide learners with invaluable experiences and skills essential for their future careers.

Student physiotherapists' perspectives of peer learning during multi-model placements

INTRODUCTION

Placements are a key component of physiotherapy courses; however, placement providers struggle to meet rising demands. To enhance placement capacity, multi-models are increasingly employed, where Universities place more than one student with one educator. Student support on placement is important, and studies exploring multi-placement models reveal educators welcome the peer support possible with this placement pattern. This research explored UK physiotherapy students' perspectives of peer relationships during placements, for which there is yet little research.

METHODS

Eight single, semi-structured interviews were conducted, exploring students' experiences of peer working on placement October to December 2020. Participants and researchers were undergraduate students at the same UK university. Interviews were virtual, recorded via Microsoft Teams and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed first individually, then collaboratively, sharing ideas and interpretations using a phenomenologically informed analytical lens.

RESULTS

Two main themes were identified: collaboration vs conflict and supportive vs hindering relationships. Students appreciated the emotional and academic support from peers, but there could be difficulties in generating constructive peer relationships, and sometimes a sense of competition from divided tutor attention.

CONCLUSION

Multi-model placements provide social and emotional support to students, increasing their confidence. Peer relationships present opportunities for collaborative working and academic support if they are adequately framed as such by the practice educator and wider team. Students may benefit from university-based support to prepare them to maximise the peer relationship. Practice educators may benefit from information about supporting students in multi-model placements. Student-led research can offer rich qualitative data and helpful educational solutions.

CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER

This small project from one UK University produced similar findings as research from other professions: placement peer relationships had the capacity to provide helpful social and emotional support to students, resulting in greater levels of confidence, collaborative working, and learning. However, there were indications that educational institutions could a) further support students to develop their capabilities in cooperative peer working, and b) assist educators to manage the challenges of multi-model placements.

The Supervisees' Perspectives Concerning the Clinical Supervision of Radiologic Sciences Students at Clinical Sites: Implications and Future Directions

INTRODUCTION

Clinical supervision (CS) is essential to practice-based learning in radiology. The assessment of the effectiveness of CS is essential to ensure the success of the process and to provide high-quality patient care.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the CS of both Diagnostic Radiography (DR) and Nuclear Medicine (NM) technology students studying at Kuwait University.

METHODS

The Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale-26 (MCSS-26©) was distributed electronically to 90 third and fourth year students from Radiologic Sciences department. Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Sciences Centre (HSC) Ethical Committee and all the participants provided electronic informed consent. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Seventy responses were collected from DR and NM (response rate 78%, DR: n= 51, NM: n=19). Overall, the mean CS score from the MCSS was 67.7±11.3, n=70. CS in NM scored more effective than that in DR with a p=0.037 (72.3±10.1, 66.0±11.3, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of CS has been evaluated in third and fourth year students across the two divisions of RS the department at Kuwait University. This study showed that students value the impact of CS in their professional role and 70% reported being satisfied with the overall CS experience. Limited studies are available that focuses on students' perceptions about clinical supervision; therefore, more studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of CS among RS students. Implications for interprofessional education are presented.

Clinical placement models for undergraduate health professions students: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Clinical learning is fundamental to undergraduate health professions students. There are several calls for the transformation of health professions education, which have direct implications on clinical learning. Clinical placement models provide structure to clinical learning. Therefore, this scoping review could contribute to supporting curriculum transformation to enhance learning in the clinical environments for undergraduate health professions students.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review identified the characteristics of research evidence related to mapping the purpose, methodologies used, outcomes, and specific recommendations associated with clinical placement models in undergraduate health professions education.

DESIGN

A scoping review method was used in this study. A search string developed from the title of the review was used to search online databases to identify research published between January 2000 and March 2020.

RESULTS

Forty-eight articles reporting on ten clinical placement models were included in this review. The majority of these articles originated from Australia and predominantly report on nursing. The aims of these articles aligned with the evaluation of the implementation of a clinical placement model. Seven categories of outcomes of the clinical placement models are reported namely, relationships, influence, environment, facilitation, inputs, knowledge scores, and student perceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

As clinical learning is fundamental to undergraduate health professions education, clinical placement models should prioritise the development of competence among undergraduate students. Insights into outcomes reported in literature could guide educators in fostering optimal learning in students who may then be able to influence community health outcomes positively.

Peer learning and collaborative placement models in health care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the literature

AIMS

To summarise the international empirical literature to provide a comprehensive overview of peer learning and collaborative practice placement models in health care and to synthesise their benefits and challenges.

BACKGROUND

Practical placements for students are in high demand due to the need for an increased nursing, midwifery and health professional workforce, thus collaborative placement models are an attractive solution to potentially increase placement capacity and enhance the student learning experience.

DESIGN

A systematic search of the literature and qualitative data synthesis using the PRISMA checklist and ENTREQ guidelines.

REVIEW METHODS

MEDLINE and CINAHL searched in March 2020. Quality appraisal of studies conducted. Collaborative models and empirical findings summarised. Reported benefits, challenges and implementation recommendations synthesised. Two tables developed for data representation.

RESULTS

172 studies were identified by the search strategy. Of these, 47 articles were included for appraisal and synthesis. 30 articles employed qualitative, seven quantitative and ten mixed-methods approaches. Research took place in eight countries. The majority of studies employed focus groups, interviews as well as questionnaire design. The total participant sample was 3462 consisting of students and educators.

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirmed that any peer learning is beneficial in supporting students' confidence and team working skills. It is especially helpful when pairing first year with third-year students. The latter can demonstrate their clinical skills and prepare for working in practice. Simultaneously, expert-led learning is important for role modelling and for the recognition of acquired skills. Evidence on the optimal placement experience is inconclusive; however, it can be concluded that any form of collaborative placement model requires careful planning and continuous preparation for staff and students.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Decision makers should consider implementing at least some form of peer learning to assist students with peer support, and ideally work towards a collaborative learning environment.

Is two a crowd? A qualitative analysis of dyad learning in an OBGYN clinical clerkship

INTRODUCTION

Dyad learning occurs when two students work together to acquire new skills and knowledge. Several studies have provided evidence to support the educational rationale for dyad learning in the controlled simulated setting. However, the role of dyad learning in the clinical setting remains uncertain. Unlike the simulated setting, learning in the clinical setting depends on a complex interplay between medical students, doctors, nurses and patients potentially making dyad learning less valuable in clerkships. The objective of this study was to explore how key stakeholders perceive the value of implementing dyad learning during medical students' clinical clerkships.

METHODS

In a constructivist qualitative study, we conducted 51 semi-structured interviews with 36 key stakeholders involved in dyad learning, including 10 medical students, 12 doctors, five nurses and nine patients. Data were coded inductively using thematic analysis, then coded deductively using stakeholder theory as a theoretical framework.

RESULTS

We found that stakeholders generally perceived the educational impact of dyad learning in the clinical setting similarly but disagreed on its value. Students emphasised that dyad learning made them participate more actively during patient encounters and patients did not mind having two students present. Doctors and nurses considered dyad learning disruptive to the balance between service and training and reported that it did not resonate with their perception of good patient care.

CONCLUSION

Dyad learning enables students to be more active during their clinical clerkships, but it easily disrupts the balance between service and training. This disruption may be exacerbated by the shifted balance in priorities and values between different stakeholder groups, as well as by making implicit teaching obligations more explicit for supervising doctors and nurses. Consequently, implementing dyad learning may not be perceived as valuable by doctors and nurses in the clinical setting, regardless of its pedagogical rationale.

A community of practice in dental education: A phenomenon of newcomers becoming oldtimers

OBJECTIVES

Community of practice (CoP) members develop cooperative learning history with shared cases, techniques, and concepts. A 2020 study was designed to explore participants' perceptions toward learning in the dental education CoP.

METHODS

The Institutional Review Board exempted (AZ #1355) study involved an incidental population of third- and fourth-year dental students (N = 285) and resulted in a 43.5% response rate. The online Community of Practice Assessment Scale, consisted of Likert-style, check box items, and one open-ended question. Survey responses were categorized as Strongly Agree (1), Agree (2), No opinion (3), Disagree (4), and Strongly Disagree (5). Univariate analyses and descriptive statistics were used to analyze study variables (domain, community, and practice).

RESULTS

Overall the learning domain is most strongly perceived by participants with mean scores ranging from 1.59 to 1.61. Responses assessing practices within the CoP had mean scores ranging from 1.72 to 1.90. Similarly, responses assessing the community ranged from 1.65 to 1.81. "Builds Knowledge and Shared Learning" was the characteristic participants most strongly agreed as beneficial with a 1.58 mean score. Participants agree that the CoP "Captures and Stores Tacit and Explicit Knowledge" with a mean score of 1.90. There was a 25.6% response rate to the open-ended question. Two themes evolved: the need for calibration and more shared learning.

CONCLUSION

Based on study results, participants strongly agreed or agreed in opinions about CoP learning resources (faculty, staff, technology, and other students) benefitting their learning. The CoP provides an optimal environment for preparing competent new dental professionals.

First-year nursing students' collaboration using peer learning during clinical practice education: An observational study

The purpose of this observational study was to describe the collaboration between first-year nursing students using peer learning during their first clinical practice education. In earlier, predominantly interview studies, peer learning has been described as a model with several positive outcomes. However, no studies on how students act in collaboration in a real-life context have been found. The present study observed sixteen arbitrarily paired nursing students (eight pairs) on three to five occasions per pair, in total 164 h from September 2015 to March 2016. Repeated unstructured observations including informal conversations were used. Using qualitative content analysis, one theme 'Involuntary collaboration leads to growth in different competencies' emerged and three categories 'Practising nursing skills and abilities when working together', 'Establishing knowledge by helping each other to understand' and 'Sharing thoughts, feelings, and knowledge and put them into words'. In conclusion, nursing students using peer learning were observed practising several competencies, some of them not so easily elicited according to earlier research as organization, nursing leadership, teaching, and supervision.

A narrative literature review: Growing the workforce through increased fieldwork capacity in genetic counseling training programs

In response to mounting concerns regarding a perceived shortage of genetic counselors, the Genetic Counselor Workforce Working Group (WFWG) was established in 2013 to identify barriers to growth of the genetic counseling workforce. After completing a workforce analysis and confirming a shortage, the WFWG convened a strategic planning session in 2017 to identify goals and strategies that would increase the number of certified counselors to meet the current and future workforce demands and ensure access to genetic counselor services. Subcommittees were formed and charged with achieving assigned goals; one such subcommittee included a curriculum working group to build a dynamic and effective educational infrastructure to increase the number of genetic counselors graduated from accredited training program. This paper reports of progress of the WFWG Curriculum Subcommittee toward achieving this goal through a narrative literature review that identifies innovative education methods that help to increase capacity of fieldwork training, both in genetic counseling training programs and in other health professions. Of the five thematic areas identified in this study, four are analyzed for insight into building clinical capacity: systems/infrastructure, rotation structure/models, skill building, and novel techniques. While additional studies are needed to establish best practices in these thematic areas, there are several take-aways that training programs can begin to utilize as they look to expand training opportunities. While growth of the genetic counseling workforce will continue to be a long-term issue, programs should begin to think creatively and innovatively about how to reach beyond traditional fieldwork training formats to build capacity. The strategies explored in this paper offer feasible and untapped solutions that can help support efforts to establish a sustainable genetic counseling workforce.

Investigating physiotherapy stakeholders' preferences for the development of performance-based assessment in practice education

OBJECTIVES

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are used in healthcare to measure the relative importance that stakeholders give to different features (or attributes) of medical treatments or services. They may also help to address research questions in health professional education. Several challenges exist regarding the performance-based assessment process (PBA) employed in physiotherapy practice-based education, a process which determines students' readiness for independent practice. Evidence highlights many commonalities among these challenges, but it is unknown which factors are the most important to stakeholders. The use of DCE methodology may provide answers and help to prioritise areas for development. Thus, this study employed DCE to identify clinical educators', practice tutors and physiotherapy students' preferences for developing the PBA process in physiotherapy.

DESIGN

Attributes (aspects of the PBA process known to be important to stakeholders) were derived from focus group interviews conducted with three groups; physiotherapy students, clinical educators (practising clinicians) and practice tutors (dedicated educational roles in the workplace). These attributes included the PBA tool, grading mechanisms, assessors involved, and, feedback mechanisms. Preferences for each group were calculated using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Seventy-two students, 124 clinical educators and 49 practice tutors (n=245) participated. Priorities identified centred primarily on the mandatory inclusion of two assessors in the PBA process and on refinement of the PBA tool.

CONCLUSION

Employment of DCE enabled the prioritisation of stakeholder-informed challenges related to PBA in physiotherapy practice-based education. This corroborates findings from previous qualitative work and facilitates a prioritised pathway for development of this process.

A mapping review of models of practice education in allied health and social care professions

Introduction

Practice education is fundamental to pre-registration learning for many health and social care professions, yet finding sufficient opportunities for students is challenging. One-to-one student–educator pairings are common, and while different models could increase placement opportunities, the associated terminology is inconsistent and an overview of advantages, challenges and available evidence is missing. This mapping review identifies, categorises and critically considers the evidence for different models of practice education used by health and social care professions.

Method

Papers from 2008 onwards reporting on practice education approaches in allied health or social care profession courses were identified in three databases. Data was extracted, methodological quality categorised and a typology of practice education models developed.

Findings

Fifty-three papers were reviewed and developed into a typology of 14 models. Mapping indicated issues with a lack of high-quality research and limitations in available outcome indicators. Pre-requisites for the effective operation of different models include preparation, communication and allowing sufficient time for new ways of working.

Conclusions

Practice education discourse is characterised by varied terminology and practices. Various models for structuring practice education exist, though the evidence for their effectiveness and impact on capacity is limited. Using consistent language and considering wider impacts and outcomes is recommended in future study.

Supervision models in physiotherapy practice education: student and practice educator evaluations

Objectives: To establish the supervision models used during physiotherapy practice placements and to determine student and practice educators' evaluations of the quality of these placements.Design: Cross-sectional study set in clinical sites providing placements for physiotherapy students in Ireland.Participants: Practice educators and students completing placements in 2015/16.Outcome Measure: Questionnaire which measured 18 indicators linked to quality assured placements. Eight additional indicators in the practice educator questionnaire addressed the overall feasibility of the supervision model. Two open-ended questions captured comments on the benefits and challenges of each model.Results: The overall response rate was 72% (112/155). The majority (75%, n = 84) of participants reported a 1:1 (one student: one educator) model of supervision. Fourteen percent (n = 16) reported a 1.2 (one student: two educators) model and 9% (n = 10) a 2.1 (two students: one educator) model. There was generally positive agreement with the questionnaire indicating that all placements, irrespective of supervision model were positively evaluated by participants. Students, however, indicated a more negative evaluation of the placement than practice educators in indictors related to communication, the provision of feedback, establishing an effective relationship with their educator and diversity of available learning opportunities. Indicators relating to productivity and the placement representing an efficient use of resources and personnel received more negative or equivocal ratings by educators.Conclusions: While the 1.1 model remains the most widely used supervision model in physiotherapy practice education, other models also score positively, offering choice to placement providers when determining the model that best suits their service.

"Perceptions, expectations and satisfaction levels of occupational therapy students prior to and after practice placement and comparison of practice placement models"

BACKGROUND

Practice placements in occupational therapy are fundamental components in developing a student's professional identity. Various models of placements are available to expose and expand students' participation in various community-based services. The purpose of this study was to compare occupational therapy students' perceptions and expectations prior to placements with their perceptions and satisfaction levels upon completion of placements, and to compare clinical placement models (role-established and role-emerging).

METHODS

The study included 155 undergraduate occupational therapy students, who completed questionnaires prior to and upon completion of their placements. The questionnaire included items that were divided into categories of placement setting and supervision, personal skills, professional skills, and community. Paired t-tests and two-way repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used in order to examine the change in scores over time, and a-parametric tests were used in order to compare the two models.

RESULTS

For all students a significant decrease in scores was found from pre- to post-placement regarding setting and supervision (t[df] = 3.96[154], p < .001), and a significant increase in scores was found from pre- to post-placement regarding personal and professional skills (t[df] = 7.82[154], p < .001; t[df] = 14.24[154], p < .001, respectively). Comparison between placement models indicated nonsignificant differences regarding personal and professional skills. However, role-established post-scores were significantly higher than role-emerging scores regarding setting and supervision, but significantly lower regarding the contribution of services to the community.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice placements promote a student's personal and professional skills. Students were less satisfied with the setting and supervision in comparison to their pre-placement expectations. Both models may contribute to students' professional development. Role-established model had an advantage in students' satisfaction with settings and supervision, while role-emerging models had an advantage in students' perceptions regarding contribution to the community. Role-emerging model may contribute to developing and expanding areas of practice in the community.

Implementing a peer-learning approach for the clinical education of respiratory therapy students

Introduction

With recent clinical placement demands exceeding supply, the University Health Network (UHN) Respiratory Therapy (RT) department implemented a 2:1 student-to-preceptor model where a focus on peer learning (PL) becomes a key component of program success. PL can be defined as students learning from and with each other in both formal and informal ways. The shift towards facilitative student-directed models in other health care professions can be seen globally with the literature suggesting that 2:1 models not only support increases in student capacity but also improve the student learning experience through PL strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of RT preceptors and students regarding the 2:1 model as an educational strategy in the context of their clinical experience. The study further explored experiences of PL to understand how learning is enabled in RT practice-based education, particularly within 2:1 models.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive study using single-episode semi-structured interviews with RT preceptors (n = 10) and students (n = 10) was conducted during the 2015–2016 RT student clinical year. Twelve open-ended interview questions were designed to draw out study participants’ PL experiences and exploration of issues using a 2:1 model in the context of their clinical experience. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

The content analysis resulted in two broad themes with respect to the RT 2:1 educational model: “enablers” and “barriers” to a PL approach. The 2:1 model was preferred by students and preceptors early on in the clinical training due to the benefits of PL, whereas opportunities to showcase independent practice was preferred towards the end of their clinical year. Furthermore, careful planning, resources, and supports need to be implemented to augment benefits and diminish potential disadvantages of using a 2:1 model structure.

Conclusion

Participants felt that a 2:1 model strongly contributes to a supportive learning environment and can have a positive influence on the RT student clinical experience at UHN. Along with the improved critical thinking and student engagement opportunities that a 2:1 model offers, increased placement numbers are also supported.

Radiographers' and students' experiences of undergraduate radiotherapy practice placement in the United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION

A three-phased, mixed-methods study was conducted to explore the experiences of undergraduate radiotherapy students and their supervising practice educators within U.K. radiotherapy practice placement.

METHODS

Qualitative data were gathered from focus groups/interviews with volunteer participants to elicit in-depth perceptions about experiences of practice placement. Data were transcribed, verbatim, and manually coded and analysed by the researcher using the applied research methodology of framework analysis, enabling the investigation of the a priori theme 'practice placement model', and recommendations were made for improvement.

RESULTS

Two radiotherapy placement models are confirmed, i.e. the single student model, and the paired student model, and advantages and disadvantages are identified for each. Study findings suggest that neither radiotherapy model is superior to the other in terms of placement education and experience. Previous and current experience of either model appears to bias students and practice educators towards that model, despite recognition of its disadvantages.

CONCLUSION

The experiences of students and practice educators using the radiotherapy models are consistent with the experiences of other AHPs and nursing using similar practice placement models. It is recommended that all students should have access to peer-assisted learning on placement to improve critical thinking skills, to enable time for reflection, and to consolidate learning.

Navigating the system: Physiotherapy student perceptions of performance-based assessment

BACKGROUND

Performance-based assessment (PBA) is an integral component of health professional education as it determines students' readiness for independent practice. Stakeholder input can provide valuable insight regarding its challenges, facilitators, and impact on student learning, which may further its evolution. Currently, evidence of stakeholder opinion is limited. Thus, we aimed to explore physiotherapy students' perceptions of performance-based assessment in their capacity as its central stakeholders.

METHODS

A qualitative interpretive constructivist approach was employed using focus group interviews for data collection. Six focus groups were completed (n = 33). Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore the data.

RESULTS

Two themes were identified. The first outlined perceived inconsistencies within the process, and how these impacted on student learning. The second described how students used their experiential knowledge to identify strategies to manage these challenges thus identifying key areas for improvement.

CONCLUSION

Inconsistencies outlined within the current physiotherapy performance-based assessment process encourage an emphasis on grades rather than on learning. It is timely that the physiotherapy academic and clinical communities consider these findings alongside evidence from other health professions to improve assessment procedures and assure public confidence and patient safety.

Comparison of paired and single clinical placement models: a time-use analysis

BACKGROUND

To meet rising clinical placement demand caused by increasing health student numbers, the use of paired (two students) rather than single (one student) placement models has been proposed. There is, however, limited research available to inform placement providers about the relative effects of both models on healthcare services, including patient- and non-patient-related activities and patient occasions of service.

AIMS

To investigate a key clinical question: Does clinical educator (supervisor) and student time use differ during paired placements compared with single placements? Also to examine the satisfaction levels of clinical educators (CEs) and students with paired and single clinical placement models.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

Queensland Health speech and language therapists (N = 44) and speech and language therapy students (N = 32) involved in paired or single clinical placements were recruited for this study. CEs and students completed time-use surveys for 3 days after the midpoint of placements; CEs also completed surveys for 3 matched days during a non-placement period 3 weeks or more following placements for comparative purposes. CEs and students additionally completed a satisfaction survey at the end of placements. Paired and single CE and student groups were compared for differences in their time-use and satisfaction levels using non-parametric statistics.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

The placement model did not impact on occasions of service provided by CEs (p = 0.931) or students (p = 0.776). It also had no effect on the percentage of time CEs or students engaged in patient-related activities (p = 0.577; 0.291) and non-patient-related activities (p = 0.559; 0.177). On clinical placement days, CEs spent a median 10 minutes longer at work regardless of whether or not it was a paired or single placement, compared with non-placement days (p = 0.107). CEs and students who had been involved in a paired placement reported the same high levels of placement satisfaction (various measures) as those who had been involved in a single placement.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

The paired-placement model has the potential to increase student placement offers without negatively impacting on clinical service provision including occasions of service, patient or non-patient-related activities, or overall CE time spent at work.

Learner : preceptor ratios for practice-based learning across health disciplines: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Practice-based learning is a cornerstone of developing clinical and professional competence in health disciplines. Practice-based learning systems have many interacting components, but a key facet is the number of learners per preceptor. Different learner : preceptor ratios may have unique benefits and pose unique challenges for participants. This is the first comprehensive systematic review of the topic. Our research questions were: What are the benefits and challenges of each learner : preceptor ratio in practice-based learning from the perspectives of the learners, preceptors, patients and stakeholder organisations (i.e. the placing and health care delivery organisations)? Are any ratios superior to others with respect to these characteristics and perspectives?

METHODS

Qualitative systematic review of published English-language literature since literature database inception, including multiple health disciplines.

RESULTS

Seventy-three articles were included in this review. Eight learner : preceptor ratio arrangements were identified involving nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, pharmacy, dietetics, speech and language therapy, and medicine. Each arrangement offers unique benefits and challenges from the perspectives of learners, preceptors, programmes and health care delivery organisations. Patient perspectives were absent. Despite important advantages of each ratio for learners, preceptors and organisations, some of which may be profession specific, the 2 : 1 and 2+ : 2+ learner : preceptor ratios appear to be most likely to successfully balance the needs of all stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the learner : preceptor ratio chosen for its expected benefits, our results illuminate challenges that can be anticipated and managed. Patient perspectives should be incorporated into future studies of learner : preceptor ratios.

Benefits and challenges of role-emerging placements of student occupational therapists in HIV service organisations

Background and aims:

Recognising the importance of occupational therapy for people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) has led to the possibility of promoting and integrating services in HIV service organisations through role-emerging placements for student occupational therapists. The objective of this study was to investigate the benefits and challenges of role-emerging placements of student occupational therapists in HIV service organisations.

Methods:

This study employed qualitative methods to understand the perspectives of student occupational therapists, HIV service organisation staff, an occupational therapy preceptor, and people with HIV following 8-week role-emerging placements of student occupational therapists in HIV service organisations. Transcribed interviews were analysed using content analysis to identify themes.

Findings:

Results highlighted the following benefits: 1) Reinforcing professional skills; 2) Developing competency in providing rehabilitation services for people with HIV; 3) Shining a light on the role of occupational therapy; and 4) Empowering HIV service organisations. Challenges included: 1) Starting the groundwork; and 2) Building relationships.

Conclusion:

The placements of student occupational therapists in HIV service organisations can foster the integration of occupational therapy services in these organisations to maintain the optimum community responses. Findings also demonstrated the value that role-emerging placements have in increasing the competencies of the student occupational therapists as future rehabilitation professionals.

Profile of 1 year of fieldwork experiences for undergraduate occupational therapy students from a large regional Australian university

Objective Fieldwork experience is a significant component of many health professional education programs and affects future practice for graduates. The present study used self-reported student data to produce a profile of undergraduate student placement experiences. Methods Cross-sectional surveys exploring placement location, setting and client types, models of supervision, interventions and financial costs were completed by students following each placement. Data were analysed using descriptive analysis. Results Placements were predominantly conducted outside capital cities (69.8%; n=184), with 25.8% (n=68) in rural settings. Students experienced predominantly public health in-patient settings and community settings, with only 15% experiencing private settings. Conclusions The placement profile of undergraduate occupational therapy students appeared to be consistent with workforce reports on occupational therapy professional practice. What is known about the topic? Fieldwork experienced by health professional students is critical to preparing new graduates for practice. Although the World Federation of Occupational Therapy provides guidance on what is required for occupational therapy fieldwork experience, little is known about what students actually experience during their fieldwork placements. What does this paper add? The present study is the first to document the range of fieldwork experienced by occupational therapy students in one program over 1 year, and provides the basis for comparison with other occupational therapy programs, as well as other disciplines nationally and internationally. What are the implications for practitioners? Occupational therapy students experienced few opportunities in private practice or speciality services, and had mostly one-on-one supervision. To provide a future workforce that is able to address the changing health system, it is vital that students are exposed to a range of fieldwork experiences and supervision styles that replicate the demands of future practice.

Physiotherapy students and clinical educators perceive several ways in which incorporating peer-assisted learning could improve clinical placements: a qualitative study

QUESTION

What are the experiences of students and clinical educators in a paired student placement model incorporating facilitated peer-assisted learning (PAL) activities, compared to a traditional paired teaching approach?

DESIGN

Qualitative study utilising focus groups.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four physiotherapy students and 12 clinical educators.

INTERVENTION

Participants in this study had experienced two models of physiotherapy clinical undergraduate education: a traditional paired model (usual clinical supervision and learning activities led by clinical educators supervising pairs of students) and a PAL model (a standardised series of learning activities undertaken by student pairs and clinical educators to facilitate peer interaction using guided strategies).

RESULTS

Peer-assisted learning appears to reduce the students' anxiety, enhance their sense of safety in the learning environment, reduce educator burden, maximise the use of downtime, and build professional skills including collaboration and feedback. While PAL adds to the clinical learning experience, it is not considered to be a substitute for observation of the clinical educator, expert feedback and guidance, or hands-on immersive learning activities. Cohesion of the student-student relationship was seen as an enabler of successful PAL.

CONCLUSION

Students and educators perceive that PAL can help to position students as active learners through reduced dependence on the clinical educator, heightened roles in observing practice, and making and communicating evaluative judgments about quality of practice. The role of the clinical educator is not diminished with PAL, but rather is central in designing flexible and meaningful peer-based experiences and in balancing PAL with independent learning opportunities.

REGISTRATION

ACTRN12610000859088. [Sevenhuysen S, Farlie MK, Keating JL, Haines TP, Molloy E (2015) Physiotherapy students and clinical educators perceive several ways in which incorporating peer-assisted learning could improve clinical placements: a qualitative study.Journal of Physiotherapy61: 87-92].

The collaborative model of fieldwork education: a blueprint for group supervision of students

Historically, occupational therapists have used a traditional one-to-one approach to supervision on fieldwork. Due to the impact of managed care on health-care delivery systems, a dramatic increase in the number of students needing fieldwork placement, and the advantages of group learning, the collaborative supervision model has evolved as a strong alternative to an apprenticeship supervision approach. This article builds on the available research to address barriers to model use, applying theoretical foundations of collaborative supervision to practical considerations for academic fieldwork coordinators and fieldwork educators as they prepare for participation in group supervision of occupational therapy and occupational therapy assistant students on level II fieldwork.