Hypofractionated irradiation for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

Palliative radiotherapy regimens for patients with thoracic symptoms from non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy to the chest is often used in patients with lung cancer, but radiotherapy regimens are more often based on tradition than research results. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001 and previously updated in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

The two objectives of this review were:1. To assess the effects of different palliative radiotherapy regimens on improving thoracic symptoms in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who are not suitable for radical RT given with curative intent.2. To assess the effects of radiotherapy dose on overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who are not suitable for radical RT given with curative intent.

SEARCH METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE (1966 - Jan 2014), EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, reference lists, handsearching of journals and conference proceedings, and discussion with experts were used to identify potentially eligible trials, published and unpublished.Two authors (FM and RS) independently identified all studies that may be suitable for inclusion in the review.We updated the search up to January 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different regimens of palliative thoracic radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The reviewers assessed search results independently and possible studies were highlighted and the full text obtained. Data were extracted and attempts were made to contact the original authors for missing information.The primary outcome measure was improvement in major thoracic symptoms (degree and duration). Secondary outcome measures were short and long term toxicities, effect on quality of life and overall survival.Patient reported outcomes were reported descriptively. Quantitative data such as survival and toxicity were analysed as dichotomous variables and reported using relative risks (RR).For this update of the review a meta-analysis of the survival data was carried out.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen randomised controlled trials (3576 patients) were included, with no new studies added in this update.There were important differences in the doses of radiotherapy investigated, the patient characteristics including disease stage and performance status and the outcome measures.The doses of RT investigated ranged from 10 Gy in 1 fraction (10Gy/1F) to 60 Gy/30F over six weeks, with a total of 19 different dose/ fractionation regimens.Potential biases were identified in some studies. Methods of randomisation, assessment of symptoms and statistical methods used were unclear in some papers. Withdrawal and drop-outs were accounted for in all but one study.All 13 studies that investigated symptoms reported that major thoracic symptoms improved following RT.There is no strong evidence that any regimen gives greater palliation. Higher dose regimens may give more acute toxicity and some regimens are associated with an increased risk of radiation myelitis. Variation in reporting of toxicities, in particular the absence of clear grading, means results of the meta-analysis should be treated with caution.Meta-analysis of overall survival broken down by performance status, a key variable, is included in this update. Further information was sought from all the original authors if stratified data was not included in the original publication. Three published studies contained sufficient data and seven authors were able to provide further information which represented 1992 patients (56% of all patients). The absence of data for nearly half of the patients has affected the quality of evidence.The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in 1-year overall survival between regimens with fewer radiotherapy fractions compared with regimens with more when patients were stratified by performance status. The results of the meta-analysis of 1-year overall survival for patients with good performance status (WHO performance status 0-1) showed moderately high heterogeneity and a summary result was not thought meaningful. The results of 1-year overall survival for patients with poor performance status was RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.02; moderate quality of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy for patients with incurable non-small cell lung cancer can improve thoracic symptoms. Care should be taken with the dose to the spinal cord to reduce the risk of radiation myelopathy. The higher dose, more fractionated palliative radiotherapy regimens do not provide better or more durable palliation and their use to prolong survival is not supported by strong evidence. More research is needed into reducing the acute toxicity of large fraction regimens and into the role of radical compared to high dose palliative radiotherapy. In the future, large trials comparing different RT regimens may be difficult to set up because of the increasing use of systemic chemotherapy. Trials looking at how best to integrate these two modalities, particularly in good PS patients, need to be carried out.

Palliative radiotherapy: when is it worth it and when is it not?

Palliative radiotherapy has been prescribed since shortly after the discovery of the x-ray in the late 1800s, and it provides symptom relief that is successful, time-efficient, and cost-effective. Although palliative radiotherapy is worthwhile in a wide variety of clinical circumstances, there are situations where it is less worthwhile. We contrast the effective use of palliative radiotherapy with its ineffective use because of issues related to the patient, treatment, or health care system.

A review of hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy

Radiotherapy commonly is employed to address symptoms in patients with symptoms caused by cancer. For this article, the authors reviewed data supporting the use of hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy. In addition to single-fraction treatment for painful bony metastasis, the available literature suggested that courses of 2 to 14 external-beam fractions may provide equivalent relief to longer course treatment in patients with a poor prognosis who have primary cancers of the lung, rectum, bladder, prostate, head and neck, spleen, and gynecologic system. Hypofractionated treatment delivers palliation that is time efficient, cost effective, and minimally toxic. Evidence suggests that the reluctance of radiation oncologists to provide single-fraction treatment acts as a barrier to referrals from palliative care professionals. Collaboration in education, research, and patient advocacy will advance the common objectives of the 2 specialties and lead to an appropriate increase in the use of palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Palliative radiotherapy regimens for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy to the chest is often used in patients with lung cancer, but radiotherapy regimens are more often based on tradition than research results.

OBJECTIVES

To discover the most effective and least toxic regimens of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, and whether higher doses increase survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, reference lists, handsearching of journals and conference proceedings, and discussion with experts were used to identify potentially eligible trials, published and unpublished.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different regimens of palliative radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Fourteen randomised trials were reviewed. There were important differences in the doses of radiotherapy investigated, the patient characteristics and the outcome measures. Because of this heterogeneity no meta-analysis was attempted.

MAIN RESULTS

There is no strong evidence that any regimen gives greater palliation. Higher dose regimens give more acute toxicity, especially oesophagitis. There is evidence for a modest increase in survival (5% at 1 year and 3% at 2 years) in patients with better performance status (PS) given higher dose radiotherapy. Some regimens are associated with an increased risk of radiation myelitis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients should be treated with short courses of palliative radiotherapy, of 1 or 2 fractions. Care should be taken with the dose to the spinal cord. The use of high dose palliative regimens should be considered for and discussed with selected patients with good performance status. More research is needed into reducing the acute toxicity of large fraction regimens and into the role of radical compared to high dose palliative radiotherapy. In the future, large trials comparing different RT regimens may be difficult to set up because of the increasing use of systemic chemotherapy. Trials looking at how best to integrate these two modalities, particularly in good PS patients, need to be carried out.

Palliative radiation therapy in oncology

Palliative radiation therapy is considered when the incurable cancer patient has symptoms specifically related to a malignancy that may be relieved by localized treatment of the primary tumor or metastatic lesions. Developing a treatment plan with radiation in the palliative setting may be more difficult than the curative setting, where there are clear guidelines for many situations. Radiation therapy has been used successfully in the management of a variety of pain syndromes. Radiation also has proven effective in the management of other tumor-related symptoms, including bleeding, neurologic compromise, dysphagia, and airway obstruction. Palliative radiation can be delivered using a variety of techniques: external beam radiation therapy, intraluminal brachytherapy (radioactive seed delivery), and systemic radionucleotides.

Management of bleeding in patients with advanced cancer

Bleeding occurs in up to 10% of patients with advanced cancer. It can present in many different ways. This article provides a qualitative review of treatment options available to manage visible bleeding. Local modalities, such as hemostatic agents and dressings, radiotherapy, endoscopic ligation and coagulation, and transcutaneous arterial embolization, are reviewed in the context of advanced cancer, as are systemic treatments such as vitamin K, vasopressin/desmopressin, octreotide/somatostatin, antifibrinolytic agents (tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid), and blood products. Considerations at the end of life are described.

Palliative percutaneous radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

Percutaneous radiotherapy is an effective tool for the palliative treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About two thirds of patients experience a notably improvement of symptoms after palliative radiotherapy. A whole variety of very different radiation schedules like a single fraction of 10 Gy, 2 fractions of 8.5 Gy, 10 fractions of 3 Gy, 25 fractions of 2 Gy, and others have been used for palliation. The effects of these different schedules have been compared in a total of 11 randomized trials of which 10 reported survival data and form subject of this review. According to these studies, an increase in total irradiation dose does not substantially prolong median survival, but results in a significant better 1-year survival. A comprehensive review of the data reveals that patients with poor performance status (ECOG score > or = 3) do not benefit from higher doses, but patients with good performance status do benefit. Patients with poor performance status, and patients with large distant tumour burden regardless of their performance status, are efficiently treated by a short course of relatively low dose radiotherapy. Schedules like 2 x 8.5 Gy and 4 x 5 Gy are most appropriate in this situation. For patients with good performance status the choice of the optimal radiation schedule is less clear. Schedules with total doses between 30 and 45 Gy in 2.5-3.0 Gy fractions should be preferred in these situations.

Palliative treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

It should go without saying that all patients with advanced NSCLC are entitled to the treatment and care described in this article. It is probably also true that in many countries where these patients are often elderly and socially disadvantaged, they may have very variable access to this treatment and care. There is reasonable research evidence that both chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy are modestly effective in controlling symptoms and prolonging life for some patients, but with significant risks of unpleasant and sometimes life-threatening toxicity. For this large and important group of patients, however, there are a large number of unanswered questions about the best regimens to use, how best to select patients so that they get the greatest benefit, how to mitigate side effects, and how best to integrate all the available treatment options. There have been significantly more trials in chemotherapy, but we must not overlook the need for research into palliative radiotherapy and other supportive care measures. There is still plenty of scope for intelligent and coordinated research.

Prospective study of palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy (8.5 Gy × 2) for patients with symptomatic non–small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Hypofractionated chest radiotherapy regimens have provided excellent palliation of pulmonary symptoms in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status in studies from Asia and Europe. We conducted a prospective study of this approach in patients from the United States.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three patients with symptomatic NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of > or =2 were enrolled between December 1994 and October 2001. Two "involved-field" fractions of 8.5 Gy were delivered 1 week apart. Patients were assessed for efficacy, toxicity, and tumor response at baseline, treatment completion, and 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months after completing radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up after treatment began was 4.3 months (range, 0.3-38). The median forced expiratory volume in 1 s and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status as measured at baseline was 1.05 L and 3, respectively. The most common presenting pulmonary symptoms were dyspnea (100%), cough (96%), anorexia/nausea (65%), and chest pain (52%). Between treatment completion and up to 4 months after treatment, dyspnea, cough, anorexia/nausea, chest pain, hoarseness, hemoptysis, and dysphagia had improved in 30%, 60%, 67%, 75%, 25%, 100%, and 100% of patients, respectively. No cases of treatment-related esophagitis, pneumonitis, or radiation myelopathy occurred. Progressive local disease was seen in only 1 (6%) of 18 assessable patients 4 months after treatment.

CONCLUSION

For patients with poor performance status and inoperable NSCLC causing pulmonary symptoms, hypofractionated, involved-field radiotherapy, 8.5 Gy in two fractions, offers acceptable palliation with minimal toxicity. A clear advantage of the very short hypofractionated regimen is that it enables patients with a short expected survival time to spend more of their remaining time away from the hospital.

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Non-small-cell lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. The majority of patients are not treatable with curative intent because of the extent of disease or patient comorbidity. Radiotherapy to the primary intrathoracic tumor is used with the aim of palliating troublesome local symptoms in approximately 25% of patients. The dose/fractionation regimens used evolved empirically, and surveys have shown widespread variation. It has not yet been clearly established which regimens give the most benefit and least toxicity. This systematic review identified 12 randomized controlled trials comparing palliative external beam radiotherapy regimens. Narrative synthesis has been performed. Palliative radiotherapy is effective in controlling symptoms. There is no strong evidence that better palliation is obtained with higher radiation doses but good evidence that toxicity is greater. There is evidence of a modest survival benefit with higher dose schedules in patients with good performance status. The majority of patients should receive short courses (one or two fractions) of hypofractionated radiotherapy, Selected patients with good performance status should be considered for higher dose regimens if the chance of modest improvement in survival and palliation is considered worth the additional inconvenience and toxicity.

Palliative radiotherapy regimens for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) to the chest is often used in patients with lung cancer, but RT regimens are more often based on tradition than research results.

OBJECTIVES

To discover the most effective and least toxic regimens of palliative RT, and whether higher doses increase survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases, reference lists, handsearching of journals and conference proceedings, and discussion with experts were used to identify potentially eligible trials, published and unpublished.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different regimens of palliative RT in patients with non-small lung cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Ten randomised trials were reviewed. There were important differences in the doses of RT investigated, the patient characteristics and the outcome measures. Because of this heterogeneity no meta-analysis was attempted.

MAIN RESULTS

There is no strong evidence that any regimen gives greater palliation. Higher dose regimens give more acute toxicity. There is evidence for a modest increase in survival (6% at 1 year and 3% at 2 years) in patients with better performance status (PS) given higher dose RT.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients should be treated with short courses of palliative RT, of 1 or 2 fractions. Care should be taken with the dose to the spinal cord. The use of high dose palliative regimens should be considered for and discussed with selected patients with good PS. More research is needed into reducing the acute toxicity of large fraction regimens and into the role of radical compared to high dose palliative RT and more homogeneous studies are needed.

Immediate side effects of large fraction radiotherapy

The use of hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens is becoming more widely recognized in the palliation of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Anecdotal reports of chest pain, rigors and fevers in the hours that follow radiotherapy led us to perform a survey estimating the frequency and severity of these symptoms following treatment to the thorax. One hundred and eighteen patients completed questionnaires 24 hours after palliative radiotherapy treatment; 84 were male. The median age was 67 years. One hundred and seven had histologically confirmed NSCLC. A parallel opposed technique was used in 113 patients. Doses ranged from 8 Gy in a single fraction to 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Chest pain was reported by 54 (45.8%) patients after the first radiotherapy fraction; in 42 it commenced within 12 hours of treatment. The pain varied in site, nature and duration; on 23 occasions, it lasted under 2 hours. Systemic symptoms (rigors, sweating, fevers) were documented on 43 questionnaires, starting within 12 hours of treatment in 33 patients and on 30 occasions lasting less than 2 hours. Chest pain and systemic symptoms occurred together in 28 patients. Only 49 (41.5%) patients reported no immediate side effects. We conclude that patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for bronchial carcinoma often develop significant symptoms in the hours following treatment. The timing and duration suggest a relationship with the radiotherapy, and we feel that patients should be warned of the possible occurrence of these symptoms.