Restoring homeostasis in a residential care facility through behaviour modification

Staff-reported antecedents to aggression in a post-acute brain injury treatment programme: what are they and what implications do they have for treatment?

Research in psychiatric settings has found that staff attribute the majority of inpatient aggression to immediate environmental stressors. We sought to determine if staff working with persons with brain injury-related severe and chronic impairment make similar causal attributions. If immediate environmental stressors precipitate the majority of aggressive incidents in this client group, it is possible an increased focus on the management of factors that initiate client aggression may be helpful. The research was conducted in a low-demand treatment programme for individuals with chronic cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury. Over a six-week period, 63 staff and a research assistant reported on 508 aggressive incidents. Staff views as to the causes of client aggression were elicited within 72 hours of observing an aggressive incident. Staff descriptions of causes were categorised using qualitative methods and analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Aggression towards staff was predominantly preceded by (a) actions that interrupted or redirected a client behaviour, (b) an activity demand, or (c) a physical intrusion. The majority of aggressive incidents appeared hostile/angry in nature and were not considered by staff to be pre-meditated. Common treatment approaches can be usefully augmented by a renewed focus on interventions aimed at reducing antecedents that provoke aggression. Possible approaches for achieving this are considered.

Two Approaches to Behavior Disorder After Traumatic Brain Injury

A 3-stage model of intervention is used to contrast the philosophy and treatment practices of 2 behavioral approaches to behavior disorder following traumatic brain injury. The first referred to here as the Operant Neurobehavioral Approach developed from neuropsychology and learning theory. The second referred to as the Relational Neurobehavioral Approach builds on the nonaversive behavioral techniques of the Operant Neurobehavioral Approach. It also incorporates principles of motivational interviewing, places more overt emphasis on the therapeutic relationship, and targets staff attributions for aggression in staff training. The strengths and weaknesses of both approaches are discussed. It is suggested that the Relational Neurobehavioral Approach is more likely to engage and/or reengage clients with traumatic brain injury who are resistant to behavior change. Research implications are discussed including the need to measure the fidelity of all intervention variables.

Long-term care of people below age 65 with severe acquired brain injury: appropriateness of aged care facilities

OBJECTIVE

To identify the number of people younger than 65 years with acquired brain injury (ABI) living in aged care facilities in Queensland, and to evaluate the appropriateness of this accommodation option.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study of all 493 Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care registered aged care facilities in Queensland. Associations between a range of demographic factors, resources, care provision and client needs were examined, from the perspective of service providers.

RESULTS

The response rate was 75%. Twenty-six per cent of facilities (n=97) were providing care for 209 people younger than 65 years with ABI. The social, cognitive and rehabilitation aspects of client care were found to be inadequate in facilities where staffing levels, training and funding resources were limited (p< 0.05). Smaller facilities (<60 beds) reported higher levels of family participation in specific aspects of client care (p<0.05). Almost 40% of the facilities indicated they did not adequately meet the specific and complex rehabilitation needs of these clients. Aged care facilities were the least favoured model of care for this client group (8%) compared with the most favoured model of small group homes (46%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current use of aged care facilities for housing younger people with high-level care needs resulting from ABI is inappropriate and does not meet client needs.