Open label trial of clarithromycin therapy in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease

"Pleiotropic" Effects of Antibiotics: New Modulators in Human Diseases

Antibiotics, widely used medications that have significantly increased life expectancy, possess a broad range of effects beyond their primary antibacterial activity. While some are recognized as adverse events, others have demonstrated unexpected benefits. These adjunctive effects, which have been defined as "pleiotropic" in the case of other pharmacological classes, include immunomodulatory properties and the modulation of the microbiota. Specifically, macrolides, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones have been shown to modulate the immune system in both acute and chronic conditions, including autoimmune disorders (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis) and chronic inflammatory pulmonary diseases (e.g., asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Azithromycin, in particular, is recommended for the long-term treatment of chronic inflammatory pulmonary diseases due to its well-established immunomodulatory effects. Furthermore, antibiotics influence the human microbiota. Rifaximin, for example, exerts a eubiotic effect that enhances the balance between the gut microbiota and the host immune cells and epithelial cells. These pleiotropic effects offer new therapeutic opportunities by interacting with human cells, signaling molecules, and bacteria involved in non-infectious diseases like spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases. The aim of this review is to explore the pleiotropic potential of antibiotics, from molecular and cellular evidence to their clinical application, in order to optimize their use. Understanding these effects is essential to ensure careful use, particularly in consideration of the threat of antimicrobial resistance.

Clarithromycin prevents preterm birth and neonatal mortality by dampening alarmin-induced maternal–fetal inflammation in mice

Background

One of every four preterm neonates is born to a woman with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation (inflammatory process induced by alarmins); yet, this clinical condition still lacks treatment. Herein, we utilized an established murine model of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation induced by the alarmin high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) to evaluate whether treatment with clarithromycin prevents preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes by dampening maternal and fetal inflammatory responses.

Methods

Pregnant mice were intra-amniotically injected with HMGB1 under ultrasound guidance and treated with clarithromycin or vehicle control, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were recorded (n = 15 dams each). Additionally, amniotic fluid, placenta, uterine decidua, cervix, and fetal tissues were collected prior to preterm birth for determination of the inflammatory status (n = 7–8 dams each).

Results

Clarithromycin extended the gestational length, reduced the rate of preterm birth, and improved neonatal mortality induced by HMGB1. Clarithromycin prevented preterm birth by interfering with the common cascade of parturition as evidenced by dysregulated expression of contractility-associated proteins and inflammatory mediators in the intra-uterine tissues. Notably, clarithromycin improved neonatal survival by dampening inflammation in the placenta as well as in the fetal lung, intestine, liver, and spleen.

Conclusions

Clarithromycin prevents preterm birth and improves neonatal survival in an animal model of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation, demonstrating the potential utility of this macrolide for treating women with this clinical condition, which currently lacks a therapeutic intervention.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04764-2.

Antibiotics for the induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics have been considered to treat ulcerative colitis (UC) due to their antimicrobial properties against intestinal bacteria linked to inflammation. However, there are concerns about their efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether antibiotic therapy is safe and effective for the induction and maintenance of remission in people with UC.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched five electronic databases on 10 December 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotic therapy to placebo or an active comparator.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered people with UC of all ages, treated with antibiotics of any type, dose, and route of administration for inclusion. Induction studies required a minimum duration of two weeks for inclusion. Maintenance studies required a minimum duration of three months to be considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome for induction studies was failure to achieve remission and for maintenance studies was relapse, as defined by the primary studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 RCTs (847 participants). One maintenance of remission study used sole antibiotic therapy compared with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). All other trials used concurrent medications or standard care regimens and antibiotics as an adjunct therapy or compared antibiotics with other adjunct therapies to examine the effect on induction of remission. There is high certainty evidence that antibiotics (154/304 participants) compared to placebo (175/304 participants) result in no difference in failure to achieve clinical remission (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.06). A subgroup analysis found no differences when steroids, steroids plus 5-ASA, or steroids plus 5-ASA plus probiotics were used as additional therapies to antibiotics and placebo. There is low certainty evidence that antibiotics (102/168 participants) compared to placebo (121/175 participants) may result in no difference in failure to achieve clinical response (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.22). A subgroup analysis found no differences when steroids or steroids plus 5-ASA were used as additional therapies to antibiotics and placebo. There is low certainty evidence that antibiotics (6/342 participants) compared to placebo (5/349 participants) may result in no difference in serious adverse events (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.71). A subgroup analysis found no differences when steroids were additional therapies to antibiotics and placebo. There is low certainty evidence that antibiotics (3/342 participants) compared to placebo (1/349 participants) may result in no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 2.06, 95% CI 0.27 to 15.72). A subgroup analysis found no differences when steroids or steroids plus 5-ASA were additional therapies to antibiotics and placebo. It is unclear if there is any difference between antibiotics in combination with probiotics compared to no treatment or placebo for failure to achieve clinical remission (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.19), serious adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.08), or withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.08). The certainty of the evidence is very low. It is unclear if there is any difference between antibiotics compared to 5-ASA for failure to achieve clinical remission (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.14). The certainty of the evidence is very low. It is unclear if there is any difference between antibiotics compared to probiotics for failure to achieve clinical remission (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.94). The certainty of the evidence is very low. It is unclear if there is any difference between antibiotics compared to 5-ASA for failure to maintain clinical remission (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.06). The certainty of the evidence is very low. It is unclear if there is any difference between antibiotics compared to no treatment for failure to achieve clinical remission in a mixed population of people with active and inactive disease (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.07). The certainty of the evidence is very low. For all other outcomes, no effects could be estimated due to a lack of data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is high certainty evidence that there is no difference between antibiotics and placebo in the proportion of people who achieve clinical remission at the end of the intervention period. However, there is evidence that there may be a greater proportion of people who achieve clinical remission and probably a greater proportion who achieve clinical response with antibiotics when compared with placebo at 12 months. There may be no difference in serious adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events between antibiotics and placebo. No clear conclusions can be drawn for any other comparisons. A clear direction for future research appears to be comparisons of antibiotics and placebo (in addition to standard therapies) with longer-term measurement of outcomes. Additionally. As there were single studies of other head-to-head comparisons, there may be scope for future studies in this area.

Anti-MAP Triple Therapy Supports Immunomodulatory Therapeutic Response in Crohn's Disease through Downregulation of NF-κB Activation in the Absence of MAP Detection

We previously reported that the triple antibiotic formulation, known as anti-MAP therapy, exhibits unique synergistic antimicrobial activity and should be effective for treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) associated with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). The absence of MAP detection in some CD cases may be linked to poor diagnostics or lack of association with the disease. To understand the therapeutic response of some CD patients to anti-MAP therapy in absence of MAP detection, we investigated the immunomodulatory potency of anti-MAP therapy and its major ingredients, clarithromycin (CLA) and rifabutin (RIF), in THP-1, Caco-2, and Jurkat T-cells. Anti-MAP formulation at 2.0 μg/mL decreased MAP viability in macrophages by 18-fold over 72 h. Additionally, M1/M2 macrophage polarization ratio was reduced by 6.7-fold, and expression and protein levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were reduced by 2.9-fold, whereas IL-10 increased by 5.0-fold in these cells. Mechanistically, the effect of anti-MAP formulation on NF-κB p65 activation was dose-dependent and decreased to 13.4% at 2.0 μg/mL. Most importantly, anti-MAP therapy also reversed pro-inflammatory response in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophages, which shows that the anti-inflammatory effect of the treatment is not just due to a decrease in MAP viability. To study the anti-cytotoxic effects of anti-MAP therapy in Caco-2 monolayers infected with MAP or treated with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), we showed a 45% decrease in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and an 84% increase in glutathione (GSH) activity, which supports anti-apoptotic activity of the drug. In Jurkat T-cells, anti-MAP therapy decreased T-cell proliferation by 4.8-fold following treatment with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and by 2.9-fold with MAP purified protein derivative (PPD). Overall, the data demonstrate that anti-MAP therapy plays a significant role in modulating and eliciting a protective immune response in macrophages, endothelial cells, and T lymphocytes, even in absence of infection. This may explain the therapeutic response of some CD patients to treatment, even in absence of MAP detection, infection, or total eradication. The study supports anti-MAP therapy as an alternate treatment option in CD patients, especially in absence of reliable MAP diagnostics.

Effects of the Concomitant Use of Low-dose Clarithromycin with an Anti-TNFα Antibody in a Patient with Intestinal Behçet Disease

A 66-year-old Japanese male with a history of Behçet disease exhibited oral and genital ulcers, and a round deep ileocecal ulcer. He was treated with a combination of mesalazine and 20 mg/day of prednisolone (PSL), but was only partially responsive to PSL and we were not able to reduce the steroid dosage. Adalimumab was also administered. However, the ulcer was not completely responsive, and weaning the patient off PSL remained impossible. In contrast, additional treatment with clarithromycin completely healed the refractory active ulcer and left only a scar. Furthermore, the ulcer has since maintained the scar stage despite successfully weaning the patient from PSL.

Anti-tuberculous therapy for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

There have been a number of studies with conflicting results which have examined the effect of anti-tuberculous therapy in Crohn's disease. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the use of anti-tuberculous therapy for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of anti-tuberculous therapy for the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane LIbrary, and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register from inception to June 22, 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-tuberculous therapy compared to placebo or another active therapy in patients with quiescent Crohn's disease were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes.. The primary outcome was relapse. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. All data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Four placebo-controlled RCTs including 206 participants were included. Three trials included an 8 to 16 week induction phase with tapering corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone or methylprednisolone) as induction therapy. Anti-tuberculous therapy included monotherapy with clofazimine, combination therapy with clofazimine, rifampin, ethambutol, and dapsone or combination therapy with clarithromycin, rifabutin and clofazimine. All of the studies were rated as unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment, three were rated as unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation and two were rated as unclear risk of bias for blinding or participants and personnel. There was a statistically significant difference in relapse rates favoring anti-tuberculous therapy over placebo. Thirty-nine per cent (44/112) of patients in the anti-tuberculous therapy group relapsed at 9 months to 2 years compared to 67% (63/94) of placebo patients (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75, I(2) = 47%). A GRADE analysis indicates that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to unknown risk of bias and sparse data. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the anti-tuberculous therapy group (37/159) compared to the placebo group (14/163) with a pooled RR of 2.57 (95% CI 1.45 to 4.55; N=322; studies=4, I(2)=64%). A GRADE analysis indicates that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to unknown risk of bias, unexplained heterogeneity and sparse data. There was no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events. Nine per cent (14/159) of anti-tuberculous therapy patients withdrew due to adverse events compared to 7% (11/163) of placebo patients (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.77, I(2) = 0%). Common adverse events included increased skin pigmentation and rashes. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-tuberculous therapy may provide a benefit over placebo for the prevention of relapse in participants with Crohn's disease in remission. However, this result is very uncertain due to unclear study quality and the small numbers of patients assessed. Further studies are needed to provide better quality evidence for the use of anti-tuberculous therapy for maintaining remission in people with quiescent Crohn's disease.

Pulmonary Mycobacterium avium Infection in a Patient with Crohn's Disease under Azathioprine Treatment

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy is known as a risk factor of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection. However, there are few reports of NTM infection under treatment with thiopurine agents. We herein report a first case of pulmonary infection caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in a patient with Crohn's disease under treatment with thiopurine. After starting antibiotics therapy for NTM including clarithromycin, rifampicin, ethambutol and streptomycin, MAC infection was well controlled, and she kept clinical remission even without azathioprine. In conclusion, our case emphasizes the importance of considering NTM infection in respiratory complications of inflammatory bowel disease patients under immunosuppressive therapies.

Efficacy and tolerability of oral budesonide in Japanese patients with active Crohn's disease: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group Phase II study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current treatments for Japanese patients with active Crohn's disease have not proved optimal, and new treatment options are required. The present study therefore evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oral budesonide in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate active Crohn's disease.

METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, Phase II study, patients (18-65 years) with baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score≥200 were randomized to once-daily (od) oral budesonide 9 mg or 15 mg, or matching placebo, for 8 weeks. Concomitant therapy with sulfasalazine or 5-aminosalicylic acid, and nutritional therapy, was allowed. The rate of remission (defined as CDAI score≤150) after 8 weeks' treatment (primary variable), health-related quality of life (assessed using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ]), and tolerability were assessed.

RESULTS

77 patients were randomized and 63 completed the study. The proportion of budesonide-treated patients with remission after 8 weeks' treatment was higher compared with placebo (23.1%, 28.0%, and 11.5% for budesonide 9 mg, 15 mg, and placebo, respectively; no significant difference). The mean change from baseline to week 8 in CDAI total score (-48.0, -58.2, and -27.2, respectively) and IBDQ total score (10.8, 23.2, and 6.5, respectively) was greater for budesonide-treated patients than placebo recipients. While budesonide 9 mg and 15 mg demonstrated similar efficacy, budesonide 9 mg caused fewer drug- and glucocorticosteroid-related adverse events and less adrenal suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral budesonide 9 mg od (for up to 8 weeks) may offer a new treatment option for Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate active Crohn's disease.

Macrolide therapy in chronic inflammatory diseases

Macrolides are a group of antibiotics with a distinctive macrocyclic lactone ring combined with sugars (cladinose, desosamine). The action of macrolides is to block protein synthesis by binding to the subunit of 50S ribosome of bacteria. Prototype macrolide was erythromycin, which came into clinical practice in the 50s of the 20th century. Its antimicrobial spectrum covers the scope of the penicillins but is extended to the impact of atypical bacteria. In the 90s more drugs of this group were synthesized—they have less severe side effects than erythromycin, extended spectrum of Gram-negative bacteria. Macrolides are effective in treating mycobacterial infections especially in patients infected with HIV. It is now known that in addition to antibacterial abilities, macrolides have immunomodulatory effects—they inhibit the production of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL1, 6, and 8) affect transcription factors (NF-κB) as well as costimulaton (CD 80) and adhesion molecules (ICAM). This review article focused not only on the their antimicrobial abilities but also on efficacy in the treatment of several inflammatory disorders independent of the infectious agent. Their wider use as immunomodulators requires further study, which can lead to an extension of indications for their administration.

[Usefulness of macrolides as anti-inflammatories in respiratory diseases]

The macrolides are antibiotics that, besides their anti-bacterial action, have an anti-inflammatory effect, by decreasing the activity of the immune cells and bacteria cell changes. An increase the survival of patients suffering from diffuse panbronchiolitis was already seen in the 1980s, after being treated with erythromycin. Currently, the use of macrolides in various chronic inflammatory diseases has increased significantly. Clinical improvements associated to the administration of macrolides have been observed in diseases such as, cystic fibrosis, asthma, and bronchiectasis. However, despite the apparent clinical benefit they seem to provide, the published results up until now are controversial and conclusive results are unable to be obtained. This means that further clinical trials are necessary to confirm or refute the long-term use of these drugs, which are not free of adverse effects, mainly the appearance of resistant bacteria.

Use and safety of rifaximin in children with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Rifaximin, Food and Drug Administration approved for traveler's diarrhea, has been used in adult patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This retrospective review was undertaken to determine its role in the treatment of pediatric IBD.

METHODS

A review of children with IBD, who were treated with rifaximin from 2005 to 2007 at our institution, was performed. Collected data included diagnosis, age, medication history, recent therapy, symptom, and interval to improvement. Response was rated as none, moderate, or optimum relief for each symptom.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were identified, 12 with Crohn disease and 11 with ulcerative colitis (UC) with a median age of 13 years. The most common complaints were diarrhea in 20 patients (87%), abdominal pain in 17 (74%), and bloody stools in 15 (65%). Rifaximin was given at doses ranging between 10 and 30 mg/kg (Table 1). Of the 20 patients who presented with diarrhea 5 (25%) had relief of diarrhea within 1 week of starting rifaximin and total of 12 patients (60%) experienced relief within 4 weeks. Abdominal pain resolved in 3 of 17 patients (17.6%) within 1 week and in 12 of 17 (70.6%) within 4 weeks. Visible bleeding resolved in 10 of 15 patients (66.7%) within 4 weeks of therapy (Table 2). Analysis of concurrent medications showed 61% experienced relief of symptoms when addition of rifaximin was the only meaningful treatment change.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifaximin was well-tolerated and showed favorable results. Larger doses of rifaximin were statistically better for abdominal pain. Further studies are needed to evaluate efficacy and optimal dosing of rifaximin in this population.

Clinical trial: randomized study of clarithromycin versus placebo in active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease is characterized by defective innate immune responses to intestinal bacteria. Clarithromycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that has good penetration into macrophages.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of clarithromycin in active Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Patients with Crohn's disease activity index > 200 and serum C-reactive protein > or = 10 mg/L were randomized to receive clarithromycin 1 g o.d. or placebo for 3 months. Patients taking more than 10 mg/day prednisolone or 3 mg/day budesonide were excluded. Primary outcome was remission (CDAI < or = 150) or response (fall in CDAI > or = 70 from pre-treatment level) at 3 months.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped after 41 patients had been recruited because of poor overall efficacy. There was no difference in combined remission or response rates at 3 months between clarithromycin: 26% (five of 19) and placebo: 27% (six of 22) (P = 1.00). The mean (s.d.) fall in Crohn's disease activity index was 35 (80) clarithromycin and -2 (114) placebo (P = 0.24). However, post hoc analysis showed a significant difference in response/remission determined by Crohn's disease activity index after 1 month: 53% (10 of 19) clarithromycin vs. 14% (three of 22) placebo (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin 1 g for 3 months is ineffective in active Crohn's disease but possible benefit was observed at 1 month, suggesting that an initial effect may be attenuated by subsequent bacterial resistance.

Macrolide antibiotics as immunomodulatory medications: proposed mechanisms of action

Macrolide antibiotics administered in sub-antimicrobial doses improve pulmonary function and decrease exacerbation frequency for persons with diffuse panbronchiolitis or cystic fibrosis. Data also suggest a beneficial effect of macrolide antibiotics in the treatment of steroid dependent asthma. Many potential immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics have been reported including the ability to down-regulate prolonged inflammation, decreasing airway mucus secretion, inhibiting bacterial biofilm, decreasing the production of reactive oxygen species, inhibiting neutrophil activation and mobilization, accelerating neutrophil apoptosis, and blocking the activation of nuclear transcription factors. Macrolides initially decrease, then increase, and have finally a sustained suppression of cytokine secretions from normal human bronchial epithelial cells through inhibition and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) and then reversibly retard cell proliferation probably through ERK. Consistent with this, macrolide antibiotics possibly reduce mucin production as well as neutrophil migration by interfering with ERK signal transduction.