Effect of laparoscopic splenectomy on portal hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

Predictors of portal vein thrombosis after simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication of splenectomy, few studies have examined PVT after simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy (HS). The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for and characteristics of PVT after HS.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 102 patients, including 76 with liver cirrhosis (LC) and 26 without, who underwent HS between April 2004 and April 2021. The incidence and location of postoperative PVT detected on contrast-enhanced CT 1 week after surgery were analyzed. In addition, pre- and intraoperative parameters were compared between patients with postoperative PVT and those without in order to determine risk factors for PVT after HS.

RESULTS

Among the 102 patients, 29 (28.4 %), including 32.9 % with LC and 15.4 % without LC, developed PVT after surgery. Among the 29 patients with PVT, 21 (72.4 %), 4 (13.8 %), and 4 (13.8 %) developed thrombus in the intrahepatic portal vein only, extrahepatic portal vein only, and both the extra- and intrahepatic portal veins, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative splenic vein dilatation was an independent risk factor for PVT after HS (odds ratio: 1.53, 95 % confidence interval: 1.156-2.026, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that splenic vein dilatation is an independent risk factor for PVT after simultaneous HS, and that PVT after HS occurs more frequently in the intrahepatic portal vein. After HS for cases with dilated splenic veins, we should pay particular attention to the PVT development in the intrahepatic portal vein regardless of the type of liver resection.

The Impact of Partial Splenic Embolization on Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Hypertension

This study investigated the impact of partial splenic embolization (PSE) on portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic findings and the portal venous system of 31 cirrhotic patients with PHG. The improved group was defined as the amelioration of PHG findings using the McCormack classification. Child–Pugh scores of the improved group (18 of 31 patients) were significantly lower compared with those of the non-improved group (p = 0.018). The changes in the diameters of the portal trunk and those of the spleno-portal junction and spleen hilum in the splenic vein of the improved group were significantly larger than those of the non-improved group (p = 0.007, p = 0.025, and p = 0.003, respectively). The changes in the diameters of the portal vein and splenic hilum of the splenic vein showed significant correlations with Child–Pugh score (r = 0.386, p = 0.039; r = 0.510, p = 0.004). In a multivariate analysis of baseline factors related to the improved group, Child–Pugh grade A was significantly associated with the improvement of PHG (odds ratio 6.875, p = 0.033). PSE could be useful for PHG, especially in patients with Child–Pugh grade A, at least in the short term.

The impact of thrombocytopenia on variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Thrombocytopenia is the most frequent haematologic disorder in patients with cirrhosis, and it is perceived as a contributory factor for bleeding events. Cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension (PHT) is often accompanied with mild to moderate thrombocytopenia when they treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). To address whether the risk of variceal hemorrhage after TIPS varies with different platelet count in patients with normal platelet count and thrombocytopenia, we conducted the retrospective controlled study to evaluate the association of platelet count with the risk of variceal bleeding after TIPS. 304 patients were selected to the study. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for potential selection bias. 63 patients from each group could be paired. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between platelet and variceal bleeding after TIPS. Platelet counts of two groups are 185.0 ± 98.7 × 10⁹/L (normal platelet count) and 70.6 ± 39.3 × 10⁹/L (thrombocytopenia) respectively. The bleeding rates of two groups in overall cohort are 10.9% (normal platelet count) and 12.9% (thrombocytopenia). After matched, the bleeding rates of two groups are 11.1% (normal platelet count) and 14.3% (thrombocytopenia) There was no statistically significant difference in bleeding rates between the two groups, either in the whole cohort (P = 0.671) or in the matched cohort (P = 0.593). Platelet count was not associated with bleeding events after TIPS (hazard ratio (HR) 95% confidence interval: 0.986-1.005, P = 0.397 in normal platelet count and 95% confidence interval: 0.968-1.020, P = 0.648 in thrombocytopenia). Thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis was not associated with the risk of variceal bleeding episodes post-TIPS. Thrombocytopenia should not be viewed as an absolute contraindication for TIPS.

Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy in Liver Cirrhosis: Prevalence, Natural History, and Risk Factors

Objective Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is a common finding in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and may cause both acute and chronic bleeding. A number of risk factors for PHG have been identified. The present study explored the characteristics of Japanese patients with LC who develop PHG. Methods Clinical findings (age, sex, etiology, the presence of esophageal varices, splenomegaly and severity of LC), laboratory data, and whether or not atrophic gastritis was found on endoscopy were retrospectively reviewed in patients with LC who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy. PHG was endoscopically graded as absent, mild, or severe. Results Of 262 patients with LC (mean age, 69 years old; 145 men), 158 had no PHG, 41 had mild PHG, and 63 had severe PHG. In a univariate analysis, a younger age, male sex, non-viral etiology, absence of atrophic gastritis, presence of esophageal varices, splenomegaly, severe LC, low platelet count, and low hemoglobin concentration were associated with PHG. A multivariate analysis showed a significant association of PHG with the absence of atrophic gastritis (p<0.048), presence of esophageal varices (p<0.001), non-viral etiology (p<0.033), splenomegaly (p<0.048), and severe LC (p<0.005). There were no cases of massive bleeding from PHG during follow-up. Conclusion Esophageal varices, splenomegaly, severe liver cirrhosis, the absence of atrophic gastritis, and etiology were found to be risk factors for PHG in Japanese patients.

Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Splenectomy in Liver Cirrhotic Patients

BACKGROUND

Splenectomy is sometimes indicated for portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis, which is a risk for hepatic carcinogenesis. This study aimed to identify risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development after splenectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 65 patients who underwent splenectomy for portal hypertension between 2009 and 2017. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors related to HCC development after splenectomy. The predictive index for HCC development was constructed from the results of multivariate analysis, and 3 risk-dependent groups were defined. Discrimination among the groups was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Post-splenectomy, 36.9% of patients developed HCC. In the univariate analysis, the etiology of cirrhosis (hepatitis C virus antibody, P = .005, and hepatitis B surface antigen, P = .008, referring to non-B and non-C patients, respectively), presence of HCC history (P < .001), and preoperative hemoglobin level (P = .007) were related to HCC development, and the presence of HCC history (P = .002) and preoperative hemoglobin level (P = .022) were independent risk factors. The predictive index classified three groups at risk; the hazards in each group were significantly different (low vs middle risk, P = .035, and middle vs high risk, P = .011).

DISCUSSION

The etiology of cirrhosis, presence of HCC history, and hemoglobin level were associated with HCC development after splenectomy. The predictive model may aid in HCC surveillance after splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension.

Impact of splenomegaly and splenectomy on prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus treated with hepatectomy

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) commonly occurs in patients with splenomegaly. This study aimed to investigate the impact of splenomegaly with or without splenectomy on long-term survival of HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) treated with liver resection (LR).

Methods

HCC patients with PVTT who underwent LR from 2005 to 2012 from 6 hospitals were retrospectively studied. The long-term overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between patients with or without splenomegaly, and between patients who did or did not undergo splenectomy for splenomegaly. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to match patients in a 1:1 ratio.

Results

Of 716 HCC patients with PVTT who underwent LR, 140 patients had splenomegaly (SM group) and 576 patients had no splenomegaly (non-SM group). The SM group was further subdivided into 49 patients who underwent splenectomy (SPT group), and 91 patients who did not received splenectomy (non-SPT group). PSM matched 140 patients in the SM group, and 49 patients in the SPT group. Splenomegaly was an independent risk factor of poor RFS and OS. The OS and RFS rates were significantly better for patients in the non-SM group than the SM group (OS: P<0.001; RFS: P<0.001), and for patients in the SPT group than the non-SPT group (OS: P<0.001; RFS: P<0.001).

Conclusions

Patients who had splenomegaly had significantly worse survival in HCC patients with PVTT. Splenectomy for splenomegaly significantly improved long-term survival in these patients.

Treatment outcomes after splenectomy with gastric devascularization or balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices: a propensity score-weighted analysis from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Although balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is often selected to treat gastric varices caused by portal hypertension, data comparing BRTO and splenectomy with gastric devascularization (Sp + Dev) are limited.

METHODS

From January 2009 to February 2018, 100 patients with gastric varices caused by portal hypertension who underwent Sp + Dev (n = 45) or BRTO (n = 55) were included. Overall survival (OS) and the rebleeding rate were calculated using the inverse probability of a treatment weighting-adjusted log-rank test. Independent risk factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. Changes in liver function and adverse events after the procedures were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients in the Sp + Dev group tended to have lower platelet counts than those in the BRTO group, but liver function did not differ between these groups. The 5-year OS rates for the Sp + Dev and BRTO groups were 73.4 and 50.0% (p = 0.005), respectively. There were no significant differences in rebleeding rates between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that serum albumin level ≤3.6 g/dL, prothrombin time% activity (PT%) ≤80%, and serum creatinine level ≥0.84 mg/dL were poor prognostic factors. Although the Sp + Dev group had more short-term complications after procedures, Sp + Dev tended to be more effective in improving liver function than BRTO.

CONCLUSIONS

Sp + Dev showed better OS and improvement of liver function compared with BRTO for the treatment of gastric varices caused by portal hypertension.

Dual Effects of Large Spleen Volume After Splenectomy for the Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Background

After splenectomy in patients with chronic liver disease, a large spleen was reported to be not only a risk factor of portal/splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT), but also a prediction for favorable improvement of liver function. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of PSVT and the improvement of liver function after splenectomy, with special attention to spleen volume (SV).

Methods

This studied included 50 patients who underwent splenectomy with diagnosed chronic liver disease between January 2005 and December 2017. After evaluation of risk factors for PSVT the cut-off value of SV for predicting PSVT was determined. According to the cut-off value of SV, 50 patients were divided into 2 groups: small-volume group (SVG) and large-volume group (LVG). Postoperative liver functions were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Twenty-eight patients developed PSVT. Larger SV was the most significant independent risk factor for PSVT. The cut-off value of SV was 520 mL. Preoperatively, LVG had significantly higher total bilirubin, and MELD (model for end-stage liver disease) score, and had significantly higher rates of pancytopenia than SVG. Postoperatively, compared to SVG, platelet count, choline esterase, and total cholesterol in LVG were significantly increased.

Conclusion

After splenectomy in the patients with chronic liver disease, large SV is an independent risk factor for PSVT, with a clear benefit in improving liver function, if PSVT is properly diagnosed and managed.

Safety of Simultaneous Hepatectomy and Splenectomy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated with Hypersplenism: A Meta-analysis

Background

We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy (HS) with hepatectomy alone (HA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hypersplenism.

Materials and Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang Data through March 1, 2018, with no limits. Two investigators independently screened all retrieved studies. The investigators of the original publications were contacted if required information was absent. All the included studies were managed by EndNote X7. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale judgment. Extracted data for each endpoint were analyzed by using STATA 12.0 software.

Results

Thirteen studies, including a total of 1468 patients, comparing the effects of HS with HA were pooled in this meta-analysis. Outcomes including postoperative complications, perioperative mortality, intraoperative blood transfusion, and albumin (ALB) content at postoperation day (POD) 7 did not differ significantly between the two groups. Simultaneous approaches significantly promoted 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates and overall survival (OS) rates, prolonged operation time, aggravated intraoperative blood loss, increased white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT) counts at POD 7, and lowered total bilirubin (T-Bil) contents at POD 1 and 7.

Conclusion

Compared to HA, HS is safer and more effective in ameliorating liver function and improving survival of HCC patients complicated with hypersplenism. This trial is registered with CRD42018093779.

Immunological consequences following splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis

The immune status in patients with liver cirrhosis is generally impaired due to concomitant hypersplenism. As the spleen is the largest lymphoid organ, deleterious events resulting from splenectomy are of concern in these patients. However, the immunological consequences after splenectomy have not yet been fully elucidated. In the present study, the immune status after splenectomy was comprehensively examined. Splenectomy was performed in 11 patients with liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism, and the immune status in peripheral blood was examined and compared before and at 1, 3 and 6 months after splenectomy. Splenectomy significantly lowered the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, due to a surge in lymphocytes in the peripheral circulation at 3 and 6 months after splenectomy. The frequency of cluster of differentiation (CD)4⁺ T cells decreased after splenectomy, whereas the frequency of CD8⁺ T cells increased. Notably, the frequencies of the naïve and central memory subsets of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells decreased, whereas those of the effector memory subset trended upward. In addition, the frequencies of other immune cells such as γδ T cells, natural killer T cells and natural killer cells transiently increased, while inhibitory cells such as regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells significantly decreased. T-cell responses to viral- and tumor-associated antigens increased after splenectomy in five of eight and two of five patients, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to precisely examine the drastic changes of immunological phenotypes in peripheral blood after splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Our findings suggested that splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis may ameliorate the impaired immune status, possibly by reducing suppressive cells and enhancing the effector cell population and function, which could, at least in part, explain the mechanisms responsible for the clinical benefits of splenectomy.

Comparison of Efficacy of Laparoscopic and Open Splenectomy Combined With Selective and Nonselective Pericardial Devascularization in Portal Hypertension Patients

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in laparoscopic techniques have demonstrated that laparoscopy is superior for managing portal hypertension. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy plus selective pericardial devascularization (LSSD) and open splenectomy and nonselective pericardial devascularization (OSD) in patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients with portal hypertension underwent either LSSD or OSD at Jingzhou Central Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016. A total of, 55 patients received LSSD, including 29 male and 26 female individuals (age, 56.0±11.6 y); 72 patients received OSD, including 45 male and 27 female individuals (age, 53.4±10.9 y). The parameters of operation and outcomes were measured and compared.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay were significantly lower in LSSD group but operation time was significantly lower in OSD group. Postoperative Child-Pugh score was significantly lower in LSSD group than in OSD group.

CONCLUSIONS

LSSD is a safe and effective treatment for liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension.

Prior Esophagogastric Devascularization Followed by Splenectomy for Liver Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension: A Modified Laparoscopic Technique

Purpose

This study was conducted to introduce a novel modified surgical technique for laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) and its safety and efficiency.

Methods

From June 2016 to November 2017, 86 patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension and serious gastroesophageal varices in our center. Of them, 32 patients underwent LSED and 54 received the modified LSED. Results and outcomes were compared retrospectively.

Results

There were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics of the two groups. No intraoperative deaths took place in both groups. The intraoperative blood loss was apparently less in the M-LSED group (P < 0.05). There was no conversion in the M-LSED group; four patients receiving LSED were converted to hand-assisted LSED due to profuse bleeding during operation (P < 0.05). Operation time was significantly shorter in the M-LSED group (P < 0.05). Otherwise, postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the M-LSED group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study showed that the modified LSED was a safe and effective approach with low conversion rate, less intraoperative bleeding, less blood transfusion, and shorter operation time and postoperative hospital stay compared with classical LSED. Moreover, this technique is relatively easy and technically feasible.

Impact of Splenic Volume and Splenectomy on Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within Milan Criteria After Curative Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal hypertension (PH) is very poor. Splenomegaly is considered important evidence of PH. Our aim was to clarify the prognostic value of splenic volume (SV) and the effect of splenectomy on the prognosis of HCC within the Milan criteria after curative hepatectomy.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed 160 patients with HCC that met the Milan criteria, including 138 who had undergone hepatectomy and 22 who had undergone hepatectomy and splenectomy between July 2004 and December 2010. SV was measured by three-dimensional computed tomography and patients allocated to three groups (high SV ≥300 mL; low <300 mL; and splenectomy) to compare post-hepatectomy survival rates.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses showed that SV is an independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival. The overall survival rates at 5 years in the high SV, low SV, and splenectomy groups were 39, 75, and 88%, respectively. The overall survival rate in the high SV group was significantly worse than in the low SV and splenectomy groups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the low SV and splenectomy groups (P = 0.831).

CONCLUSIONS

High SV is an independent predictor of post-hepatectomy HCC recurrence and overall survival. There is no significant difference in prognosis between low SV and splenectomy groups, even though the latter had high SV. Combined splenectomy with hepatectomy for HCC and PH may improve prognosis and be an appropriate alternative when liver transplantation cannot be performed.

A comparative study of two anti-coagulation plans on the prevention of PVST after laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization

Cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PH) has a high incidence in China. Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LS + ED) was confirmed as an effective and safe surgical approach. But compared to open surgery (OS + ED), the rate of portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) was found to be higher after LS + ED. PVST is a common and potentially life-threatening complication after LS + ED in patients with cirrhosis and PH. Anti-coagulation therapy should be given early, but no standard plan for PSVT prophylaxis has been developed for all patients. In this study, the efficacy and safety of early use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent PVST were retrospectively evaluated compared with conventional anti-coagulant therapy. Of 219 patients with cirrhosis and PH undergoing LS + ED at our hospital from January 2008 to June 2013, 139 received early anti-coagulant therapy with LMWH, and 80 received conventional anti-coagulant therapy. The rates and types of PVST, perioperative coagulation function, intra-abdominal active bleeding, and esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) were compared in these two groups. Of the 139 patients in the early anti-coagulation group, 42 (30.2 %) experienced postoperative PVST, including two (1.4 %) with main trunk. Of the 80 patients in the conventional anti-coagulation group, 40 (50.0 %) experienced postoperative PVST, including 12 (15.0 %) with main trunk; three (3.8 %) experienced recurrent EGVB due to main trunk thrombosis, and one (1.3 %) underwent an immediate second laparotomy for uncontrollable active bleeding. The rates of postoperative PVST (P = 0.004), main trunk thrombosis (P = 0.000), and EGVB (P = 0.048) were significantly lower in the early than in the conventional anti-coagulant group, but all tested perioperative indices of coagulation function and rates of intraperitoneal active bleeding were similar. Early anti-coagulation with LMWH is safe and effective in patients with LS + ED for cirrhosis and PH.

Pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism due to liver cirrhosis: effect of fibrin glue and polyglycolic acid felt on prophylaxis of postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the effect of fibrin glue and polyglycolic acid (PGA) felt on prevention of pancreatic fistula (PF) after laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism due to liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Twenty-three patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy with a fibrin sheet (fibrin sheet group). The sealing ability of each treatment was evaluated by an ex vivo pressure test model. Based on the results from ex vivo experiments, 27 patients received prophylaxis using fibrin glue and PGA felt (PGA with fibrin group). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PF.

RESULTS

Significantly more (5, 22%) patients developed PF in the fibrin sheet group than in the PGA with fibrin group (0%, P = .037).

CONCLUSIONS

Our new application of fibrin glue and PGA felt is an effective prophylactic procedure for preventing development of PF after laparoscopic splenectomy.

Portal hypertensive gastropathy: A systematic review of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history and therapy

AIM

To describe the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history, and therapy of portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) based on a systematic literature review.

METHODS

Computerized search of the literature was performed via PubMed using the following medical subject headings or keywords: "portal" and "gastropathy"; or "portal" and "hypertensive"; or "congestive" and "gastropathy"; or "congestive" and "gastroenteropathy". The following criteria were applied for study inclusion: Publication in peer-reviewed journals, and publication since 1980. Articles were independently evaluated by each author and selected for inclusion by consensus after discussion based on the following criteria: Well-designed, prospective trials; recent studies; large study populations; and study emphasis on PHG.

RESULTS

PHG is diagnosed by characteristic endoscopic findings of small polygonal areas of variable erythema surrounded by a pale, reticular border in a mosaic pattern in the gastric fundus/body in a patient with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Histologic findings include capillary and venule dilatation, congestion, and tortuosity, without vascular fibrin thrombi or inflammatory cells in gastric submucosa. PHG is differentiated from gastric antral vascular ectasia by a different endoscopic appearance. The etiology of PHG is inadequately understood. Portal hypertension is necessary but insufficient to develop PHG because many patients have portal hypertension without PHG. PHG increases in frequency with more severe portal hypertension, advanced liver disease, longer liver disease duration, presence of esophageal varices, and endoscopic variceal obliteration. PHG pathogenesis is related to a hyperdynamic circulation, induced by portal hypertension, characterized by increased intrahepatic resistance to flow, increased splanchnic flow, increased total gastric flow, and most likely decreased gastric mucosal flow. Gastric mucosa in PHG shows increased susceptibility to gastrotoxic chemicals and poor wound healing. Nitrous oxide, free radicals, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and glucagon may contribute to PHG development. Acute and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding are the only clinical complications. Bleeding is typically mild-to-moderate. Endoscopic therapy is rarely useful because the bleeding is typically diffuse. Acute bleeding is primarily treated with octreotide, often with concomitant proton pump inhibitor therapy, or secondarily treated with vasopressin or terlipressin. Nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonists, particularly propranolol, are used to prevent bleeding after an acute episode or for chronic bleeding. Iron deficiency anemia from chronic bleeding may require iron replacement therapy. Transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt and liver transplantation are highly successful ultimate therapies because they reduce the underlying portal hypertension.

CONCLUSION

PHG is important to recognize in patients with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension because it can cause acute or chronic GI bleeding that often requires pharmacologic therapy.

Postoperative outcomes after open splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy is considered the gold standard for resecting normal-to-moderately bigger spleens in benign conditions, and in addition could be tried for patients with malignant splenic disorders. However, the safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism is not well-known. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis by comparing with the open splenectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Several databases were searched to identify comparative studies fulfilling the predefined selection criteria from January 2000 to June 2015. The subsequent key words were utilized for browsing "laparoscopy" or "laparoscopic", "open", "splenectomy", and "liver cirrhosis". Studies evaluating laparoscopic and open splenectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis were incorporated. Two evaluators personally strained the title and abstract of each publication. Citations with contemplated compliance within our eligibility criteria underwent compressed review. Meta-analysis was carried out according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration software (review manager 5.1).

RESULTS

Seven studies containing 509 patients were included. Compared with the open splenectomy group, patients in the laparoscopic splenectomy group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (MD=210.30; 95% CI: 11.28-409.32; P=0.04), longer operative time (MD=-31.58; 95% CI: -53.34--9.82; P=0.004), shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay (MD=3.41; 95% CI: 2.39-4.43; P<0.01), lower incidence of postoperative complications (RR=1.34; 95% CI: 0.88-2.01; P=0.17), and decreased liver damage [ALT (MD=8.52; 95% CI: 0.19-16.85; P=0.05) and total bilirubin (MD=5.12; 95% CI: 0.37-9.87; P=0.03)].

CONCLUSION

Hypersplenism secondary to cirrhosis and portal hypertension should not be a contraindication for laparoscopic splenectomy.

Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Technical Standardization and Selection Criteria for Standard or Hand-Assisted Approach in 390 Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is still challenging in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This study was designed to establish safe and less invasive LS in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed 390 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, who underwent LS between 1993 and 2013. Patients were divided into 3 time periods; early (1993 to 2004, n = 106); middle (2005 to 2008, n = 159); and late (2008 to 2013, n = 125). During the middle time period, standardized technique for LS and selection criteria for hand-assisted LS were adopted. Patients with spleen volume ≥ 1,000 mL by CT volumetry, large perisplenic collateral vessels, and/or Child-Pugh score ≥ 9, underwent hand-assisted LS. During the late time period, the selection criteria were refined and patients with spleen volume ≥ 600 mL underwent hand-assisted LS.

RESULTS

Conversion to open splenectomy decreased (10.4% in the early time period, 1.9% in the middle time period, and 3.2% in the late time period, p = 0.004), median blood loss decreased (300g, 87g, and 98g, respectively, p < 0.001), and the success rate of pure LS tended to improve (87.2%, 89.5%, and 98.0%, respectively, p = 0.110). Mortality was 0% in each time period, Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or more complications tended to decrease (5.7%, 2.5%, and 0.8%, respectively, p = 0.081), and technique-related complications decreased significantly (10.4%, 3.8%, and 2.4%, respectively, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic splenectomy is now a safe and less invasive approach, even in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, because of its technical standardization with the refined selection criteria for pure or hand-assisted LS.

A meta-analysis study of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy with or without esophagogastric devascularization in the management of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and LS with esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) were the minimally invasive alternative for portal hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis of comparative clinical trials was performed to assess our questions noted above. The databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Springerlink were searched.

RESULTS

In total, 725 patients with liver cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension from eight published comparative trials were included. The operation time in the laparoscopic group was more than that in the open group [weighted mean difference (WMD) 35.24 (16.74, 53.74); P<.001]. However, there were less intraoperative blood loss [WMD -194.84 (-321.34, -68.34); P=.003] and a shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD -4.33 (-5.30, -3.36); P<.001] in the laparoscopic group. The incidence of complications was similar in the two groups. In the subgroup studies about LS versus open splenectomy, no significant differences were found in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication rates. The postoperative hospital stay in the LS group was apparently decreased [WMD -4.07 (-4.93, -3.21); P<.001]. Although the operation time of LSED was longer [WMD 43.23 (17.13, 69.32); P=.001], LSED was associated with less intraoperative blood loss [WMD -189.26 (-295.71, -82.81); P<.001] and a shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD -5.41 (-7.84, -2.98); P<.001]. Meta-analysis did not favor either LSED or open splenectomy with esophagogastric devascularization in term of complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis were in favor of LS and LSED for being a safe, minimally invasion alternative for patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Since the first laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) was reported in 1991, LS has become the gold standard for the removal of normal to moderately enlarged spleens in benign conditions. Compared with open splenectomy, fewer postsurgical complications and better postoperative recovery have been observed, but LS is contraindicated for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis in many institutions owing to technical difficulties associated with splenomegaly, well-developed collateral circulation, and increased risk of bleeding. With the improvements of laparoscopic technique, the concept is changing. This article aims to give an overview of the latest development in laparoscopic splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Despite a lack of randomized controlled trial, the publications obtained have shown that with meticulous surgical techniques and advanced instruments, LS is a technically feasible, safe, and effective procedure for hypersplenism secondary to cirrhosis and portal hypertension and contributes to decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and less impairment of liver function. It is recommended that the dilated short gastric vessels and other enlarged collateral circulation surrounding the spleen be divided with the LigaSure vessel sealing equipment, and the splenic artery and vein be transected en bloc with the application of the endovascular stapler. To support the clinical evidence, further randomized controlled trials about this topic are necessary.

Long-term outcome of splenectomy in advanced cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and thrombocytopenia

Splenectomy may be a treatment option in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis when there is no potential donor for liver transplantation. We retrospectively investigated the long-term outcome of splenectomy on survival in advanced cirrhotic patients with HCC and thrombocytopenia. Between 1999 and 2009, 46 cirrhotic patients with thrombocytopenia (Child-Pugh class B or C) who underwent splenectomy for the simultaneous or secondary treatment of HCC at our institute were evaluated. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 93.5, 76.0, and 37.9%, respectively. Splenectomy resulted in a significant reduction in mean portal venous pressure from 21.2 to 16.8 mmHg and improvements in liver function tests such as total bilirubin, prothrombin time, platelet count, Child-Pugh score for 3 years, and albumin for 2 years. The mean frequency of treatment for HCC recurrence after surgery was 3.0 times (range 1-11). Seven patients out of 16 scheduled for Interferon (IFN) therapy after surgery achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). Multivariate analysis identified SVR after IFN therapy as an independent significant prognostic factor (Hazard ratio 0.18, 95%CI 0.03-0.65, P=0.006). Postoperative complications including liver failure (n=1), portal thrombosis (n=7), ascites (n=5), and bacterial infections (n=4) were observed in 14 patients (30%). Splenectomy can be a feasible supportive therapy for the continuation of anticancer therapy and completion of IFN therapy based on improvements in liver function and thrombocytopenia with minimum complications in patients with HCC and advanced cirrhosis with no potential donor.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) versus laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) plus preoperative endoscopic varices ligation (EVL) in the treatment of recurrent variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) plus preoperative endoscopic varices ligation (EVL) in their efficacy in preventing recurrent bleeding and improving the long-term liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and March 2012, we enrolled 83 patients (55 with TIPS, defined as the TIPS group, and 28 with LS plus preoperative EVL, defined as the LS group) with portal hypertension and a history of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding resulting from liver cirrhosis. The clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to the patients' characteristics and preoperative variables. Within 30 days after surgery, one patient in the TIPS group died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, whereas no patient in the LS group died. Complications occurred in 14 patients in the TIPS group, which included rebleeding, encephalopathy, ascites, bleeding from a pseudoaneurysm of the thoracoabdominal aorta, and pulmonary infection, compared with 5 patients in the LS group, which included pulmonary effusion, pancreatic leakage, and portal vein thrombosis. During a mean follow-up of 13.6 months in the TIPS group and 12.3 months in the LS group, the actuarial survival was 85.5 % in the TIPS group versus 100 % in the LS group. The long-term complications included rebleeding and encephalopathy in the TIPS group.

CONCLUSIONS

LS plus EVL was superior to TIPS in the prevention of gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients. This treatment was associated with a low rate of portosystemic encephalopathy and improvements in the long-term liver function.

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization using conventional instruments: initial experience of 5 cases

PURPOSE

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been proposed for several intra-abdominal surgical interventions. However, application of the LESS technique in portal hypertension is still in its infancy. We report in this article a new technique of LESS splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization with conventional laparoscopic instruments in patients with portal hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to April 2012, LESS splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization was performed on 5 patients with portal hypertension. Surgical techniques and short-term outcomes were summarized and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

All the operations were successful with a mean operative duration of 252 minutes (range, 220-270 minutes), intraoperative blood loss of 290 mL (range, 250-350 mL), and hospital stay of 8.2 days (range, 7-9 days). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. The umbilical incision healed well with a satisfactory cosmetic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

LESS splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization is feasible when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons and may offer safety comparable to that of the conventional laparoscopic operation.

Laparoscopic splenectomy with or without devascularization of the stomach for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Open splenectomy and devascularization are effective treatments for cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia and variceal bleeding. However, it remains controversial whether laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and devascularization (LSD) can be indicated and beneficial in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of LS and LSD for patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension was undertaken to clarify controversy about their utilization in such patients.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy was performed to retrieve relevant studies from PubMed and Embase.com. The literature search and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The methodology of the identified articles was poor. Six hundred and fifty-one patients, including 478 LS patients and 173 LSD patients, were involved in efficacy and safety evaluations. There was wide variability in the outcome measures between studies. There was only one death in the patients underwent LSD. Reported major complications included post-operative bleeding requiring re-surgery, pancreatic leakage and gastric perforation. Seven studies were identified with comparisons between laparoscopic and open procedures. No meta-analysis was possible because of heterogeneity between studies and lack of randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The publications reviewed revealed LS and LSD to be safe and effective in the setting of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. From the comparison articles, laparoscopic procedures appear to be superior to open procedures regarding blood loss, hospital stay, complication rate and liver function impairment. However, it is difficult to draw firm statistical conclusions due to lack of high-quality evidence.

Long-term postoperative outcomes of hypersplenism: laparoscopic versus open splenectomy secondary to liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hypersplenism is a common clinical manifestation in patients with liver cirrhosis. For treatment, surgeons can choose between two options: open splenectomy (OS) or laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). Although splenectomy has wide exposure and acceptance as a remedy for the patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis, the data are sparse with regard to its long-term outcomes, including hematologic response and liver function after the surgery. This study aimed to determine the long-term effect of OS versus LS for cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism.

METHODS

Between September 2003 and June 2011, the study enrolled 63 consecutive patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis who were treated with LS (n = 34) or OS (n = 29). The hematologic parameters and liver function in both groups were evaluated before and after splenectomy, and a comparative study of the long-term follow-up period was conducted.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 100% of the patients in both groups had a complete response in terms of platelet and leukocyte counts. No changes in liver function were noted. The LS group benefited from less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the OS group experienced. The mean follow-up period was 25 months. To date, no death has been reported in either group. All the patients showed complete or partial hematologic response to splenectomy and exhibited improvement in liver function. None of the parameters differed significantly between the two groups. Portal or splenic vein thromboses were detected in three patients (2 in OS and 1 in LS), whereas esophageal variceal bleeding occurred for one patient in the LS group and one patient in the OS group.

CONCLUSION

This study investigated patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis. The findings showed that LS can be considered a well-disposed surgical procedure with good surgical outcomes compared with OS.

Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization is a safe, effective, minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of portal hypertension with refractory variceal bleeding

Open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (OSED) is a typical surgery for portal hypertension. Because of the high morbidity associated with it, it is desirable to develop a minimally invasive alternative. To investigate the safety and effect of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LSED), we performed LSED for 24 patients suffering from portal hypertension with refractory variceal bleeding while conducting OSED for 30 patients. The perioperative data and follow-up results were analyzed. Operation times were similar in both groups. Less intraoperative blood and faster return of gastrointestinal function were found in the LSED group. The LSED group had lower levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin after surgery. In both groups, the levels of platelet count, white blood cell count, or hemoglobin were increased after operation dramatically. During the follow-up period (range = 3-36 months), no patient had recurrent hypersplenism or variceal bleeding. Hence, LSED is a safe and minimally invasive intervention for portal hypertension with refractory variceal bleeding.

Laparoscopic surgery in the management of hypersplenism and esophagogastric varices: our initial experiences

BACKGROUND

Owing to recent advances in laparoscopic surgery, devascularization of the upper stomach with splenectomy (Spx) or Hassab's procedure (Has) as well as Spx for patients with portal hypertension have been attempted laparoscopically in some facilities, the results of which have been reported. This article describes the authors' surgical techniques and their results.

METHODS

Between August 1999 and August 2010, the authors treated 110 cases of portal hypertension with Spx or Has. Among these patients, 56 who simultaneously underwent additional major operations were eliminated from the study, leaving 54 patients eligible. They included 38 with open surgeries and 16 with laparoscopic surgeries, which consisted of 10 splenectomies and 6 Has operations. The perioperative data for the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Purely laparoscopic Spx (L-Spx) was completed for 9 patients. Conversion from laparoscopic to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was necessary for 1 patient because of poor visualization. Operative time was significantly longer in L-Spx than in the open method. Postoperative hospital stays were shorter for L-Spx. HALS was used for all 6 laparoscopic Has patients. There was no conversion from the laparoscopic to the open method. Operative time was significantly longer for laparoscopic Has than for open Has. Postoperative complication rates were significantly reduced, and postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter for laparoscopic Has.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the data are still preliminary, laparoscopic surgery for patients with portal hypertension may prove to be a successful strategy.

Laparoscopic splenectomy is an effective and safe intervention for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the standard procedure for the normal to moderately enlarged spleens. We performed this study to investigate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of laparoscopic splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 24 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy (group 1), 24 cases of open splenectomy (group 2) for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis, and 68 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (group 3). We performed comparisons between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3 in terms of demographic, intraoperative, postoperative variables, and changes in blood counts and liver function.

RESULTS

Patients in groups 1 and 2 had comparable demographic characteristics, but those in group 1 had less estimated blood loss, fewer complications, and shorter duration of oral intake, and they required less analgesia and shorter post-hospital stays. In both groups, leukocyte and platelet counts increased significantly and transaminase and total bilirubin decreased postoperatively, but not significantly, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Compared with group 3, patients in group 1 were older, had lower preoperative hemoglobin levels and leukocyte counts, poorer Child-Pugh class, required more operation time, and suffered more estimated blood loss; however, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of conversion rates, transfusion rates, complication rates, and postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis.