Comparison of hormonal therapy and chemohormonal therapy in patients with newly diagnosed clinical stage D prostatic cancer

Chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer mainly affects elderly men, and its incidence has steadily increased over the last decade. The management of this disease is replete with controversy. In men with advanced, metastatic prostate cancer, hormone therapy is almost universally accepted as the initial treatment of choice and produces good responses in most patients. However, many patients will relapse and become resistant to further hormone manipulation; the outlook for these patients is poor. Many have disease extending to the skeleton, which is associated with severe pain. Therapies for these men include chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, palliative radiotherapy, and radioisotopes. Systemic chemotherapy has been evaluated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) for many years, with disappointing results. However, more recent studies with newer agents have shown encouraging results. There is therefore a need to explore the value of chemotherapy in this disease.

OBJECTIVES

The present review aims to assess the role of chemotherapy in men with metastatic HRPC. The major outcome was overall survival. Secondary objectives include the effect of chemotherapy on pain relief, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, quality of life, and treatment-related toxicity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by searching electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, and handsearching of relevant journals and conference proceedings. There was no restriction of language or location.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only published randomised trials of chemotherapy in HRPC patients were eligible for inclusion in this review. Randomised comparisons of different chemotherapeutic regimens, chemotherapy versus best standard of care or placebo, were relevant to this review. Randomised, dose-escalation studies were not included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction tables were designed specifically for this review to aid data collection. Data from relevant studies were extracted and included information on trial design, participants, and outcomes. Trial quality was also assessed using a scoring system for randomisation, blinding, and description of patient withdrawal.

MAIN RESULTS

Out of 107 randomised trials of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer identified by the search strategy, 47 were included in this review and represented 6929 patients with HRPC. Only two trials compared the same chemotherapeutic interventions and therefore a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate. The quality of some trials was poor because of poor reporting, low-patient recruitment, or poor trial design. For clarity, trials were categorised according to the major drug used, but this was not a definitive grouping, since many trials used several agents and would be eligible for inclusion in a number of categories. Drug categories included estramustine, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and docetaxel. Only studies using docetaxel reported a significant improvement in overall survival compared to best standard of care, although the increase was small (< 2.5 months). The mean percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in PSA compared to baseline was as follows: estramustine 48%; 5-fluorouracil 20%; doxorubicin 50% (one study only); mitoxantrone 33%; and docetaxel 52%. Pain relief was reported in 35% to 76% of patients receiving either single agents or combination regimens. A three weekly regime of docetaxel significantly improved pain relief compared to mitoxantrone plus prednisone (the latter regimen approved as standard therapy for HRPC in the USA). All chemotherapeutics, either as single agents or in combination, were associated with toxicity; the major ones being myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, cardiac toxicity, neuropathy, and alopecia. Quality of life was significantly improved with docetaxel compared to mitoxantrone plus prednisone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HRPC have not traditionally been offered chemotherapy as a routine treatment because of treatment-related toxicity and poor responses. Recent data from randomised studies, in particular those using docetaxel, have provided encouraging improvements in overall survival, palliation of symptoms, and improvements in quality of life. Chemotherapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with HRPC. However, patients should make an informed decision based on the risks and benefits of chemotherapy.

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group P-0014: a phase 3 randomized study of patients with high-risk hormone-naive prostate cancer: androgen blockade with 4 cycles of immediate chemotherapy versus androgen blockade with delayed chemotherapy

Currently, approximately 30,000 men die annually of metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Androgen blockade is palliative and is generally effective for an average of 2 to 3 years until a patient develops androgen-independent disease. Newer chemotherapeutic regimens can induce remissions in approximately 50% of patients; however, median survival for patients with androgen-independent disease is still 8 to 12 months. The strategy of using chemotherapy regimens after androgen blockade has been proved noncurative, and new approaches are needed to attempt to cure patients with advanced disease. It has been demonstrated in the preclinical setting that androgen withdrawal induces apoptosis in cancer cells in both the Shinogi breast cancer model and the LNCaP prostate cancer model. In both of these models, androgen withdrawal was not curative, and the tumors grew back in a hormone-independent state. It is possible that the addition of chemotherapy at the time of initial androgen ablation will improve cell kill by potentiating apoptosis, thereby killing cells that might otherwise have mutated to the androgen-independent state if allowed to continue to cycle and grow. The rationale behind Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) P-0014 is to demonstrate in a randomized phase 3 trial that giving patients chemotherapy at the beginning of androgen blockade may improve patient survival.

Optimal timing and dosage of chemotherapy as a combined treatment with androgen withdrawal in the human prostate LNCaP tumour model

Although numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been evaluated for patients with advanced prostate cancer, none have demonstrated improved survival benefits. Here, in order to determine whether the efficacy of chemotherapy can be enhanced by changing the regimen, we evaluated the effect of the varied timing and dosage of chemotherapy in combination with androgen withdrawal on time to androgen-independent (AI) progression in the human androgen-dependent LNCaP tumour model. We first demonstrated the synergistic effect of mitoxantrone on induction of apoptosis in LNCaP cells maintained in the steroid hormone-depleted charcoal-stripped media (CSM) compared to those in the standard media. In addition, this synergy was most remarkable during the simultaneous treatment of LNCaP cells with mitoxantrone and CSM compared to the pre- or post-use of mitoxantrone with CSM. LNCaP tumour growth in athymic nude mice and their increase in serum PSA levels were significantly inhibited by the simultaneous injection of mitoxantrone with castration, compared to the administration of mitoxantrone 2 weeks before or after castration. The TUNEL staining revealed that apoptotic cell death was extensively induced in LNCaP tumours treated with simultaneous castration and mitoxantrone compared to tumours treated with the other schedules. Furthermore, nude mice bearing LNCaP tumours were injected with a total of 0.5 mg mitoxantrone divided into 2, 5 and 10 days, with the most significant therapeutic effect and delayed AI progression observed in mice given injection of mitoxantrone for 2 days. These findings suggest that this might be the optimal way to perform cytotoxic chemotherapy and androgen withdrawal simultaneously in patients with advanced prostate cancer and to administer chemotherapeutic agents at high dosage within short intervals.

Orchiectomy and orchiectomy plus mitomycin C for metastatic prostate cancer in patients with poor prognosis: the final results of a European Organization for Research in Cancer Therapy Genitourinary Group Trial

PURPOSE

The outcome of patients with symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer is poor and improved treatment regimens are urgently needed. Theoretically, the combination of orchiectomy and chemotherapy could reduce androgen sensitive and insensitive cells in the prostate. This European Organization for Research in Cancer Therapy Genitourinary Group randomized, multicenter phase III trial demonstrates the outcome of orchiectomy alone versus orchiectomy followed by intravenous mitomycin C.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 189 patients with metastatic prostate cancer and poor prognostic factors were randomized in this trial by 42 institutions. Of these patients 184 (97%) were eligible for study, including 90 treated with orchiectomy alone (orchiectomy only arm) and 94 treated with orchiectomy followed by 15 mg./m.2 mitomycin C in 1 week (combined treatment arm). Mitomycin C was administered every 6 weeks and treatment was continued as long as tolerance and patient compliance allowed, and no progression was observed. Objective and subjective criteria for progression were clearly defined in the protocol.

RESULTS

Patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced between the 2 treatment arms. At a median followup of 4.2 years 144 patients had died, including 112 of prostate cancer. No significant differences for time to overall (p = 0.17), subjective (p = 0.25) and objective (p = 0.08) progression were found between the 2 treatment groups. For progression-free survival no difference was noted (p = 0.67) between the 2 treatment groups but a trend in favor of orchiectomy alone was observed for overall survival (p = 0.04). Mitomycin C induced considerable hematological, gastrointestinal, renal and pulmonary toxicity leading to discontinuation in 31% of patients with pulmonary toxicity and 7% with renal deterioration. In addition, the quality of life evaluation revealed significant reduction in the combined treatment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this randomized phase III study orchiectomy plus mitomycin C for metastatic prostate cancer in patients with poor prognostic factors cannot be recommended due to failure of improvement in survival and reduced quality of life parameters.