Safety and efficacy of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction: Result of a bridging study in Japan

Penile prosthesis implantation: a bibliometric-based visualization study

The treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) using penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) has recently garnered significant interest, but reports of bibliometric analyses of studies on PPI have yet to appear. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use visualization techniques to statistically and qualitatively assess the state of knowledge, current research topics, and trends in this field. The Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was searched for publications about PPI from the inception of the database to 2023. VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), CiteSpace (version 6.2. R2), and Excel (version 2021) were used for the data analysis. The results show a total of 1015 original articles and reviews on PPI published over this nearly 50 years, with an increasing trend in the number of studies published each year. The United States is the country with the most published studies (n = 578). Mayo Clinic is the organization with the most publications overall (n = 46). The Journal of Sexual Medicine has the most publications (n = 184). The most prolific author is Wilson, Steven K (n = 31). The most commonly used terms were erectile dysfunction (n = 509), penile prosthesis (n = 332), implantation (n = 207), satisfaction (n = 201), surgery (n = 200), infection (n = 134), outcomes (n = 128), Peyronie's disease (n = 121), men (n = 115), and experience (n = 109). Current research focuses on four main areas: complications of PPI, the current status of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), the use of PPI in radical prostatectomy and Peyronie's disease populations, and patient satisfaction after PPI. Improving patient satisfaction with PPI through improved mechanical design and surgical techniques is a key concern for future research.

Efficacy and patient satisfaction of low-intensity shockwave treatment for erectile dysfunction in a retrospective real-world study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for patients with erectile dysfunction, compare the efficacy between two types of lithotripters (ED1000 [focused type] and Renova [linear type]), and detect factors indicative of therapeutic gain with the treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 76 patients (52.8 ± 11.7 years) treated by ED1000 (12 times over 9 weeks) and 484 patients (52.5 ± 11.6 years) treated by Renova (4 times over 4 weeks). Age, sexual symptoms scores, and blood examinations were assessed. Efficacy was judged by improvement of the scores and patient satisfaction and compared between patients at 1 month after treatment with the lithotripters. Independent factors influencing efficacy by Renova were also assessed.

RESULTS

Sexual symptom scores were improved significantly by both lithotripters, although the changes in the scores did not differ significantly between them. Efficacy rate as judged by patient satisfaction was 65.8% with the ED1000 and 71.1% with Renova, also without significant difference. Among several factors including age, sexual symptoms scores, endocrinological factors, metabolic factors, and the rate of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use, only age was found to be an independent factor influencing the efficacy of Renova.

CONCLUSION

We clearly showed the high efficacy of both lithotripters. Although the efficacy rate did not differ between them, we speculated that the fewer treatment sessions needed with the Renova versus the ED1000 would be a great advantage for patients. We also suggest that Renova should be recommended for patients younger than 70 years of age.

Sexual life of Japanese patients with erectile dysfunction taking phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: an Internet survey using the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales-Short Form questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

To investigate details of sexual function of erectile dysfunction in Japanese patients taking phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.

METHODS

A Japanese version of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales-Short Form was used to carry out a nationwide survey using the Internet. A total of 556 erectile dysfunction patients (age 30-70 years) who had been prescribed a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor and had attempted sexual intercourse within the past 6 months were included in this survey. Scores were compared in relation to the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors most frequently taken within the past 6 months.

RESULTS

In the subdomains of self-confidence and spontaneity of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales-Short Form, scores for vardenafil and tadalafil were significantly higher than those for sildenafil. In the subdomain of time concern of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales-Short Form, the score for tadalafil was significantly lower than that for others.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the hypothesis that Japanese patients with erectile dysfunction have high sexual self-confidence, spontaneity and low time concerns when taking tadalafil. These characteristics of tadalafil could be associated with high patient satisfaction and high preference.

[Comparative study for the treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil and vardenafil--multi-centric research in Nagano City]

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of two types of phoshodiestrase type 5 ( PDE 5) inhibitors (sildenafil (sil) and vardenafil (var)) were investigated for multi-centric study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty five patients (55.9 +/- 10.9 years old) with erectile dysfunction (ED) were treated by both of sil and var. The patients were administered a pair of 25 mg of sil and 5 mg of var, or 50 mg of sil and 10 mg of var. The efficacy for ED and safety of these 2 drugs were evaluated after administration of each drugs at least 2 times.

RESULTS

The results showed that the score of international index of erectile function 5 (IIEF5) were elevated from 8.87 +/- 4.10 to 17.24 +/- 6.17 after treatments (p< 0.0001, Student' s t test). The efficacy rates for ED were 81.6% in sil and 81.6% in var, respectively. The adverse reactions rates such as headache, burning, palpitation, etc. were 13.6% in sil and 5.6% in var, which is significantly higher in sil (p = 0.032; chi2 test). These side effects were not serious at all, and there were no cases that gave up to use PDE5 inhibitors because of adverse reactions. According to individual patients experiences, 40.7% of patients preferred sil, 45.4% choose var. In addition, associated effects for quality of life (QOL) of ED patients treated by PDE5 inhibitors were analyzed. The results revealed that encouraging in life 46.5%, rejuvenation feeling 45.1%, self care for their health 28.2%, improvement of depression 12.7%, improvement of voiding dysfunction 5.6%, intimacy with partner 38.0%, good conversation with partner 18.3%, and so on.

CONCLUSION

The treatments of ED by sil and var were very effective and safety. Furthermore, associated effects for QOL of ED patients were also improved with these treatments.

The Efficacy and Safety of Vardenafil in East Asian Men with Erectile Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Previous clinical studies assessing the efficacy and safety of vardenafil, an oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) have consisted mostly of Caucasian patients.

AIM

The aim of this article is to describe the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in men of East Asian ethnicity with ED.

METHODS

Data were pooled from two 12-week, double-blind studies that included 306 East Asian men randomized to placebo or 10 mg of vardenafil.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Efficacy variables included the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function (IIEF-EF) domain score, questionnaires of Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP2 and SEP3), and a Global Assessment Question (GAQ). Safety assessments included laboratory tests, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram recordings, and patients' reporting of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 306 East Asian men with ED were treated with placebo (N = 151) or vardenafil (N = 155). Mean baseline IIEF-EF domain scores (placebo, 13.4; vardenafil, 14.2) were consistent with moderate ED. At end point, the patients treated with vardenafil had a significantly greater increase in IIEF-EF domain score compared with placebo (24.2 vs. 15.9; P < 0.0001). The average per patient penetration (SEP2) success rate was significantly higher in the vardenafil group compared with placebo (88% vs. 58%; P < 0.0001). Moreover, the average per patient intercourse completion (SEP3) success rate was significantly higher in the vardenafil group compared with placebo (69% vs. 23%; P < 0.0001). Positive GAQ responses were reported by 85% of patients receiving vardenafil, compared with 33% of those receiving placebo. The most frequent adverse events were vasodilatation (primarily facial flushing), rhinitis, and headache, all of which were of mild intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil is an effective, well-tolerated oral drug for the treatment of East Asian men with moderate ED of broad-spectrum etiology.

Vardenafil: a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-5 for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Vardenafil is a selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. It was found to be effective in a high percentage of patients and a broad spectrum of underlying conditions. It potentiates the increase in intracellular cGMP in the corpora cavernosa in response to sexual stimuli, resulting in enhanced and prolonged erections. The overall tolerability and safety profile is acceptable, with headache, flushing, rhinitis and dyspepsia being the major reported side effects. Importantly, tolerability and safety in cardiovascular patients seems to be good with no significant increase in cardiovascular events that could be directly attributed to the pharmacologic agent. Only mild blood-pressure lowering effects were observed in healthy individuals, as well as hypertensive patients on multiple antihypertensive agents. However, special caution is mandatory if vardenafil is administered in combination with alpha-blockers, as significant hypotension might occur. Importantly, any drug serving as a nitric oxide donor is contraindicated in combination with vardenafil.

Up-titration of vardenafil dose from 10 mg to 20 mg improved erectile function in men with spinal cord injury

AIM

Vardenafil is a highly selective phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Efficacy of vardenafil has been demonstrated in various ED populations, but that in Japanese patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) has not been assessed.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicenter, flexible dose, 12-week study in patients with ED due to SCI. Following a 4-week observation period, patients received vardenafil 10 mg for 4 weeks, and based on efficacy, tolerability and patient preference, doses for the remaining 8 weeks were decided by investigators. The primary efficacy parameter was erectile function domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function.

RESULTS

Ten patients took 10 mg all through the study, while 22 patients took 20 mg after completing 4 weeks' treatment with 10 mg. The erectile function domain score increased from 12.2 at baseline to 25.0 at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) in the former group and from 10.3 to 22.5 in the latter group, respectively. Importantly, there was a 5.0 point increase in erectile function domain score after up-titration in the latter group. Drug-related adverse events were observed in 22% of patients including hot flushes (9%) and headache (6%), but these were transient and mild in intensity. Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug were not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil 10 and 20 mg was well tolerated and improved erectile function in patients with SCI. Of interest, erectile function was further improved by 20 mg in patients who were not sufficiently treated with 10 mg.

Vardenafil 20-mg demonstrated superior efficacy to 10-mg in Japanese men with diabetes mellitus suffering from erectile dysfunction

AIM

Vardenafil is a highly selective and potent phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The efficacy of vardenafil has been demonstrated in a broad range of ED populations, but has not yet been assessed in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), although DM is frequently associated with difficult-to-treat ED. This is the first study to investigate whether high-dose vardenafil (20 mg) can demonstrate superior efficacy to the usual dose (10 mg) in this subpopulation in Japan.

METHODS

The study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-centre, parallel group comparison 12-week study. Following 4 weeks observation period, 778 patients aged 26-64 years old with ED and DM (HbA1c >12% at screening was excluded) both of more than 3 years duration were randomly allocated to one of the three groups, vardenafil 10 mg, 20 mg, or placebo (randomization ratio 3:3:1). Erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function was estimated as the primary efficacy parameter.

RESULTS

Vardenafil 10 and 20 mg both significantly improved the EF domain score from 13.6 and 13.9 at baseline to 21.8 and 22.9 at last observation carried forward (LOCF), respectively, compared to placebo (13.7 at baseline to 16.3 at LOCF; p<0.0001). In addition, vardenafil 20 mg demonstrated superior efficacy to 10 mg (p<0.05), and the difference was more evident in severe ED patients (baseline EF domain score <11). The safety profile was comparable between these two doses (drug-related adverse events: 6.6, 22.0 and 24.2% in placebo, vardenafil 10 mg, and 20 mg arms, respectively). The most common adverse events were hot flush, headache and nasal congestion, which were mild in intensity and transient, and are known to be common to PDE5 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

In Japanese men with DM and ED, vardenafil 10 mg and 20 mg were effective in improving erectile function with comparable safety profiles. Vardenafil 20 mg demonstrated superior efficacy compared with 10 mg, suggesting incremental clinical benefit in using the higher dose in this difficult-to-treat population.

Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND

There are no randomised and properly blinded trials directly comparing one PDE-5 inhibitor with another in a normal home setting. Valid indirect comparisons with a common comparator must examine equivalent doses, similar duration, similar populations, with the same outcomes reported in the same way.

METHODS

Published randomised, double-blind trials of oral PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction were sought from reference lists in previous reviews and electronic searching. Analyses of efficacy and harm were carried out for each treatment, and results compared where there was a common comparator and consistency of outcome reporting, using equivalent doses.

RESULTS

Analysis was limited by differential reporting of outcomes. Sildenafil trials were clinically and geographically more diverse. Tadalafil and vardenafil trials tended to use enriched enrollment. Using all trials, the three interventions were similar for consistently reported efficacy outcomes. Rates of successful intercourse for sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil were 65%, 62%, and 59%, with placebo rates of 23-28%. The rates of improved erections were 76%, 75% and 71%, respectively, with placebo rates of 22-24%, and NNTs of 1.9 or 2.0. Reporting of withdrawals was less consistent, but all-cause withdrawals for sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil were 8% 13% and 20%. All three drugs were well tolerated, with headache being the most commonly reported event at 13-17%. There were few serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

There were differences between trials in outcomes reported, limiting comparisons, and the most useful outcomes were not reported. For common outcomes there was similar efficacy between PDE-5 inhibitors.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction

The cyclic nucleotide signalling pathway mediates the smooth-muscle relaxing effects of nitric oxide necessary for normal erectile function. Down-regulation of this pathway is central to the pathophysiology of many forms of erectile dysfunction (ED), which is often associated with other chronic diseases (e.g. hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus) and treatments (e.g. certain drugs, radical prostatectomy). Conversely, selective inhibition of the enzyme that catalyses the degradation of cGMP (phosphodiesterase type 5, PDE-5) promotes erectile responses to sexual stimulation. The successful launch and commercialization of the selective PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5I) sildenafil transformed the treatment of ED, not only by providing an effective, well tolerated oral ED therapy, but also by fostering greater candour about the problem among men. Sildenafil is highly effective in promoting erectile responses across a wide spectrum of severity and causes of ED, including patients with ED that is often refractory to treatment. The recent advent of vardenafil, which has the highest in vitro potency of all available PDE5Is, and tadalafil, which has a prolonged half-life that may enable couples to have sexual activity with less planning, represent further advances. Other PDE5Is offering further potential improvements are under active investigation.