JUA clinical guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Cost-effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: implications for Japan's public healthcare system

AIMS

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) represents a significant public health issue in Japan. This study evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of water vapor energy therapy (WAVE) versus prostatic urethral lift (PUL) for men with moderate-to-severe BPH from a public healthcare payer's perspective in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision analytic model compared WAVE to PUL among males in Japan. Clinical effectiveness and adverse event (AE) inputs were obtained from a systematic literature review. Resource utilization and cost inputs were derived from the Medical Data Vision database and medical service fee national data in Japan. Experts reviewed and validated model input parameters. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine how changes in the values of uncertain parameters affect the model results.

RESULTS

Throughout patients' lifetimes, WAVE was associated with higher quality-adjusted life years (0.920 vs. 0.911 year 1; 15.564 vs. 15.388 lifetime) and lower total costs (¥734,134 vs. ¥888,110 year 1; ¥961,595 vs. ¥1,429,458 lifetime) compared to PUL, indicating that WAVE is a more effective and less costly (i.e. dominant) treatment strategy across all time horizons. Lifetime cost-savings for the Japanese healthcare system per patient treated with WAVE instead of PUL were ¥467,863. The 32.7% cost difference between WAVE and PUL was predominantly driven by lower WAVE surgical retreatment rates (4.9% vs. 19.2% for WAVE vs PUL, respectively, at 5 years) and AE rates (hematuria 11.8% vs. 25.7%, dysuria 16.9% vs. 34.3%, pelvic pain 2.9% vs. 17.9%, and urinary incontinence 0.4% vs. 1.3% for WAVE vs PUL, respectively, at 3 months). Model findings were robust to changes in parameter input values.

LIMITATIONS

The model represents a simplification of complex factors involved in resource allocation decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Driven by lower retreatment and AE rates, WAVE was a cost-effective and cost-saving treatment for moderate-to-severe BPH in Japan compared to PUL, providing better outcomes at lower costs to the healthcare system.

Phytotherapy Adds to the Therapeutic Armamentarium for the Treatment of Mild-To-Moderate Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines hardly recommend herbal extracts for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, many patients are unsatisfied with first-line synthetic drugs and often prefer herbal medicines because of good tolerability. To improve the decision-making process, which should consider the patients' expectations, it is crucial to reflect on the role of phytotherapy in the treatment of LUTS. We (panel experts) reflected on current guideline recommendations and real practice across various European countries and debated the potential role of plant extracts with a focus on pumpkin seed soft extract investigated over 12 months in two randomised placebo-controlled trials.

SUMMARY

Most guidelines give no clear recommendations on phytotherapy due to the heterogeneity of clinically investigated extracts. Nevertheless, plant extracts are prescribed to patients with mild-to-moderate LUTS. Also, self-medicating patients often handle their complaints with herbal products. Many patients aim to avoid synthetic drugs for fear of sexual functional side effects and a negative impact on their quality of life. For the elderly, vasoactive comedications might become an issue. When taking plant extracts, patients experience an acceptable symptomatic relief similar to that achieved with synthetics but without side effects. Key Messages: In shared decision-making for purely symptomatic treatment, a low risk of side effects takes priority. We propose to consider patient preferences in the treatment of mild-to-moderate LUTS in men with a low risk of disease progression. We found a consensus that pumpkin seed soft extract adds to the therapeutic armamentarium for patients who cannot or do not want to apply synthetic drugs.

Effects of preoperative dutasteride treatment in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

OBJECTIVES

To investigate factors influencing the degree of difficulty in finding and maintaining an appropriate plane on the surgical capsule of the prostate during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

METHODS

A total of 116 men undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia between January 2010 and September 2013 at our hospital were included in this analysis. The degree of difficulty in finding and maintaining the plane of the surgical capsule of the prostate was retrospectively evaluated and graded by using video-based analysis according to newly defined criteria (grade I, least difficult; grade IV, most difficult). Factors influencing the degree of difficulty were investigated.

RESULTS

Video analysis was possible in 99 of 116 patients. Decapsulation difficulty in decapsulation was deemed as being grade I in 32 patients, grade II in 31 patients, grade III in 20 patients and grade IV in 16 patients. Preoperative dutasteride therapy was the only factor associated with an increasing level of difficulty in decapsulation during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preoperative dutasteride therapy effectively reduces intraoperative blood loss, surgeons with limited experience should be careful with the use of dutasteride, because its administration might increase surgical difficulty during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Influence of baseline variables on changes in International Prostate Symptom Score after combined therapy with dutasteride plus tamsulosin or either monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms: 4-year results of the CombAT study

OBJECTIVE

To examine, using post hoc analysis, the influence of baseline variables on changes in international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) and IPSS quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with either the α-blocker tamsulosin or the dual 5-alpha reductase inhibitor dutasteride, alone or in combination, as part of the 4-year Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CombAT was a 4-year, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in 4844 men ≥50 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of BPH by medical history and physical examination, an IPSS ≥12 points, prostate volume (PV) ≥30 mL, total serum PSA level ≥1.5 ng/mL, and Qmax >5 mL/s and ≤15 mL/s with a minimum voided volume ≥125 mL. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive oral daily tamsulosin, 0.4 mg; dutasteride, 0.5 mg; or a combination of both. Baseline variable subgroups analysed were as follows: PV (30 to <40; 40 to <60; 60 to <80; ≥80 mL), PSA level (1.5 to <2.5; 2.5 to <4; ≥4 ng/mL), age (median: <66, ≥66 years), IPSS (median: <16, ≥16; IPSS thresholds, <20, ≥20), IPSS QoL score (question 8, Q8) (median: <4, ≥4), Qmax (median: <10.4, ≥10.4 mL/s), BPH impact index (BII) (median: <5, ≥5) and body mass index (BMI, median: <26.8, ≥26.8 kg/m(2) ). Within each baseline variable subgroup, changes in IPSS, Qmax and IPSS QoL Q8 from baseline were evaluated using a generalized linear model with effects for baseline IPSS, Qmax or IPSS QoL Q8 and treatment group at each post-baseline assessment up to and including the month 48 visit using a last observation carried forward approach. The treatment comparisons of combination therapy vs dutasteride and combination therapy vs tamsulosin were performed from the general linear model with statistical significance defined as P ≤ 0.01.

RESULTS

Combination therapy resulted in a significantly greater improvement from baseline IPSS at 48 months vs tamsulosin monotherapy across all baseline subgroups. The benefit of combination therapy over dutasteride was confined to groups with lower baseline PV (<60 mL) and PSA (<4 ng/mL). In groups with baseline PV ≥60 mL and PSA ≥4 ng/mL, dutasteride and combination therapy show similar improvements in symptoms. Combination therapy resulted in significantly improved Qmax compared with tamsulosin but not dutasteride monotherapy. Qmax improvement appeared to increase with PV and PSA level in combination therapy subjects. The proportion of subjects with an IPSS QoL ≤2 (at least mostly satisfied) at 48 months was significantly higher with combination therapy than with dutasteride for subgroups with PV 40-60 mL and PSA level <4 ng/mL and than with tamsulosin for all PSA subgroups and PV subgroups ≥40 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

CombAT data support the use of long-term combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin in patients considered at risk for progression of BPH, as determined by high PV (≥30 mL) and high PSA (≥1.5 ng/mL). Combination therapy, dutasteride monotherapy and tamsulosin monotherapy all improved Qmax , but to different extents (combination therapy > dutasteride >> tamsulosin), suggesting that dutasteride contributes most to the Qmax benefit in combination therapy. Combination therapy provided consistent improvement over tamsulosin in LUTS across all analysed baseline variables at 48 months. Compared with dutasteride, the superiority of combination therapy at 48 months was shown in patients with PV <60 mL or PSA <4 ng/mL.