Incomplete esophageal myotomy and early recurrence of an epiphrenic diverticulum

Myotomy-First Approach to Epiphrenic Esophageal Diverticula

Introduction: Epiphrenic esophageal diverticula are typically treated with concurrent cardiomyotomy and diverticulectomy. However, resection of these diverticula can be technically difficult and associated with significant morbidity with a staple line leak rate ranging up to 27%. For this reason, and because the diverticulum is secondary to a primary esophageal motility disorder such as achalasia, we decided to adopt a laparoscopic myotomy-first strategy, reserving the diverticulectomy for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms. Methods: From 2004 to 2018, 22 patients with epiphrenic diverticula were treated by laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication alone, with the plan to add the diverticulectomy as a second stage if needed. There were 13 women and 9 women, with a mean age of 68 years. Results: Patients had been symptomatic for an average of 36 months. The most common presenting symptom was dysphagia (91%), followed by regurgitation (77%). More than half of the diverticula were solitary and on the right side. Esogphagoscopy ruled out cancer. Esophageal manometry (18 patients) showed achalasia in 14 patients, nutcracker esophagus in 3 patients, and nonspecific motility disorder in 1 patient. There were no perioperative complications, and average length of stay was 2.5 days. At a mean follow-up of 68 months, dysphagia resolved in 77% and regurgitation in 86% of patients. Three patients had persistent symptoms: 2 patients underwent a transthoracic diverticulectomy (1 patient with resolution of symptoms and 1 patient with no improvement). Another patient had per oral endoscopic myotomy, but his dysphagia persisted. Conclusions: The laparoscopic myotomy-first approach reduces risk and unnecessary surgery. A laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication provide excellent resolution of symptoms for most, whereasonly a few will need a staged resection of the diverticulum.

Minimally invasive therapy for epiphrenic diverticula: Systematic review of literature and report of six cases

INTRODUCTION:

Epiphrenic diverticula (ED) are infrequent and conventional surgical treatment entails aggressive open or transthoracic surgery. Minimally invasive treatment has changed the surgical approach but some surgical controversies are not resolved.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study is to describe our experience in minimally invasive treatment of the ED and to perform a systematic review of the current literature in this subject.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We reviewed all data from the Hospital de Sant Pau, focusing on patients that underwent minimally invasive treatment for an ED since 1998 to date. Furthermore, we performed a systematic literature review focused on the minimally invasive approach for ED.

RESULTS:

A total of 6 patients have been treated (5 transhiatal and 1 with abdominal and thoracic approach). We found a predominance of males with a median age of 63. The diagnosis was made with an endoscopy, barium swallow and manometry. Half of the manometry results were pathologic. The surgical technique involved a diverticulectomy, myotomy and a Dor partial founduplication. Two patients that presented suture line leakage (SLL) were treated conservatively. No mortality was reported. The systematic review was carried out under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses scheme, with a total of 20 studies where 189 patients were found. No comparative or prospective randomised trials were found. Overall morbidity was 24%, with a SLL rate of 12%, hospital stay of 5 days and mortality of 1.5%. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 81.5% of the patients were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION:

The minimally invasive approach for ED is a safe and feasible procedure.

Squamous cell carcinoma in a large epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum

Carcinoma is rare in an esophageal diverticulum. The case of a 53-year-old man with a large mass in a long-standing symptomatic epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum is presented in this study. Squamous cell carcinoma in the diverticulum with pleural invasion was diagnosed after surgical diverticulectomy. The patient underwent subtotal esophagectomy with locoregional lymph node dissection and reconstruction with gastric tube because of micro-invasion at the surgical margin. The patient developed malignant pleural effusion at 6 months after surgery, and he eventually expired 3 months later. Carcinoma can develop in esophageal diverticula and is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor prognosis.

Assessment of a pathophysiology-directed treatment for symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum

Epiphrenic diverticulum is a rare disease associated with distal esophageal obstruction and a weakened muscularis propria. We have adhered to an operative strategy of excision (diverticulectomy), repair of esophageal wall, and relief of functional and mechanical obstruction. We sought to assess this pathophysiology-directed treatment strategy. From 1987 to 2005, 44 patients underwent surgery for epiphrenic diverticulum. Diverticulectomy, repair, and relief of distal obstruction was performed in 35 (80%) and esophagectomy in nine (10%). Outcome (symptoms, diet, subsequent therapies and morbidity) was assessed by follow-up. Forty of 44 patients had preoperatively identifiable esophageal obstruction (91%). Distal obstruction was functional in 32 patients and mechanical in 24; these conditions coexisted in 16. After surgery, there were no in-hospital deaths; 15 patients experienced 22 in-hospital complications. Survival was 90% at 5 years and 72% at 10 years. Symptoms improved in most patients (P = 0.0004), except for gastroesophageal reflux; new symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 9/27 (33%) without this symptom preoperatively. Diet was less restricted postoperatively (P < 0.0001). Of 35 patients undergoing diverticulectomy, three (8.6%) required dilatation and two (6%) reoperation; 6/9 esophagectomy patients required dilatations. Preoperative assessment must include evaluation for mechanical obstruction. Adherence to a pathophysiology-directed operative strategy is safe and will improve the symptoms of most patients, with little need for reintervention. However, occasional patients will experience new symptoms, particularly reflux. Esophagectomy is the alternative for patients who are not candidates for diverticulectomy, repair of esophageal wall, and relief of distal obstruction.