Diaphragmatic acute massive herniation after laparoscopic gastroplasty for esophagectomy

Postoperative hiatal herniation after open vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy; a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia (PEHH) is a known, but relatively uncommon, complication after esophagectomies. The incidence of PEHH seems to be increasing since the introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled incidence of PEHH after esophagectomy, and to evaluate if minimally invasive technique is associated with increased risk for PEHH compared to open esophagectomy.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Medline via Ovid and Web of Science was performed. Retrospective and prospective studies in English language describing the incidence or risk factors for PEHH were included. Weighted incidence of PEHH after all types of esophagectomy, and after open or minimally invasive technique was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 7943 esophagectomy patients were included in the analysis. In total, 310 patients (3.9%) were diagnosed with PEHH. The estimated weighted incidence rate for PEHH after open esophagectomy was 0.024 (95% confidence interval: 0.012-0.045) compared to 0.065 (95% confidence interval: 0.040-0.106) after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Odds ratio for PEHH after minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to open esophagectomy was 2.76 (95% confidence interval: 1.49-5.11).

CONCLUSION

The risk for post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia was significantly higher after minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to open technique. Heterogeneity and retrospective designs of the included studies were important limitations of the analysis. Future studies should investigate preventive measures to reduce PEHH after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Paraconduit Hiatal Hernia Following Esophagectomy: Incidence, Risk Factors, Outcomes and Repair

BACKGROUND

Paraconduit hiatal hernia (PCHH) is a known complication of esophagectomy with significant morbidity. PCHH may be more common with the transition to a minimally invasive approach and improved survival. We studied the PCHH occurrence following minimally invasive esophagectomy to determine the incidence, treatment, and associated risk factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent esophagectomy at an academic tertiary care center between 2013-2020. We divided the cohort into those who did and did not develop PCHH, identifying differences in demographics, perioperative characteristics and outcomes. We present video of our laparoscopic repair with mesh.

RESULTS

Of 49 patients who underwent esophagectomy, seven (14%) developed PCHH at a median of 186 d (60-350 d) postoperatively. They were younger (57 versus 64 y, P< 0.01), and in cases of resection for cancer, more likely to develop tumor recurrence (71% versus 23%, P= 0.02). There was a significant difference in 2-y cancer free survival of patients with a PCHH (PCHH 19% versus no hernia 73%, P< 0.01), but no significant difference in 5-y overall survival (PCHH 36% versus no hernia 68%, P= 0.18). Five of seven PCHH were symptomatic and addressed surgically. Four PCHH repairs recurred at a median of 409 d.

CONCLUSIONS

PCHH is associated with younger age and tumor recurrence, but not mortality. Safe repair of PCHH can be performed laparoscopically with or without mesh. Further studies, including systematic video review, are needed to address modifiable risk factors and identify optimal techniques for durable repair of post-esophagectomy PCHH.

Diaphragmatic hernia after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a retrospective analysis of risk factors and post-repair outcomes

Background

Esophageal cancer surgery has historically been associated with high levels of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Post-esophagectomy diaphragmatic hernia (PEDH) represents a potentially life-threatening surgical complication, with incidence and risk factors not clearly demonstrated. This study evaluates presenting characteristics and repair outcomes in PEDH after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery between March 1997 and April 2018 at two high-volume centers were included. The patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and were managed according to a standardized follow-up care plan. The primary outcomes included PEDH incidence, risk factor identification, and surgical results after hernia repair. Patient characteristics and perioperative data were collected and a multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PEDH.

Results

A total of 414 patients were enrolled and 22 (5.3%) were diagnosed with PEDH during a median follow-up period of 16 (range, 6–177) months. All patients underwent surgical repair and 16 (73%) required treatment within 24 hours. PEDH repair was mainly performed through a laparoscopic approach (77.3%), with an overall postoperative morbidity of 22.7% and one mortality case. The median length of hospital stay was 6 (range, 2–95) days, and no early recurrences were observed, although three (13.6%) cases relapsed over a median follow-up of 10.1 months after hernia repair. Univariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between PEDH and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.016), pathological complete response (P=0.001), and lymph node harvest (P=0.024). On the other hand, multivariate analysis identified pathological complete response [3.616 (1.384–9.449), P=0.009] and lymph node harvest [3.029 (1.140–8.049), P=0.026] as the independent risk factors for developing PEDH.

Conclusions

PEDH represents a relevant surgical complication after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer, including a 5.3% incidence and requiring surgical repair. Pathological complete response and lymph node harvest were found to be independent risk factors for PEDH, independently of the esophagectomy technique.

Transverse colon perforation in the mediastinum after esophagectomy: a case report

Background

While anastomotic leakage, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, and pneumonia are well-known complications of esophagectomy, the incidence of hiatal hernia after esophagectomy for carcinoma has been reported to only be between 0.6 and 10%. We report a very rare case of hiatal hernia with transverse colon rupture in the mediastinum after esophagectomy in a 65-year-old woman.

Case presentation

The patient underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage IIA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and salvage esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction through a posterior mediastinum route for residual carcinoma. Three years after the initial surgery, two metastatic nodules in the lateral and posterior segments of the liver were detected on follow-up CT and were treated with oral anticancer drugs. After 6 months, the patient was readmitted for anorexia. Upon admission, computed tomography revealed an ileus caused by a hiatal hernia. Emergent operative repair was performed; an incarcerated herniation of the transverse colon was perforated in the mediastinum, and partial transverse colon resection and colostomy were performed. Intensive care was required to control septic shock after surgery, and the patient was discharged on the 53rd postoperative day.

Conclusions

Cases of hiatal hernia with digestive tract prolapsing into the mediastinum after esophagectomy with reconstruction through posterior mediastinum are rare but potentially life-threatening complications.

Enterothorax After Hepatic Surgery: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Enterothorax (ET) is a rare complication after hepatic surgery. The literature in this field is limited and mainly based on case reports. The aim of this study was to review our department's experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 602 patients who underwent hepatic resection between November 2008 and December 2016. Major hepatic surgery (n = 321) was defined as right or extended right hepatectomy (n = 227), left or extended left hepatectomy (n = 63), trisegmentectomy (n = 13), and living donor liver transplantation (n = 18). ET cases were identified by analyzing clinical courses and radiological imaging.

RESULTS

ET was observed in five out of 602 patients (0.8%). All patients developed the complication after major hepatic surgery (five out of 321, 1.6%). ET exclusively occurred after right (n = 3) or extended right hepatectomy (n = 2). Median time to diagnosis was 22 months. Radiological imaging showed herniation of small (n = 2), large bowel (n = 2), or omental fat (n = 1) with a median diaphragmatic defect of 3.9 cm. Two patients presented with acute incarceration and underwent emergency surgery, one patient reported recurrent pain and underwent elective repair, and two patients refused surgery. Follow-up imaging in two operated patients showed no recurrence of ET after 36 and 8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients after right hepatectomy have a substantial risk of ET. Acute right upper quadrant pain and/or dyspnea after hepatectomy should be investigated with adequate radiological imaging. Elective surgical repair of ET is recommended to avoid emergency surgery in case of incarceration.

Emergency Laparoscopic Repair of Giant Left Diaphragmatic Hernia following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Description of a Case and Review of the Literature

Postoperative diaphragmatic hernia (PDH) is an increasingly reported complication of esophageal cancer surgery. PDH occurs more frequently when minimally invasive techniques are employed, but very little is known about its pathogenesis. Currently, no consensus exists concerning preventive measures and its management. A 71-year-old man underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Three months later, he developed a giant PDH, which was repaired by direct suture via laparoscopic approach. A hypertensive pneumothorax occurred during surgery. This complication was managed by the anaesthesiologist through a high fraction of inspired O₂ and several recruitment manoeuvres. The patient remained free of hernia recurrence until he died of neoplastic cachexia 5 months later. Laparoscopic repair of PDH may be safe and effective even in the acute setting and in the case of massive herniation. However, surgeons and anaesthesiologists should be aware of the risk of intraoperative pneumothorax and be prepared to treat it promptly.

Oesophageal replacement with stomach: A personal series and review of published experience

AIM

To describe the outcomes of oesophageal replacement using stomach in children.

METHODS

All children undergoing oesophageal replacement in a regional centre were prospectively recorded in a customised database and subjected to continual follow up. Complications within 30 days were classified as early, and all other complications were classified as late. Outcomes were related to a comprehensive analysis of published experience where studies were classified as having long-term follow up if the median duration exceeded 5 years.

RESULTS

Ten children underwent oesophageal replacement using the stomach between 1998 and 2016. Indications were oesophageal atresia (6), caustic ingestion (2), foreign body ingestion (1) and oesophageal hamartoma (1). Two children died at 2 and 7 months after gastric transposition. All survivors are under review, with a median follow up of 8.5 years (range 3-14 years). Complications occurred in every case. Among survivors, three had early complications and eight had late complications. Early complications included anastomotic leak (2) and lung compression by stomach (1). Late complications were anaemia (8), anastomotic stricture (7), oesophagitis (5), dumping syndrome (2), perforation of a jejunostomy (1), para-gastric hiatal hernia (1), gastric outlet obstruction (1), Barrett's oesophagus (1), prolonged inability to swallow (1) and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (1). Among 57 publications, only three achieved complete long-term follow up. The incidence of reported complications was higher when follow up was complete.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal replacement by gastric transposition in children leads to serious chronic morbidity. Published experience masks this because of incomplete and short follow up.

Diaphragmatic hernia following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer - Are we too radical?

BACKGROUND

Diaphragmatic herniation (DH) of abdominal contents into the thorax after oesophageal resection is a recognised and serious complication of surgery. While differences in pressure between the abdominal and thoracic cavities are important, the size of the hiatal defect is something that can be influenced surgically. As with all oncological surgery, safe resection margins are essential without adversely affecting necessary anatomical structure and function. However very little has been published looking at the extent of the hiatal resection. We aim to present a case series of patients who developed DH herniation post operatively in order to raise discussion about the ideal extent of surgical resection required.

METHODS

We present a series of cases of two male and one female who had oesophagectomies for moderately and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas of the lower oesophagus who developed post-operative DH. We then conducted a detailed literature review using Medline, Pubmed and Google Scholar to identify existing guidance to avoid this complication with particular emphasis on the extent of hiatal resection.

DISCUSSION

Extended incision and partial resection of the diaphragm are associated with an increased risk of postoperative DH formation. However, these more extensive excisions can ensure clear surgical margins. Post-operative herniation can be an early or late complication of surgery and despite the clear importance of hiatal resection only one paper has been published on this subject which recommends a more limited resection than was carried out in our cases.

CONCLUSION

This case series investigated the recommended extent of hiatal dissection in oesophageal surgery. Currently there is no clear guidance available on this subject and further studies are needed to ascertain the optimum resection margin that results in the best balance of oncological parameters vs. post operative morbidity.

Comparison of minimally invasive and open gastric transposition in children

BACKGROUND

Gastric transposition is an established method of esophageal replacement in children, and the use of minimally invasive techniques avoids the trauma of open access. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of minimally invasive versus open gastric transposition in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of attempted laparoscopic-assisted gastric transposition at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), London, United Kingdom, between 2003 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. A comprehensive literature search was completed on MEDLINE for minimally invasive gastric transposition in children, and postoperative outcomes were collated. The outcomes from the retrospective review (single-center, GOSH) and the literature search (multicenter) were compared with those of the largest study on open gastric transposition consisting of 192 cases performed at GOSH.

RESULTS

In this retrospective review of 19 patients (mean age, 3.5 years; range, 0.4-15 years), the indications were long-gap esophageal atresia, postoperative, caustic, and idiopathic esophageal stricture, and esophageal dysmotility. Three cases were converted to laparotomy and excluded from subsequent analysis. There were one anastomotic leak, two strictures, and no deaths in this series. The literature search yielded a further 50 cases for comparison. Single-center (n=16) and multicenter (n=66) comparison of minimally invasive versus open technique (n=192) showed no difference in leak (6.3% and 16.7%, respectively, versus 12.0%; P=.701 and P=.398), stricture (12.5% and 15.2% versus 20.8%; P=.535 and P=.370), and mortality rates (0% and 1.5% versus 4.7%; P=1.000 and P=.461).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive gastric transposition is a safe and acceptable alternative to open surgery in children.

Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Herniation of abdominal contents via the diaphragmatic hiatus is a potentially life-threatening complication of esophagectomy. Mounting evidence suggests that hiatal hernias are more common following minimally invasive esophagectomy. Therefore, post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia and its treatment bear increasing significance.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of five patients with hiatal hernia following esophagectomy over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Successful laparoscopic reduction of a post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia was done without mesh reinforcement in three patients. One patient underwent mesh reinforcement. One patient was found to have carcinomatosis upon laparoscopic inspection, and repair of the hiatal hernia was abandoned. There were no perioperative deaths or complications. One patient developed a recurrent hiatal hernia 14 months after repair of the initial hiatal hernia. Patients were discharged within a mean of 1.75 days after surgical repair.

DISCUSSION

We have successfully used laparoscopy to treat hiatal hernias after esophagectomy. The benefits conferred by laparoscopy, including better visualization of the right gastroepiploic artery supplying the gastric conduit, minimally invasive evaluation of the field for metastasis, and shorter recovery time, make it our favored approach. Here, we describe our experience with hiatal hernia following esophagectomy and our operative technique.

Incidence of diaphragmatic hernias following minimally invasive versus open transthoracic Ivor Lewis McKeown esophagectomy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of post-operative hiatal herniation after open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis McKeown esophagectomy for malignant disease.

METHODS

All patients undergoing esophageal resection were entered into a prospectively maintained database. After Institutional Review Board approval, the database was queried to identify patients who underwent minimally invasive (MIE) and open transthoracic (TTE) Ivor Lewis McKeown esophagectomy (transthoracic three-hole) with gastric pull-up for malignant disease. The cohorts were compared for the incidence of hiatal hernia on routine CT scan for cancer surveillance. Data up to 24 months post-operatively was included. Patients undergoing trans-hiatal or hybrid procedures as well as intra-thoracic anastomosis were excluded as were patients in whom jejunum or colon was used for reconstruction.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2009, 19 MIEs and 20 open TTEs met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in age, co-morbidity, pathology or perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. During routine follow-up, para-gastric hiatal hernia was noted on CT scan in 5(26%) patients following MIE at a mean of 13.8 months postoperatively, with incidence ranging from 3 to 20 months postoperatively (19, 20, 18, 3, and 9 months, respectively). Hernia contents in these patients were omentum in one case and colon in the other four cases. None of the patients undergoing TTE were noted to have herniation (P = 0.01). All hernias were asymptomatic; three were repaired electively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significantly higher incidence of para-gastric hiatal hernia after Ivor Lewis McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to similar open procedures. Additional precautions to prevent para-gastric hernia should be taken during laparoscopic resection.

Pancreatic herniation after transhiatal esophagectomy

Diaphragmatic herniation as a complication after esophagectomy has been described. Contents within the hernia sac have been mainly limited to the small bowel and colon. We believe this is the first case report in the literature of a pancreatic herniation after esophagectomy. The incidence, presentation, technical risk factors, and treatment of post-esophagectomy diaphragmatic hernias are discussed.

Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair?: a systematic review of the literature

Biologic grafts for hernia repair are a relatively new development in the world of surgery. A thorough search of the Medline database for uses of various biologic grafts in hernia shows that the evidence behind their application is plentiful in some areas (ventral, inguinal) and nearly absent in others (parastomal). The assumption that these materials are only suited for contaminated or potentially contaminated surgical fields is not borne out in the literature, with more than 4 times the experience being reported in clean fields and the average success rates being higher (93% vs 87%). Outcomes prove to be highly dependent on material source, processing methods and implant scenarios with failure rates ranging from zero to more than 30%. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) grafts have an aggregate failure rate of 6.7% at 19 months whereas acellular human dermis (AHD) grafts have a failure rate of 13.6% at 12 months. Chemically cross-linked grafts have much less published data than the non-cross-linked materials. In particular, the search found 33 articles for SIS, 32 for AHD, and 13 for cross-linked porcine dermis. Furthermore, the cumulative level of evidence for each graft material was fairly low (2.6 to 2.9), and only 1 material (SIS) had level 1 evidence reported in any hernia type (inguinal and hiatal). Together, biologic grafts have published evidence showing success rates better than 90% overall and more than 2000 years of cumulative implant time. Improvements in materials, techniques, and patient selection are likely to improve these numbers as this field of surgery matures.

The prevention and management of perioperative complications

The most important issues in perioperative complications of oesophagectomy are prevention, early detection and appropriate management. Anastomotic leakage is the most frequent technical surgical complication. Prevention comprises avoidance of tension or impaired vascularization of the conduit and meticulous suture technique. Management includes early diagnosis, conservative treatment or endoscopic stenting of contained leakage, and re-operation of non-contained insufficiency. All other surgical complications - such as bleeding, tracheobronchial lesions or chylothorax - are rare and warrant special therapeutic modalities. The main general non-surgical complication is postoperative pneumonia, which should be prevented by effective pain control (especially peridural catheter) and appropriate techniques of artificial respiration. Special attention should be offered to postoperative tachyarrhythmias and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Prevention of complications also includes exclusion of patients with high operative risk based on scores and specific preoperative treatment of risk factors.