Does systematic 2-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal malignancy offer a survival advantage? Results from 178 consecutive patients

Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The first line treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is still surgical resection and the choice of surgical scheme depends on surgeon. Now the efficacy comparison of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) is still controversial.

AIM

To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of HMIE and OE in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for related articles. The odds ratio (OR) or standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of HMIE and OE.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies including a total of 2397 patients were selected. HMIE was significantly associated with less blood loss (SMD = -0.43, 95%CI: -0.66, -0.20; P = 0.0002) and lower incidence of pulmonary complications (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.57, 0.90; P = 0.004). No significant differences were seen in the lymph node yield (SMD = 0.11, 95%CI: -0.08, 0.30; P = 0.26), operation time (SMD = 0.24, 95%CI: -0.14, 0.61; P = 0.22), total complications rate (OR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.46, 0.99; P = 0.05), cardiac complication rate (OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.62, 1.34; P = 0.64), anastomotic leak rate (OR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.67, 1.35; P = 0.78), duration of intensive care unit stay (SMD = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.21, 0.19; P = 0.93), duration of hospital stay (SMD = -0.13, 95%CI: -0.28, 0.01; P = 0.08), and total mortality rates (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.47, 1.06; P = 0.09) between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the OE, HMIE shows less blood loss and pulmonary complications. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of HMIE.

BRF2 as a promising indicator for radical lymph-node dissection surgery in patients with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus

PURPOSE

Radical lymph-node dissection surgery in patients with cN0 middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We sought a novel biomarker that could be used for decision-making in relation to radical lymph-node dissection.

METHODS

One hundred and nineteen patients with cN0 middle thoracic ESCC undergoing three-field lymph-node dissection (3FLND) or two-field lymph-node dissection (Ivor Lewis) esophagectomy were reviewed. A survival analysis, and Chi-square and parametric tests were performed.

RESULTS

A Cox regression analysis revealed that the expression of BRF2 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.014) and progression-free survival (P = 0.014). The survival of patients who underwent 3FLND was better than that of patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the BRF2 overexpression group (P = 0.002), but not in the BRF2 nonoverexpression group (P = 0.386). The risk of lymph-node recurrence and the number of recurrent lymph nodes in patients with the overexpression of BRF2 were increased in the Ivor Lewis group in comparison to the 3FLND group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001). The risk of cervical and superior mediastinal lymph-node recurrence was positively correlated with the overexpression of BRF2 (P = 0.027). Furthermore, in the Ivor Lewis group, a significant correlation was found between the risk of lymph-node recurrence or the number of recurrent lymph nodes and the expression of BRF2 (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004), but not in the 3FLND group (P = 0.193 and P = 0.694).

CONCLUSIONS

3FLND generated better survival outcomes and reduced the rate of lymph-node recurrence in comparison to Ivor Lewis in patients with the overexpression of BRF2. BRF2 can be used as an indicator for radical lymph-node dissection surgery in cN0 ESCC patients.

A personal perspective on controversies in the surgical management of oesophageal cancer

Significant disagreement and debate persist regarding several aspects of the optimal surgical management of oesophageal cancer. We address some of these issues based on our consecutive series of 165 patients undergoing oesophageal resection (reported in full elsewhere) and the available literature. The areas considered are controversial but we argue in favour of a 'traditional' two-stage open approach (Ivor-Lewis), leaving the pylorus alone, making no attempt to perform a radical lymphadenectomy and fashioning a hand sewn anastomosis.

Prognostic significance of lymph node characteristics on survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prognostic significance of lymph node characteristics (total number of resected lymph nodes, metastatic lymph node ratio, and metastatic lymph nodes site) on survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, between October 1, 2003, and December 31, 2008, were reviewed. Survival data and clinicopathological characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

Among 205 patients, the median overall survival time was 48.0 months and the overall 5-year survival rate was 44.7 %. The independent risk factors for disease-free survival were the metastatic lymph node ratio (P < 0.001) and the number of positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001) and not the total number of resected lymph nodes (Χ (2) = 3.063, P = 0.216). There was no difference in survival between patients with extrathoracic and intrathoracic lymph node metastasis (Χ (2) = 0.295, P = 0.587). No significant relation was found between tumor location and the site of metastatic lymph nodes (rs = 0.125, P = 0.245).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding revealed that the ratio and the number, but not the site, of metastatic lymph nodes were independent prognostic risk factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. We suggest taking these factors into consideration for better estimation of prognosis.

Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open techniques with respect to oncologic outcomes through analysis of the extent of lymph node clearance, number of lymph nodes retrieved, oncologic stage, and 5-year mortality.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review of the literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases (1950-2011), and evaluated all comparative studies. Comparison between the open and MIE/hybrid MIE (HMIE) groups was possible with data being available for direct comparison.

RESULTS

After careful review, 17 case-control studies with 1,586 patients having an esophagectomy were included in this systematic review. The median (range) number of lymph nodes found in the MIE, open and HMIE groups were 16 (5.7-33.90), 10 (3-32.80) and 17 (17-17.15), of which there was significance between the MIE and open groups (p=0.03) but not significant between MIE versus HMIE (p=0.25). There was no statistical significance in pathologic stage between open, MIE and HMIE groups. Generally, there were good short-term (30 day) survival rates between all three groups. The open group had 5-year survival rates between 16% and 57% compared to the MIE group 12.5%-63% (p=0.33). Overall 5-year survival was found to be not significant between open group and MIE (p=0.93). MIE does not appear on statistical evidence to present any survival advantage.

CONCLUSION

The evidence of this study suggests that MIE is equivalent to standard open esophagectomy in achieving similar oncological outcomes. Further randomised controlled trials are required to provide for a higher level of evidence.

The significance of lymph node status as a prognostic factor for esophageal cancer

The revision of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 7th Edition, suggests the lymph node (LN) status to be the most significant risk factor in esophageal cancer. This article reviews the current status of LNs as indicators of prognosis. The significance of the number of metastatic LNs, the number of resected LNs, and a novel index, the "LN ratio" (metastatic LNs/removed LNs) in patients with esophageal cancer, were reviewed. The number of metastatic LNs independently predicted the prognosis of both overall survival and relapse-free survival. The number of positive LNs was also the best predictive marker of survival. Furthermore, overall survival significantly depended on the number of surgically removed LNs, and the LN ratio closely correlated with survival. The LN status is considered to be the most significant information that can be used to predict the prognosis. However, there are many issues that still need to be resolved. Better knowledge of the N-status is therefore needed to effectively utilize this information. Further research should focus on the N-status of patients with esophageal cancer.

Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes to total number of nodes resected is prognostic for survival in esophageal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The role of the number of metastatic nodes in esophageal cancer surgery is of interest. We assess predictors of survival after oesophagectomy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction malignancy.

METHODS

Prospective data of consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy between 1991 and 2007.

RESULTS

Of 224 patients, 148 patients (66%) had adenocarcinoma, 70 (31%) squamous cell carcinoma, and 6 (2.6%) were other tumor types. Five-year survival was 43% with hospital mortality of 3.5%. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 14%. The total number of affected nodes significantly reduced survival (four or more metastatic nodes). Further analysis of the ratio of nodes affected to the total number resected showed a significant decrease in survival as the percentage of positive nodes increased (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer should be staged according to a minimum total number of metastatic lymph nodes and ratios because this more accurately predicts survival than current staging systems.

Surgical outcomes associated with oesophagectomy in New South Wales: an investigation of hospital volume

INTRODUCTION

Resection remains the standard treatment for curable oesophageal cancer. By linking the NSW Central Cancer Registry (CCR) and the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection (APDC) databases, mortality, post-resection complication and survival associated with oesophagectomy were investigated.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer from 2000 to 2005 as recorded in the CCR (n = 2,082) were linked with records in the APDC, giving a total of 17,205 episodes of care. Over 15% (n = 321) of all patients underwent an oesophagectomy.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The overall 30-day mortality rate following resection was 3.7%, ranging from 2.6% in high volume hospitals to 6.4% in low volume hospitals. Three-year absolute survival for localised-regional disease following oesophagectomy was 64% (95%CI 54-73%) in high-volume hospitals, 58% (95%CI 46-68%) in mid-volume and 45% (95%CI 23-65%) in low-volume hospitals. The post-resection complication rate was 19% (95%CI 13-26%) for high-volume hospital, 24% (95%CI 13-40%) in low-volume and 31% (95%CI 22-41%) in mid-volume hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Oesophagectomy in NSW is performed with satisfactory results. However, there is a suggestion that higher- rather than lower-volume hospitals have better post-resection outcomes.

Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Using Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration data, we sought to (1) characterize the relationship between survival and extent of lymphadenectomy, and (2) from this, define optimum lymphadenectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

What constitutes optimum lymphadenectomy to maximize survival is controversial because of variable goals, analytic methodology, and generalizability of the underpinning data.

METHODS

A total of 4627 patients who had esophagectomy alone for esophageal cancer were identified from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Patient-specific risk-adjusted survival was estimated using random survival forests. Risk-adjusted 5-year survival was averaged for each number of lymph nodes resected and its relation to cancer characteristics explored. Optimum number of nodes that should be resected to maximize 5-year survival was determined by random forest multivariable regression.

RESULTS

For pN0M0 moderately and poorly differentiated cancers, and all node-positive (pN+) cancers, 5-year survival improved with increasing extent of lymphadenectomy. In pN0M0 cancers, no optimum lymphadenectomy was defined for pTis; optimum lymphadenectomy was 10 to 12 nodes for pT1, 15 to 22 for pT2, and 31 to 42 for pT3/T4, depending on histopathologic cell type. In pN+M0 cancers and 1 to 6 nodes positive, optimum lymphadenectomy was 10 for pT1, 15 for pT2, and 29 to 50 for pT3/T4.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater extent of lymphadenectomy was associated with increased survival for all patients with esophageal cancer except at the extremes (TisN0M0 and >or=7 regional lymph nodes positive for cancer) and well-differentiated pN0M0 cancer. Maximum 5-year survival is modulated by T classification: resecting 10 nodes for pT1, 20 for pT2, and >or=30 for pT3/T4 is recommended.

Prognostic significance of perigastric lymph nodes metastases on survival in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer

Several publications have showed that the number of metastatic lymph node (LN) should be taken into consideration in nodal category of esophageal cancer, but seldom considered extent of involved regional LNs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the significance of the extent of regional LN metastasis on survival in patients with esophageal cancer. A total of 245 thoracic esophageal cancer patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with standard lymphadenectomy between January 2000 and December 2006 were included in the study. Data including demographic factors, pathologic findings, LN parameters and survival outcomes were collected. The survival experience was depicted using Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to screen the significant prognostic factors. The univariate analysis to further explore the significant prognostic factor was done by log-rank test. After a median follow-up of 53.2 months, the 5-year survival rate was 46.3% for the entire cohort. Cox model regression indicated that the LN status and perigastric nodal status, aside from residual tumor status, histological tumor type and depth of invasion, were the independent prognostic factors. Patients without LN metastasis had better 5-year survival than those with positive nodes (64.2% vs. 18.9%, X2=35.875, P<0.001). However, For those patients with nodal involvement, there was no difference in 5-year survival between patients with involved nodes<3 and >or=3 (27.8% vs. 0%, X2=0.925, P=0.336). When considering the location of LN metastasis, patients could be further stratified according to whether the perigastric nodes were involved or not (37.5% vs. 10.0%, X2=4.295, P=0.038). In conclusion, involved LN number had no prognostic implication in nodal involved patients based on our data. Whereas, perigastric nodal involvement should be used to refine the N category (N0, no nodal metastasis, N1, non-perigastric node metastasis, N2, perigastric node metastasis) for the future esophageal cancer staging criteria.