Tele-ophthalmic screening using digital imaging devices

A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada

Background

Over 700,000 New Zealanders (NZ), particularly elderly and Māori, live without timely access to specialist ophthalmology services. Teleophthalmology is a widely recognised tool that can assist in overcoming resource and distance barriers. Teleophthalmology gained unprecedented traction in NZ during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown. However, its provision is still limited and there are equity issues. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review identifying, describing and contrasting teleophthalmology services in NZ with the comparable countries of Australia, USA, Canada and the United Kingdom.

Methods

The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Google were systemically searched using the keywords: telemedicine, ophthalmology, tele-ophthalmology/teleophthalmology. The searches were filtered to the countries above, with no time constraints. An integrative approach was used to synthesise findings.

Results

One hundred and thirty-two studies were identified describing 90 discrete teleophthalmology services. Articles spanned from 1997 to 2020. Models were categorised into general eye care (n=21; 16%); emergency/trauma (n=6; 4.5%); school screening (n=25; 19%); artificial intelligence (AI) (n=23; 18%); and disease-specific models of care (MOC) (n=57; 43%). The most common diseases addressed were diabetic retinopathy (n=23; 17%); retinopathy of prematurity (n=9; 7%); and glaucoma (n=8; 6%). Programs were mainly centred in the US (n=72; 54.5%), followed by the UK (n=29; 22%), then Canada (n=16; 12%), Australia (n=13; 10%), with the fewest identified in NZ (n=3; 2%). Models generally involved an ophthalmologist consultative service, remote supervision and triaging. Most models involved local clinicians transmitting fed-forward or live images.

Conclusion

Teleophthalmology will likely play a crucial role in the future of eye care. COVID-19 has offered a unique opportunity to observe the use of teleophthalmology services globally. Feed-forward and, increasingly, live-based teleophthalmology services have demonstrated feasibility and cost-effectiveness in similar countries internationally. New Zealand’s teleophthalmology services, however, are currently limited. Investing in strategic partnerships and technology at a national level can advance health equities in ophthalmic care.

Anterior ophthalmic imaging

Improvements in imaging chips and computer processing power have brought major advances in imaging of the anterior eye. Digitally captured images can be visualised immediately and can be stored and retrieved easily. Anterior ocular imaging techniques using slitlamp biomicroscopy, corneal topography, confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), ultrasonic biomicroscopy, computerised tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are reviewed. Conventional photographic imaging can be used to quantify corneal topography, corneal thickness and transparency, anterior chamber depth and lateral angle and crystalline lens position, curvature, thickness and transparency. Additionally, the effects of tumours, foreign bodies and trauma can be localised, the corneal layers can be examined and the tear film thickness assessed.

Diabetic retinopathy screening with pharmacy-based teleophthalmology in a semiurban setting: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic eye complications are the leading cause of visual loss among working-aged people. Pharmacy-based teleophthalmology has emerged as a possible alternative to in-person examination that may facilitate compliance with evidence-based recommendations and reduce barriers to specialized eye care. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of mobile teleophthalmology screening compared with in-person examination (primary care) for the diabetic population residing in semiurban areas of southwestern Ontario.

METHODS

A decision tree was constructed to compare in-person examination (comparator program) versus pharmacy-based teleophthalmology (intervention program). The economic model was designed to identify patients with more than minimal diabetic retinopathy, manifested by at least 1 microaneurysm at examination (modified Airlie House classification grade of ≥ 20). Cost-effectiveness was assessed as cost per case detected (true-positive result) and cost per case correctly diagnosed (including true-positive and true-negative results).

RESULTS

The cost per case detected was $510 with in-person examination and $478 with teleophthalmology, and the cost per case correctly diagnosed was $107 and $102 respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $314 per additional case detected and $73 per additional case correctly diagnosed. Use of pharmacologic dilation and health care specialists' fees were the most important cost drivers.

INTERPRETATION

The study showed that a compound teleophthalmology program in a semiurban community would be more effective but more costly than in-person examination. The findings raise the question of whether the benefits of pharmacy-based teleophthalmology in semiurban areas, where in-person examination is still available, are equivalent to those observed in remote communities. Further study is needed to investigate the impact of this program on the prevention of severe vision loss and quality of life in a semiurban setting.

Ultra-wide field retinal imaging in detection, classification, and management of diabetic retinopathy

Current ultra-wide field (UWF) retinal imaging systems utilize scanning laser ophthalmoscope technology combined with an ellipsoidal mirror to capture up to 200 degrees of the retina in a single image. When compared with mydriatic ETDRS-protocol, 7 standard field photographs and clinical examination, nonmydriatic UWF images appear to have excellent agreement in allowing the detection and classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR), although larger, definitive validation studies are still forthcoming. UWF imaging and angiography allow visualization of peripheral retinal nonperfusion, vascular leakage and neovascularization in patients with DR that may not be captured on 7 standard fields. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate whether modified laser treatment algorithms based on improved visualization of the retinal periphery might improve patient outcomes. Nonmydriatic UWF imaging has potential applications for ocular diabetic telehealth programs, but validation of newer, more portable, and more affordable UWF imaging models is needed.

Fundus autofluorescence imaging in an ocular screening program

Purpose. To describe integration of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging into an ocular screening program. Methods. Fifty consecutive screening participants were included in this prospective pilot imaging study. Color and FAF (530/640 nm exciter/barrier filters) images were obtained with a 15.1MP Canon nonmydriatic hybrid camera. A clinician evaluated the images on site to determine need for referral. Visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and ocular pathology detected by color fundus and FAF imaging modalities were recorded. Results. Mean ± SD age was 47.4 ± 17.3 years. Fifty-two percent were female and 58% African American. Twenty-seven percent had a comprehensive ocular examination within the past year. Mean VA was 20/39 in the right eye and 20/40 in the left eye. Mean IOP was 15 mmHg bilaterally. Positive color and/or FAF findings were identified in nine (18%) individuals with diabetic retinopathy or macular edema (n = 4), focal RPE defects (n = 2), age-related macular degeneration (n = 1), central serous retinopathy (n = 1), and ocular trauma (n = 1). Conclusions. FAF was successfully integrated in our ocular screening program and aided in the identification of ocular pathology. Larger studies examining the utility of this technology in screening programs may be warranted.

Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

To compare nonmydriatic stereoscopic Optomap ultrawide field images with dilated stereoscopic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-standard field 35-mm color 30-degree fundus photographs (ETDRS photography) and clinical examination for determining diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) severity.

DESIGN

Single-site, prospective, comparative, instrument validation study.

METHODS

One hundred three diabetic patients (206 eyes) representing the full spectrum of DR severity underwent nonmydriatic ultrawide field 100-degree and 200-degree imaging, dilated ETDRS photography, and dilated fundus examination by a retina specialist. Two independent readers graded images to determine DR and DME severity. A third masked retina specialist adjudicated discrepancies.

RESULTS

Based on ETDRS photography (n = 200), the results were as follows: no DR (n = 25 eyes [12.5%]), mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR; 47 [23.5%]), moderate NPDR (61 [30.5%]), severe NPDR (11 [5.5%]), very severe NPDR (3 [1.5%]), and proliferative DR (52 [2.5%]). One (0.5%) eye was ungradable and 6 eyes did not complete ETDRS photography. No DME was found in 114 eyes (57.0%), DME was found in 28 eyes (14.0%), and clinically significant DME was found in 47 eyes (23.5%), and 11 (5.5%) eyes were ungradable. Exact DR severity agreement between ultrawide field 100-degree imaging and ETDRS photography occurred in 84%, with agreement within 1 level in 91% (K(W) = 0.85; K = 0.79). Nonmydriatic ultrawide field images exactly matched clinical examination results for DR in 70% and were within 1 level in 93% (K(W) = 0.71; K = 0.61). Nonmydriatic ultrawide field imaging acquisition time was less than half that of dilated ETDRS photography (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonmydriatic ultrawide field images compare favorably with dilated ETDRS photography and dilated fundus examination in determining DR and DME severity; however, they are acquired more rapidly. If confirmed in broader diabetic populations, nonmydriatic ultrawide field imaging may prove to be beneficial in DR evaluation in research and clinical settings.

Glaucoma screening: analysis of conventional and telemedicine-friendly devices

PURPOSE

Portable, telemedicine-friendly devices offer novel opportunity for screening and monitoring glaucoma in the remote and rural regions of the world. This study examines the effective combination of telemedicine-friendly screening devices for detection of glaucoma in relation with conventional, hospital-based devices.

METHODS

A total of 399 eyes were screened with telemedicine-friendly devices and conventional, hospital-based devices such as ophthalmoscope, tonometer and perimeter.

RESULTS

Combination of age and family history of glaucoma alone has a sensitivity of 35.6% (specificity 94.2%, area under the curve 0.81, correctly classified 81.1%) and an addition of telemedicine-friendly or conventional visual field tests optimized the sensitivity to 91.1% (specificity 93.6%, area under the curve 0.95, correctly classified 93%). Analysis indicates good agreement between vertical cup-to-disc ratio by ophthalmoscopy and digital image reading. An addition of intraocular pressure test does not change sensitivity (35.6%) and specificity (94.2%).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that evaluations of cup-to-disc ratio and visual field, using telemedicine-friendly devices, are most useful tools in screening for glaucoma. When used together these devices may be an alternative for conventional glaucoma screenings.

Retinal image analysis: concepts, applications and potential

As digital imaging and computing power increasingly develop, so too does the potential to use these technologies in ophthalmology. Image processing, analysis and computer vision techniques are increasing in prominence in all fields of medical science, and are especially pertinent to modern ophthalmology, as it is heavily dependent on visually oriented signs. The retinal microvasculature is unique in that it is the only part of the human circulation that can be directly visualised non-invasively in vivo, readily photographed and subject to digital image analysis. Exciting developments in image processing relevant to ophthalmology over the past 15 years includes the progress being made towards developing automated diagnostic systems for conditions, such as diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration and retinopathy of prematurity. These diagnostic systems offer the potential to be used in large-scale screening programs, with the potential for significant resource savings, as well as being free from observer bias and fatigue. In addition, quantitative measurements of retinal vascular topography using digital image analysis from retinal photography have been used as research tools to better understand the relationship between the retinal microvasculature and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, advances in electronic media transmission increase the relevance of using image processing in 'teleophthalmology' as an aid in clinical decision-making, with particular relevance to large rural-based communities. In this review, we outline the principles upon which retinal digital image analysis is based. We discuss current techniques used to automatically detect landmark features of the fundus, such as the optic disc, fovea and blood vessels. We review the use of image analysis in the automated diagnosis of pathology (with particular reference to diabetic retinopathy). We also review its role in defining and performing quantitative measurements of vascular topography, how these entities are based on 'optimisation' principles and how they have helped to describe the relationship between systemic cardiovascular disease and retinal vascular changes. We also review the potential future use of fundal image analysis in telemedicine.

Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma in the developed world: are we there yet?

BACKGROUND

In 1995, the Quebec Agency for Health Services and Technology Assessment (AETMIS) stated that a formal screening program for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) could not be recommended for the province of Quebec, owing to "a high degree of uncertainty and because of the high cost such a program would entail." The purpose of this article was to evaluate the possibility of instituting a POAG screening program in light of recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma.

METHODS

We reviewed new developments that have occurred since the mid to late 1990s in the field of glaucoma. Changes that could positively influence the feasibility and organization of future glaucoma screening programs were identified.

RESULTS

New technologies, including confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT II), optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT), and scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx-VCC), permit early detection of optic nerve and nerve fibre layer structural damage. Together with advanced psychophysical tests (frequency doubling perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry) for earlier detection of functional damage, they provide an increased understanding of the diagnosis and monitoring of POAG. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) remains the most important risk factor for glaucoma. Clinical trials indicate that lowering IOP at different stages of the disease can arrest or decrease its rate of progression. Moreover, it is important to assess pachymetry because IOP measurements are influenced by central corneal thickness. Finally, new treatments, such as prostaglandin analogues or selective laser trabeculoplasty, are safer and may also achieve lower intraocular pressures.

INTERPRETATION

Health policy involves the investment of public resources, and cost-effectiveness analyses for POAG screening are heavily weighted by the degree of uncertainty that glaucoma screening can be effectively and reliably achieved. The many new developments and advancements outlined herein, combined with the possible increasing prevalence of POAG, necessitate the re-evaluation of screening for primary open-angle glaucoma.

Photoscreening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of image quality between film photography and digital imaging

PURPOSE

Retinal images from patients attending an urban screening centre before and after the transition from film photography to digital image acquisition were analysed for quality of image.

METHODS

A total of 1946 diabetic patients, aged 12-92 years (mean 55.6 +/- 14.88 years), were included in this retrospective study of retinal screening techniques. Each imaging group was subdivided into age-matched groups. In all subjects pupils were pharmacologically dilated before photography. The images were reviewed by the same three experienced observers and graded at the time of screening from grade 1 (excellent quality) to grade 4 (unreadable).

RESULTS

Of 938 patients in the film group, 31.3% had excellent images, 38.2% good, 22.7% poor and 7.8% were unreadable. Of the 1008 patients in the digital imaging group, 25.3% had excellent images, 46.3% good, 14.6% poor and 13.8% were unreadable. A significant difference was observed in patients over 65 years of age who exhibited a threefold increase in failure rate with digital imaging (33.7% v 11.3%)(P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In this study population a statistically significant degradation of image quality was observed in those older than 65 years following transition to digital photography. This has implications for service provision planning.

Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

To assess three novel digital fundus cameras for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening.

METHODS

Digital colour and red-free retinal imaging (Topcon TRC 50 IA, Canon CR6-45NM, and MediTell) was used to capture 427 images of 70 diabetes patients and control subjects. The images were graded for DR by three readers in a randomized and masked manner using a modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study classification. The reference standard was based on mydriatic ophthalmoscopy and colour and red-free images.

RESULTS

Digital 50 degrees red-free imaging had sensitivity of 97.7%, two-field 50 degrees colour imaging 94.0%, and two-field 45 degrees colour imaging sensitivity of 88.9%. The specificity of these imaging modalities was 98.9-100%, and ungradeable images represented 1.2-1.6%. The hand-held digital colour videocamera (MediTell) showed a sensitivity of 6.9% and ungradeable images represented 92.3%.

CONCLUSION

Digital 50 degrees red-free and two-field 50 degrees or 45 degrees colour imaging were suitable for DR screening, whereas the hand-held digital videocamera did not fulfil the needs of DR screening.

Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in digital retinal images: a tool for diabetic retinopathy screening

AIMS

To develop a system to detect automatically features of diabetic retinopathy in colour digital retinal images and to evaluate its potential in diabetic retinopathy screening.

METHODS

Macular centred 45 degrees colour retinal images from 1273 patients in an inner city diabetic retinopathy screening programme. A system was used involving pre-processing to standardize colour and enhance contrast, segmentation to reveal possible lesions and classification of lesions using an artificial neural network. The system was trained using a subset of images from 500 patients and evaluated by comparing its performance with a human grader on a test set of images from 773 patients.

RESULTS

Maximum sensitivity for detection of any retinopathy on a per patient basis was 95.1%, accompanied by specificity of 46.3%. Specificity could be increased as far as 78.9% but was accompanied by a fall in sensitivity to 70.8%. At a setting with 94.8% sensitivity and 52.8% specificity, no cases of sight-threatening retinopathy were missed (retinopathy warranting immediate ophthalmology referral or re-examination sooner than 1 year by National Institute for Clinical Excellence criteria). If the system was implemented at 94.8% sensitivity setting over half the images with no retinopathy would be correctly identified, reducing the need for a human grader to examine images in 1/3 of patients.

CONCLUSION

This system could be used when screening for diabetic retinopathy. At 94.8% sensitivity setting the number of normal images requiring examination by a human grader could be halved.

Use of Telemedicine in Periodic Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy

Telemedicine was used for taking ocular fundus images of diabetic patients, which were subsequently sent by electronic mail to experienced ophthalmologists at a university hospital. The ophthalmologists provided reports on the patients to the internists. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this telemedicine system. A total of 279 diabetic patients were admitted to the Third Department of Internal Medicine of Yokohama City University Hospital, School of Medicine, for blood sugar control or for education on lifestyle between April, 1999, and October, 2000. The subjects did not have eye disease nor diabetic retinopathy when evaluated by an ophthalmologist (at either Yokohama City University Hospital or other facility) within 3 months before enrollment in the study. After dilation of the pupil, fundus images were taken of each eye from four angles using a nonmydriatic fundus camera. The images were transmitted by electronic mail to the Division of Ophthalmology of Tokyo University Branch Hospital along with other patient information. The ophthalmologists there evaluated the images on the screen according to Fukuda's classification of diabetic retinopathy. They sent ophthalmologic reports to the internists at the Third Department of Internal Medicine of Yokohama City University Hospital, School of Medicine, and recommended whether the patient should be seen by his/her regular ophthalmologist earlier than the next scheduled visit. Fundus images were obtained at the time of admission, at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge, and at every 6 months thereafter. Out of the images of 1170 eyes obtained at various time points from the 279 patients, 1076 (92.0%) were successfully evaluated by the ophthalmologists at the University of Tokyo, while 60 (5.1%) could not be evaluated and there was a communication problem for the images of 34 eyes. The ophthalmologists determined that 5 eyes of 3 patients required further evaluation by the patient's regular ophthalmologist based on the images transferred by telemedicine. No patient dropped out during the study period.

Fundus imaging and the telemedical management of diabetes

Diabetes is the major preventable form of blindness among people of working age in the Western world, despite the improvements in laser photocoagulation treatments. It is known that regular glycaemic control and annual retinal screening of people with diabetes can reduce its incidence. Effective treatment needs to be available but also screening methods which are simple to perform and cost-effective should be implemented. It will be important in future to integrate digital images of the fundus into the health records of diabetic patients. Screening programmes for the detection of diabetic retinopathy aided by image-processing software for processing fundus images will save manpower and increase quality. Before this can happen, we need more clinical studies of store-and-forward techniques, so that they can be standardized and their effectiveness established against that of traditional analogue screening.

Telemedical devices in diabetes management

This paper reviews telemedicine and its recent expansions within diabetes management. Diabetes mellitus continues to be one of the major chronic diseases with up to 11% of national health care expenditure, when all late complications are taken into account. Over and above this, the incidence of diabetes is increasing in pandemic fashion. Diabetes has been the focus of telemedicine and information technology over the past two decades. Useful applications supporting high quality treatment exist in clinical management, education, decision support and modelling. Development of high-speed networks enables transmission of good quality photographs making consultations from distant locations possible. Databases and data analysis are fundamental to diabetes outcome research. Less successful has been the development of electronic medical records although this is a dream of many. Evidence of improved clinical outcome using telemedical applications still awaits the breakthrough.

Effect of digital image compression on screening for diabetic retinopathy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Digital imaging is widely used for diabetic retinopathy screening. The storage and transmission of digital images can be facilitated by image compression. The authors aimed to assess the effect of image compression on the accuracy of grading diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

Forty nine 35 mm transparencies (17 with no retinopathy, eight with background, five with preproliferative, and 19 with proliferative retinopathy) were digitised and subjected to JPEG compression by 90%, 80%, 70%, and 0%. The 196 images were randomised and graded on a portable computer. Two masked graders assessed the images for grade of retinopathy and image quality (0-10). The sensitivity and specificity of retinopathy grading were calculated with a weighted kappa for grading agreement between levels of compression.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of retinopathy grading was reduced by JPEG compression. At 90%, 80%, 70%, and 0% compression the sensitivities were 0.38, 0.50, 0.65, and 0.72, respectively; the specificity results were 1.00, 1.00, 0.83, and 0.84, respectively; and the weighted kappa scores were 0.60, 0.75, 0.77, and 0.84, respectively. The quality scores for 90%, 80%, 70%, 0% compression were 2.9 (SD 1.1, 95% CI; 2.7-3.2), 4.6 (SD 1.1, 95% CI; 3.0-5.6), 5.8 (SD1.5, 95% CI 5.0-6.6), 6.3 (SD1.4, 95% CI; 5.4-7.2) (p<0.01 for each intergroup comparison).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate significant loss of sensitivity to the features of diabetic retinopathy with JPEG compression; this was compounded by the thin film transistor (TFT) screen. The authors found the quality of uncompressed images on TFT screens too poor to give grading sensitivities which reach current guidelines for diabetic retinopathy screening.

Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability to determine clinical levels of diabetic retinopathy, timing of next appropriate retinal evaluation, and necessity of referral to ophthalmology specialists using stereoscopic nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal images as compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) seven standard field 35-mm stereoscopic color fundus photographs.

DESIGN

Prospective, clinic-based, comparative instrument validation study.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four patients (108 eyes) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus selected after chart review from a single center to include the full spectrum of diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

Nonsimultaneous 45 degrees -field stereoscopic digital-video color images (JVN images) were obtained from three fields with the Joslin Vision Network (JVN) system before pupil dilation. Following pupil dilation, ETDRS seven standard field 35-mm stereoscopic color 30 degrees fundus photographs (ETDRS photos) were obtained. Joslin Vision Network images and ETDRS photos were graded on a lesion-by-lesion basis by two independent, masked readers to assess ETDRS clinical level of diabetic retinopathy. An independent ophthalmology retina specialist adjudicated interreader disagreements in a masked fashion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Determination of ETDRS clinical level of diabetic retinopathy, timing of next ophthalmic evaluation of diabetic retinopathy, and need for prompt referral to ophthalmology specialist.

RESULTS

There was substantial agreement (kappa = 0.65) between the clinical level of diabetic retinopathy assessed from the undilated JVN images and the dilated ETDRS photos. Agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.87) for suggested referral to ophthalmology specialists for eye examinations. Comparison of individual lesions between the JVN images and the ETDRS photos and for interreader comparisons were comparable to the prior ETDRS study.

CONCLUSIONS

Undilated digital-video images using the JVN system were comparable photographs for the determination of diabetic retinopathy level. The results validate the agreement between nonmydriatic JVN images and dilated ETDRS photographs and suggest that this digital technique may be an effective telemedicine tool for remotely determining the level of diabetic retinopathy, suggesting timing of next retinal evaluation and identifying the need for prompt referral to ophthalmology specialists. Thus, the JVN system would be an appropriate tool for facilitating increased access of diabetic patients into recommended eye evaluations, but should not be construed as a paradigm that would replace the need for comprehensive eye examinations.

Fred Hollows lecture: digital screening for eye disease

The purpose of this study was to explore progress, in the adaptation to community screening for blinding eye disease, of digital imaging devices and technology for storage and transmission. Available imaging systems were compared to gold standard clinical photography in terms of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of common blinding eye conditions. Since the use of expensive non-portable imaging devices is likely to be limited for widespread community screening purposes, a portable fundus camera (Nidek, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) and a prototype monocular digital indirect ophthalmoscope constructed at the Lions Eye Institute (LEI) were selected for comparative trials for the screening of optic disc cupping, glaucoma and clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy. Fifty-one eyes of 27 consecutive patients being assessed at the LEI clinic for glaucoma were dilated and photographed with a Zeiss retinal camera, and digital images were taken with the portable Nidek NM100 fundus camera (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) or with a prototype digital monocular indirect ophthalmoscope. Vertical cup: disc ratios (VCDR) were measured on the disc photographs by one ophthalmologist while three other clinicians were presented with compressed digital images in random order to estimate VCDR. Field trials were also carried out to demonstrate the practicality of compression, local storage and then transmission by mobile telephone ISDN lines and satellite, of optic discs and fundus images of patients with diabetes in either rural Western Australia or Surabaya, Indonesia. Kappa values of correlations of measurement of agreement between measured and estimated VCDR were 0.87, 0.45 and 0.84, respectively, for the three observers, corresponding to a specificity of 79-97% and a sensitivity of 70-95%. The portable Nidek fundus camera was also assessed for specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in comparison to standard Zeiss fundus camera photographs. Of 49 eyes in 25 consecutive patients attending the LEI clinic for assessment of diabetic retinopathy, three ophthalmologists assessed photographs and images in random order. When used for screening diabetic retinopathy, the digital images of the Nidek camera were graded as adequate quality in only 56% of eyes compared to 93% of the photographs. The kappa value of agreement in analysis of diabetic retinopathy was only 0.30. The prototype digital monocular indirect ophthalmoscope compared favourably with the Nidek camera. At 1:5 compression, images of size 36 kB transmitted from Surabaya to Perth took 29 s on the mobile telephone, while uncompressed images took 170 s. Images compressed 1:5 were transmitted in 60 s using the satellite telephone, while the uncompressed images took 240 s. Satellite transmission was more expensive but the lines were more stable than telephone connections from Indonesia. Digital imaging is becoming a powerful tool for ophthalmology in clinical records, teaching and research, and interoffice diagnostic opinions. It also has enormous potential for community screening for blinding eye diseases, such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Inexpensive portable imaging devices that are easy to use, and on which local health workers might be trained, must be developed and validated in terms of sensitivity and specificity of performance. The technology of image capture, image compression, transmission, data base storage and analysis is rapidly evolving and becoming less expensive.

The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group (DDSG)

PURPOSE

The role of digital monochromatic nonmydriatic fundus photography as an adjunct in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy is evaluated.

METHODS

197 patients were sequentially evaluated by three different techniques: dilated ophthalmoscopy by an experienced ophthalmologist, performance of 7 standard color mydriatic stereo fields, and a single digital monochromatic nonmydriatic image incorporating the disc and macula. Stereo color photographs served as the reference standard and were compared to either ophthalmoscopy performed by a physician, or a single digital photograph transmitted electronically to a reading site and evaluated by a trained non-physician grader. Sensitivity and specificity of the three methods were compared. The decision as to whether or not to refer to an ophthalmologist for potential treatment (Kaiser modified ETDRS level > 21) was then chosen for analysis.

RESULTS

A single nonmydriatic monochromatic digital photograph appeared equivalent to standard color photography and more sensitive than mydriatic ophthalmoscopy in the detection of diabetic retinopathy in this patient population. Sensitivity of digital photography compared with color photography was 78%, and the specificity 86% contrasted with comparable ratios of 34% and 100% for ophthalmoscopy versus color photography. No patient identified by ophthalmoscopy alone for referral based on retinopathy level of > 21 would have been missed by a single digital monochromatic photographic image.

CONCLUSION

A single nonmydriatic monochromatic wide field digital photograph of the disc and macula in diabetic patients is a sensitive and cost-effective means for detecting diabetic retinopathy in high-risk populations.