Importance of core biopsy in the diagnosis of thyroid lymphoma

Effectiveness of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of thyroid lymphoma and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) and thyroid lymphoma (TL) clinically present as rapidly enlarging neck masses. Unfortunately, in this situation, like in any other thyroid swelling, a routine fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is the first and only diagnostic test performed at the initial contact in the average thyroid practice. FNA, however, has a low sensitivity in diagnosing ATC and TL, and by the time the often "inconclusive" result is known, precious time has evolved, before going for core-needle biopsy (CNB) or incisional biopsy (IB) as the natural next diagnostic steps.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic value of CNB in the clinical setting of a rapidly enlarging thyroid mass, via a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data on CNB reliability in the differential diagnosis of ATC and TL.

METHODS

A PubMed, Embase and Web of Science database search was performed on June 23th 2021. Population of interest comprised patients who underwent CNB for clinical or ultrasonographical suspicion of ATC or TL, patients with a final diagnosis of ATC or TL after CNB, or after IB following CNB.

RESULTS

From a total of 17 studies, 166 patients were included. One hundred and thirty-six were diagnosed as TL and 14 as ATC following CNB. CNB, with a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 94,3% and 100% for TL and 80,1% and 100% for ATC respectively, proved to be superior to FNA (reported sensitivity for TL of 48% and for ATC of 61%). Furthermore, the need for additional diagnostic surgery after CNB was only 6.2% for TL and 17.6% for ATC.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediately performing CNB for a suspected diagnosis of ATC and TL in a rapidly enlarging thyroid mass is more appropriate and straightforward than a stepped diagnostic pathway using FNA first and awaiting the result before doing CNB.

2019 Practice guidelines for thyroid core needle biopsy: a report of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association

Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) has been increasingly used for the pre-operative diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Since the Korean Society of the Thyroid Radiology published the ‘Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Thyroid CNB’ in 2017 and the Korean Endocrine Pathology Thyroid CNB Study Group published ‘Pathology Reporting of Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy’ in 2015, advances have occurred rapidly not only in the management guidelines for thyroid nodules but also in the diagnostic terminology and classification schemes. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) reviewed publications on thyroid CNB from 1995 to September 2019 and updated the recommendations and statements for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules using CNB. Recommendations for the resolution of clinical controversies regarding the use of CNB were based on expert opinion. These practical guidelines include recommendations and statements regarding indications for CNB, patient preparation, CNB technique, biopsy-related complications, biopsy specimen preparation and processing, and pathology interpretation and reporting of thyroid CNB.

Core Needle Biopsy of the Thyroid: 2016 Consensus Statement and Recommendations from Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology

Core needle biopsy (CNB) has been suggested as a complementary diagnostic method to fine-needle aspiration in patients with thyroid nodules. Many recent CNB studies have suggested a more advanced role for CNB, but there are still no guidelines on its use. Therefore, the Task Force Committee of the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology has developed the present consensus statement and recommendations for the role of CNB in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. These recommendations are based on evidence from the current literature and expert consensus.

The role of core-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy in 4580 patients with 4746 thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of core-needle biopsy (CNB) compared to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. The Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies using CNB for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, the incidence of non-diagnostic, inconclusive results, and the complications of CNB and FNA. To overcome the heterogeneity, additional analyses based on three, homogeneous inclusion criteria were performed and subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty eligible studies of 4580 patients (4746 nodules) were included. Both CNB and FNA demonstrated a high sensitivity (91 %, 74 %, respectively; p = .053) and specificity (99 %, 100 %, respectively; p = .914). The area under the curve was larger in CNB (0.99) than in FNA (0.94). CNB demonstrated a significantly lower pooled proportion of non-diagnostic (5.5 %; p < .001) and inconclusive results (8.0 %; p < .001) than FNA (22.6 %, 40.2 %, respectively). The complications rate of FNA (0.0 %) was lower than that of CNB (0.01 %), although not significantly (p = .948). This meta-analysis showed variable heterogeneities, i.e., no heterogeneity to considerable heterogeneity. Additional meta-analyses based on three, homogeneous inclusion criteria demonstrated that heterogeneities were reduced, and the results are in agreement with those of all of the included studies. Subgroup analyses have explained the cause of heterogeneity across studies. Both CNB and FNA may be acceptable diagnostic tools for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. CNB may be a complementary diagnostic tool in nodules with initially non-diagnostic and indeterminate results on previous FNA.

Core needle biopsy could reduce diagnostic surgery in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer or thyroid lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fine needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) or thyroid lymphoma (TL).

METHODS

Between January 2000 and March 2012, 104 patients were diagnosed with ATC or TL by means of ultrasound (US)-guided FNA, CNB, or surgery. This study ultimately included 99 patients with ATC (n = 59) or TL (n = 40). We evaluated the sensitivity and positive predictive value of FNA and CNB for the diagnosis of ATC and TL, and compared the rates of diagnostic surgery between FNA and CNB.

RESULTS

FNA was used in 83 patients, and CNB was used in 32 patients initially (n = 16), after FNA results (n = 8), or simultaneously with FNA (n = 8). CNB achieved sensitivity of 87.5 % (28/32) and positive predictive value of 100.0 % (28/28) for the diagnosis of ATC and TL. The respective values for FNA were 50.6 % (40/79) and 90.9 % (40/44). The rate of diagnostic surgery was significantly lower after CNB (4/32, 12.5 %) than after FNA (28/79, 35.4 %) (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

CNB was able to reduce unnecessary diagnostic surgery in patients with ATC or TL by virtue of its superior diagnostic sensitivity and positive predictive value compared to FNA.

KEY POINTS

• Diagnostic sensitivity and PPV for CNB were 87.5 % and 100.0 %, respectively. • The respective values for FNA were 50.6 % and 91.0 % for ATC and TL. • Diagnostic surgery rates were reduced after CNB compared to FNA (p = 0.020).

The Role of Core Needle Biopsy and Its Impact on Surgical Management in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Experience at 3 Medical Institutions

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Medullary thyroid carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy that is challenging to diagnose. Our aim was to present our experience using core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma compared with fine-needle aspiration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and March 2012, 202 thyroid nodules in 191 patients were diagnosed as medullary thyroid cancer by using sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration, core needle biopsy, or surgery. One hundred eighty-three thyroid nodules in 172 patients were included on the basis of the final diagnosis. We evaluated the sensitivity and positive predictive value of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer. We compared the rate of a delayed diagnosis, a diagnostic surgery, and surgery with an incorrect diagnosis for fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy and investigated the factors related to the fine-needle aspiration misdiagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer.

RESULTS

Fine-needle aspiration showed 43.8% sensitivity and 85.1% positive predictive value for the diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer; 25.7% (44/171) of patients had a delayed diagnosis, while 18.7% (32/171) underwent an operation for accurate diagnosis, and 20.5% (35/171) underwent an operation with an incorrect diagnosis. Core needle biopsy achieved 100% sensitivity and positive predictive value without a delay in diagnosis (0/22), the need for a diagnostic operation (0/22), or an operation for an incorrect diagnosis (0/22). A calcitonin level of <100 pg/mL was the only significant factor for predicting the fine-needle aspiration misdiagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer (P = .034).

CONCLUSIONS

Core needle biopsy showed a superior sensitivity and positive predictive value to fine-needle aspiration and could optimize the surgical management in patients with medullary thyroid cancer. Because the ability of fine-needle aspiration to diagnose medullary thyroid cancer significantly decreases in patients with serum calcitonin levels of <100 pg/mL, core needle biopsy could be indicated for these patients to optimize their surgical management.

Thyroid core needle biopsy: taking stock of the situation

Recently, the microhistologic evaluation by core needle biopsy (CNB) has been reported as high accurate to diagnose thyroid nodules with previous indeterminate or not adequate fine-needle aspiration cytology. In addition, sparse data have been reported regarding the use of CNB in other conditions. Aim of this review was to furnish the state of the art of this topic by summarizing published data about the diagnostic performance of CNB in thyroid lesions, and provide an easy to use reference for clinical practice. Sources encompass studies published through May 2014. Original articles were investigated and following specific aspects were discussed: 1. The "large" needle biopsy in 90's; 2. Complications by and patient's comfort with thyroid CNB; 3. Advantages provided by examination of a microhistologic sample of thyroid nodule; 4. Use of CNB in thyroid nodules with previous not adequate (Thy 1/Class 1/Category I) cytology; 5. Use of CNB in thyroid neoplasms (Thy 3/Class 3/Category III-IV) cytology; 6. Use of CNB in specific ultrasonographic presentations of thyroid nodules or in patients with peculiar clinical contexts; 7. First-line approach by CNB in thyroid nodules; 8. Immunohistochemistry and molecular tests on CNB samples; and 9. Future perspective.

Thin core biopsy should help to discriminate thyroid nodules cytologically classified as indeterminate. A new sampling technique

Indeterminate neoplasms (IN) represent the gray zone of thyroid cytology in which malignant and benign tumors cannot be discriminated. Recently, the approach by thin core needle biopsy has been proposed. Here we report a new thin core needle biopsy approach in 40 consecutive patients with thyroid IN at cytology. In this study, a 21-G needle was inserted into the nodule, advanced within the lesion, and moved ahead reaching extranodular tissue. The resulting sample allowed to evaluate the cytomorphology of nodular tissue, its relationship with extranodular parenchyma, and the nodule's capsule when present. All biopsies were adequate for diagnosis but one. Of the 39 adequate samples, 5 cases were papillary cancer as confirmed at histology, while 14 nodules avoided surgery because of Hürthle cell hyperplasia in thyroiditis (n = 6) and microfollicular adenomatous hyperplasia (n = 8). The remaining 20 cases were assessed as follicular neoplasms because of encapsulation and were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Of these, 6 had positive markers in different degree and 1/6 has follicular cancer at histology, while the other 14 were benign after surgery. Overall, this approach by thin core needle biopsy identified benignancy in 14/40 (35 %) IN avoiding surgery. As a conclusion, thin core biopsy should help to discern the nature of thyroid lesions cytologically classified as indeterminate, and it should be used as a complementary test in thyroid nodule assessment.