Effects of care pathways on stroke care practices at regional hospitals

Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators

IMPORTANCE

Despite advancements in stroke rehabilitation research, occupational therapy practitioners still face challenges with implementing research into routine practice. Although the development of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is one critical step along the knowledge translation continuum for the population of people with stroke, research is also needed to identify the most effective strategies for implementing EBPs with stroke survivors who are receiving occupational therapy services.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize research related to occupational therapy practitioners' implementation of EBPs in adult stroke rehabilitation.

DATA SOURCES

We searched four electronic databases-CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Academic Search Complete-and the peer-reviewed journal Implementation Science to identify relevant research studies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION

Studies that met the following inclusion criteria were included in the scoping review: published between January 2003 and January 2018, addressed the adult stroke population, and examined the implementation of occupational therapy interventions. Data were abstracted on the basis of recommendations from the seminal review framework established by Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Thematic analysis identified themes that emerged from the included studies.

FINDINGS

Twenty-five articles satisfied our inclusion parameters. Our analyses yielded three overarching themes: barriers to implementation, facilitators of implementation, and implementation strategies. Implementation strategies often consisted of multimodal knowledge translation training programs.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Although the stroke rehabilitation literature appears to have established the barriers to and facilitators of EBP implementation, greater attention to the identification of effective implementation strategies that promote the uptake of EBPs by occupational therapy practitioners is needed.

WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS

This article summarizes the contextual factors and effective strategies that may influence practitioners' implementation of stroke research findings in real-world practice.

Identifying and classifying indicators affected by performing clinical pathways in hospitals: a scoping review

AIM

To analyse the evidence regarding indicators affected by clinical pathways (CPW) in hospitals and offer suggestions for conducting comprehensive systematic reviews.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic scoping review and searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, OVID, Science Direct, ProQuest, EMBASE and PubMed. We also reviewed the reference lists of included studies. The criteria for inclusion of studies included experimental and quasi-experimental studies, implementing CPW in secondary and tertiary hospitals and investigating at least one indicator. Quality of included studies was assessed by two authors independently using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program for clinical trials and cohort studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Quasi-Experimental Studies.

RESULTS

Forty-seven out of 2191 studies met the eligibility and inclusion criteria. The majority of included studies had pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design and had been done in developed countries, especially the United States. The investigation of evidence resulted in identifying 62 indicators which were classified into three categories: input indicators, process and output indicators and outcome indicators. Outcome indicators were more frequent than other indicators. Complication rate, hospital costs and length of hospital stay were dominant in their own category. Indicators such as quality of life and adherence to guidelines have been considered in studies that were done in recent years.

CONCLUSION

Implementing CPW can affect different types of indicators such as input, process, output and outcome indicators, although outcome indicators capture more attention than other indicators. Patient-related indicators were dominant outcome indicators, whereas professional indicators and organizational factors were considered less extensively. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?: WHAT DOES THIS ARTICLE ADD?

Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The authors present an overview of the current evidence and management recommendations for evaluation and treatment of adults with acute ischemic stroke. The intended audiences are prehospital care providers, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators responsible for the care of acute ischemic stroke patients within the first 48 hours from stroke onset. These guidelines supersede the prior 2007 guidelines and 2009 updates.

METHODS

Members of the writing committee were appointed by the American Stroke Association Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee, representing various areas of medical expertise. Strict adherence to the American Heart Association conflict of interest policy was maintained throughout the consensus process. Panel members were assigned topics relevant to their areas of expertise, reviewed the stroke literature with emphasis on publications since the prior guidelines, and drafted recommendations in accordance with the American Heart Association Stroke Council's Level of Evidence grading algorithm.

RESULTS

The goal of these guidelines is to limit the morbidity and mortality associated with stroke. The guidelines support the overarching concept of stroke systems of care and detail aspects of stroke care from patient recognition; emergency medical services activation, transport, and triage; through the initial hours in the emergency department and stroke unit. The guideline discusses early stroke evaluation and general medical care, as well as ischemic stroke, specific interventions such as reperfusion strategies, and general physiological optimization for cerebral resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Because many of the recommendations are based on limited data, additional research on treatment of acute ischemic stroke remains urgently needed.

Telemedically provided stroke expertise beyond normal working hours. The Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care

BACKGROUND

State-of-the-art stroke management requires neurological expertise for the recognition of complex cerebrovascular syndromes or stroke-mimicking symptoms and initiation of proven acute therapies. Many community hospitals struggle to fulfill these premises particularly at evening/nighttimes or weekends. Telemedicine can improve that situation by offering rapid access to neurological expertise, but it has not been shown to what extent it is used beyond working times.

METHODS

The Telemedical Project for Integrated Stroke Care is a telemedical network of 2 stroke centers and 12 regional general hospitals with newly established stroke wards in Bavaria. This analysis comprises all teleconsultations from 1st February 2003 to 15th December 2006. The consultations were prospectively documented and categorized according to predefined indications and direct impact on clinical decisions. The teleconsultations were analyzed concerning whether they were requested during regular working time or during off-time (at evening/night times or weekends).

RESULTS

A total of 10,239 teleconsultations were carried out in 8,326 patients. The 6,679 patients with cerebrovascular diagnosis comprised 51% of all admitted stroke cases between 2003 and 2006. During off-time 6,306 consultations (62%) were requested; 1,598 teleconsultations yielded nonstroke diagnoses, with 68% beyond working hours. Of all presented stroke patients 567 (8.5%) received systemic thrombolysis, with 58% off-time. Interhospital transports were initiated in 1,050 patients (10.5% of all), mainly for specific diagnostic workup or interventional treatments. Sixty percent of these transfers were launched off-time.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of teleconsultations were requested beyond normal working times and a significant proportion had an immediate impact on clinical decisions.