Non-invasive computed tomography angiography in the assessment of coronary stent patency: an Australian experience

CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future

Coronary stenting became a mainstay in coronary revascularization therapy. Despite tremendous advances in therapy, in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a key problem after coronary stenting. Coronary CT angiography evolved as a valuable tool in the diagnostic workup of patients after coronary revascularization therapy. It has a negative predictive value in the range of 98% for ruling out significant ISR. As CT imaging of coronary stents depends on patient and stent characteristics, patient selection is crucial for success. Ideal candidates have stents with a diameter of 3 mm and more. Nevertheless, even with most recent CT scanners, about 8% of stents are not accessible mostly due to blooming or motion artifacts. While the diagnosis of ISR is currently based on the visual assessment of the stent lumen, functional information on the hemodynamic significance of in-stent stenosis became available with the most recent generation of dual source CT scanners. This paper provides a comprehensive overview on previous developments, current techniques, and clinical evidence for cardiac CT in patients with coronary artery stents.

Percutaneous revascularization in a patient with anomalous origin of left main coronary artery

Anomalous origin of the coronary artery from opposite coronary sinus is infrequently observed during coronary angiography. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of anomalous coronary artery is technically difficult and challenging. It requires appropriate selection of guide catheters for adequate stability, coaxial alignment and backup support during the intervention. We hereby report a rare case of anomalous origin of left main coronary artery (LM) from the right coronary sinus, having a retro-aortic course to the left side before its bifurcation into left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex artery. The 59-year-old man had successful PCI of atherosclerotic LAD lesions. A 64-slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) performed at 4 years of follow-up demonstrated patency of coronary stents and also delineated the origin and course of the anomalous LM. The case illustrates the rarity of anomalous LM, and describes technical issues during PCI and the role of MDCT in coronary anomaly imaging.

Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress?

BACKGROUND

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has demonstrated promise in the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature regarding the improved diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice MDCT.

METHODS

An EMBASE, OVID, PubMed and Cochrane Library database search was performed using the key words 'computed tomography' matched with the terms 'coronary artery' or 'coronary angiography' to identify English-language articles examining MDCT cardiac imaging. Studies that compared 16-slice or 64-slice MDCT with catheter-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in nonrevascularized, poststent and post-coronary artery bypass graft patients were included. Data were pooled to obtain a weighted sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for MDCT. Negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated based on sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Currently, 15 studies involving 1008 patients have examined the efficacy of 64-slice MDCT in the assessment of coronary artery stenosis (more than 50% luminal narrowing). In these studies, 64-slice MDCT has demonstrated a sensitivity (89%), specificity (96%) and diagnostic accuracy (95%) similar to that of 16-slice MDCT. However, 64-slice MDCT was able to assess 5% more coronary artery segments than 16-slice MDCT. In revascularized patients, MDCT can accurately assess both bypass graft occlusion and stenosis. The 64-slice MDCT is also capable of adequately detecting in-stent restenosis. Improvements in spatial and temporal resolution with 64-slice technology have decreased the occurrence of high attenuation and motion artefacts that plagued the previous generation of MDCT scanners.

CONCLUSION

MDCT offers an accurate assessment of the coronary arteries, stented arteries and bypass grafts. The improved accuracy and safety of MDCT may reduce the need for catheter-based coronary angiography.

Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomography angiography (MDCT) for detection of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients treated with coronary stenting when compared to invasive catheter angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of PUBMED and MEDLINE databases for English literature was performed. Only studies with at least 10 patients comparing 16- or more detector rows MDCT angiography with invasive catheter angiography in the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis (more than 50% stenosis) were included for analysis. Sensitivity and specificity estimates pooled across studies were tested using a fixed effects model.

RESULTS

15 studies met selection criteria for inclusion in the analysis. There were eight studies performed with 16-detector row CT scanners, and five studies with 64-detector row scanners and one study with a 40-detector scanner. The remaining study was performed with a mixture of 16-and 64-detector row scanners. Prevalence of in-stent restenosis following coronary stenting was 18% (95% CI: 13, 24%). Pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of overall MDCT angiography for the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis was 85% (95% CI: 78, 90%) and 97% (95% CI: 95, 98%), respectively. No significant difference was found between 16- and 64-detector row scanners regarding the sensitivity and specificity of MDCT for assessment of in-stent restenosis (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that MDCT angiography (with 16 or more detector rows) has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis when compared to invasive catheter angiography. A high specificity value of MDCT may be most valuable as a non-invasive technique of excluding coronary stent restenosis or occlusion. The main factors affecting visualization are stent diameters and stent materials.