Cervical cancer screening in north east Thailand using the visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) test and its relationship to high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) status

Diagnostic accuracy for alternative cervical cancer screening strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of screening cervical cancer tests as alternative standalone methods. The combined estimates of sensitivity of visual inspection with acetic acid, visual inspection with lugol's iodine, conventional pap smear, liquid-based cytology, High risk HPV testing by clinician, High risk HPV testing by self- sampling, cervicography were 64%, 80%, 55%, 70%, 70% and 67% respectively; the combine values of specificity of these screening strategies were 88%, 88%, 96%, 59%, 94%, and 95% respectively. Our findings draw attention to an attractive opinion to facilitate the collection of specimens for DNA HPV by patients in settings where they don't have access to a regular screening programs.

Update on organ preserving surgical strategies for penile cancer

With the passage of time, there has been a major paradigm shift in the surgical management of penile cancer from radical to organ preserving penile surgical techniques, with closer surgical margins which offer good oncological, cosmetic and functional outcomes with improved physical and psychosexual well-being. This article aims to provide an update of the current organ preserving surgical strategies for penile cancer.

Cervical screening strategies in resourced and resource-constrained countries

Screening for cervical cancer is well established in resourced countries, but in resource-constrained countries, it is almost non-existent at national level. In resourced countries, the Pap test forms the hallmark of screening, with the human papillomavirus DNA test a recent adjunct. In many resourced countries, however, screening for cervical cancer is still far from ideal. A coverage around 50% prevails in some countries, and few have reached the target of 80% or more. Furthermore, the human papillomavirus test and newly developed biomarkers may lead to the development of a 'super test', which could be applied less frequently compared with present-day cytological screening. In resource-constrained countries, the movement is towards a 'screen and treat' approach. The main screening methods under investigation are the visual inspection after diluted acetic acid application test and the human papillomavirus test. Cryotherapy and large loop excision of the transformation zone have been used most often as treatment methods. The ideal seems to be the human papillomavirus test with large loop excision of the transformation zone, provided a low-cost human papillomavirus test becomes available. Coverage is even a greater problem in resource-constrained countries, a problem in need of urgent attention. Resource-constrained countries, however, must curtail the high incidence of cervical cancer, which is often a lower priority than other pressing healthcare needs.

Cervical cancer screening in primary health care setting in Sudan: a comparative study of visual inspection with acetic acid and Pap smear

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of visual inspection with the use of acetic acid (VIA) as a screening method for cervical cancer, an alternative to the Pap smear used in primary health care setting in Sudan, and to compare sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and histological diagnosis of positive cases of both tests.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 934 asymptomatic women living in Khartoum, Sudan, was conducted during 2009-2010. A semi-structured questionnaire containing socio-economic and reproductive variables was used to collect data from each participant. Methods of screening used were VIA and conventional Pap smear, followed by colposcopy and biopsy for confirmation of the positive results of both screening tests.

RESULTS

The tests identified altogether 119 (12.7%) positive women. VIA detected significantly more positive women than Pap smear (7.6% versus 5.1%; P = 0.004), with an overlap between the two screening tests in 19% of positive results. There was no significant difference between VIA and Pap smear findings and sociodemographic and reproductive factors among screened women. Use of colposcopy and biopsy for positive women confirmed that 88/119 (73.9%) were positive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. VIA had higher sensitivity than Pap smear (74.2% versus 72.9%; P = 0.05) respectively. Out of 88 confirmed positive cases, 22 (25.0%) cases were invasive cervical cancer in stage 1, of which 19 versus three were detected by VIA and Pap smear respectively (P = 0.001). VIA had higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Pap smear (60.2% versus 47.7%) and (41.9% versus 83.8%) respectively. The combination of VIA/Pap has better sensitivity and specificity than each independent test (82.6% and 92.2%).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study showed that VIA has higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared to Pap smear, but a combination of both tests has greater sensitivity and specificity than each test independently. It indicates that VIA is useful for screening of cervical cancer in the primary health care setting in Sudan, but positive results need to be confirmed by colposcopy and biopsy.