The use of intra-operative endo-anal ultrasound in perianal disease

Fistula development after anal abscess drainage-a multicentre retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Anal abscesses are common and, despite correct treatment with surgical drainage, carry the risk of developing fistulas. Studies identifying risk factors for the development of anal fistulas are sparse. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for anal fistulas after anal abscess surgery.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing acute surgery for anal abscesses in the Capital Region of Denmark between 2018 and 2019. The patients were identified using ICD-10 codes for anal abscesses. Predefined clinicopathological factors and postoperative courses were extracted from patient records.

RESULTS

A total of 475 patients were included. At a median follow-up time of 1108 days (IQR 946-1320 days) following surgery, 164 (33.7%) patients were diagnosed with an anal fistula. Risk factors for developing fistulas were low intersphincteric (OR 2.77, 95CI 1.50-5.06) and ischioanal (OR 2.48, 95CI 1.36-4.47) abscesses, Crohn's disease (OR 5.96, 95CI 2.33-17.2), a history of recurrent anal abscesses (OR 4.14, 95CI 2.47-7.01) or repeat surgery (OR 5.96, 95CI 2.33-17.2), E. coli-positive pus cultures (OR 4.06, 1.56-11.4) or preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) of more than 100 mg/L (OR 3.21, 95CI 1.57-6.71).

CONCLUSION

Several significant clinical risk factors were associated with fistula development following anal abscess surgery. These findings are clinically relevant and could influence the selection of patients for specialised follow-up, facilitate expedited diagnosis, and potentially prevent unnecessarily long treatment courses.

Impact of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound on the outcome of anal fistula surgery: a prospective cohort study

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) on postoperative outcome in patients with anal fistula.

METHOD

This prospective study compared clinical and functional outcomes of patients with and without preoperative 3D-EAUS examination 1 year after anal fistula surgery. Patients were prospectively followed and evaluated by a standardized protocol including physical examination, the Wexner Incontinence Score (WIS) and anorectal manometry, at baseline and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were enrolled. There were no significant differences in demographic and operative parameters, except for operation time, between the two groups. At 1 year follow-up, the overall recurrence rates were 8.8% (9/102) in the 3D-EAUS group and 13.8% (13/94) in the examination under anaesthesia (EUA) group. In the subgroup of patients with complex fistulae, the recurrence rate was numerically lower in the 3D-EAUS group (12.8% vs 22.5%; P = 0.26). The WIS in the EUA group significantly worsened (0.35 ± 0.94 vs 1.07 ± 1.59; P = 0.003) with a decreased the number of fully continent patients (82.5% vs 55%; P = 0.008) while neither the WIS nor the proportion of fully continent patients changed in the 3D-EAUS group. Fewer patients in the 3D-EAUS group developed incontinence postoperatively (6.7% vs 33.3%; P = 0.012) and they had better maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure than the EUA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative use of 3D-EAUS had a favourable impact on the outcome of surgical treatment for anal fistulae, especially in those with complex anal fistula. It should be routinely used in the clinical setting.

Role of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the preoperative assessment of perianal sepsis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the diagnosis of perianal sepsis comparing the results with the surgical findings, considered as reference standard.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2013, all the patients referred for the assessment and treatment of perianal sepsis with suspected anorectal origin were enrolled in the study. All patients gave informed written consent. Prior to surgery, all the patients underwent anamnestic evaluation, clinical examination, and unenhanced and H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS. Surgery was performed by a colorectal surgeon blinded to the 3D-EAUS results.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients with suspected perianal suppurations were assessed during the study period. In 12 patients, the H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS was not performed, and so, they were excluded from the study. Very good agreement between 3D-EAUS and examination under anesthesia (EUA) in the classification of primary fistula tracts (kappa = 0.93) and in the identification of fistula internal opening (kappa = 0.97) was found. There was a good concordance (kappa = 0.71) between 3D-EAUS and surgery in the detection of fistula secondary extensions. The overall sensitivity and specificity of 3D-EAUS in the diagnosis of perianal sepsis were 98.3 and 91.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

3D-EAUS is a safe and reliable technique in the assessment of perianal sepsis. It may assist the surgeon in delineating the fistula tract anatomy and in determining the origin of sepsis, supporting the preoperative planning of definitive and appropriate surgical therapy.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformations: new discoveries

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Fecal incontinence and constipation are common problems in follow-up of anorectal malformations (ARMs). We evaluated the anal sphincters using the 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS) and the anorectal manometry after ARMs repair.

METHODS

Seventeen patients, divided into 3 groups according to Wingspread classification, underwent anorectal manometry and 3D-EAUS. Clinical, manometric, and endosonographic scoring systems were used.

RESULTS

The average anal resting pressure (aARP) was significantly higher in low ARMs than in intermediate and high ARMs. The anal squeeze pressure was not statistically different between the 3 groups. Three-dimensional EAUS visualized internal anal sphincter (IAS) disruptions in 7 of 17 patients and absence of IAS in 6 of 17 children with high ARMs. Scars of the external anal sphincter were localized in low ARMs and generalized in the other groups. In the case of IAS disruption with aARP greater than 20 mm Hg, fecal incontinence and constipation improved with biofeedback and/or laxatives, whereas daily enemas were necessary in absence of IAS with aARP less than 20 mm Hg. Statistical correlation was observed between endosonographic and manometric findings and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions of the anal sphincter are common in ARMs. Three-dimensional EAUS and anorectal manometry ensure a complete assessment of the anal sphincter and could provide useful information to define the most appropriate treatments to improve the quality of life.

Prognostic value of endoanal ultrasound for fistula-in-ano: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess whether preoperative endoanal ultrasound plays a prognostic role in the surgical outcome of anal fistula.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted at a single institution.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients underwent 83 studies. Indications for endoanal ultrasound included complex fistulas and tracts, multiple external openings, recurrent fistulas, and/or failed previous surgical intervention. Mean age was 51.7 years. Fifty-three patients (77 percent) were men. Mean duration of symptoms was 3.1 years. Forty-nine patients (71 percent) had undergone previous surgical intervention to eradicate sepsis or fistula. Sixty patients (87 percent) underwent surgical interventions and were divided into two groups: Group A (73.3 percent), concordance with ultrasound findings; and Group B (26.7 percent), nonconcordance. Mean follow-up in the surgical group was 15.6 months. Measured outcome was total number of operations per patient and failure rate of primary surgical intervention. No difference was noted in mean total number of operations between Group A (1.57) and Group B (1.69) (P = 0.71). There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward a higher failure rate of the primary intervention in the nonconcordance group [failure rate 18.2 percent in Group A vs. 25 percent in Group B (P = 0.72)].

CONCLUSIONS

The findings and accuracy of preoperative endoanal ultrasound did not influence postoperative outcome.