Investigation to predict faecal continence in patients undergoing reversal of a defunctioning stoma (Porridge enema test)

The Water-Holding Procedure for Ensuring Postoperative Continence Prior Restoring Intestinal Continuity

BACKGROUND

A defunctioning stoma can become necessary in a relevant number of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. As a matter of course, patients seek an early closure of the stoma. However, preoperative management of these patients varies and the prediction of continence after stoma removal can become challenging. Patients might be fully continent despite low manometric pressures and vice versa. An easy and reliable way to predict continence after stoma reversal would improve patients' management and outcome. Although frequently performed in various surgical centers in Germany, there is no published data on the water-holding test. Hence, this is the first study evaluating the role of the test in clinical practice.

METHOD

We performed a prospective pilot study to evaluate the role of anorectal manometry and the water-holding procedure as a predictor of postoperative continence prior to stoma reversal. Inclusion criteria were a successfully passed water-holding test, any type of fecal diversion and the possibility of restoring intestinal continuity. Preoperative low manometric pressure levels were not an exclusion criteria for stoma reversal. Fifty-two patients with ostomy were consecutively enrolled in this study between October 2013 and February 2016. Anorectal manometry was performed in all patients prior to stoma reversal. After stoma removal, patients were followed-up for 6 months. Postoperative incontinence was determined using the Wexner incontinence score.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients (38 males, 14 females) were included at an average age of 59 (range 33-83) years. Most frequent indications for intestinal diversion were rectal cancer surgery, IBD-related surgery, or surgery for diverticular disease. Low anterior rectal resection was performed in 17 patients (32.7%), followed by a proctocolectomy in 9 (17.3%), colectomy in 9 (17.3%), and recto-sigmoid resection in 7 patients (13.5%). Median time from stoma creation to reversal was 206 days (range 48-871 days). All patients had successfully passed the standardized water-holding test. At the same time, the majority of patients had low preoperative manometric pressure values and would normally not have been reversed at that point. The median postoperative Wexner incontinence score was at 1.5 (range 0-20), 0.5 (range 0-14), and 0 (range 0-11) at 14, 60, and 180 days after stoma reversal. Low preoperative manometric squeeze and/or resting pressure levels were not associated with a higher postoperative incontinence score at 14, 60, or 180 days after stoma reversal.

CONCLUSION

A standardized water-holding test can function as an easy and reliable method before stoma reversal to predict sufficient postoperative fecal continence. In case of a sufficient water-holding test despite low manometric pressure levels, the risk for postoperative anal incontinence seems to be low. Preoperative manometric pressure levels do not appear to predict postoperative continence.

Anorectal function evaluation and predictive factors for faecal incontinence in 600 patients

AIM

Anorectal function was assessed in patients with and without faecal incontinence (FI) . Risk factors predictive for FI were determined.

METHOD

Between 2003 and 2009, all consecutive patients referred were assessed by questionnaire, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Predictive factors were identified and used to develop a statistical model to predict FI.

RESULTS

Of 600 patients (519 women), 285 (48%) were faecally incontinent. In comparison with continent women, incontinent women (mean Vaizey score 15.4), were older, had more liquid stools, more deliveries, more urinary incontinence, lower anal pressures, shorter sphincter length, smaller rectal capacity and more sphincter defects. Incontinent men (mean Vaizey score 15.3) were older and had lower anal pressures. Incontinent and continent patients showed an overlap in test results. Predictors in women were age, stool consistency, anal pressures, rectal capacity, and internal and external sphincter defects. The area under the ROC-curve was 0.84 (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.87). Using a cut off point of 0.4, FI was predicted with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 86%, 68%, 74% and 82%, respectively. The model was studied in five women with a temporary stoma and was accurate in predicting FI after stoma closure.

CONCLUSION

Incontinent patients have lower pressures, smaller rectal capacity and more sphincter defects than controls, but show a large overlap. Our model shows a relatively high sensitivity and negative predictive value for predicting FI in women. The model seems promising in the patients studied with a temporary stoma.

Does a defunctioning stoma affect anorectal function after low rectal resection? Results of a randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Anorectal function is often impaired after low anterior resection of the rectum. Many factors affect the functional outcome and not all are known.

OBJECTIVE

This trial aimed to assess whether a temporary defunctioning stoma affected anorectal function after the patients had been stoma-free for a year.

DESIGN

Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Twenty-one Swedish hospitals performing surgery for rectal cancer participated.

PATIENTS

Patients who had undergone low anterior resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum were eligible.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive a defunctioning stoma or no stoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anorectal function was evaluated with a questionnaire after patients had been without a stoma for 12 months. Questions pertained to stool frequency, urgency, fragmentation of bowel movements, evacuation difficulties, incontinence, lifestyle alterations, and whether patients would prefer a permanent stoma.

RESULTS

After exclusion of patients in whom stomas became permanent, a total of 181 (90%) of 201 patients answered the questionnaire (90 in the stoma group and 91 in the no-stoma group). The median number of stools was 3 during the day and 0 at night in both groups. Inability to defer defecation for 15 minutes was reported in 35% of patients in the stoma group and 25% in the no stoma group (P = .15). Median scores were the same in each group regarding need for medication, evacuation difficulties, fragmentation of bowel movements, incontinence, and effects on well-being. Two patients (2.2%) in the stoma group and 3 patients (3.3%) in the no-stoma group would have preferred a permanent stoma.

LIMITATIONS

Because this study was an analysis of secondary end points of a randomized trial, no prestudy power calculation was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

A defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection did not affect anorectal function evaluated after 1 year. Many patients experienced impaired anorectal function, but nearly all preferred having impaired anorectal function to a permanent stoma.

Retention test in sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence

INTRODUCTION

Sacral nerve stimulation has become an established treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. However, the mechanism of its action remains obscure. We aim to assess whether sacral nerve stimulation improves patients' ability to retain rectal content.

METHODS

Patients who had been treated successfully with sacral nerve stimulation underwent four retention tests during which the stimulator was turned either on or off. Both the patients and investigators were blinded to the status of the stimulator. The retention test results were assessed for interassessment agreement and for any differences between the on and off phases. Wexner scores, anorectal physiology tests, and patients' perceptions of stimulator settings were also recorded.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (16 women; mean age, 57.5 years) took part in the study. Retention tests showed moderate interassessment agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa index, 0.45). There were no sharp differences in retained volume between the stimulator's on and off phases (median 50 (range, 0-300) mL vs. 50 (range, 0-300) mL; P = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve stimulation does not alter patients' ability to retain rectal content. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanism of sacral nerve stimulation.