Comparative study of Contour Transtar and STARR procedure for the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS)--feasibility, morbidity and early functional results

Surgical management of the rectocele - An update

Rectocele is defined as a hernia of the rectum with protrusion of the anterior rectal wall through the posterior wall of the vagina. This condition occurs commonly, with an estimated prevalence of 30-50% of women over age 50. The symptomatology that leads to consultation is variable but consists predominantly of anorectal and/or gynecological complaints such as dyschezia, requiring digital disimpaction maneuvers, pelvic heaviness, anal incontinence, or dyspareunia. Rectocele may be isolated or associated with other disorders of pelvic stasis involving cystocele and uterine prolapse. Complementary exams (dynamic imaging and anorectal manometry) are essential before deciding on the surgical management of this condition. The indications for surgical management of rectocele are based on the intensity of symptoms and the resulting deterioration in quality of life, and surgery should be discussed after failure of medical treatment. Different approaches are possible, although there is currently no real consensus in the literature. The initial approach depends on the type of rectocele: if it involves the low or mid rectum or is isolated, an approach from below (transanal, transperineal, or transvaginal approach) can be proposed, while, in the presence of a high rectocele and/or associated with various disorders of pelvic stasis, transabdominal rectopexy is more suitable.

Standard stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled transanal rectal resection with one high-volume stapler to prevent complications in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The causes of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) can actually be either functional or mechanical (primary or secondary deficit of the sensitivity, slow bowel transit, pelvic floor dyssynergia, internal and external rectal prolapse, recto-anal intussusceptions, anterior or posterior rectocele and pelvic prolapse of the bladder, uterus, bowel or sigma). The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and feasibility of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure performed by a single or double stapler through clinical and functional outcomes for transanal stapled surgery.

METHODS

From January 2016 to October 2017, ninety patients with ODS secondary to rectal prolapse, anal-rectal intussusception and anterior rectocele, that underwent to a STARR procedure were enrolled. Thirty of these underwent a STARR procedure with double circular stapler PPH-01 (Group A); 30 with single circular stapler CPH34HV with a purse string suture (Group B); and 30 with single circular stapler CPH34HV with a "parachute technique" (Group C). All patients were selected with clinical examination, Wexner score for fecal incontinence and ODS score for constipation. Patients also underwent a Defeco RMN for an anatomical and dynamic evaluation of the pelvic floor.

RESULTS

No recurrence rates were observed in the three groups. The mean operative time was 46.3 minutes in group A; 34.5 minutes in group B; and 37.6 minutes in Group C. The volume of the resected specimen was 17 mL in group A; 15 mL in group B; and 16 mL in Group C. Complications were bleeding (3.3% in group A); fecal urgency (6.6% in group A, 10% in group B and 3.3% in group C); rectal hematoma (3.3% in group A). all symptoms significantly improved after the operation without differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The STARR technique performed with a single stapler CPH34HV is safe, faster and less expensive than the STARR performed by a double PPH01. Besides, with the parachute technique, it is possible to resect asymmetric prolapses.

STARR with Contour Transtar for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Long-Term Results

INTRODUCTION

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a widespread and disabling syndrome. With this study, we want to evaluate the long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) performed with Contour Transtar device in the treatment for ODS. A re-evaluation of 113 patients subjected to STARR from June 2007 to January 2010 was conducted.

METHODS

All the patients treated for symptomatic ODS with STARR with Contour Transtar were included in the study. We re-evaluate all patients treated in the study period with clinical examination and specific questionnaire to verify the stability of the functional results and the satisfaction at 5 years from surgery. Constipation was graded using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; eventual use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively, 6 months and 5 years after surgery. Long-term complications were also investigated.

RESULTS

Constipation intensity decreased from the preoperative value of 15.8 (±4.9) to 5.2 (±3.9) (p < 0.0001) at 6 months and remained stable after 5 years (7.4 ± 4.1; p < 0.01). Patients who use laxatives and enema decrease from 74 (77%) and 27 (28%) to only 16 (17%; p < 0.001) and 5 (5%; p < 0.001), respectively, at 5-year follow-up. None continue to help themselves with digitations after surgery. Also the satisfaction rate remained stable (3.64 vs 3.81) during the 5 years of the study.

CONCLUSION

The long-term results have demonstrated the efficacy of the STARR with Contour Transtar in treating ODS and the stability over time of the defecatory improvements.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02971332.

The evolution of transanal surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome: Mid-term results from a randomized study comparing double TST 36 HV and Contour TRANSTAR staplers

A randomized study was carried out to compare the mid-term outcome of transanal rectal resection with the CCS-30 TRANSTAR and two TST36 staplers in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. After selection, patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups:104 underwent a TRANSTAR operation and 104 a transanal rectal resection with two TST36 staplers. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, and defecography. Cumulative complication rate was significantly higher in TRANSTAR operation (P = 0.019). All symptoms and defecographic parameters significantly improved (P < 0.001), without differences. Costs were significantly lower with double TST (P = 0.035). Recurrence rates were 6.2% in TRANSTAR group and 11.4% with double TST (P = 0.206). Two circular TST 36 staplers consent to obtain the same clinical and functional results than the CCS-30, with significantly lower complication rate and costs.

Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations: Results III: Rectal wall excisional procedures (Rectal Excision)

AIM

To assess the outcomes of rectal excisional procedures in adults with chronic constipation.

METHOD

Standardised methods and reporting of benefits and harms were used for all CapaCiTY reviews that closely adhered to PRISMA 2016 guidance. Main conclusions were presented as summary evidence statements with a summative Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2009) level.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were identified, providing data on outcomes in 8340 patients. Average length of procedures was 44 min and length of stay (LOS) was 3 days. There was inadequate evidence to determine variations in procedural duration or LOS by type of procedure. Overall morbidity rate was 16.9% (0-61%), with lower rates observed after Contour Transtar procedure (8.9%). No mortality was reported after any procedures in a total of 5896 patients. Although inconsistently reported, good or satisfactory outcome occurred in 73-80% of patients; a reduction of 53-91% in Longo scoring system for obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) occurred in about 68-76% of patients. The most common long-term adverse outcome is faecal urgency, typically occurring in up to 10% of patients. Recurrent prolapse occurred in 4.3% of patients. Patients with at least 3 ODS symptoms together with a rectocoele with or without an intussusception, who have failed conservative management, may benefit from a rectal excisional procedure.

CONCLUSION

Rectal excisional procedures are safe with little major morbidity. It is not possible to advise which excisional technique is superior from the point of view of efficacy, peri-operative variables, or harms. Future study is required.

[Transtar™ operation for rectocele and obstructed defecation syndrome]

The Contour® Transtar™ operation represents a further methodological development of conventional transanal stapled rectal resection (STARR) for the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) and/or full thickness rectal prolapse. In contrast to the conventional STARR technique a specially designed single curved stapler is used with which the rectal wall is incised in a circular fashion and anastomosed. This results in a monoblock resection with almost unlimited extent of resection. In multicenter studies the procedure has generally been shown to be effective for treatment of ODS with intussusception and rectocele. In comparison to conventional STARR the resected tissue samples are larger and the functional effectiveness is comparable. Furthermore, data from prospective randomized trials revealed higher effectiveness in long-term follow-up. With reference to full thickness rectal prolapse, feasibility studies have been performed which showed low morbidity but long-term follow-up studies suggest a high recurrence rate of >40 %.

Transanal surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome: Literature review and a single-center experience

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a functional disorder commonly encountered by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists, and greatly affects the quality of life of patients from both societal and psychological aspects. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes of ODS are complex. However, intra-rectal intussusception and rectocele are frequently found in patients with ODS and both are thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of ODS. With the development of evaluation methods in anorectal physiology laboratories and radiology studies, a great variety of new operative procedures, especially transanal procedures, have been invented to treat ODS. However, no procedure has been proved to be superior to others at present. Each operation has its own merits and defects. Thus, choosing appropriate transanal surgical procedures for the treatment of ODS remains a challenge for all surgeons. This review provides an introduction of the current problems and options for treatment of ODS and a detailed summary of the essential assessments needed for patient evaluation before carrying out transanal surgery. Besides, an overview of the benefits and problems of current transanal surgical procedures for treatment of ODS is summarized in this review. A report of clinical experience of some transanal surgical techniques used in the authors’ center is also presented.

Evaluating the Surgeons’ Perception of Difficulties of Two Techniques to Perform STARR for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

Background. After initial enthusiasm in the use of a dedicated curved stapler (CCS-30 Contour Transtar) to perform stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), difficulties have emerged in this surgical technique. Objective. First, to compare surgeons’ perception of difficulties of STARR performed with only Transtar versus STARR performed with the combined use of linear staplers and Transtar to cure ODS associated with large internal prolapse and rectocele; second, to compare the postoperative incidence of the urge to defecate between the 2 STARR procedures. Design and Setting. An Italian multicenter randomized trial involving 25 centers of colorectal surgery. Patients. Patients with obstructed defecation syndrome and rectocele or rectal intussusception, treated between January and December 2012. Interventions. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo STARR with a curved alone stapler (CAS group) or with the combined use of linear and curved staplers (LCS group). Main Outcome Measures. Primary end-points were the evaluation of surgeons’ perception of difficulties score and the incidence of the “urge to defecate” at 3-month follow up. Secondary end-points included duration of hospital stay, rates of early and late complications, incidence of “urge to defecate” at 6 and 12 months, success of the procedures at 12 months of follow-up. Results. Of 771 patients evaluated, 270 patients (35%) satisfied the criteria. Follow-up data were available for 254 patients: 128 patients (114 women) in the CAS group (mean age, 52.1; range, 39-70 years) and 126 (116 women) in LCS group (mean age, 50.7 years; range, 41-75 years). The mean surgeons’ perception score, was 15.36 (SD, 3.93) in the CAS group and 12.26 (SD, 4.22) in the LCS group ( P < .0001; 2-sample t test). At 3-month follow-up, urge to defecate was observed in 18 (14.6%) CAS group patients and in 13 (10.7%) LCS group patients ( P = .34; Fisher’s exact test). These values drastically decrease at 6 months until no urge to defecate in all patients at 12 months was observed. At 12-month follow-up, a successful outcome was achieved in 100 (78.1%) CAS group patients and in 105 (83.3%) LCS group patients ( P = .34; Fisher’s exact test). No significant differences between groups were observed in the hospital stay and rates of early or late complications occurring after STARR. Conclusions. STARR with Transtar associated with prior decomposition of prolapse, using linear staplers, seems to be less difficult than that without decomposition. Both procedures appear to be safe and effective in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome resulting in similar success rates and complications.

A transanal procedure using TST STARR Plus for the treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: 'A mid-term study'. Int J Surg. 2016;32:58-64. [PMID: 27345262 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.039]

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and outcomes of TST STARR (Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection) plus to treat Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) at mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

From April 2013 to September 2014, 50 cases (7 male patients) with ODS caused by rectocele and/or internal rectal prolapse were treated with the new TST STARR Plus. Clinical data from the 18 month mid-term follow up, including efficacy and constipations were recorded.

RESULTS

The average duration of surgery was 21 ± 4 min (range 12-35 min). The average postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range 4-8 days). The pathological findings showed that the specimens contained full-thickness rectal tissue in all patients. The mean volume of resected specimen was 12.3 cm(3). Postoperative complications included five cases with transient faecal urgency that dissipated after 3 months; one patient suffered anastomotic bleeding on the sixth day after surgery, with successful haemostasis achieved through conservative therapy. The Wexner constipation score improved in patients affected by ODS from 13.96 ± 2.37 preoperatively to 7.00 ± 3.90, 7.28 ± 3.91, 8.10 ± 4.05 and 8.44 ± 4.08 at 3,6,12 and 18 months postoperatively, respectively, with all p < 0.05. Overall outcome was reported as ''excellent'' in 42% of patients, ''good'' in 36% of patients, ''adequate'' in 12% of patients, and ''poor'' in 10% of patients after 18 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The TST STARR Plus is a simple, safe, and effective option for selected patients with ODS. Long-term prospective clinical studies are needed to validate the advantages of this emerging, novel procedure.

Management of obstructed defecation

The management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is mainly conservative and mainly consists of fiber diet, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation or hydrocolontherapy, biofeedback, transanal electrostimulation, yoga and psychotherapy. According to our experience, nearly 20% of the patients need surgical treatment. If we consider ODS an “iceberg syndrome”, with “emerging rocks”, rectocele and rectal internal mucosal prolapse, that may benefit from surgery, at least two out of ten patients also has “underwater rocks” or occult disorders, such as anismus, rectal hyposensation and anxiety/depression, which mostly require conservative treatment. Rectal prolapse excision or obliterative suture, rectocele and/or enterocele repair, retrograde Malone’s enema and partial myotomy of the puborectalis muscle are effective in selected cases. Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy may be an effective surgical option. Stapled transanal rectal resection may lead to severe complications. The Transtar procedure seems to be safer, when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception. A multidisciplinary approach to ODS provides the best results.

Surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome-is there an ideal technique

Obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is a common disorder with a considerable impact on the quality of life of affected patients. Surgery for ODS remains a challenging topic. There exists a great variety of operative techniques to treat patients with ODS. According to the surgeon’s preference the approach can be transanal, transvaginal, transperineal or transabdominal. All techniques have its advantages and disadvantages. Notably, high evidence based studies are significantly lacking in literature, thus making accurate assessments difficult. Careful patient’s selection is crucial to achieve optimal functional results. It is mandatory to assess not only defecation disorders but also evaluate overall pelvic floor symptoms, such as fecal incontinence and urinary disorders for choosing an appropriate and tailored strategy. Radiological investigation is essential but may not explain complaints of every patient.

STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry

PURPOSE

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is limited by the capacity of the circular stapler used. This prospective cohort study was conducted to assess real-world clinical outcomes of STARR with the new CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device, shortly named TRANSTAR, at 12 months postoperatively.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2011, consecutive patients who underwent TRANSTAR in 22 European colorectal centers were enrolled in the study. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed by the changes in a number of scoring systems (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) score, ODS score, St. Mark's score, Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score), at 12 months as compared to baseline. All complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (98% female), mean age 60 years, were entered in the study. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the KESS (median 18 vs. 6; p < 0.01), ODS (median 15 vs. 4; p < 0.01), and PAC-Qol scores (median 2.10 vs. 0.86; p < 0.01). St. Mark's and EQ-5D scores improved nonsignificantly. Complications were reported in 11 % of patients, including bleeding (5%), staple line complications (3%), urinary retention (2%), and persistent pain (1%). No major complications or mortality occurred.

CONCLUSION

TRANSTAR facilitated a tailored, real circumferential full-thickness rectal resection, leading to improved patient functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months postoperatively. It represents a safe and effective treatment for ODS in local clinical practice, although the sustainability of real-world results needs to be proven in the long-term follow-up.

STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry

PURPOSE

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is limited by the capacity of the circular stapler used. This prospective cohort study was conducted to assess real-world clinical outcomes of STARR with the new CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device, shortly named TRANSTAR, at 12 months postoperatively.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2011, consecutive patients who underwent TRANSTAR in 22 European colorectal centers were enrolled in the study. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed by the changes in a number of scoring systems (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) score, ODS score, St. Mark's score, Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score), at 12 months as compared to baseline. All complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (98% female), mean age 60 years, were entered in the study. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the KESS (median 18 vs. 6; p < 0.01), ODS (median 15 vs. 4; p < 0.01), and PAC-Qol scores (median 2.10 vs. 0.86; p < 0.01). St. Mark's and EQ-5D scores improved nonsignificantly. Complications were reported in 11 % of patients, including bleeding (5%), staple line complications (3%), urinary retention (2%), and persistent pain (1%). No major complications or mortality occurred.

CONCLUSION

TRANSTAR facilitated a tailored, real circumferential full-thickness rectal resection, leading to improved patient functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months postoperatively. It represents a safe and effective treatment for ODS in local clinical practice, although the sustainability of real-world results needs to be proven in the long-term follow-up.

Constipation and pelvic outlet obstruction

Caring for patients with constipation and pelvic outlet obstruction can be challenging, requiring skill, patience, and empathy on the part of the medical professional. The mainstay of treatment is behavioral with surgery reserved for a select group of patients. The evaluation, diagnostic, and treatment modalities of both constipation and pelvic outlet with a focus on current advancements and technology are explored in depth.

Correlation between outcome and instrumental findings after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Several studies show that stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) significantly improves constipation in most patients, while others remain symptomatic for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the study was to analyze clinical, manometric, and endoanal ultrasonography results in order to find any possible correlation between clinical and instrumental data, particularly in dissatisfied patients, both for those who remain symptomatic for ODS and for patients with new-onset fecal disorders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients underwent a preoperative and postoperative assessment based on clinical evaluation, proctoscopy, defecography, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasonography. Furthermore, we asked patients about a subjective satisfaction grading of outcome.

RESULTS

From January 2007 to December 2009, 103 patients were treated in our department with STARR for ODS. Postoperative endoanal ultrasound did not demonstrate any variations compared with the preoperative one. Postoperative scores showed statistically significant improvement, with respect to the preoperative value, with good and sufficient scores in 79.6% of patients, and an overall rate of satisfaction of 87.1%. Fecal disorders, including also the slightest alteration of continence, occurred in 24% of patients, in particular soiling 1.8%, urgency 7.4%, occasional gas leakage 5.5%, and liquid/solid leakage 9.3%. Anorectal manometry revealed a statistically significant reduction only in sensitivity threshold and maximum tolerated volume compared to patients with no disorders of continence.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate good satisfaction grading and a statistically significant improvement in scores of constipation. There is no close correlation between satisfaction grading and scores. Besides, the assessment of patient's satisfaction often does not match the objective functional outcome.

[Pelvic floor disorders from the surgeon's viewpoint]

Pelvic floor disorders present very differently with regard to symptoms and manifestation. Both diagnostic and treatment options require specific experience and an interdisciplinary approach. Diagnostic work-up is primarily based on medical history, physical examination and procto-rectoscopy. Furthermore, endosonography and perineal sonography have also gained importance. In almost all cases following these basic examinations conservative therapy options should be considered. As the interdisciplinary concept is very important, for careful diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders it became crucial to find an adequate form of treatment. Every decision for surgical therapy should not only focus on the results of previous examinations but should also consider the individual situation of each patient. In pelvic floor disorders a large variety of symptoms are confronted with a vast number of different and often highly specific procedures. The decisions on who to treat and how to treat are not only based on individual patient requests and desires but also on the experience and preference of the surgeon.

[Transanal procedure for functional bowel diseases]

The transanal operative procedure for the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) can be secondarily applied in cases of failure or ineffectiveness of conservative treatment. Clinically established transanal procedures are rectocele resection (RR), mucosectomy for internal rectal prolapse according to the Rehn-Delorme procedure (MR) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR Contour Transtar). Only few studies have indicated the value of RR and MR in the treatment of obstructive diseases and in general study quality and evidence level are low. There might be an indication in rectocele-associated symptoms, such as incomplete evacuation, straining and digitation. In contrast the STARR procedure has been well characterized by a large number of high quality studies providing an elevated evidence level for the treatment of ODS. Functional results are available with a follow-up of 1 year up to 68 months postoperatively. Response rates of up to 90% were reported whereas recurrence rates were given as a maximum of 18% at 68 months follow-up. In summary the STARR procedure provides good functional results for conservative refractory outlet obstruction with minor morbidity and outcome seems to remain stable in the long-term follow-up.

Stapled transanal rectal resection with contour transtar for obstructed defecation syndrome: lessons learned after more than 3 years of single-center activity

BACKGROUND

Obstructed defecation syndrome is a widespread and disabling disease.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection performed with a new dedicated curved device in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of 187 stapled transanal rectal resections performed from June 2007 to February 2011 was conducted.

SETTINGS

The entire study was conducted at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

: All the patients with symptomatic obstructed defecation syndrome and the presence of a rectocele and/or a rectorectal or rectoanal intussusception, in the absence of sphincter contractile deficiency, were included in the treatment protocol.

INTERVENTIONS

All procedures were performed with the use of the Contour Transtar device. We analyzed the functional results of this technique, the incidence and features of the surgical and functional complications, and ways to prevent or treat them.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Constipation was graded by using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also investigated.

RESULTS

The constipation intensity was statistically reduced from the preoperative mean value of 15.8 (± 4.9) to 5.2 (± 3.9) at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). Of the 151 (80.3%) patients who took laxatives and the 49 (26.2%) who used enemas before treatment, only 25 (13.2%; p < 0.0001) and 7 (3.7%; p < 0.0001) continued to do so after surgery. None of the 17 (9.1%) patients who had previously helped themselves with digitations needed to continue this practice. Almost all patients showed a good satisfaction rate (3.87/5) after the procedure.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations are the short follow-up of 1 year and the design of the study that may introduce potential selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that stapled transanal rectal resection performed with the use of the Contour Transtar is a safe and effective procedure to treat obstructed defecation syndrome.

Modified technique for performing STARR with Contour Transtar™

Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) performed using CCS-30 Contour Transtar™ despite its recent introduction seems to be an effective surgical procedure to treat obstructed defecation syndrome. The major constraint of this procedure is the need to open the prolapse longitudinally using the CCS-30. This is often difficult and can lead to an inadequate or spiralling resection. Our modified technique, presented in this paper, creates the prolapse opening with an electric scalpel between two Kocher clamps, placed to grab the whole prolapsed tissue at 2 and 4 o'clock, respectively. The results of the first 83 procedures confirm that this technique allows the surgeon to simplify the prolapse's longitudinal opening and especially the first loading of the tissue between the CCS-30 jaws, which is necessary to start the circular resection, as confirmed by the absence of spiralling and major complications in this series.

Feasibility and safety study of day-case Transtar™ procedure

BACKGROUND

Short hospitalization surgery is cost effective and convenient for both patients and healthcare system. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) conducted with the new curved device, Contour Transtar, has proved an effective and safe procedure for treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of STARR, performed as a day-case procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of all STARR performed as day-case surgery between September 2009 and February 2011. The entire study (intervention, data collection and data analysis) was conducted at the One-day Surgery Unit of the St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. All patients with surgical indication to STARR for the presence of an obstructed defecation syndrome were included in the study. We excluded from day-case protocol, patients over 65 years old, with an ASA score of III-IV or with a BMI over 35. The surgical technique reflects the original technique proposed by Antonio Longo with the exception of the longitudinal prolapse opening, which was created with the use of an electric scalpel between two Kocher clamps and not by an application of Transtar stapler. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing this procedure with short hospitalization, we investigated the presence and the time of presentation of post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients underwent STARR as a day-case regimen, and none presented major complications or required an extension of hospital stay or readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

STARR performed with Contour Transtar, in selected patients, is safe and feasible in day-case regimen if performed by expert surgeons and in a structure that allows the physician to keep the patient hospitalized or to re-admit and promptly treat those patients who present major surgical complication.

Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pain after pelvic surgery

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of sacral nerve modulation for chronic pelvic pain after pelvic or anal surgery for benign disease.

METHOD

From January 2004 to December 2009, 17 (14 female; age 56 years) consecutive patients suffering from chronic pelvic pain underwent evaluation for sacral nerve modulation in three pelvic floor units.

RESULTS

The previous surgery included stapled transanal rectal resection (five), hysterectomy (four), haemorrhoidectomy (two), stapled haemorrhoidopexy (one), fistulectomy (one), urethral sphincterotomy (one), appendicectomy (one), discectomy (one) and laparoscopy for endometriosis (one). Eight (47%) patients fulfilled the criteria for definitive implantation and were followed for a mean of 39 months. Using a visual analog pain score, pain levels fell from 8.2 preoperatively to 1.9, 2.1, 2.0 and 1.8 at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. Age < 60 years and duration of symptoms of < 24 months were good predictors and stapling was a poor predictor of success.

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve modulation seems to be effective over time in some patients with chronic pain related to previous surgery.

Stapled transanal rectal resection and sacral nerve stimulation - impact on faecal incontinence and quality of life

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess the impact of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) on pre-existing faecal incontinence and quality of life in patients suffering from obstructive defaecation syndrome (ODS) and to evaluate the efficiency of sequential sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for improvement of persistent incontinence after STARR.

METHOD

Thirty-one patients with ODS and major faecal incontinence prior to STARR were prospectively enrolled. The outcome was measured using the Cleveland Clinic Constipation and Incontinence score (CCS, CCIS), Faecal Incontinence Qualities-of-Life Index (FIQL), Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality-of-Life (PAC-QOL) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).

RESULTS

The overall levels of constipation (CCS from 13.1 ± 3.8 to 6.2 ± 5.4; P < 0.001) and incontinence (CCIS from 12.6 ± 3.2 to 9.4 ± 5.1; P = 0.005) were significantly improved after STARR; concordantly, the global and specific quality of life were significantly improved. Following postoperative constipation and incontinence, three different groups of patients were differentially referred to SNS. In group I (n = 16, 52%), both constipation (CCS from 12.6 ± 4.0 to 3.6 ± 1.9; P < 0.001) and incontinence (CCSI from 12.43 ± 3.2 to 5.1 ± 1.9; P < 0.001) were improved. In group II (n = 8, 25%), only constipation was improved (CCS from 12.3 ± 2.3 to 3.3 ± 2.2; P < 0.001), while incontinence persisted (CCIS from 12.8 ± 2.9 to 13.1 ± 3.1; P > 0.05). In group III (n = 7, 23%) there was no improvement at all. Sacral nerve stimulation was successfully carried out in six (85%) of seven patients in group II (post-SNS CCSI 6.1 ± 1.7; P = 0.01) but failed in five of five patients in group III.

CONCLUSION

Stapled transanal rectal resection improves quality of life in ODS patients with both severe constipation and faecal incontinence. Sacral nerve stimulation may efficiently improve persisting incontinence after STARR in selected patients.

Predictive factors for postoperative constipation and continence after stapled transanal rectal resection

BACKGROUND

Although stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has become an important surgical option in the treatment of obstructive defaecation syndrome, objective data about parameters that predict its success or failure are not yet available.

METHODS

Medical history, clinical and radiomorphological data were obtained prospectively from a multi-institutional STARR registry. Predictive factors for postoperative constipation (Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score, CCS) and incontinence (Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score, CCIS) were identified using univariable and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 181 of 201 patients in the STARR registry, with completed median follow-up of 19·4 (range 12-41) months. Although the CCS decreased significantly overall (from mean(s.d.) 16·3(4·9) to 6·7(4·1); P < 0·001), 31 patients (17·1 per cent) complained about persisting constipation. CCIS levels remained unchanged overall, but 16 patients (8·8 per cent) had new-onset faecal incontinence. Multivariable analysis revealed that rectocele (β = -0·302, P < 0·001) and intussusception (β = -0·392, P < 0·001) were independent predictors of low CCS levels, and intussusception (β = -0·216, P = 0·001) and enterocele (β = -0·171, P = 0·012) were independent predictors of low CCIS levels. In contrast, small rectal diameter (β = -0·293, P < 0·001), low squeeze pressure (β = -0·188, P = 0·005) and increased pelvic floor descent at rest (β = 0·264, P < 0·001) predicted high CCIS levels.

CONCLUSION

Factors for a favourable outcome after STARR included rectocele, intussusception and enterocele, whereas small rectal diameter, low sphincter pressure and increased pelvic floor descent were unfavourable. These findings should be integrated into the therapy algorithm for STARR.

A transanal procedure using an endoscopic linear stapler for obstructed defecation syndrome: the first Chinese experience

BACKGROUND

Transanal surgery using an endoscopic linear stapler is a recognized, but not widely performed technique for the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). A study of consecutive patients was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the technique for the treatment of ODS in Chinese patients.

METHODS

From November 2008 to December 2010, 43 female patients with ODS caused by rectocele and/or rectal intussusception underwent transanal surgery using an endoscopic linear stapler in three Chinese hospitals. Clinical and functional data including the Wexner constipation score and outcome classification were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The average duration of surgery was 23 ± 4 min (range 15-30 min). Blood loss was 10 ± 2 ml (range 5-15 ml). The average postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range 4-6 days). The pathologic findings showed that the specimen contained rectal muscle in all patients. Postoperative complications included 4 patients with transient fecal urgency, 3 patients with anorectal pain, and one patient with mild bleeding from the stapled suture line. Three patients reported minor fecal incontinence (Wexner score less than 3). During a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-26 months), the mean constipation score improved from preoperative 13.56 to postoperative 5.07 at 1 year (P < 0.05). The outcome at 1 year was excellent in 18 of 43 patients, good in 13, fairly good in 7, and poor in 5. Postoperative defecography was performed in 28 patients. Rectocele disappeared in 15 patients. Rectocele depth was reduced from 34 ± 4 mm preoperatively to 17 ± 3 mm postoperatively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The transanal procedure using an endoscopic linear stapler is an easy, safe, and effective option for selected patients with ODS. Long-term prospective, randomized, controlled studies are needed to confirm the advantages of this procedure in comparison with the traditional transanal and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) techniques.

Resected specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up after STARR procedures

AIM

To investigate stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures as surgical techniques for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) by analyzing specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up.

METHODS

From January to December 2007, we have treated 30 patients. Fifteen treated with double PPH-01 staplers and 15 treated using new CCS 30 contour. Resected specimen were measured with respect to average surface and volume. All patients have been evaluated at 24 mo with clinical examination, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Average surface in the CCS 30 group was 54.5 cm² statistically different when compared to the STARR group (36.92 cm²). The average volume in the CCS 30 group was 29.8 cc, while in the PPH-01 it was 23.8 cc and difference was statistically significant. The mean hospital stay in the CCS 30 group was 3.1 d, while in the PPH-01 group the median hospital stay was 3.4 d. As regards the long-term follow-up, an overall satisfactory rate of 83.3% (25/30) was achieved. Endoanal ultrasonography performed 1 year following surgery was considered normal in both of the studied groups. Mean resting pressure was higher than the preoperative value (67.2 mmHg in the STARR group and 65.7 mmHg in the CCS30 group vs 54.7 mmHg and 55.3 mmHg, respectively). Resting and squeezing pressures were lower in those patients not satisfied, but data are not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The STARR procedure with two PPH-01 is a safe surgical procedure to correct ODS. The new Contour CCS 30 could help to increase the amount of the resected tissue without differences in early complications, post-operative pain and in hospital stay compared to the STARR with two PPH-01 technique.

Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders

AIM: To prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) compared to standard conservative treatment, and whether preoperative symptoms and findings at defecography and anorectal manometry can predict the outcome of STARR.

METHODS: Thirty patients (Female, 28; age: 51 ± 9 years) with rectocele or rectal intussusception, a defecation disorder, and functional constipation were submitted for STARR. Thirty comparable patients (Female, 30; age 53 ± 13 years), who presented with symptoms of rectocele or rectal intussusception and were treated with macrogol, were assessed. Patients were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire at study enrollment and 38 ± 18 mo after the STARR procedure or during macrogol treatment. A responder was defined as an absence of the Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional constipation. Defecography and rectoanal manometry were performed before and after the STARR procedure in 16 and 12 patients, respectively.

RESULTS: After STARR, 53% of patients were responders; during conservative treatment, 75% were responders. After STARR, 30% of the patients reported the use of laxatives, 17% had intermittent anal pain, 13% had anal leakage, 13% required digital facilitation, 6% experienced defecatory urgency, 6% experienced fecal incontinence, and 6% required re-intervention. During macrogol therapy, 23% of the patients complained of abdominal bloating and 13% of borborygmi, and 3% required digital facilitation.No preoperative symptom, defecographic, or manometric finding predicted the outcome of STARR. Post-operative defecography showed a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) of the rectal diameter and rectocele. The post-operative anorectal manometry showed that anal pressure and rectal sensitivity were not significantly modified, and that rectal compliance was reduced (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION: STARR is not better and is less safe than macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. It could be considered as an alternative therapy in patients unresponsive to macrogol.

Improved clinical outcomes with a new contour-curved stapler in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome: a mid-term randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Stapled transanal rectal resection has become the primary surgical procedure for surgical treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome caused by rectocele or rectal intussusception. The procedure is generally performed with 2 circular staplers. Recently, a dedicated contour-curved stapler was developed.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the effects of these stapler types on relief of symptoms.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a regional referral center in Naples, Italy.

PATIENTS

Patients with obstructed defecation syndrome and rectocele or rectal intussusception, treated from November 2005 through September 2007.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to undergo stapled transanal rectal resection with 2 circular staplers or the contour-curved stapler.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was success rate at 24 months, defined by symptom improvement on an obstructed defecation syndrome scale. Secondary end points included success rate at 12 months, Agachan-Wexner constipation score, and rates of early and late complications at 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

Of 198 patients evaluated, 63 patients (31.8%) satisfied criteria. Follow-up data were available for 61 patients: 30 patients (28 women) in the circular stapler group (mean age, 53; range, 41-75 years) and 31 (29 women) in the contour-curved stapler group (mean age, 55; range, 38-69 years). At 24-month follow-up, success was achieved in 21 patients (70.0%) with the circular staplers and in 27 (87.0%) with the contour-curved stapler (P = .10). Symptom scores improved significantly in both groups from baseline to 12 months (P < .0001). Improvement was maintained in the contour-curved stapler group: mean score, 5.0 (SD, 1.6) at 12 months and 5.5 (1.5) at 24 months (P = .20). In the circular stapler group, symptom scores worsened from 4.5 (1.5) at 12 months to 9.0 (1.3) at 24 months (P < .0001). At 24 months, the groups differed significantly in symptom scores (P < .0001) and constipation scores (P = .03). No significant differences were seen in duration of postoperative hospital stay or rate of early or late complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled transanal rectal resection with either circular or contour-curved staplers can achieve relief of symptoms in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. The contour-curved stapler appears to result in more stable clinical results over time.

Enterocele is not a contraindication to stapled transanal surgery for outlet obstruction: an analysis of 170 patients

AIM

Enterocele is common among patients suffering from obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS), but it is often considered a contraindication for stapled transanal surgery. The functional results and complication rates were compared in patients with or without enterocele who were treated with stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for ODS.

METHOD

Patients presenting with ODS were evaluated using standardized clinical and radiological investigations. A total of 170 patients were treated with either PPH01-STARR or Contour Transtar® and were followed up for a median of 18 months.

RESULTS

On preoperative defecography, 55 (32%) of 170 patients were found to have an enterocele. The preoperative Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scores (CCCS) in patients with and without enterocele were (mean ± standard deviation) 15.9 ± 5.4 and 15.4 ± 5.2, respectively. At 18 months postoperatively the CCCS were 8.5 ± 2.7 and 8.1 ± 2.6 (P < 0.001), respectively, in patients with and without enterocele. Morbidity was 7.3% (n = 4) in patients with enterocele (anal pain, n = 1; minor bleeding, n = 2; and acute urinary retention, n = 1) and 7.0% (n = 8) in patients without enterocele (anal pain, n = 3; minor bleeding, n = 3; acute urinary retention, n = 1; and staple line dehiscence, n = 1). There were no cases of pelvic sepsis, small bowel injury or postoperative ileus. No patient needed surgical re-operation.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in functional outcome and postoperative complications in patients with and without enterocele undergoing STARR for ODS.

Resected specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up after STARR procedures

AIM: To investigate stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures as surgical techniques for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) by analyzing specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up.

METHODS: From January to December 2007, we have treated 30 patients. Fifteen treated with double PPH-01 staplers and 15 treated using new CCS 30 contour. Resected specimen were measured with respect to average surface and volume. All patients have been evaluated at 24 mo with clinical examination, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography.

RESULTS: Average surface in the CCS 30 group was 54.5 cm² statistically different when compared to the STARR group (36.92 cm²). The average volume in the CCS 30 group was 29.8 cc, while in the PPH-01 it was 23.8 cc and difference was statistically significant. The mean hospital stay in the CCS 30 group was 3.1 d, while in the PPH-01 group the median hospital stay was 3.4 d. As regards the long-term follow-up, an overall satisfactory rate of 83.3% (25/30) was achieved. Endoanal ultrasonography performed 1 year following surgery was considered normal in both of the studied groups. Mean resting pressure was higher than the preoperative value (67.2 mmHg in the STARR group and 65.7 mmHg in the CCS30 group vs 54.7 mmHg and 55.3 mmHg, respectively). Resting and squeezing pressures were lower in those patients not satisfied, but data are not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: The STARR procedure with two PPH-01 is a safe surgical procedure to correct ODS. The new Contour CCS 30 could help to increase the amount of the resected tissue without differences in early complications, post-operative pain and in hospital stay compared to the STARR with two PPH-01 technique.

Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) in the surgical treatment of the obstructed defecation syndrome: results of STARR Italian Registry

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome ODS by the analysis of the data collected in the STARR Italian Registry (SIR) with a special emphasis on the analysis of symptoms and quality of life.

METHODS

Collected data included, preoperative tests findings, and the evaluation of symptoms; the latter was obtained by using dedicated tools such as the Obstructed Defecation Syndrome Score (ODS-S), the Severity Symptom Score (SSS), and the Continence Grading Scale (CGS). Data on the quality of life were collected by Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) and the Euro Quality of Life-5 Domains Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS). The evaluation of the symptoms and the quality of life was repeated 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The SIR had collected data on 2171 patients (1653 females, 76.1%; mean age 56.2 years; range 20-96 years). A significant improvement (P < .0001) was seen between preoperative and 12-month follow-up in all scores: ODS-S (16.7 vs. 5.0), SSS (15.6 vs. 2.6), CGS (2.0 vs. 0.7), PAC-QoL (51.0 vs. 22.1), and EQ-5D VAS (57.5 vs. 85.7). Complications included defecatory urgency (4.5% at 12 months), bleeding (3.6%), perineal sepsis (3.4%), and one case of rectovaginal fistula (0.05%).

CONCLUSION

The analysis of SIR data seems to confirm that STARR is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of ODS. However, further studies are required to evaluate the long-term stability of results.

Anatomical and functional results after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defaecation syndrome

AIM

The STARR procedure is a surgical option for the treatment of rectocoele associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of this technique in restoring anatomy and the long-term sustainability of symptom control and quality of life.

METHODS

Of 48 patients operated on from 2003 to 2007, 30 were enrolled for this prospective assessment of anatomical correction and functional improvement of ODS. Results from a standardised questionnaire concerning functional results (ODS score), faecal incontinence (Cleveland Clinic score) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) were prospectively collected. Systematic dynamic defaecography, together with anorectal physiology testing, were performed before surgery and 6 months after. 25 patients were available for long-term assessment of functional outcome (more than 4 years).

RESULTS

The mean age of the population was 57 +/- 7 years. STARR produced significant improvements in the PAC QoL (p < 0.05) and ODS score (p < .0001), but not in the incontinence score. At defaecography, correction was significant with respect to the depth (p = 0.007), perimeter (p < 0.0001) and neck (p = 0.001) of rectocoele. Anorectal physiology revealed a lower maximal tolerated rectal volume (p<.0001). After 58 months, the 25 patients showed sustained functional results and QoL. Four patients (16%) underwent further surgical procedure for pelvic floor disorders and 8 patients (32%) still required laxatives.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the efficacy of the STARR procedure, with sustained improvement in function and QoL. However, a substantial number of patients remain symptomatic.

Long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defecation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rectocele and distal rectal intussusception are organic causes of obstructive defecation syndrome and can be corrected surgically once conservative treatment remedies have been exhausted. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure was introduced as a new treatment approach. This study presents the first long-term results of this procedure. PATIENTS AND PROCEDURES: A STARR procedure was performed in 14 patients (two male, 12 female, age 53 ± 12 years) between January 2003 and August 2005. The indication for surgery was a severe, conservatively treated stool evacuation disorder secondary to symptomatic rectocele and/or distal intussusception.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 68 ± 10 (49-83) months. The defecation score (0-20 points) decreased from a preoperative 13.4 ± 3.4 to 3.2 ± 2.0 after 3 months and increased slightly to 4.7 ± 3.4 by the time of the final examination. In 12 patients (85.7%), the obstructive defecation syndrome was significantly improved. These positive results were also maintained in the long-term. Five patients (38.5%) reported a slight worsening of continence in terms of urge incontinence. The most affected patients were those with preoperative normal continence. Procedure-related anal reoperations were required in two patients (14.3%).

CONCLUSION

Even in long-term, transanal rectal wall resection seems to be an effective therapy for obstructive defecation syndrome. However, it is associated with a substantial number of reoperations and in some patients with persistent urge incontinence.