1
|
Campos FG, Martinez CAR, Bustamante-Lopez LA, Mendonça RLDS, Kanno DT. Intra-abdominal desmoid tumors in familial adenomatous polyposis: How much do clinical and surgical variables interfere with their development? Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2023; 78:100144. [PMID: 36476966 PMCID: PMC9723922 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Familial Adenomatous Polyposis is a complex hereditary disease that exposes the carrier to a great risk of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). After prophylactic surgery, intra-abdominal desmoid tumors are known to be one the most important cause of death. Therefore, recognition of increased-risk patients and modification of operative strategy may be crucial. AIM The objective of this study was to estimate the desmoid tumor risk in relation to various surgical and clinical variables. METHODS Patients who had undergone polyposis since 1958 were included in the study. After exclusion criteria were met, those who had developed desmoid tumors were selected to undergo further evaluation. RESULTS The study revealed that the risk of developing desmoid tumors was associated with various factors such as sex ratio, colectomy, and reoperations. On the other hand, the type of surgery, family history, and surgical approach did not affect the risk of developing desmoid tumors. The data collected from 146 polyposis patients revealed that 16% had desmoid polyps. The sex ratio was 7:1, and the median age at colectomy was 28.6 years. Family history, multiple abdominal operations, and reoperations were some of the characteristics that were common in desmoid patients. CONCLUSION Recognition of clinical (female sex) and surgical (timing of surgery and previous reoperations) data as unfavorable variables associated with greater risk may be useful during the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fábio Guilherme Campos
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferrantella A, Saberi RA, Willobee BA, Quiroz HJ, Langshaw AH, Pandya S, Thorson CM, Sola JE, Perez EA. Prophylactic colectomy for children with familial adenomatous polyposis: resource utilization and outcomes for open and laparoscopic surgery. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:40. [PMID: 34423161 DOI: 10.21037/tgh-20-190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic approach for the surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has become increasingly common for pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and resource utilization between open and laparoscopic surgery for prophylactic colectomy in children with FAP. Methods The Kids' Inpatient Database (2009 and 2012) was analyzed for children (age ≤20 years) with FAP that underwent prophylactic total colectomy or proctocolectomy. Patient demographics, treating hospital characteristics, hospital charges, and short-term outcomes were compared according to the surgical technique utilized (open versus laparoscopic). Results Overall, we identified 216 patients with FAP that underwent elective total colectomy, of which 95 cases were performed by open surgery and 121 were done laparoscopically. The majority of patients were treated at large, not-for-profit, urban teaching hospitals, and the median age was equal (16 years) in both groups. Complications that were more common for open procedures included accidental perforation or hemorrhage (4% vs. 0%, P=0.023), reopening of surgical site (3% vs. 0%, P=0.049), and pneumonia (3% vs. 0%, P=0.049). Simultaneous proctectomy was performed more commonly in the open cohort (91% vs. 71%, P<0.001) as well as ileostomy creation (74% vs. 49%, P<0.001). The median length of stay was similar in the open and laparoscopic groups (7 vs. 6 days, P=0.712). Median total hospital charges were also similar ($67,334 vs. $68,717, P=0.080). Conclusions A laparoscopic approach for prophylactic colectomy can be safely performed in children with FAP, and total hospital charges are equivalent compared to open surgery. However, simultaneous proctectomy was performed less often with laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Ferrantella
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Rebecca A Saberi
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Brent A Willobee
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Hallie J Quiroz
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Amber H Langshaw
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Samir Pandya
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Chad M Thorson
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Juan E Sola
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Eduardo A Perez
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vitellaro M, Piozzi G, Signoroni S, Ricci MT, Ciniselli CM, Cardani A, Vecchi I, Mancini A, Magarotto A, Verderio P, Massimino M, Ferrari A, Biasoni D. Short-term and long-term outcomes after preventive surgery in adolescent patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28110. [PMID: 31802619 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND APC gene pathogenic variants are characterized by a lifetime risk of nearly 100% to develop a colorectal carcinoma. International guidelines suggest a prophylactic surgery in the second decade. METHODS A descriptive analysis was performed evaluating a surgical series of adolescent patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) enrolled in the prospectively maintained hereditary polyposis registry. RESULTS Thirty-eight adolescent patients (median age 16 years; range, 7-19) underwent laparoscopic prophylactic surgery. APC gene pathogenic variants were detected in all patients, and six patients were proband. No patients were converted to open surgery. Median postoperative stay was five days (4-16). Early postoperative complications were one dural puncture and one anastomotic leakage. Regarding late complications, we observed one patient having small bowel obstruction 56 months after surgery. Pathological reports showed one patient with pTis adenocarcinoma in two separate sites; 33 patients with low-grade dysplasia, four with high-grade dysplasia. One patient developed a desmoid tumor 37 months after surgery. After a median follow-up of 40.5 months, no patients died or had a second abdominal surgery because of cancer in rectal stump. CONCLUSIONS Rectal sparing surgery was the first choice in the major respect of patients' quality of life. Laparoscopic prophylactic surgery for FAP is well accepted from adolescents. It represents a safe option due to the low incidence of post-surgical desmoids and quick postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Vitellaro
- Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Colorectal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Piozzi
- Colorectal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Signoroni
- Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Ricci
- Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Maura Ciniselli
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Cardani
- Department of Critical and Supportive Therapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Vecchi
- Department of Critical and Supportive Therapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Mancini
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Magarotto
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Verderio
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maura Massimino
- Pediatric Oncology Section, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Section, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
A systematic review of risk-reducing cancer surgery outcomes for hereditary cancer syndromes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:2241-2250. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
5
|
Currie AC, Blazeby JM, Suzuki N, Thomas-Gibson S, Reeves B, Morton D, Kennedy RH. Evaluation of an early-stage innovation for full-thickness excision of benign colonic polyps using the IDEAL framework. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:1004-1016. [PMID: 30993857 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Colectomy is the current approach for patients with endoscopically unresectable benign polyps but risks considerable morbidity. Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision (FLEX) is a novel procedure, specifically developed to treat endoscopically unresectable benign colonic polyps, which could reduce the treatment burden of the current approach and improve outcomes. However, traditional evaluations of surgical innovations lack methodological rigour. This study reports the development and feasibility of the FLEX procedure in selected patients. METHOD A prospective development study using the Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) framework was undertaken, by one surgeon, of the FLEX procedure in selected patients with endoscopically unresectable benign colonic polyps. Three-dimensional (3D)-CT colonography reconstructions were used preoperatively to rehearse patient-specific, critical manoeuvres. Targetted, full-thickness excision was performed: after marking the margin of the caecal polyp using circumferential endoscopic argon plasma coagulation, transmural endoscopic sutures were used to evert the bowel and resection was undertaken by laparoscopic linear stapling. Feasibility outcomes (establishing 'local success') included evidence of complete polyp resection without adverse events (especially safe closure of the excision site). RESULTS Ten patients [median (interquartile range) age: 74 (59-78) years] with polyp median diameters of 35 (30-41) mm, were referred for and consented to receive the FLEX procedure. During the same time frame, no patient underwent colectomy for benign polyps. One further patient received FLEX for local excision of a presumed malignant polyp because severe comorbidity prohibited standard procedures. The FLEX procedure was successfully performed locally, with complete resection of the polyp and safe closure of the excision site, in eight patients. Three noncompleted procedures were converted to laparoscopic segmental colectomy under the same anaesthetic because of endoscopic inaccessibility (two patients) and transcolonic suture failure (one patient). CONCLUSIONS The FLEX procedure is still under development. Early data demonstrate that it is safe for excision of selected benign polyps. Modifications to transcolonic suture delivery are now required and there is a need for wider adoption before more definitive evaluation can be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Currie
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
| | - J M Blazeby
- Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Division of Surgery, Head & Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - N Suzuki
- Wolfson Department of Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
| | - S Thomas-Gibson
- Wolfson Department of Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
| | - B Reeves
- Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - D Morton
- Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - R H Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chittleborough TJ, Warrier SK, Heriot AG, Kalady M, Church J. Dispelling misconceptions in the management of familial adenomatous polyposis. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87:441-445. [PMID: 28266097 DOI: 10.1111/ans.13919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2016] [Revised: 12/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis require surgical intervention at some point in their lives. The diagnosis is often apparent from their phenotype and family history, however, this is not always the case. Many factors can influence the surgical strategy although the polyposis burden and distribution remain the main consideration. While prophylactic removal of the rectum and colon is often required, sparing the rectum at the index surgery is safe in select patients. This article aims to dispel misconceptions in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Chittleborough
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Kalady
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Sanford R. Weiss, MD Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James Church
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Sanford R. Weiss, MD Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aziz O, Albeyati A, Derias M, Varsani N, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Clark SK, Jenkins JT, Kennedy RH. Anastomotic leaks can be detected within 5 days following ileorectal anastomosis: a case-controlled study in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:251-259. [PMID: 27444690 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM To determine the earliest time point at which anastomotic leaks can be detected in patients undergoing total colectomy with primary ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. METHOD This was a case-controlled study of 10 anastomotic leak patients vs 20 controls following laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis (from 96 consecutive patients between 2006 and 2013). Panel time-series data regression was performed using a double subscript structure to include both variables. A generalized least squares multivariate approach was applied in a random effects setting to calculate correlations for observations, with anastomotic leak being the dependent variable. Univariate and multivariate regression calculations were then performed according to individual observations at each recorded time point. Time-series analysis was used to determine when a variable became significant in the leak group. RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified a significant difference between leak and control groups in mean heart rate (P < 0.001), mean respiratory rate (P = 0.017) and mean urine output (P = 0.001). Time-point analysis showed that heart rate was significantly different between leak and control groups at postoperative day 4.25. Multivariate analysis identified a significant difference between groups in alanine transaminase (P = 0.006), bilirubin (P = 0.008), creatinine (P = 0.001), haemoglobin (P < 0.001) and urea (P = 0.007). There were no differences between groups with regard to markers of inflammation such as albumin, white blood cell count, neutrophil count and C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION Anastomotic leaks can be detected early (within 4.5 days of surgery) through changes in physiological, blood test and observational parameters, providing an opportunity for early intervention in these patients to salvage the anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Aziz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,The Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Albeyati
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - M Derias
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - N Varsani
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - H Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Athanasiou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - S K Clark
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J T Jenkins
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - R H Kennedy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yamadera M, Ueno H, Kobayashi H, Konishi T, Ishida F, Yamaguchi T, Hinoi T, Inoue Y, Kanemitsu Y, Tomita N, Ishida H, Sugihara K. Current status of prophylactic surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan. Surg Today 2016; 47:690-696. [PMID: 27770209 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1431-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted this study to clarify the current clinical practice of prophylactic colectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in Japan. METHODS This retrospective multi-center cohort study involved 23 specialized institutions for colorectal disease in Japan. We analyzed the records of 147 patients who underwent prophylactic surgical treatment between 2000 and 2012. Patients were divided into Group 1 (2000-2006) and Group 2 (2007-2012) based on their date of surgery. RESULTS Age at the time of prophylactic surgery was 27 and 31 years in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The proportion of attenuated FAP was significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (1.0 vs. 13 %, respectively). Pathological examination revealed an increased incidence of malignant polyps in the resected specimens from Group 2 patients (10 vs. 23 %, respectively; P = 0.034). Laparoscopic surgery was more frequent in Group 2 than in Group 1 (61 vs. 40 %, respectively). There was no surgical mortality in either group. CONCLUSION Prophylactic surgery for FAP results in good short-term surgical outcomes in Japan. The current surgical approach is characterized by limited surgical indications for patients with attenuated FAP, delayed timing of colectomy, and the increasing standardization of laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Yamadera
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
| | - Hirotoshi Kobayashi
- Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Gastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumio Ishida
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Yamaguchi
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Hinoi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Inoue
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohiro Tomita
- Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Ishida
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kenichi Sugihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ueno H, Kobayashi H, Konishi T, Ishida F, Yamaguchi T, Hinoi T, Kanemitsu Y, Inoue Y, Tomita N, Matsubara N, Komori K, Ozawa H, Nagasaka T, Hasegawa H, Koyama M, Akagi Y, Yatsuoka T, Kumamoto K, Kurachi K, Tanakaya K, Yoshimatsu K, Watanabe T, Sugihara K, Ishida H. Prevalence of laparoscopic surgical treatment and its clinical outcomes in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2016; 21:713-722. [PMID: 26820718 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-016-0953-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery is becoming the preferred technique for most colorectal interventions. This study aimed to clarify the time trend of surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and its relevance to clinical outcomes in Japan over a 13-year period. METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study comprising 23 specialist institutions for colorectal disease and a cohort of 282 FAP patients who underwent total colectomy or proctocolectomy during 2000-2012. Patient clinical backgrounds and surgical outcomes were compared between the first and second halves of the study period. RESULTS The proportion of surgical types adopted over the entire study period was 46, 21, 30, and 3 % for ileoanal anastomosis (IAA), ileoanal canal anastomosis, ileorectal anastomosis, and permanent ileostomy, respectively. FAP patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery have increased since 2008 and reached 74 % in the past 3 years. In particular, the number of patients undergoing laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IAA increased approximately four-fold from the first to the second half of the study period. A laparoscopic approach was increasingly used in patients with coexisting colorectal malignancies. Despite this trend, surgical results of the laparoscopic approach between the two study periods showed similar morbidity, pouch operation and stoma closure completion rates. No postoperative mortality was observed in this series, and laparoscopic surgery was comparable to open surgery in terms of stoma closure rate, incidence of intra-abdominal/abdominal desmoid tumors, and postoperative survival rate in both study periods. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic approach is increasingly being adopted for prophylactic FAP surgery in Japan and may provide clinically acceptable practical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Ueno
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan.
| | - Hirotoshi Kobayashi
- Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Gastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumio Ishida
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Yamaguchi
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Hinoi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Inoue
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Naohiro Tomita
- Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | | | - Koji Komori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Heita Ozawa
- Department of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nagasaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Motoi Koyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yoshito Akagi
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - Toshimasa Yatsuoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Kumamoto
- Department of Organ Regulatory Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Kurachi
- Department of Surgery 2, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Kohji Tanakaya
- Department of Surgery, Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Watanabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hideyuki Ishida
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Day RW, Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Fielder S, Calhoun J, Conrad C, Vauthey JN, Gottumukkala V, Aloia TA. Patient-Reported Outcomes Accurately Measure the Value of an Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221:1023-30.e1-2. [PMID: 26611799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2015] [Revised: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery (ER) pathways have become increasingly integrated into surgical practice. Studies that compare ER and traditional pathways often focus on outcomes confined to inpatient hospitalization and rarely assess a patient's functional recovery. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes for patients treated on an Enhanced Recovery in Liver Surgery (ERLS) pathway vs a traditional pathway. STUDY DESIGN One hundred and eighteen hepatectomy patients rated symptom severity and life interference using the validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory preoperatively and postoperatively at every outpatient visit until 31 days after surgery. The ERLS protocol included patient education, narcotic-sparing anesthesia and analgesia, diet advancement, restrictive fluid administration, early ambulation, and avoidance of drains and tubes. RESULTS Seventy-five ERLS pathway patients were clinically comparable with 43 patients simultaneously treated on a traditional pathway. The ERLS patients reported lower immediate postoperative pain scores and experienced fewer complications and decreased length of stay. As measured by symptom burden on life interference, ERLS patients were more likely to return to baseline functional status in a shorter time interval. The only independent predictor of faster return to baseline interference levels was treatment on an ERLS pathway (p = 0.021; odds ratio = 2.62). In addition, ERLS pathway patients were more likely to return to intended oncologic therapy (95% vs 87%) at a shorter time interval compared to patients on the traditional pathway (44.7 vs 60.2 days). CONCLUSIONS In oncologic liver surgery, enhanced recovery's primary mechanism of action is reduction in life interference by postoperative surgical symptoms, allowing patients to return sooner to normal function and adjuvant cancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan W Day
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Charles S Cleeland
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xin S Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sharon Fielder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John Calhoun
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vijaya Gottumukkala
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Day RW, Fielder S, Calhoun J, Kehlet H, Gottumukkala V, Aloia TA. Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement. Br J Surg 2015; 102:1594-1602. [PMID: 26364714 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Revised: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery (ER) protocols are used widely in surgical practice. As protocols are multidisciplinary with multiple components, it is difficult to compare and contrast reports. The present study examined compliance and transferability to clinical practice among ER publications related to colorectal surgery. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register databases were searched for current colorectal ER manuscripts. Each publication was assessed for the number of ER elements, whether the element was explained sufficiently so that it could be transferred to clinical practice, and compliance with the ER element. RESULTS Some 50 publications met the reporting criteria for inclusion. A total of 22 ER elements were described. The median number of elements included in each publication was 9, and the median number of included patients was 130. The elements most commonly included in ER pathways were early postoperative diet advancement (49, 98 per cent) and early mobilization (47, 94 per cent). Early diet advancement was sufficiently explained in 43 (86 per cent) of the 50 publications, but only 22 (45 per cent) of 49 listing the variable reported compliance. The explanation for early mobilization was satisfactory in 41 (82 per cent) of the 50 publications, although only 14 (30 per cent) of 47 listing the variable reported compliance. Other ER elements had similar rates of explanation and compliance. The most frequently analysed outcome measures were morbidity (49, 98 per cent), length of stay (47, 94 per cent) and mortality (45, 90 per cent). CONCLUSION The current standard of reporting is frequently incomplete. To transfer knowledge and facilitate implementation of pathways that demonstrate improvements in perioperative care and recovery, a consistent structured reporting platform is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan W Day
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Herman Pressler, Unit 1484, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Sharon Fielder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Herman Pressler, Unit 1484, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - John Calhoun
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Herman Pressler, Unit 1484, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - Vijaya Gottumukkala
- Department of Anaesthesia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Herman Pressler, Unit 1484, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Herman Pressler, Unit 1484, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Heneghan HM, Martin ST, Winter DC. Segmental vs extended colectomy in the management of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:382-9. [PMID: 25510173 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2014] [Accepted: 10/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM The optimal surgical approach to the management of colorectal cancer in the setting of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is contentious. While some advocate total colectomy, others perform segmental resection followed by regular endoscopic surveillance. This systematic review evaluates the evidence for segmental colectomy (SC) and total (extended) colectomy (TC) in the management of HNPCC. METHOD Two major databases (PubMed and Cochrane) were searched using predefined terms. All original articles, published in English, comparing the oncological outcomes of SC and TC in HNPCC patients from January 1950 to July 2013 were included. RESULTS Eighty-four studies were identified. After applying exclusion criteria, six studies involving 948 patients were included (mean age 47.4 years, 51.8% male). SC was more commonly performed than TC (n = 780; 82.3%). Mean follow-up was 106.5 months. Metachronous high-risk adenomas were detected more often after SC, although the difference was not statistically significant (23.4% vs 9.6%; OR 2.258, P = 0.057). Metachronous cancers occurred more frequently after SC than after TC (23.5% vs 6.8%; OR 3.679, P < 0.005). However, there was no difference in overall survival (90.7% vs 89.8% for SC and TC, respectively; P = 0.085). Only one study reported operative mortality (0% in each group), there was no report of operative morbidity or functional outcome. CONCLUSION The optimal surgical approach in the management of HNPCC remains unclear. More adenomas and cancers occur after SC than after TC but there certainly is no evidence to suggest that more radical surgery leads to improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Heneghan
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Urso EDL, Delaini GG, Campi M, Bacchelli C, Pucciarelli S. Colorectal polyposis: clinical presentation and surgical treatment. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 Suppl 1:61-6. [PMID: 25511863 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E D L Urso
- 1^ Surgical Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Laparoscopic-assisted proctocolectomy with prolapsing technique for familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24:e228-32. [PMID: 24710262 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3182a4bfcb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of laparoscopic total proctocolectomy (TPC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has been controversial, given its technical difficulty of selecting the appropriate distal transection line and achieving safe anastomosis. We herein describe our initial experience with the prolapsing technique for laparoscopic-assisted TPC and IPAA (J-pouch) in the treatment of FAP. METHODS A consecutive series of patients with FAP undergoing laparoscopic-assisted TPC with IPAA were identified from a prospectively collected database between June 2004 and February 2012. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, operative outcomes, and follow-up. RESULTS The surgery was successfully completed in all 6 patients without any conversion to open surgery. The median operating time was 279 minutes (range, 240 to 386 min) and the median blood loss was 17.5 mL (range, 5 to 161 mL). No patient required blood transfusion. The median length of diet resumption and postoperative hospital stay were 7 days (range, 6 to 10 d) and 15 days (range, 13 to 21 d), respectively. A postoperative complication, wound infection, occurred in 1 patient. No anastomotic leakages or small bowel obstructions occurred. At a median follow-up of 59 months (range, 14.2 to 107.5 mo), no carcinoma had developed at the pouch or at the anastomotic site. Sexual function and fertility were unchanged as compared with preoperatively in 2 male patients. None of the patients experienced night-time incontinence or had to use a pad. CONCLUSIONS Our limited experience suggests that this prolapsing technique helps prevent problems with laparoscopic-assisted TPC and IPAA for FAP patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gianotti L, Beretta S, Luperto M, Bernasconi D, Valsecchi MG, Braga M. Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target? Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29:329-41. [PMID: 24337781 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1802-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The complexity of "fast track" (FT) surgery might decrease its applicability in daily practice and extensive diffusion. The aim of this study was to understand if the positive effect of FT on the outcome might be affected by the number, type, level of evidence of the components, or their possible combinations. METHODS We performed a Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library literature search of randomized and non-randomized trials comparing FT to conventional care (CC) in elective colorectal operations. By a meta-analytic approach, the effect of FT was estimated by the risk ratio (RR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the risk of post-operative complications. RESULTS The analysis included 53 studies (36 non-RCTs with and 17 RCTs), with 4,100 patients in the FT group and 4,424 patients in the CC group for a total of 8,524 patients. Fifty-six different item combinations were observed. The median rate of strategy implementation was 50 %. The positive effect of FT over CC was observed regardless the number (<10 vs. ≥10) of strategies used (RR = 0.80; 95 % CI 0.66-0.98 and RR = 0.75; 95 % CI 0.65-0.87, respectively), the application of items with strong vs. low level evidence (RR = 0.78; 95 % CI 0.67-0.90 and RR = 0.76; 95 % CI 0.63-0.92, respectively), or the frequency (≥80 vs. <80 %) of items implemented (RR = 0.80; 95 % CI 0.69-0.93 and RR = 0.73; 95 % CI 0.61-0.87, respectively). CONCLUSION The positive effects of FT seem to be achieved regardless the multiplicity and variance of item grouping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Gianotti
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Milano-Bicocca University, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vitellaro M, Sala P, Signoroni S, Radice P, Fortuzzi S, Civelli EM, Ballardini G, Kleiman DA, Morrissey KP, Bertario L. Risk of desmoid tumours after open and laparoscopic colectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 2014; 101:558-65. [PMID: 24493089 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Desmoid tumour (DT) is a main cause of death after prophylactic colectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of prophylactic laparoscopic colectomy on the risk of developing DT in patients with FAP. METHODS The database of a single institution was reviewed. Patients with classical FAP with defined genotype who underwent either open or laparoscopic colectomy between 1947 and 2011 were included in the study. The impact of various demographic and clinical features on the risk of developing DT was assessed. RESULTS A total of 672 patients underwent prophylactic colectomy: 602 by an open and 70 by a laparoscopic approach. With a median (range) follow-up of 132 (0-516) months in the open group and 60 (12-108) months in the laparoscopic group, 98 patients (16·3 per cent) developed DT after an open procedure compared with three (4 per cent) following laparoscopic surgery. The estimated cumulative risk of developing DT at 5 years after surgery was 13·0 per cent in the open group and 4 per cent in the laparoscopic group (P = 0·042). In multivariable analysis, female sex (hazard ratio (HR) 2·18, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·40 to 3·39), adenomatous polyposis coli mutation distal to codon 1400 (HR 3·85, 1·90 to 7·80), proctocolectomy (HR 1·67, 1·06 to 2·61), open colectomy (HR 6·84, 1·96 to 23·98) and year of surgery (HR 1·04, 1·01 to 1·07) were independent risk factors for the diagnosis of DT after prophylactic surgery. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery decreased the risk of DT after prophylactic colectomy in patients with FAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Vitellaro
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ileo neo-rectal anastomosis for colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28:1313-4. [PMID: 23092985 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1597-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
18
|
Warrier SK, Kalady MF. Familial adenomatous polyposis: challenges and pitfalls of surgical treatment. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2012; 25:83-9. [PMID: 23730222 PMCID: PMC3423882 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is complex and requires both sound judgment and technical skills. Because colorectal cancer risk approaches 100%, prophylactic colorectal surgery remains a cornerstone of management. Both patient factors and disease characteristics influence surgical decision-making regarding the timing of prophylactic surgery, the extent of resection, and types of reconstruction. Making appropriate choices can be challenging and there is continued debate regarding optimal strategies. This chapter reviews the controversies in colorectal surgery for FAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish K. Warrier
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
- Sanford R. Weiss, M.D. Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Matthew F. Kalady
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
- Sanford R. Weiss, M.D. Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Laukaitis CM, Erdman SH, Gerner EW. Chemoprevention in patients with genetic risk of colorectal cancers. COLORECTAL CANCER 2012; 1:225-240. [PMID: 25221625 PMCID: PMC4162131 DOI: 10.2217/crc.12.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
A number of genetic syndromes are known to convey a high risk of colorectal cancer. Current standards of medical practice for these patients involve genetic testing followed by screening and surgical procedures. Pharmaceutical therapies for any of these syndromes are limited in number and are generally not approved by any regulatory body for applications in these genetic groups. This review discusses advances in mechanistic understanding of the disease processes leading to the development of promising pharmaceutical therapies. Clinical trials of potential chemotherapeutic agents must focus on the reduction of disease-related events, including cancer and cancer-related mortality, in patients with genetic syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Laukaitis
- The University of Arizona, Department of Medicine & Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Steven H Erdman
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Nationwide Children’s Hospital & The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | - Eugene W Gerner
- The University of Arizona, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine & Arizona Cancer Center, BIO5 Institute Oro Valley, 1580 E. Hanley Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85737, USA
| |
Collapse
|