Acute epididymitis: why patient and consort must be investigated

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urological Infections: Summary of the 2024 Guidelines

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Urological infections significantly impact the wellbeing and quality of life of individuals owing to their widespread occurrence and diverse clinical manifestations. The objective of the guidelines panel was to provide evidence-based guidance on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and male accessory-gland infections, while addressing crucial public health aspects related to infection control and antimicrobial stewardship.

METHODS

For the 2024 guidelines on urological infections, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Key recommendations emphasise the importance of a thorough medical history and physical examination for patients with urological infections. The guidelines stress the role of antimicrobial stewardship to combat the rising threat of antimicrobial resistance, providing recommendations for antibiotic selection, dosing, and duration on the basis of the latest evidence.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This overview of the 2024 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into managing urological infections and are designed for effective integration into clinical practice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology has issued an updated guideline on urological infections. The guidelines provide recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, with a particular focus on minimising antibiotic use because of the increasing global threat of antimicrobial resistance.

Acute orchiepididymitis: Epidemiological and clinical aspects: An analysis of 152 cases

Introduction

Orchiepididymitis is an inflammation of the testis and epididymis. Epididymitis, orchitis, and true orchiepididymitis are all examples of orchiepididymites. They are the most frequent cause of adult acute scrotal pain.

Objectives

to investigate the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic, and evolutionary characteristics of acute orchiepididymitis in the urology department of University Hospital Center.

Materials and methods

This is a three-year retrospective, descriptive study of 152 patients who consulted the urology department at the university hospital center for treatment of orchiepididymitis (2017–2019).

Results

In our study, 152 patients were included. The average age was 49,5 years (17–82 years). The average of consultation delay was 7 days. Prostatic pathology was found to be the main medical antecedent in 18.5% of patients, and transurethral resection of the prostate was found to be the main surgical antecedent in 8.5% of cases. Clinical examination revealed that the predominant clinical symptom was painful inflammatory bursa in 94% of cases, followed by lower urinary tract disorders in 57.5% of cases, and fever in 10% of cases.

A germ was isolated in 26 cases after a systematic cytobacteriological examination of the urine (CBEU) (17%). All patients received medical treatment, and 21% of them were received urgical treatment. In 84.5% of cases, the outcome was favorable.

Conclusion

Acute orchiépididymitis is a common cause for a consultation to the emergency room. Diagnosis is based on clinical examination and ultrasound. Because of the frequency of complications and sequelae that might influence fertility in the long term, it is a diagnostic and therapeutic emergence

Orchiepididymitis is an inflammation of the testis and epididymis, most often of infectious origin.

Acute orchiépididymitis is a frequent reason for consultation in the emergency room.

Diagnosis is based on clinical examination and scrotal ultrasound.

The early and appropriate antibiotic treatment avoided serious complications

United Kingdom British association for sexual health and HIV national guideline for the management of epididymo-orchitis, 2020

The British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) UK guideline for the management of epididymo-orchitis has been updated in 2020. It offers advice on diagnostic tests, treatment and health promotion principles in the effective management of epididymo-orchitis. Empirical treatment should be started in patients with objective swelling and tenderness on testicular examination. First-line empirical treatment for sexually acquired epididymo-orchitis has changed to ceftriaxone 1g intramuscularly and doxycycline. Higher dose of ceftriaxone in line with the BASHH 2018 gonorrhoea guideline ensures effective treatment of strains with reduced susceptibility. Ofloxacin or doxycycline is recommended in patients with epididymo-orchitis probably due to non-gonococcal organisms (e.g. negative microscopy for gram-negative intracellular diplococci or no risk factors for gonorrhoea identified). Where Mycoplasma genitalium is tested and identified, treatment should include an appropriate antibiotic (e.g. moxifloxacin). If enteric pathogens are a likely cause (e.g. older patient, not sexually active, recent instrumentation, men who practice insertive anal intercourse, men with known abnormalities of the urinary tract or a positive urine dipstick for leucocytes and nitrites), ofloxacin and levofloxacin are recommended. A clinical care pathway has been produced to simplify the management of epididymo-orchitis. A patient information leaflet has been developed.

Etiology and Clinical Features of Epididymo-orchitis: A Single-center Study in Tehran, Iran

CDATA[Introduction: Epididymo-orchitis is a common urological disease among men. Little is known about the clinical and epidemiological aspects of the disease in Iran. Thus, the present study was aimed at investigating the etiology, clinical sequelae and risk factors of patients with epididymo- orchitis in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

Patients presenting with epididymo-orchitis were prospectively analyzed in order to study the etiology and pattern of the disease. Bacteriological, molecular and serological tests were undertaken to look for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Brucella spp., Mycoplasma spp, and other bacteria.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with epididymo-orchitis were evaluated according to their clinical symptoms, duration of symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory studies. The mean age of the patients was 53 years. Fever, dysuria, pain in the flanks, urinary frequency and discharges occurred in 58.0%, 50.0%, 50.0%, 28.0% and 6.0%, respectively. Bacterial pathogen was identified in 26% (13/50) of patients by urine culture. Escherichia coli was the etiological agent in 11/13 patients (84.6%). Two out of 50 patients (4.0%) were also positive for Chlamydia trachomatis. Two samples were serologically positive for Brucella spp. High Mean age, fever, urinary frequency, history of the underlying disease and history of urinary tract infections were found to have a significant association with the positive bacteriologic urine culture (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common clinical manifestations were fever, dysuria, and abdominal pain. E. coli and C. trachomatis were the major causative agents. The use of a set of diagnostic approaches including clinical symptoms, urine culture and more precise techniques such as PCR should be taken into consideration for the definitive diagnosis.

Epididymo-orchitis caused by enteric organisms in men > 35 years old: beyond fluoroquinolones

Epididymo-orchitis is a common urological condition in men of all ages, causing a unilateral or bilateral swelling of the epididymis and/or testis. It is frequently caused by sexually transmitted infections, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrheae, as well as common enteric organisms implicated in urinary tract infections. Men over 35 years old may develop epididymo-orchitis associated with enteric organisms, often associated with functional bladder outlet problems such as benign prostatic hyperplasia or urethral stricture disease. Fluoroquinolones, especially ciprofloxacin, have long been the mainstay of treatment for these infections; however, rising resistance to ciprofloxacin in E. coli isolates in Europe and the USA means that there is an unprecedented necessity for alternative antimicrobials with adequate penetration into genital tissues (epididymis and testes) to allow appropriate and comprehensive treatment of epididymo-orchitis in this group of patients.

Epididymitis: revelations at the convergence of clinical and basic sciences

Acute epididymitis represents a common medical condition in the urological outpatient clinic. Mostly, epididymitis is caused by bacterial ascent through the urogenital tract, with pathogens originating either from sexually transmitted diseases or urinary tract infections. Although conservative antimicrobial therapy is possible in the majority of patients and is usually sufficient to eradicate the pathogen, studies have shown persistent oligozoospermia and azoospermia in up to 40% of these patients. Animal models of epididymitis are created to delineate the underlying reasons for this observation and the additional impairment of sperm function that is often associated with the disease. Accumulated data provide evidence of a differential expression of immune cells, immunoregulatory genes and pathogen-sensing molecules along the length of the epididymal duct. The evidence suggests that a tolerogenic environment exists in the caput epididymidis, but that inflammatory responses are most intense toward the cauda epididymidis. This is consistent with the need to provide protection for the neo-antigens of spermatozoa emerging from the testis, without compromising the ability to respond to ascending infections. However, severe inflammatory responses, particularly in the cauda, may lead to collateral damage to the structure and function of the epididymis. Convergence of the clinical observations with appropriate animal studies should lead to better understanding of the immunological environment throughout the epididymis, the parameters underlying susceptibility to epididymitis, and to therapeutic approaches that can mitigate epididymal damage and subsequent fertility problems.

Management of epididymo-orchitis in three different clinical settings: Streamlining pathways and improving care

Objective:

This study represents the first direct comparison of management of epididymo-orchitis (EO) by Accident and Emergency (A&E), Urology and Genito-Urinary Medicine (GUM) departments in a large tertiary care centre, and their compliance with international guidelines.

Methods:

Case notes of patients with EO who attended A&E, Urology and GUM between January and June 2014 were analysed retrospectively.

Results:

A total of 127 men were seen (median age: 33, range: 15–79). Forty-four attended A&E (median age: 35), 30 Urology (median age: 37), and 53 GUM (median age: 31). MSU was sent in 17/44 (38.6%) of A&E, 11/30(36.7%) of Urology, and 35/53(66%) of GUM patients. Fifty-three of 53 (100%) of GUM, 14/44 (31.8%) of A&E and four of 30 (13.3%) of Urology patients had chlamydia and gonorrhoea NAAT testing. Of these, 90.9% of A&E, 93.3% of Urology and 100% of GUM patients were prescribed antibiotics. Twelve A&E and one Urology patient were referred to GUM. Conversely, only three of 11 A&E and zero of five GUM patients aged over 50 were referred for urological follow-up.

Conclusion:

The management of EO, especially in younger men at risk of STIs by A&E and Urology, and older men at risk of urological problems by GUM, is an area for significant improvement. Closer co-operation between departments, unifying local management protocols, abandoning the traditional demographic divide, and ensuring effective referral pathways are essential to improving care.

BASHH UK guideline for the management of epididymo-orchitis, 2010

The BASHH UK guideline for the management of epididymo-orchitis has been updated in 2010. Consideration should be made of the changing potential aetiologies of epididymo-orchitis - mumps in non-immune individuals and tuberculosis in the immunocompromised and men from countries of high prevalence. The treatment of sexually acquired epididymo-orchitis has changed given the high levels of quinolone-resistant gonorrhoea such that ceftriaxone and doxycycline are recommended in those at high risk of gonorrhoea and doxycycline or ofloxacin in those patients where gonorrhoea is considered unlikely (negative microscopy for Gram-negative intracellular diplococci and no risk factors for gonorrhoea identified). A clinical care pathway has also been produced to simplify the management of epididymo-orchitis.

The implementation of European Association of Urology guidelines in the management of acute epididymo-orchitis

INTRODUCTION

Acute epididymo-orchitis is a common and increasing problem. This retrospective study reviewed whether the European Association of Urology guidelines for the management of acute epididymo-orchitis, which form the basis of this Trust's present inter-departmental guidelines, are being effectively implemented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Case notes of 53 patients attending the emergency department with acute epididymo-orchitis over a 6-month period were reviewed retrospectively. The hospital results' database was used to confirm the diagnostic tests requested on patients at the time of their initial presentation.

RESULTS

Of the study cohort, 26 patients were aged </= 35 years and 27 patients were aged > 35 years. The results demonstrated that a sexual history was documented in only 43.4% of cases. A mid-stream urine sample was sent for routine culture in 54.7% of cases whilst urine for the Chlamydia polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was obtained in 17% and a urethral swab performed in 5.6%. Antibiotics were prescribed in 81% of cases. Of these patients, 46.5% received ciprofloxacin alone (mean age, 52 years; range, 18-87 years), 25.5% received doxycycline alone (mean age, 30 years; range, 18-45 years) and 21% received both ciprofloxacin and doxycycline (mean age, 33 years; range 18-49 years). In 26.4% of cases, verbal advice to attend a genito-urinary medicine clinic was given, whilst a formal telephone referral was made in only one case. Formal urological follow-up was arranged for only three out of 11 patients aged > 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a joint emergency department/urology clinical protocol for the investigation and treatment of acute epididymo-orchitis already exists within the Trust, our current management conforms to this in only a minority of cases. Many different strategies can be employed in the implementation of clinical practice guidelines and all are associated with variable degrees of success. The regular movement of junior staff through each department necessitates that the distribution of management protocols and guidelines occurs at frequent intervals throughout the year and that their implementation is continuously monitored so that, if necessary, further implementation strategies can be employed.

Management of Acute Epididymitis: Are European Guidelines Being Followed?

OBJECTIVE

Acute epididymitis is increasing in men aged 35 years or under due to sexually-transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis. This study examines whether Urological surgeons are following European guidelines for the management of acute epididymitis in these patients.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire survey was conducted of specialists in Urology in two regions of the UK.

RESULTS

Of 79 completed replies, 41 (52%) take a detailed sexual history but only 34 (43%) refer patients to a Genitourinary medicine clinic. Quinolones are the most commonly prescribed first-line antibiotic by 56 (71%) respondents, principally ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

The current management of acute epididymitis in young men must be improved. Ciprofloxacin is not the optimal antimicrobial for the treatment of urogenital chlamydial infection. We recommend that all such patients be referred to local Genitourinary medicine services for contact-tracing and treatment of their sexual partners.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in young patients with acute epididymitis

Specimens from 11 patients presenting with acute epididymitis were tested for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), growth in McCoy cells and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and for other microorganisms by standard laboratory techniques. Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection was detected in four patients by tissue culture, in three patients by EIA and in nine patients by PCR. These findings confirm the usually low detection rate of Chlamydia trachomatis by conventional tissue culture and EIA. Detection by PCR indicated both the diagnostic value of this technique and the importance of this organism in epididymitis.