Urinary continence after salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy, assessed by a self-administered questionnaire: a prospective study

Analysis of quality of life and late biochemical predictors for localized cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) despite a curatively intended radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this study was to describe the quality of life (QoL) of patients with a BCR while identifying predictors of early (ER) and late recurrence (LR).

METHODS

For this purpose, a total of 330 PCa patients with a BCR following RP at Charité University Hospital in Berlin were analyzed. BCR was defined as two consecutive PSA values ≥ 0.2 after a previous non-detectable level. LR was defined as a BCR after 3 years post-RP. Differences in overall survival (OS) were calculated using the log-rank testing. A logistic regression model was applied to identify predictors of ER and LR. We further evaluated difference between ER and LR with respect to functional outcomes in urinary and sexual domains as well as the patients QoL.

RESULTS

Out of 330 patients, 180 patients showed late BCR. Patients rated their global QoL with 64.5% in ER and 68.8% LR as good (EORTC quality of life Questionnaire, question 29 and 30). The questionnaire did not reveal QoL differences in terms of sexual and urinary function within ER and LR. The main predictor for LR was preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels with a relative risk (RR) of 0.96 (p = 0.011). OS for patients with LR was significant longer than for patients with ER (154.3 vs. 143.2 months, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a BCR show a good quality of life possibly irrespective of the time point of BCR. We further identified preoperative PSA levels as a predictor of LR and noted that patients with LR patients lived longer. Further studies are needed.

Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy adversely affects urinary continence irrespective of radiotherapy regime

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of different postoperative radiotherapy (RT) regimes on post-prostatectomy continence and QoL.

METHODS

Men after prostatectomy (RP) and RT were assigned in adjuvant (ART), early salvage (ESRT) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) groups depending on time of initiation, indication and pre-RT-PSA (≤/>0.5 ng/ml). Continence and QoL outcomes were evaluated by validated questionnaire. Statistical analysis included students t test, Chi square, Fisher's test, ROC- and McNemar-Bowker-Analyses.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 5.1 years. 33.5, 38.2 and 28.3% received ART, ESRT and SRT, respectively. Mean time to RT was 0.3 (±0.4), 1.8 (±2.5) and 3.3 (±3.6) years respectively. Differences in age at RP (p = 0.54) and RT (p = 0.47) between groups were not significant. Mean-RT-dose was similar (p = 0.70). Differences in continence distribution between groups before (p = 0.56) and after RT (p = 0.38) were not significant. No significant differences were observed for frequency (p = 0.58) or amount (p = 0.88) of urine loss, impact on QoL (p = 0.13) and ICIQ-SF scores (p = 0.69) between groups. Even though no significant difference in post-RT-continence (p = 0.89) was observed in the direct comparison between groups, a significant worsening of long-term continence was observed in all groups (p < 0.001). We found no cutoff and no time-point after RP at which this negative effect of RT on continence became insignificant (AUC = 0.474). A subgroup with apparent local recurrence showed no differences for ICIQ-SF-score (p = 0.155), QoL (0.077), incontinence grade (p = 0.387), frequency (p = 0.182) and amount (p = 0.415) of urine loss. Proportionally more men in this subgroup remembered deterioration of continence after RT (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative RT adversely affects long-term continence; this negative effect is irrespective of time of initiation or indication for RT. These results suggest a need for innovative strategies of prostate cancer therapy with lasting oncological, functional and QoL outcomes.

[Treatment of male urinary incontinence by artificial urinary sphincter with intracavernous cuff]

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study are to describe the implantation technique of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) with intracavernous cuff, define the indications and report the preliminary results of this technique.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A single-centre retrospective study was carried out in 10 patients with a median age of 66 years. The aetiology of urinary incontinence was radical prostatectomy alone in four cases, combined with radiotherapy in four cases and transurethral resection of the prostate in two cases. The initial treatment consisted of AUS in seven cases and suburethral tape in two cases and the last patient had not been previously treated. Failure of AUS was due to atrophy in three cases and urethral erosion in four cases. Six patients needed to use more than three pads per day. Erections were absent in all patients. All patients were treated by insertion of an intracavernous cuff according to the same technique: perineoscrotal incision on the median raphe, dissection of the bulbar urethra and inferior aspect of the corpora cavernosa, vertical incision of the tunica albuginea on either side of the urethra, passage of the cuff from one incision to the other behind the tunica albuginea and leaving the tunica albuginea against the urethra, and closure of the tunica albuginea by interrupted sutures leaving a passage for the cuff. The median follow-up was 15.5 months.

RESULTS

The median operating time was 90 min. No intraoperative complication was observed. Two patients had to be explanted because of infection of the material. Seven of the remaining eight patients were satisfied and six of them needed less than one pad per day. A history pelvic irradiation did not appear to have any impact on the results.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of male urinary incontinence by artificial urinary sphincter with intracavernous cuff is a simple technique that improves the trophicity and calibre of the urethra underneath the cuff. This technique achieved good results in patients with a history of pelvic irradiation.

Impact of salvage therapy for biochemical recurrence on health-related quality of life following radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of salvage therapy for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2003, a total of 249 patients who underwent RP were available for 2-year follow up. Of the respondents, 203 men did not show evidence of recurrence (group A), and 46 men received salvage hormonal therapy and/or radiotherapy after RP because of a rise in PSA (group B). The general and prostate-target HRQOL was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, respectively. Patients completed the HRQOL instruments by mail at baseline and at 24 months after RP.

RESULTS

All of the patients completed both questionnaires. At baseline no significant differences were found between the two groups in any of the HRQOL domains. There were significant improvements in mental health and social function for the patients without biochemical recurrence postoperatively. Repeated measure anova revealed significantly different patterns of alteration in several general HRQOL domains among the treatment groups. The urinary and bowel domains were equivalent between the two treatment groups at baseline and 24 months after RP. The patients treated with salvage hormonal therapy tended to show delayed recovery of sexual function.

CONCLUSION

Using a self-administered questionnaire, biochemical recurrence following RP was found to impose a substantial burden in patients with localized prostate cancer.

The effect of postprostatectomy external beam radiotherapy on quality of life

BACKGROUND

Postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy may improve prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, but little is known about its effect on quality of life.

METHODS

From the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) data base, 1289 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) without neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormone therapy completed validated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires. Of these, 69 patients also received salvage radiotherapy at a median of 14 months after RP. The University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index and the 36-item short form SF-36 questionnaire were used to compare HRQOL 12 to 18 months after external beam radiotherapy or 26 to 32 months after RP alone. Those responses also were compared with HRQOL responses from 55 men with data prior to and 12 to 18 months after primary radiotherapy. Multivariate regression identified differences between treatment groups.

RESULTS

Men who underwent salvage radiotherapy were younger (P = .03) and had lower incomes (P = .01) than men who underwent RP alone; they also were younger than men who underwent primary radiotherapy (P < .01). In addition, men who received salvage radiotherapy were more likely than men who underwent RP alone to have clinically high-risk prostate cancer (P < .01). Multivariate analyses revealed that men who received salvage radiotherapy experienced more marked decrements in sexual function (P = .01) and bowel function (P = .03) than men who underwent RP alone. Salvage radiotherapy led to less impairment of sexual function (P < .01) and less sexual bother (P = .04) than primary radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although salvage radiotherapy is associated with unclear survival benefits, it adversely affects sexual and bowel function. Until randomized clinical trials demonstrate disease-specific survival benefits for salvage radiotherapy, the HRQOL detriments of additional therapy must be weighed against improved PSA progression-free survival.