Evaluation of peri-operative peripheral and renal venous levels of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors and their relevance in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Does surgery affect systemic immune response? a perioperative analysis of TGF-β, IL-8 and CD45RO

Background

The options of (neo-)adjuvant immunotherapy in addition to surgery in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) are steadily increasing, but patients do not always respond to therapy as intended. The objectives of this study were to investigate the systemic perioperative course of the biomarkers CD45RO, TGF-β, and IL-8 in non-tumor-related minor and tumor-related major maxillofacial surgery and to perform association analyses with demographic and histomorphologic parameters. A deeper understanding of surgery-related changes in various of different immune biomarkers could help to better understand the immunologic consequences of surgery which could influence immunotherapeutic protocols.

Methods

Peripheral whole blood from 38 patients was analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) at five different timepoints before and after maxillofacial surgery to detect changes in mRNA expression of the biomarkers TGF-β, IL-8 and CD45RO. All patients underwent general anesthesia to undergo either resection and free flap reconstruction for OSCC or minor maxillofacial surgery (controls). Statistical analysis was done using Mann-Whitney-U test, Wilcoxon test, and Spearman's correlation.

Results

Compared to the preoperative expression, there was a significant postoperative downregulation of CD45RO, TGF-β and IL-8 until the 4th postoperative day (p ≤ 0.003) in OSCC patients. For TGF-β and IL-8, the reduction in expression was significant (p ≤ 0.004) compared to controls. By postoperative day 10, all analyzed parameters converged to baseline levels. Only CD45RO still showed a significant downregulation (p=0.024). Spearman analysis revealed a significant correlation between increased duration of surgery and perioperative reduction in peripheral blood expression of CD45RO, TGF-β and IL-8 (p ≤ 0.004). Perioperative changes in TGF-β and PD-L1 expression were shown to be not correlated. Preoperative TGF-β expression was significantly lower in patients with lymph node metastases (p=0.014).

Conclusion

With regard to the analyzed parameters, major oncologic head-and-neck surgery does not seem to have long-lasting systemic immunologic effects. Reduced CD45RO might be an expression of transient systemic immunosuppression in response to major surgery. The association of duration of surgery with expression changes of immunologic markers supports efforts to keep the duration of surgery as short as possible. As perioperative TGF-β and PD-L1 expression changes are not associated, these results support further investigation of a combined perioperative anti-PD-1 and anti-TGF-β immunotherapy.

Contemporaneous Perioperative Inflammatory and Angiogenic Cytokine Profiles of Surgical Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients: Clinical Implications

Surgery-induced tumor growth acceleration and synchronous metastatic growth promotion have been observed for decades. Surgery-induced wound healing, orchestrated through growth factors, chemokines, and cytokines, can negatively impact patients harboring residual or metastatic disease. We provide detailed clinical evidence of this process in surgical breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients. Plasma samples were analyzed from 68 cancer patients who had not received treatment before surgery or adjuvant therapy until at least four weeks post-surgery. The levels of plasma cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors were simultaneously quantified and profiled using multiplexed immunoassays for eight time points sampled per patient. The immunologic processes are induced immediately after surgery in patients, characterized by a drastic short-term shift in the expression levels of pro-inflammatory and angiogenic molecules and cytokines. A rapid and significant spike in circulating plasma levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), placental growth factor (PLGF), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) after surgery was noted. The rise in these molecules was concomitant with a significant drop in transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-AB/BB), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-2 (MCP-2). If not earlier, each plasma analyte was normalized to baseline levels within 1-2 weeks after surgery, suggesting that surgical intervention alone was responsible for these effects. The effects of surgical tumor removal on disrupting the pro-inflammatory and angiogenic plasma profiles of cancer patients provide evidence for potentiating malignant progression. Our findings indicate a narrow therapeutic window of opportunity after surgery to prevent disease recurrence.

Low gamma-butyrobetaine dioxygenase (BBOX1) expression as a prognostic biomarker in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a machine learning approach

Gamma-butyrobetaine dioxygenase (BBOX1) is a catalyst for the conversion of gamma-butyrobetaine to l-carnitine, which is detected in normal renal tubules. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognosis, immune response, and genetic alterations associated with low BBOX1 expression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We analyzed the relative influence of BBOX1 on survival using machine learning and investigated drugs that can inhibit renal cancer cells with low BBOX1 expression. We analyzed clinicopathologic factors, survival rates, immune profiles, and gene sets according to BBOX1 expression in a total of 857 patients with kidney cancer from the Hanyang University Hospital cohort (247 cases) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (610 cases). We employed immunohistochemical staining, gene set enrichment analysis, in silico cytometry, pathway network analyses, in vitro drug screening, and gradient boosting machines. BBOX1 expression in RCC was decreased compared with that in normal tissues. Low BBOX1 expression was associated with poor prognosis, decreased CD8+ T cells, and increased neutrophils. In gene set enrichment analyses, low BBOX1 expression was related to gene sets with oncogenic activity and a weak immune response. In pathway network analysis, BBOX1 was linked to regulation of various T cells and programmed death-ligand 1. In vitro drug screening showed that midostaurin, BAY-61-3606, GSK690693, and linifanib inhibited the growth of RCC cells with low BBOX1 expression. Low BBOX1 expression in patients with RCC is related to short survival time and reduced CD8+ T cells; midostaurin, among other drugs, may have enhanced therapeutic effects in this context.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Combined with Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) refers to the removal of the primary renal tumor in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In the past, the combination of CN with cytokine-based immunotherapy was considered the standard of care. However, CN’s role during the targeted treatment era remains controversial. We attempted to address this issue by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. We synthesized data from 15 studies comparing CN and targeted therapy to targeted therapy alone. Our results show that CN combined with targeted therapy was associated with increased survival compared to targeted therapy only. Careful patient selection is required to take full advantage of any survival benefit that CN may offer. Future research endeavors should focus on developing appropriate prognostic models to guide appropriate patient selection for CN.

Abstract

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains controversial during the targeted therapy era. To reconcile the current literature, we analyzed the reported survival data at the individual patient level and compared the long-term survival outcomes of CN combined with targeted therapy vs. targeted therapy alone in patients with mRCC. We performed a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (end-of-search date: 21 July 2020). We recuperated individual patient data from the Kaplan–Meier curves for overall (OS), progression-free (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) from each study. We subsequently performed one-stage frequentist and Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses using both Cox proportional hazards and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were also performed as sensitivity analyses. A subgroup analysis was also performed to determine the effect of CN timing. Fifteen studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria were identified, including fourteen retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial. In the one-stage frequentist meta-analysis, the CN group had superior OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–0.62, p < 0.0001) and CSS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.53–0.75, p < 0.0001). No meaningful clinical difference was observed in PFS (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.80–1.02, p = 0.09). One-stage Bayesian meta-analysis also revealed superior OS (HR: 0.59, 95% credibility interval [CrI]: 0.55–0.63) and CSS (HR: 0.63, 95% CrI: 0.53–0.75) in the CN group, while no meaningful clinical difference was detected in PFS (HR: 0.91, 95% CrI: 0.80–1.02). Similar results were obtained with the RMST models. The OS benefit was also noted in the two-stage meta-analyses models, and in the subgroup of patients who received upfront CN. The combination of CN and targeted therapy for mRCC may lead to superior long-term survival outcomes compared to targeted therapy alone. Careful patient selection based on prognostic factors is required to optimize outcomes.

Baseline perfusion CT parameters as potential biomarkers in predicting long-term prognosis of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the relationship among baseline perfusion CT parameters, clinical, and pathological factors with post-nephrectomy long-term progression-free survival in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively collected 127 patients from March 2005 to May 2007 who undertook perfusion CT. 61 patients were confirmed of pT1N0M0 or pT2N0M0 ccRCC. The mean follow-up time is 118.8 months (± 13.1 m, range 72-135 m). We compared clinical, pathological factors (gender, T stage, age, Fuhrmann grade, VEGF level, and MVD), and perfusion parameters before treatment [blood flow (BF), blood volume, mean transition time, and permeability surface-area product] between groups with post-nephrectomy metastasis and without metastasis. Association between covariates and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox proportional regression.

RESULTS

Among 61 patients, 11 developed distant metastasis (10 in the lung, one in the bone). BF in metastatic group [429.1 (233.8, 570.1) ml/min/100 g] was significantly higher than non-metastatic group [214.3 (153.3, 376.5) ml/min/100 g] (p = 0.011). Metastatic group also had more patients with higher Fuhrmann grade. Multi-covariant Cox regression demonstrated T staging, Fuhrmann grade, and BF were significantly associated with PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.35, 3.08, and 1.006]. In another model, BF > 230 ml/min/100 g was associated with PFS (HR 12.90), along with T staging and Fuhrmann grade (HR 4.73, 3.69).

CONCLUSION

Baseline tumor BF is a potential biomarker in prediction long-term metastasis of localized ccRCC and may help screening for higher risk localized ccRCC patients who need personalized surveillance strategy after nephrectomy.

Methods for the evaluation of biomarkers in patients with kidney and liver diseases: multicentre research programme including ELUCIDATE RCT

Background

Protein biomarkers with associations with the activity and outcomes of diseases are being identified by modern proteomic technologies. They may be simple, accessible, cheap and safe tests that can inform diagnosis, prognosis, treatment selection, monitoring of disease activity and therapy and may substitute for complex, invasive and expensive tests. However, their potential is not yet being realised.

Design and methods

The study consisted of three workstreams to create a framework for research: workstream 1, methodology – to define current practice and explore methodology innovations for biomarkers for monitoring disease; workstream 2, clinical translation – to create a framework of research practice, high-quality samples and related clinical data to evaluate the validity and clinical utility of protein biomarkers; and workstream 3, the ELF to Uncover Cirrhosis as an Indication for Diagnosis and Action for Treatable Event (ELUCIDATE) randomised controlled trial (RCT) – an exemplar RCT of an established test, the ADVIA Centaur® Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Ltd, Camberley, UK) [consisting of a panel of three markers – (1) serum hyaluronic acid, (2) amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen and (3) tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1], for liver cirrhosis to determine its impact on diagnostic timing and the management of cirrhosis and the process of care and improving outcomes.

Results

The methodology workstream evaluated the quality of recommendations for using prostate-specific antigen to monitor patients, systematically reviewed RCTs of monitoring strategies and reviewed the monitoring biomarker literature and how monitoring can have an impact on outcomes. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate monitoring and improve the merits of health care. The monitoring biomarker literature is modest and robust conclusions are infrequent. We recommend improvements in research practice. Patients strongly endorsed the need for robust and conclusive research in this area. The clinical translation workstream focused on analytical and clinical validity. Cohorts were established for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and renal transplantation (RT), with samples and patient data from multiple centres, as a rapid-access resource to evaluate the validity of biomarkers. Candidate biomarkers for RCC and RT were identified from the literature and their quality was evaluated and selected biomarkers were prioritised. The duration of follow-up was a limitation but biomarkers were identified that may be taken forward for clinical utility. In the third workstream, the ELUCIDATE trial registered 1303 patients and randomised 878 patients out of a target of 1000. The trial started late and recruited slowly initially but ultimately recruited with good statistical power to answer the key questions. ELF monitoring altered the patient process of care and may show benefits from the early introduction of interventions with further follow-up. The ELUCIDATE trial was an ‘exemplar’ trial that has demonstrated the challenges of evaluating biomarker strategies in ‘end-to-end’ RCTs and will inform future study designs.

Conclusions

The limitations in the programme were principally that, during the collection and curation of the cohorts of patients with RCC and RT, the pace of discovery of new biomarkers in commercial and non-commercial research was slower than anticipated and so conclusive evaluations using the cohorts are few; however, access to the cohorts will be sustained for future new biomarkers. The ELUCIDATE trial was slow to start and recruit to, with a late surge of recruitment, and so final conclusions about the impact of the ELF test on long-term outcomes await further follow-up. The findings from the three workstreams were used to synthesise a strategy and framework for future biomarker evaluations incorporating innovations in study design, health economics and health informatics.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN74815110, UKCRN ID 9954 and UKCRN ID 11930.

Funding

This project was funded by the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 6, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Prognostic value of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been controversial with the advent of targeted therapy. Our study was to identify the prognostic value of CN combined with targeted therapy for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by conducting a meta-analysis based on the existing population-based studies.

METHODS

Research articles published up to September 2015 were searched through PubMed and Embase. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with mRCC undergoing CN combined with targeted therapy compared with targeted therapy alone. Furthermore, analysis was made to evaluate some potential prognostic factors predicting survival.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in our analysis with 2688 mRCC patients. A fixed-effect model was performed and found the pooled HR of OS was 0.60 (95 % CI 0.53-0.67, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the pooled median survival ratio was elevated (HR 2.11, 95 % CI 1.78-2.49, p < 0.0001), indicating that patients who received CN combined with targeted therapy yielded a more than twofold prolonged OS compared with those who received targeted therapy alone. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in PFS in the patients undergoing CN combined with targeted therapy (HR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.57-1.19, p = 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that CN combined with targeted therapy has a significant OS advantage in patients with mRCC. However, the results should be evaluated in the context of the potential selection biases of the existing evidence. Large prospective cohort studies are required to confirm these findings.

Change in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor after gamma knife radiosurgery for meningioma: a preliminary study

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the plasma level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for the treatment of meningioma.

Methods

Fourteen patients with meningiomas had peripheral venous blood collected at the time of GKRS and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month and 6 month visits. Plasma VEGF levels were measured using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. For controls, peripheral blood samples were obtained from 20 healthy volunteers.

Results

The mean plasma VEGF level (29.6 pg/mL) in patients with meningiomas before GKRS was significantly lower than that of the control group (62.4 pg/mL, p=0.019). At 1 week after GKRS, the mean plasma VEGF levels decreased to 23.4 pg/mL, and dropped to 13.9 pg/mL at 1 month, 14.8 pg/mL at 3 months, then increased to 27.7 pg/mL at 6 months. Two patients (14.3%) with peritumoral edema (PTE) showed a level of VEGF 6 months after GKRS higher than their preradiosurgical level. There was no significant association found in an analysis of correlation between PTE and tumor size, marginal dose, age, and sex.

Conclusion

Our study is first in demonstrating changes of plasma VEGF after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for meningioma. This study may provide a stimulus for more work related to whether measurement of plasma level has a correlation with tumor response after SRS for meningioma.

Thrombospondin-1 in urological cancer: pathological role, clinical significance, and therapeutic prospects

Angiogenesis is an important process for tumor growth and progression of various solid tumors including urological cancers. Thrombospondins (TSPs), especially TSP-1, are representative “anti”-angiogenic molecules and many studies have clarified their pathological role and clinical significance in vivo and in vitro. In fact, TSP-1 expression is associated with clinicopathological features and prognosis in many types of cancers. However, TSP-1 is a multi-functional protein and its biological activities vary according to the specific tumor environments. Consequently, there is no general agreement on its cancer-related function in urological cancers, and detailed information regarding regulative mechanisms is essential for a better understanding of its therapeutic effects and prognostic values. Various “suppressor genes” and “oncogenes” are known to be regulators and TSP-1-related factors under physiological and pathological conditions. In addition, various types of fragments derived from TSP-1 exist in a given tissue microenvironment and TSP-1 derived-peptides have specific activities. However, a detailed pathological function in human cancer tissues is not still understood. This review will focus on the pathological roles and clinical significance of TSP-1 in urological cancers, including prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial cancer. In addition, special attention is paid to TSP-1-derived peptide and TSP-1-based therapy for malignancies.

[Renal toxicity of anti-VEGF (corrected) targeted therapies]

For a few years, new targeted therapies have been used for metastatic cancers, targeting VEGF and its receptors and improving patients' survival for metastatic carcinoma (kidney, GIST, breast, colorectal). The objective of these treatments is to block either circulating VEGF (bevacizumab; VEGF-Trap), or tyrosine kinase receptors (especially the VEGF receptor) (sorafenib, sunitinib, brivanib, imatinib, etc.). Indeed, VEGF stimulates endothelial cell proliferation and then tumour growth and metastasis. However, all these antiangiogenic drugs share similar side effects, most frequently gastrointestinal disturbance, skin toxicity and hypertension. Hypertension seems to be especially frequent in case of good response. Renal side effects have probably been underestimated in the first place and their exact frequency is not known, needing some specific trials and registries. Proteinuria, thrombotic microangiopathies and acute renal failures have been reported: renal biopsies might be necessary for precise evaluation of renal damages. Physiopathology seems very close to preeclampsia. Good collaboration between oncologists, nephrologists and cardiologists is therefore crucial in order to continue these targeted therapies safely for the patients.

Serum 20S proteasome is elevated in patients with renal cell carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis

Background:

To date, no reliable serum marker for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the putative significance of circulating 20S proteasome levels.

Methods:

Preoperative 20S proteasome serum levels were determined in 113 CCRCC patients and 15 healthy controls by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Associations with CCRCC, pathological variables, disease-specific survival (DSS), and response to sunitinib were evaluated.

Results:

Median 20S proteasome levels were higher in CCRCC patients than in healthy controls (4.66 vs 1.52 μg ml⁻¹, P<0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve curve was 87.1%. The 20S proteasome levels were associated with symptoms (P=0.0008), distant metastases (P=0.0011), grade (P=0.0247), and necrosis (P=0.0462). The 20S proteasome levels were identified as a prognostic factor for DSS in both univariable (hazards ratio 1.21, P<0.001) and multivariable (hazards ratio 1.17, P=0.0015) survival analysis. In patients responding to sunitinib, 20S proteasome levels were lower than in patients with stable disease and progressive disease.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates for the first time that increased 20S proteasome levels are associated with CCRCC, advanced disease, and poor prognosis. Routine use of this marker may allow better diagnosis, risk stratification, risk-adjusted follow-up, and identification of patients with a greater likelihood of response to targeted therapy.

The impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy

PURPOSE

Vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy is a standard of care in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of novel agents remains poorly defined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed baseline characteristics and outcomes of 314 patients with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy naïve, metastatic renal cell carcinoma from United States and Canadian cancer centers to study the impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy on overall survival.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy (201) were younger (p < 0.01), and more likely to have a better Karnofsky performance status (p < 0.01), more than 1 site of metastasis (p = 0.04) and lower corrected calcium levels (p < 0.01) compared to those who did not undergo cytoreductive nephrectomy (113). On univariable analysis cytoreductive nephrectomy was associated with a median overall survival of 19.8 months compared to 9.4 months for patients who did not undergo cytoreductive nephrectomy (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.32, 0.59; p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis and adjusting for established prognostic risk factors the overall survival difference persisted (adjusted HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.46, 0.99; p = 0.04) in favor of the cytoreductive nephrectomy group. In subgroup analyses stratified for favorable/intermediate/poor risk criteria, patients in the poor risk group had a marginal benefit (p = 0.06). Similarly patients with Karnofsky performance status less than 80% also had a marginal survival benefit (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study cytoreductive nephrectomy was independently associated with a prolonged overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor targeted agents, although the benefit is marginal in those patients with poor risk features.

The value of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

PURPOSE

We evaluated the value of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the targeted therapy era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 78 patients treated with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma between 2006 and 2009. A total of 45 patients underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by targeted therapy (cytoreductive nephrectomy group) and 33 were treated with targeted therapy alone (noncytoreductive nephrectomy group). We estimated progression-free and overall survival using Kaplan-Meier curves. The prognostic significance of each variable was estimated with a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological variables did not differ in the 2 groups except for Karnofsky performance status and sarcomatoid feature. The treatment response rate did not differ in the 2 groups (23.1% vs 30.3%, p = 0.488). Median progression-free survival was 11.7 and 9.0 months in the cytoreductive and noncytoreductive nephrectomy groups (p = 0.270), and median overall survival was 21.6 and 13.9 months, respectively (p = 0.128). On multivariate analysis Karnofsky performance status (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4-5.7, p = 0.003) and sarcomatoid features (HR 2.9, 95% 1.3-6.7, p = 0.013) were independent predictors of progression-free survival. Karnofsky performance status (HR 3.3, 95% 1.7-6.5, p = 0.001), sarcomatoid features (HR 2.7, 95% 1.2-6.2, p = 0.021) and liver metastasis (HR 2.7, 95% 1.0-7.1, p = 0.045) were independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant differences in tumor response or survival between the 2 groups. Prospective trials are needed to confirm our results.

Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a very heterogeneous disease with widely varying prognosis. An accurate knowledge of the individual risk of disease progression and mortality after treatment is essential to counsel patients, plan individualized surveillance protocols and select patients for adapted treatment schedules and new clinical trials.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on prognostic factors of localized and metastatic RCC was performed.

RESULTS

Prognostic factors in RCC include anatomical (TNM classification, tumor size), histological (Fuhrman grade, histologic subtype), clinical (symptoms and performance status), and molecular features. All these features are not perfectly accurate when used alone. Therefore an increasing number of prognostic models or nomograms that include several combined prognostic features have been designed in order to improve predictive accuracy. UCLA Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the Mayo Clinic's SSIGN score are the two most used prognostic models for localized RCC. In the setting of metastatic RCC the classical anatomical and histological tumor features have little predictive value. However, accurate prognostic models have been designed to predict response to therapy, and progression-free and overall survival. The two most used tools to predict response to immunotherapy are the model designed by the French Group of Immunotherapy and the Motzer's model. The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs have deeply changed the treatment of metastatic RCC. Predictive tools that are adapted to the modern targeted therapies are now needed.

CONCLUSION

There is increasing knowledge on prognostic factors of localized and metastatic RCC. Several predictive models have been developed by combining different prognostic features and are valuable tools for patient counseling, treatment decision-making and trial design. Further research is needed to assess whether the combination of classical prognostic factors with molecular features and information from gene and protein expression profiling can increase the predictive accuracy of the current prognostic models.

Diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers for renal cell carcinoma: a critical appraisal of the current state of research and clinical applicability

CONTEXT

Earlier detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the recent expansion of treatment possibilities have positively influenced the outlook for patients with this disease. However, progression and treatment response are still not sufficiently predictable. Molecular markers could help to refine individual risk stratification and treatment planning, although they have not yet become clinically routine.

OBJECTIVE

This review presents an overview of diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers for RCC and a subgrouping of these markers for different clinical issues.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature and recent meeting abstracts were searched using these terms: renal (cell) carcinoma, molecular/tumor markers, biopsy, blood, urine, disease progression/prognosis, immunohistochemistry, risk factors, and survival. Due to the resulting large number of articles, studies were subjectively selected according to the importance of a study on the field, number of investigated patients, originality, multivariate analyses performed, contrast with previously published data, actuality, and assumed clinical applicability of the described results. More then 90% of the selected studies originated from the past 10 yr; >50% of the articles were written in 2006 or later.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

These data were predominantly obtained via nonrandomized, retrospective, but often controlled studies. Thereby, the resulting level of evidence is 2A/2B. The broad spectrum of described molecular markers (MMs) for RCC consists of markers already extensively studied in other malignancies (eg, p53), as well as MMs typically associated with specific RCC-altered gene functions and pathways (eg, von Hippel-Lindau [VHL]). The main goal of using MMs is to refine the prediction of clinical end points like tumor progression, treatment response, and cancer-specific and/or overall survival. Further, MMs might facilitate the clinical work-up of undefined renal masses and prove to be more convenient tools for screening and follow-up in blood and urine.

CONCLUSIONS

Presently, there are a number of promising MMs for diverse clinical questions, but the available data are not yet valid enough for routine, clinical application. We should comply with the demand for large multicenter prospective investigations, stratified for RCC type and treatment modalities, to lift the use of molecular markers in RCC to a practical level, thereby providing a better consultation for our patients regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.