Population-based study of erectile dysfunction and polypharmacy

Erectile Dysfunction as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor: Time to Step Up?

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major health problem that affects a significant proportion of the general population, and its prevalence is even higher in patients with CV risk factors and/or disease. ED and cardiovascular (CV) disease share several common pathophysiological mechanisms, and thus, the potential role of ED as a predictor of CV events has emerged as a significant research aspect.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to present and critically discuss data assessing the relation between ED and CV disease and the potential predictive value of ED for CV events.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature has been performed to identify studies evaluating the association between ED and CV disease.

RESULTS

Several cross-sectional and prospective studies have examined the association between ED and CV disease and found an increased prevalence of ED in patients with CV disease. ED was shown to independently predict future CV events. Importantly, ED was found to precede the development of overt coronary artery disease (CAD) by 3 to 5 years, offering a "time window" to properly manage these patients before the clinical manifestation of CAD. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are the first-line treatment option for ED and were shown to be safe in terms of CV events in patients with and without CV disease.

CONCLUSION

Accumulating evidence supports a strong predictive role of ED for CV events. Early identification of ED could allow for the optimal management of these patients to reduce the risk for a CV event to occur.

The global prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the global prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED); as well as its association with physiological and pathological ageing by examining the relationship between ED and cardiovascular disease (CVD), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and dementia. We also aimed to characterise discrepancies caused by the use of different ED screening tools.

METHODS

The Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) were searched to find population-based studies investigating the prevalence of ED and the association between ED and CVD, BPH, and dementia in the general population.

RESULTS

The global prevalence of ED was 3-76.5%. ED was associated with increasing age. Use of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS)-derived questionnaire identified a high prevalence of ED in young men. ED was positively associated with CVD. Men with ED have an increased risk of all-cause mortality odds ratio (OR) 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.57), as well as CVD mortality OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.00-2.05). Men with ED are 1.33-6.24-times more likely to have BPH then men without ED, and 1.68-times more likely to develop dementia than men without ED.

CONCLUSION

ED screening tools in population-based studies are a major source of discrepancy. Non-validated questionnaires may be less sensitive than the IIEF and MMAS-derived questionnaire. ED constitutes a large burden on society given its high prevalence and impact on quality of life, and is also a risk factor for CVD, dementia, and all-cause mortality.

Hypertension might be a risk factor for erectile dysfunction: a meta-analysis

The study aimed to evaluate whether hypertension was a risk factor for erectile dysfunction (ED). Databases including PubMed and Embase were retrieved to identify studies related to hypertension in ED patients. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the effect size. Subgroup analyses stratified by total number of enrolled subjects and research regions were performed. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing a single study at one time. Egger's test was used to evaluate the publication bias. Totally, 40 studies including 121,641 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. As a result, hypertension was closely related to ED (OR = 1.74, 95% CI, 0.63-0.80, p < .01). Subgroup analysis indicated hypertension was the risk factor for ED whatever the participants numbers. When stratified by different regions, hypertension was a risk factor for ED in Africa (OR = 3.35, 95% CI, 1.45-7.77, p < .01), Americas (OR = 1.97, 95% CI, 1.68-2.31, p < 0.01), Asia (OR = 1.46, 95% CI, 1.16-1.84, p < .01) and Europe (OR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.34-2.49, p < .01), but not in Australia. Hypertension may be a potential risk factor for ED.

Common prescription medication use and erectile dysfunction: results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of erectile dysfunction (ED) with commonly used medications including antihypertensive treatment (AHT), psychoactive medication and pain and anti-inflammatory medication.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey used a multistage stratified design to recruit a random sample of 2301 men aged 30-79 years. ED was assessed using the five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Prescription medications, captured using a combination of drug inventory and self-report with a prompt by indication, included in this analysis comprised AHT, psychoactive medication, and pain and anti-inflammatory medication. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of the association of medication use with ED and to adjust for potential confounders including age, comorbid conditions and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.

RESULTS

Multivariable analyses showed benzodiazepines (adjusted OR = 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 5.31) and tricyclic antidepressants (adjusted OR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.09, 10.27) were associated with ED, while no association was observed for serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and atypical antipsychotics. The use of AHT, whether in monotherapy or in conjunction with other AHTs, and pain or anti-inflammatory medications were not associated with ED after accounting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the BACH survey suggest adverse effects of some psychoactive medications (benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants). No evidence of an association of AHT or pain and anti-inflammatory medication with ED was observed.

Erectile dysfunction and the internet: drug company manipulation of public and professional opinion

Given that the Internet is now a major source of information regarding health and mental health problems, and that it is in the interest of the pharmaceutical industry to influence public and professional opinion, this study evaluated 70 websites about erectile dysfunction. The 31 drug company-funded websites (44%) were, compared with the 39 websites that are not industry funded, significantly more biased toward biological factors in general, and toward medication in particular (p < .01). The high proportion of websites that are industry sponsored, and the bias of those websites, confirms previous studies on depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and demonstrates that drug companies are using their financial might to manipulate public and professional opinion on the Internet.

What do most erectile dysfunction guidelines have in common? No evidence-based discussion or recommendation of heart-healthy lifestyle changes and/or Panax ginseng

Sexual health or erectile dysfunction (ED) state of the art guidelines provide a thorough overview of conventional prescription or other notable extrinsic treatment options. Yet, over the past 10-15 years, a plethora of international researchers have established that individual and comprehensive lifestyle changes can prevent and potentially improve ED. We review the lifestyle evidence that should equate to grade A or level 1 evidence recommendations for ED. We also review the evidence for Panax ginseng, an over-the-counter (OTC) dietary supplement with a 35-year history of laboratory investigations, multiple positive randomized trials over approximately 15 years and several independent meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Perhaps it is time to at least discuss and even emphasize lifestyle and other non-conventional interventions in ED guidelines so that patients can explore a diversity of potentially synergistic choices with their physicians and can improve their quality and quantity of life. Ignoring the consistent, positive data on lifestyle modifications in ED guidelines, for example, is tantamount to ignoring diet and lifestyle changes to reduce the risk of or ameliorate cardiovascular diseases.

Is erectile dysfunction a reliable proxy of general male health status? The case for the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) has emerged progressively as a sentinel marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The correlation between ED and the burden arising from multiple comorbid conditions has been incompletely analyzed.

AIM

Assess whether erectile function, defined with the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score, is associated with health-significant comorbidities scored with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).

METHODS

Clinical and hemodynamic variables of the last 140 consecutive patients who underwent penile color Doppler ultrasonography for new-onset ED were considered. Patients were assessed with a thorough medical and sexual history. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with the CCI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Descriptive statistics and either linear or logistic regression models tested the association among IIEF-EF, hemodynamic parameters, and CCI, which was included in the model both as continuous and categorized variable (0 vs. ≥1).

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 138 patients (98.6%) (mean age 46.6 years [standard deviation 13.0]; range 21-75 years). CCI was 0, 1, and ≥2 in 94 (68.1%), 23 (16.7%), and 21 (15.25%) patients, respectively. Of all, 35 patients (79.5%) did not have a CVD comorbidity. Mean IIEF-EF was 13.7 (9.3). ED severity was no ED, mild, mild to moderate, moderate, and severe in 12 (9.1%), 28 (20.2%), 12 (9.1%), 23 (16.2%), and 63 (45.5%) patients, respectively. At multivariable linear regression analysis, CCI significantly worsened with increased age (β=0.33; P=0.001) and decreased IIEF-EF values (β=-0.25; P=0.01). At logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05; P=0.004) and IIEF-EF (OR: 0.95; P=0.04) emerged as significant predictors of categorized CCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of ED, as objectively interpreted with IIEF-EF, accounts for a higher CCI, which may be considered a reliable proxy of a lower general male health status regardless of the etiology of ED.