Can simvastatin improve erectile function and health-related quality of life in men aged ≥40 years with erectile dysfunction? Results of the Erectile Dysfunction and Statins Trial [ISRCTN66772971]

Incidence of erectile dysfunction treatment after radical prostatectomy by Statin use in Finnish Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common after radical prostatectomy (RP) due to cavernous nerve damage. Risk of ED is also affected by vascular function. Statins prevent vascular events but their association with post-prostatectomy ED is unclear. We explored the likelihood of starting ED treatment after RP by statin use at the population level.

METHODS

The study cohort included 14,295 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with no ED treatment prior to diagnosis of PCa treated with RP in Finland during 1995-2013. Information on use of cholesterol-lowering drugs and ED medication during 1995-2014 and penile prosthesis implantation during 1996-2014 were gathered from national registries. Risk of ED treatment initiation after RP was analyzed by pre-diagnostic and post-diagnostic statin and non-statin cholesterol lowering (NSCL) drug use with Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Pre-diagnostic statin use or NSCL drug use overall had no association with risk of ED treatment initiation after RP. Post-diagnostic statin use was associated with a slightly increased risk of initiation of any ED treatment (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01-1.14). Patients with the longest duration of post-diagnostic statin use had a significantly decreased risk of PDE5 inhibitor initiation compared to non-users (HR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.20-0.94). Among patients with no cardiovascular comorbidities, pre-diagnostic statin users had a significantly increased risk of initiation of injectable ED drugs (HR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.04-1.55), however, no association with risk of any other ED treatment was observed.

CONCLUSION

Statin users have a slightly increased risk of ED treatment initiation after RP, which probably reflects the effect of the underlying vascular insufficiency.

Interactions between erectile dysfunction, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular drugs

Sexual health has a fundamental role in overall health and well-being, and a healthy and dynamic sex life can make an important contribution to a good quality of life. Sexual dysfunction, and especially erectile dysfunction (ED) in men, is highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). CVD and ED have shared risk factors and pathophysiological links, such as endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and low plasma testosterone levels. ED has been shown to be an independent and early harbinger of future CVD events, providing an important window to initiate preventive measures. Therefore, screening and diagnosing ED is essential for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD because the assessment of ED offers an easy and low-cost prognostic tool that is an alternative to other investigational cardiovascular biomarkers. Moreover, ED is a major contributing factor to the discontinuation of, or poor adherence to, cardiovascular therapy. Cardiovascular drugs have divergent effects on erectile function, with diuretics and β-blockers having the worst profiles, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and nebivolol having the best profiles. Pharmacological treatment of ED has an equivocal effect on the risk of CVD, suggesting a complex interaction between ED and drugs for CVD. In this Review, we discuss how sexual function could be incorporated into the patient history taken by physicians treating individuals with CVD, not merely as part of the diagnostic work-up but as a means to pursue tangible and essential benefits in quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes.

Erectile Dysfunction as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor: Time to Step Up?

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major health problem that affects a significant proportion of the general population, and its prevalence is even higher in patients with CV risk factors and/or disease. ED and cardiovascular (CV) disease share several common pathophysiological mechanisms, and thus, the potential role of ED as a predictor of CV events has emerged as a significant research aspect.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to present and critically discuss data assessing the relation between ED and CV disease and the potential predictive value of ED for CV events.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature has been performed to identify studies evaluating the association between ED and CV disease.

RESULTS

Several cross-sectional and prospective studies have examined the association between ED and CV disease and found an increased prevalence of ED in patients with CV disease. ED was shown to independently predict future CV events. Importantly, ED was found to precede the development of overt coronary artery disease (CAD) by 3 to 5 years, offering a "time window" to properly manage these patients before the clinical manifestation of CAD. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are the first-line treatment option for ED and were shown to be safe in terms of CV events in patients with and without CV disease.

CONCLUSION

Accumulating evidence supports a strong predictive role of ED for CV events. Early identification of ED could allow for the optimal management of these patients to reduce the risk for a CV event to occur.

Effects of Preoperative Atorvastatin Treatment On Erectile Function After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Subgroup of ESTO1, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction is common after radical prostatectomy because of damage to the cavernous nerves. Thus, it is important to identify new ways to avoid this problem. For example, statins have shown positive effects on erectile function and may have anti-inflammatory effects that improve recovery after surgery.

AIM

The aim of this exploratory analysis of a subgroup from ESTO1, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, was to evaluate the preoperative use of atorvastatin on erectile function after radical prostatectomy.

METHOD

Patients were randomized to either 80 mg atorvastatin or placebo daily before undergoing radical prostatectomy from study inclusion to the day of surgery. Altogether 118 men with prostate cancer and scheduled for radical prostatectomy were asked to fill out the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire before surgery and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The study was exploratory, with the main outcome being the overall difference between IIEF-5 scores in the 2 groups at 12 months. Several hypotheses generating sub-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Overall, 85% filled out the IIEF-5 questionnaire before their operation and 85%, 81%, 78%, and 78% completed it at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up, respectively. 52% of men had information available at all time points. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline in either erectile function, comorbidities, or tumor characteristics. The median duration of use of atorvastatin and placebo before surgery was 27 and 25 days, respectively. Preoperative atorvastatin treatment had no statistically significant effect on erectile function after prostatectomy as compared with placebo, although IIEF-5 scores were higher at all time points in the statin arm. Furthermore, atorvastatin treatment compared with placebo improved IIEF-5 scores at 12 months after surgery when the cavernous nerves were at least partially intact bilaterally (P < .04, n = 65); however, after full bilateral or unilateral nerve-sparing, the difference was not statistically significant.

CLINICAL IMPLICATION

Short-term statin treatment did not improve recovery of erectile function after prostatectomy; however, further studies are needed before final conclusions.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

This was a randomized placebo-controlled study. Original ESTO1 study was designed to detect a difference in prostate cancer biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

Short-term atorvastatin treatment before radical prostatectomy had no statistically significant effect on the recovery of erectile functions in a non-selected cohort of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Further studies will be needed to clarify the role of long-term atorvastatin use before and after prostatectomy. Siltari A, Riikonen J, Fode M, et al. Effects of Preoperative Atorvastatin Treatment On Erectile Function After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Subgroup of ESTO1, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Sex Med 2019;16:1597-1605.

Non-invasive Management Options for Erectile Dysfunction When a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Fails

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) are the drug of choice for medical management of erectile dysfunction (ED). On-demand PDE5Is have an overall efficacy of 60-70% for ED; 30-35% of patients fail to respond to a PDE5I, and 30-50% of non-responders can be salvaged with detailed counseling on proper use and physician follow-up to ensure that the patient has been prescribed an appropriate and full PDE5I clinical trial. True non-responders may be offered intracavernosal injections of erectogenic drugs, intraurethral alprostadil, or surgical insertion of a penile prosthesis. Such options are not discreet and are associated with more adverse effects than PDE5Is. Thus patients may request additional non-invasive medical management options. This review describes published literature on patients who failed to respond to an on-demand PDE5I regimen and were treated with a non-invasive PDEI-based regimen, including switching from one PDE5I to another; increasing the dose of PDE5I above the labeled dosage range; using two PDE5Is concurrently; using a daily PDE5I regimen; or combining a PDE5I with a testosterone supplement, α-adrenergic antagonist, intraurethral or intracavernosal alprostadil, vacuum erection device, or low-intensity shock wave therapy. The limitations of published clinical trials do not allow for sufficient evidence to recommend one option over another. Therefore, in PDE5I-refractory patients, the choice of a specific next step should be individualized based on the preference of the patient and his sexual partner, the advantages and disadvantages of the various options, the concurrent medical illnesses and medications of the patient, and the patient's response to treatment.

Effects of statin therapy on augmentation index as a measure of arterial stiffness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of statin therapy on augmentation index (AIx) as a measure of arterial stiffness using a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

METHODS

The search included PubMed-Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of statin therapy on arterial stiffness measured as AIx. A random-effects model and generic inverse variance method were used for quantitative data synthesis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method. Random-effects meta-regression was performed using unrestricted maximum likelihood method to evaluate the impact of potential confounders.

RESULTS

18 trials examining the effects of statin therapy on arterial stiffness were included. A significant reduction in aortic AIx following statin therapy was proven (WMD: -2.40%, 95% CI: -4.59, -0.21, p=0.032; I(2): 51.20%). HR-adjusted AIx 75% values also revealed a significant improvement by statin therapy (WMD: -5.04%, 95% CI: -7.81, -2.27, p<0.001; I(2): 0%), but not when analysis was restricted to unadjusted AIx values (WMD: -2.30%, 95% CI: -4.83, 0.23, p=0.075; I(2): 53.83%). There was no significant change in carotid (WMD: -2.75%, 95% CI: -8.06, 2.56, p=0.309; I(2): 26.86%) and peripheral (WMD: 0.25%, 95% CI: -3.31, 3.82, p=0.889; I(2): 72.19%) AIx due to statin treatment. There was also no difference in the effect size calculated for different statins subgroups. The impact of statins on AIx was independent of LDL-cholesterol level (slope: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.13; p=0.181).

CONCLUSION

Statin therapy causes a significant reduction in aortic AIx which is independent of LDL-cholesterol changes.

The Circle of Lifestyle and Erectile Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) has been significantly associated with many chronic conditions including obesity, the metabolic syndrome, hypogonadism, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease (CVD), lower urinary tract symptoms, and psychiatric/psychological disorders. ED is also a well-established predictor of CVD.

AIM

This review will focus on the association of ED with cardiovascular, metabolic, and cognitive conditions and discuss the effects of managing lifestyle factors in order to reduce the burden of ED and consequently outcomes in patients with chronic conditions.

METHODS

A literature search using Medline, PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health), and abstracts from scientific meetings was performed from 1990.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome measures were improvements in sexual function.

RESULTS

A total of 59 reviews on the topic were evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting several lifestyle factors associated with CVD/metabolic/cognitive disorders, e.g., smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, and physical activity, can have significant benefits, leading to an improvement in ED as well as testosterone levels and consequently CVD. Kirby M. The circle of lifestyle and erectile dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2015;3:169-182.

Erectile dysfunction as a marker for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and intervention: a cost analysis

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men.

AIM

This study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to determine the cost effectiveness of this screening protocol.

METHODS

The known incidence and prevalence of ED and CVD, the rate of undiagnosed CVD, and the effects of CVD treatment were used to model the change in prevalence of acute CVD events and ED as a function of the number of men with ED and CVD. The cost savings associated with reduction in acute cardiovascular (CV) events and ED prevalence was estimated over 20 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Acute CVD event rate reduction and associated cost savings were modeled over 20 years.

RESULTS

The relative risk of ED in men with CVD is 1.47 and the coprevalence of both ED and CVD was estimated at 1,991,520 men. Approximately 44% of men with CVD risk factors are unaware of their risk. If all men presenting with ED were screened for CVD, 5.8 million men with previously unknown CVD risk factors would be identified over 20 years, costing $2.7 billion to screen. Assuming a 20% decrease in CV events as a result of screening and treatment, 1.1 million cardiovascular events would be avoided, saving $21.3 billion over 20 years. Similarly, 1.1 million cases of ED would be treated, saving $9.7 billion. Together, the reduction in acute CVD and ED treatment cost would save $28.5 billion over 20 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for CVD in men presenting with ED can be a cost-effective intervention for secondary prevention of both CVD and, over the longer term, ED.

Pravastatin improves the impaired nitric oxide-mediated neurogenic and endothelium-dependent relaxation of corpus cavernosum in aged rats

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pravastatin treatment on diminished corpus cavernosum (CC) function associated with aging.

METHODS

Male rats were divided into three groups as adult rats (12-14 weeks old), aged rats (72-80 weeks old) and aged rats given 10 mg/kg/d pravastatin in drinking water for six weeks. Blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff method. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides and testosterone levels were estimated in blood. Changes in expression levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), phosphorylated eNOS (p-eNOS) (Ser-1177), neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), NADPH oxidase subunit gp91(phox), Rho A and Rho kinase (ROCK2) in CC were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Nitric oxide (NO)-mediated endothelium-dependent and neurogenic CC relaxation were evaluated by acetylcholine (ACh, 0.1 nM-100 µM) and electrical field stimulation (EFS; 30 V, 5 ms, 2-32 Hz), respectively.

RESULTS

In aged rats, NO-mediated, both endothelium-dependent and neurogenic CC relaxation, were significantly impaired as compared to adult rats. Besides, eNOS, p-eNOS and nNOS expressions decreased significantly in CC from aged rats, while gp91(phox), RhoA and ROCK2 expressions increased significantly. The diminished relaxation in response to ACh or EFS as well as the changes in expression of these proteins in aged rats were significantly improved by pravastatin treatment.

CONCLUSION

Pravastatin improves NO-mediated CC relaxations of aged rats probably by inhibiting NADPH oxidase/Rho kinase pathways, and this effect does not seem to be associated with lipid lowering effect of this drug.

Statins and male sexual health: a retrospective cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

Conflicting reports exist regarding the role of statins in male gonadal and sexual function. Some studies report a beneficial effect, particularly for erectile dysfunction (ED), through statins' anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular protective properties. Others suggest that statins might be associated with sexual dysfunction through negative effects on hormone levels.

AIM

This study aims to compare the risk of gonadal or sexual dysfunction in statin users vs. nonusers in a single-payer healthcare system.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all male patients (30-85 years) enrolled in the Tricare San Antonio market. Using 79 baseline characteristics, we created a propensity score-matched cohort of statin users and nonusers. The study duration was divided into a baseline period (October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2005) to describe patient baseline characteristics, and a follow-up period (October 1, 2005 to March 1, 2012) to determine patient outcomes. Statin users were defined as those prescribed a statin for ≥3 months between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2005.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were identified as the occurrence of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), ED, infertility, testicular dysfunction, or psychosexual dysfunction during the follow-up period as identified by inpatient or outpatient International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of statin use with patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 20,731 patients who met study criteria, we propensity score-matched 3,302 statin users with 3,302 nonusers. Statin use in men was not significantly associated with an increased or decreased risk of BPH (odds ratio [OR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.19), ED (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.90-1.13), infertility (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.66-2.29), testicular dysfunction (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.73-1.14), or psychosexual dysfunction (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.94-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use was not associated with increased risk of being diagnosed with gonadal or sexual dysfunction in men. Further studies using a larger sample may be needed.

Non-cardiovascular effects associated with statins

Statins form the pharmacologic cornerstone of the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In addition to beneficial cardiovascular effects, statins seem to have multiple non-cardiovascular effects. Although early concerns about statin induced hepatotoxicity and cancer have subsided owing to reassuring evidence, two of the most common concerns that clinicians have are myopathy and diabetes. Randomized controlled trials suggest that statins are associated with a modest increase in the risk of myositis but not the risk of myalgia. Severe myopathy (rhabdomyolysis) is rare and often linked to a statin regimen that is no longer recommended (simvastatin 80 mg). Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses suggest an increase in the risk of diabetes with statins, particularly with higher intensity regimens in people with two or more components of the metabolic syndrome. Other non-cardiovascular effects covered in this review are contrast induced nephropathy, cognition, cataracts, erectile dysfunction, and venous thromboembolism. Currently, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines indicate that the cardiovascular benefits of statins generally outweigh non-cardiovascular harms in patients above a certain threshold of cardiovascular risk. Literature is also accumulating on the potential non-cardiovascular benefits of statins, which could lead to novel applications of this class of drug in the future.

Treatment strategies for diabetic patients suffering from erectile dysfunction: an update

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common complications of diabetes. The complex pathophysiology of this disease makes it difficult to create clinical treatments tailored specifically for diabetic patients.

AREAS COVERED

This article will provide an update of both medical and surgical treatment approaches for diabetic ED, as well as discuss established treatments that are the cornerstone of this field.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, PDE type 5 inhibitors represent the first-line treatment for all patients with ED. In the interim since this article's first publication several new PDE5 inhibitors have come to market. Several others that were previously on the market are now available for daily dosing. Analysis of both testosterone level and hemoglobin A1c is an essential part of treatment. Intracavernosal injections and vacuum constriction devices remain safe, and are highly effective treatment options. The implantable penile prosthesis remains a safe, and definitive treatment modality for those patients with refractory ED. Over the coming years as the understanding of the underlying causes of diabetic ED continues, the development of new, noninvasive, but effective medical treatments will lead to even more options for the treatment of this difficult disease.

The effect of statins on erectile dysfunction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in older men, especially those with comorbidities such as diabetes and atherosclerotic disease, conditions where statins are frequently prescribed.

AIM

To examine the effect of statin therapy on ED using the five-item version of the International Inventory of Erectile Function (IIEF).

METHODS

We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of studies identified by a systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Examination of the 186 retrieved citations resulted in the selection of 11 randomized trials for inclusion in the meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in the IIEF score.

RESULTS

IIEF increased by 3.4 points (95% CI 1.7-5.0, P = 0.0001) with statins compared to control. This effect remained statistically significant after multiple sensitivity analyses, including analysis for publication bias, a cumulative meta-analysis, and 11 repeated analyses with each study omitted sequentially. The increase in IIEF with statins was approximately one-third to one-half of that previously reported with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and larger than the effect of lifestyle modification. Metaregression showed an increase in benefit with decreasing lipophilicity. The average age of participants and the degree of LDL cholesterol lowering did not alter the effect on IIEF.

CONCLUSION

Statins cause a clinically relevant improvement of erectile function as measured by the five-item version of the IIEF.

Simvastatin improves the sexual health-related quality of life in men aged 40 years and over with erectile dysfunction: additional data from the erectile dysfunction and statin trial

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction is prevalent in men over 40 years, affecting their quality of life and that of their partners. The aims of this study were:a) To evaluate the internal reliability of the male erectile dysfunction specific quality of life (MED-QoL) scale and explore its factor structure.b) To evaluate the effect of simvastatin on subscales of the MED-QoL in men over forty years with erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

This is a double blind randomised controlled trial of 40 mg simvastatin or placebo given once daily for six months to men over forty years with untreated erectile dysfunction, who were not at high cardiovascular risk and were not on anti-hypertensive or lipid-lowering medication. 173 eligible men were recruited from 10 general practices in East of England. Data were collected at two points over 30 weeks.We report on the factor structure of MED-QoL, the internal reliability of the scale and the derived subscales, and the effect of simvastatin on MED-QoL subscales.

RESULTS

An initial analysis of the MED-QoL items suggested that a number of items should be removed (MED-QoL-R). Exploratory factor analysis identified three subscales within the MED-QoL-R which accounted for 96% of the variance, related to feelings of Control, initiating Intimacy, and Emotional response to erectile dysfunction. The alpha value for the revised scale (MED-Qol-R) was >0.95 and exceeded .82 for each subscale. Regression analysis showed that patients in the placebo group experienced a significantly reduced feeling of Control over erectile dysfunction than those in the statin group. Those in the placebo group had significantly lower Emotional response than those in the statin group at the close of trial, but there was no significant treatment effect on Intimacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our revised MED-QoL-R identified three subscales. Secondary analysis showed a significant improvement in sexual health related quality of life, specifically in relation to perception of control and emotional health in men with untreated erectile dysfunction given 40 mg simvastatin for six months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN66772971.

A review of the positive and negative effects of cardiovascular drugs on sexual function: a proposed table for use in clinical practice

Several antihypertensive drugs, such as diuretics and β-blockers, can negatively affect sexual function, leading to diminished quality of life and often to noncompliance with the therapy. Other drug classes, however, such as angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are able to improve patients’ sexual function. Sufficient knowledge about the effects of these widely used antihypertensive drugs will make it possible for cardiologists and general practitioners to spare and even improve patients’ sexual health by switching to different classes of cardiac medication. Nevertheless, previous data (part I) indicate that most cardiologists lack knowledge about the effects cardiovascular agents can have on sexual function and will thus not be able to provide the necessary holistic patient care with regard to prescribing these drugs. To be able to improve healthcare on this point, we aimed to provide a practical overview, for use by cardiologists as well as other healthcare professionals, dealing with sexual dysfunction in their clinical practices. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature was performed. The eight most widely used classes of antihypertensive drugs have been categorised in a clear table, marking whether they have a positive, negative or no effect on sexual function.