Alpha-Adrenoceptor Agents in Anaesthesia: New compounds override old problems

Results of cystometry and urethral pressure profilometry in dogs sedated with medetomidine or xylazine

OBJECTIVE

To compare effects of medetomidine and xylazine hydrochloride on results of cystometry and micturition reflexes in healthy dogs and results of urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) in sedated and conscious dogs.

ANIMALS

20 dogs.

PROCEDURES

Urodynamic testing was performed 6 times in each dog (3 times after administration of xylazine [1 mg/kg of body weight, IV] and 3 times after administration of medetomidine (30 microg/kg, IM). Before each episode of sedation, UPP was performed. Heart and respiratory rates and indirect blood pressures were recorded prior to and 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after injection of sedative. Cystometry measurements included threshold volume, threshold pressure, and tonus limb. The UPP measurements included maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP), functional profile length, and, in male dogs, plateau pressure.

RESULTS

Mean MUCP was decreased markedly in xylazine- and medetomidine-sedated dogs. Xylazine and medetomidine also decreased plateau pressure in male dogs. The MUCP measurements were consistent among days for conscious and xylazine-sedated dogs but were inconsistent for medetomidine-sedated female dogs. The proportion of valid cystometry measurements was greater for xylazine (39 of 60) than for medetomidine (27 of 60). Cystometry was considered invalid when bladder pressure reached 30 cm H2O without initiation of a micturition reflex.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Medetomidine and xylazine have similar effects on measurement of UPP and cystometry. Medetomidine was less consistent among days for UPP in female dogs and produced fewer valid cystometry tests, compared with xylazine. For urodynamic evaluations, medetomidine administered IM cannot be substituted for xylazine administered IV.

Investigation of romifidine and detomidine for the clinical sedation of horses

The effects of two intravenous doses of romifidine (80 and 120 microg/kg) and one dose of detomidine (20 microg/kg) were compared in a blinded study in 30 horses requiring to be sedated for routine dental treatment. Several physiological parameters were assessed before and for two hours after the administration of the drugs, and the horses' teeth were rasped 30 minutes after they were administered. Romifidine produced a dose-dependent effect on most parameters. Detomidine at 20 microg/kg was similar to romifidine at 120 microg/kg in the magnitude of its sedative effects, but was similar to romifidine at 80 pg/kg in its duration. There were no significant differences between the three treatments in terms of the clinical procedure score.

Cardiopulmonary effects of medetomidine in sheep and in ponies

Medetomidine was administered intravenously to six sheep at 5, 10 and 20 micrograms kg-1 and to one horse and four ponies at 5 and 10 micrograms kg-1. In both species medetomidine resulted in significant decreases in heart rate and cardiac output and, initially, in an increase in arterial blood pressure. In the ponies this increase in blood pressure was followed by a significant and prolonged decrease, but in the sheep the secondary decrease in blood pressure was not statistically significant. In the sheep, the three doses of medetomidine resulted in profound and significant decreases in arterial oxygen tensions, which were significantly dose related, but in the ponies the arterial blood oxygen tensions were not significantly decreased. In both species medetomidine caused a small but significant increase in arterial blood carbon dioxide tensions.