1
|
Gantt EE, Williams RN. The Triumph of the Will: Evolutionary Psychology and the Conceptual Incoherence of Enhancement. JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/0022167819899009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Recent decades have witnessed a profound increase in scholarly work and scientific research conducted under the banner of evolutionary psychology. Although evolutionary psychologists typically disavow any historical or conceptual link to the political or scientific project of eugenics, or at the very least downplay the current relevance of such linkages, a growing number of evolutionary thinkers have begun to embrace a biological science of cognitive and moral enhancement. This article examines some of the ways in which advocates of enhancement assume human agency as central to their project even as their naturalistic explanations of human behavior deny that agency. The article also argues that the utopian moral project that animates the evolutionary enhancement movement is undercut by the materialist metaphysics that undergirds the neo-Darwinian worldview employed to ground the project in the first place, a metaphysics that relativizes and ultimately rejects any meaningful morality or moral endeavor whatsoever.
Collapse
|
2
|
Costs, burdens and the prevention of genetic disorders: what role for professional influence? J Community Genet 2021; 12:503-505. [PMID: 34558036 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00553-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
3
|
Cohen-Kfir N, Bentwich ME, Kent A, Dickman N, Tanus M, Higazi B, Kalfon L, Rudolf M, Falik-Zaccai TC. Challenges to effective and autonomous genetic testing and counseling for ethno-cultural minorities: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:98. [PMID: 33059675 PMCID: PMC7565773 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00537-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Arab population in Israel is a minority ethnic group with its own distinct cultural subgroups. Minority populations are known to underutilize genetic tests and counseling services, thereby undermining the effectiveness of these services among such populations. However, the general and culture-specific reasons for this underutilization are not well defined. Moreover, Arab populations and their key cultural-religious subsets (Muslims, Christians, and Druze) do not reside exclusively in Israel, but are rather found as a minority group in many European and North American countries. Therefore, focusing on the Arab population in Israel allows for the examination of attitudes regarding genetic testing and counseling among this globally important ethnic minority population. Methods We used a qualitative research method, employing individual interviews with 18 women of childbearing age from three religious subgroups (i.e., Druze, Muslim, and Christian) who reside in the Acre district, along with focus group discussions with healthcare providers (HCPs; 9 nurses and 7 genetic counselors) working in the same geographical district. Results A general lack of knowledge regarding the goals and practice of genetic counseling resulting in negative preconceptions of genetic testing was identified amongst all counselees. Counselors’ objective of respecting patient autonomy in decision-making, together with counselees’ misunderstanding of genetic risk data, caused uncertainty, frustration, and distrust. In addition, certain interesting variations were found between the different religious subgroups regarding their attitudes to genetic counseling. Conclusions The study highlights the miscommunications between HCPs, particularly counselors from the majority ethno-cultural group, and counselees from a minority ethno-cultural group. The need for nuanced understanding of the complex perspectives of minority ethno-cultural groups is also emphasized. Such an understanding may enhance the effectiveness of genetic testing and counseling among the Arab minority group while also genuinely empowering the personal autonomy of counselees from this minority group in Israel and other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nehama Cohen-Kfir
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, P.O. Box 1589, Safed, Israel.,The Institute of Human Genetics, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
| | - Miriam Ethel Bentwich
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, P.O. Box 1589, Safed, Israel.
| | - Andrew Kent
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Nomy Dickman
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, P.O. Box 1589, Safed, Israel
| | - Mary Tanus
- Israeli Ministry of Health, Akko District, Acre, New York, USA
| | - Basem Higazi
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, P.O. Box 1589, Safed, Israel
| | - Limor Kalfon
- The Institute of Human Genetics, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
| | - Mary Rudolf
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, P.O. Box 1589, Safed, Israel
| | - Tzipora C Falik-Zaccai
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, P.O. Box 1589, Safed, Israel.,The Institute of Human Genetics, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reprogenetics, reproductive risks and cultural awareness: what may we learn from Israeli and Croatian medical students? BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:85. [PMID: 31771574 PMCID: PMC6880344 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0427-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Past studies emphasized the possible cultural influence on attitudes regarding reprogenetics and reproductive risks among medical students who are taken to be “future physicians.” These studies were crafted in order to enhance the knowledge and expand the boundaries of cultural competence. Yet such studies were focused on MS from relatively marginalized cultures, namely either from non-Western developing countries or minority groups in developed countries. The current study sheds light on possible cultural influences of the dominant culture on medical students in two developed countries, potentially with different dominant cultures regarding reprogenetics and reproductive risks: Israel and Croatia. Methods Quantitative-statistical analyses were employed, based on anonymous questionnaires completed by 150 first year medical students in Israel and Croatia. The questionnaires pertained to the knowledge and attitudes regarding genetics, reproduction and reproductive risks. These questionnaires were completed before the students were engaged in learning about these topics as part of the curriculum in their medical school. Results Substantial differences were revealed between the two groups of medical students. Israeli medical students were less tolerant regarding reproductive risks and more knowledgeable about genetics and reproductive risks than Croatian medical students. For example, while nearly all Israeli medical students (96%) disagreed with the idea that “Screening for reproductive risks in prospective parents is wrong,” less than 40% of their Croatian counterparts shared a similar stance. Similarly, all (100%) Israeli medical students correctly observed that “A carrier of a recessive genetic disease actually has the disease” was wrong, as opposed to only 82% of Croatian students. Conclusions By linking applicable theoretical literature to these findings, we suggest that they may reflect the hidden influence of the dominant culture in each country, disguised as part of the “culture of medicine.” Acknowledging and learning about such influence of the dominant culture, may be an important addition to the training of medical students in cultural competence, and specifically their cultural awareness. Such an acknowledgement may also pave the road to drawing the attention of existing physicians regarding a less known yet an important aspect of their cultural competence, insofar as the cultural awareness component is concerned.
Collapse
|
5
|
Šlesingerová E. In risk we trust/Editing embryos and mirroring future risks and uncertainties. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2019; 22:191-200. [PMID: 30229357 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-018-9851-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Tendencies and efforts have shifted from genome description, DNA mapping, and DNA sequencing to active and profound re-programming, repairing life on genetic and molecular levels in some parts of contemporary life science research. Mirroring and materializing this atmosphere, various life engineering technologies have been used and established in many areas of life sciences in the last decades. A contemporary progressive example of one such technology is DNA editing. Novel developments related to reproductive technologies, particularly embryo editing, prenatal human life engineering, and germline engineering need to be analyzed against the broader social and structural background. The crucial analytical scope for this paper is a specific field: the life-editing technologies used in reproductive medicine and performed experimentally on viable human embryos, particularly CRISPR/Cas9 technology. This text argues that germline editing technologies, as a representative part of contemporary biomedicine, are merging ideas of treatment and enhancement to avoid future risks. Using this specific life manipulation of embryos and gametes, the text analyzes these processes within the concept of power over life-biopower and the specific governing rationality that imagines, classifies, and governs contemporary societies. The text specifically focuses on the potential to create, define, and manage future risks and uncertainties related to prenatal life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Šlesingerová
- Institute of Sociology, Research Group: "Biotechnologies, Nature and Society", Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raz AE, Amano Y, Timmermans S. Coming to terms with the imperfectly normal child: attitudes of Israeli parents of screen-positive infants regarding subsequent prenatal diagnosis. J Community Genet 2018; 10:41-50. [PMID: 29504050 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0361-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examines the interface between newborn screening and prenatal diagnosis from the point-of-view of parents of screen-positive children. Many conditions covered by newborn screening represent classic (autosomal recessive) Mendelian disorders. Parents of screen-positive infants therefore often come to learn that they are carriers of the disease, and face a decision whether to test for it in future pregnancies. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2015-2017 with 34 Israeli parents whose child was screen positive. Three major themes emanated from the parents' attitudes toward prenatal testing for the disease in prospective hypothetical pregnancies: rejection of prenatal testing for the disease associated with the screen positive, and relying instead on newborn screening to reveal if a future baby is also sick (18/34, 53%); support of prenatal testing to get more information (7/34, 21%) and support of prenatal testing in order to abort in case of a test positive (9/34, 26%). We discuss the importance of newborn screening for reproductive decision-making, highlighting the arguments associated with positive and negative parental views of the possibility of having another child with the same condition associated with the screen-positive of the child that had already been born. The conclusions challenge the common assertion that parents pursue the dream of the "perfect child" through prenatal diagnosis that "naturally" leads to selective abortion. The diversity of views expressed by Israeli parents of screen-positive children highlights the diversity of normative scripts of "genetic responsibility" in the context of parenthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviad E Raz
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
| | - Yael Amano
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hosoya S. Changes in Attitudes towards Marriage and Reproduction among People with a Genetic Illness. ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE MIDDLE EAST 2017. [DOI: 10.3167/ame.2016.120203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
In this article, the change in attitude towards marriage and reproduction among Iranian people with a genetic illness called thalassemia has been investigated, along with an analysis of the impact brought by the national thalassemia prevention programmes, which were introduced to discourage marriage between carriers (thalassemia minor) and the birth of severe homozygous cases (thalassemia major). Marriage and reproductive choices of people with both thalassemia minor and thalassemia major were focused upon in order to prevent the birth of affected babies. Thalassemia carrier couples prefer to choose abortion of affected foetuses, rather than giving up their marriage, and some people with thalassemia major choose a person with thalassemia major as a marriage partner, though they must give up having their own child.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hosoya S. Changes in Attitudes towards Marriage and Reproduction among People with a Genetic Illness. ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE MIDDLE EAST 2017. [DOI: 10.3167/ame.2017.120203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
9
|
Abstract
From a historical perspective, selective reproduction is nothing new. Infanticide, abandonment, and selective neglect of children have a long history, and the widespread deployment of sterilization and forced abortion in the twentieth century has been well documented. Yet in recent decades selective reproduction has been placed under the aegis of science and expertise in novel ways. New laboratory and clinical techniques allow for the selective fertilization of gametes, implantation of embryos, or abortion of fetuses. Although they will often overlap with assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), what we term selective reproductive technologies (SRTs) are of a more specific nature: Rather than aiming to overcome infertility, they are used to prevent or allow the birth of certain kinds of children. This review highlights anthropological research into SRTs in different parts of the world, discussing how selective reproduction engages with issues of long-standing theoretical concern in anthropology, such as politics, kinship, gender, religion, globalization, and inequality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine M. Gammeltoft
- Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark;,
| | - Ayo Wahlberg
- Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark;,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Howard H, Swinnen E, Douw K, Vondeling H, Cassiman JJ, Cambon-Thomsen A, Borry P. The Ethical Introduction of Genome-Based Information and Technologies into Public Health. Public Health Genomics 2013; 16:100-9. [DOI: 10.1159/000346474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2012] [Accepted: 12/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
11
|
Dichotomies of collectivism and individualism in bioethics: Selective abortion debates and issues of self-determination in Japan and ‘the West’. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73:507-514. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2010] [Revised: 05/11/2011] [Accepted: 05/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
12
|
Bouffard C, Godin JK, Bévière B. State Intervention in Couples’ Reproductive Decisions: Socioethical Reflections Based on the Practice of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in France. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2010.505897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|