BHIVA guidelines on HIV and chronic hepatitis: coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C virus infection (2005)

High rate of seronegative HCV infection in HIV-positive patients

Co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant global health problem. The two viruses are transmitted with high efficacy via blood-to-blood contact, mainly intravenous drug use (IVDU), whereas HCV is less easily transmitted sexually. Antibody testing is the main screening method for HCV infection, although it may not be the optimal option for HIV infection. The aim of this study was to investigate HCV infection in HIV-positive patients, with and without a detectable anti-HCV antibody response. A total of 187 plasma samples were obtained from HIV-positive patients in Surabaya, Indonesia and examined for anti-HCV [HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) 3.0], HCV genotype/subtype [reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using primers targeting a part of NS5B/5'UTR followed by sequencing] and HCV viral load (quantitative RT-PCR). A total of 119 patients (63.6%) were found to be anti-HCV-positive and, among these, HCV RNA was detected in 73 (61.3%), with HCV-1a as the predominant subtype (31.5%). Of the 68 anti-HCV-negative samples, HCV RNA was detected in 26/68 (38.2%) mostly as the HCV-3a subtype (50%). High HCV viral loads were more common among the HCV-seropositive patients. The HCV-seropositive samples with detected HCV RNA were mostly obtained from HIV-positive patients with parenteral transmission (IVDU) (76.7%); however, the HCV-seronegative samples with detected HCV RNA were mostly from patients who had acquired HCV through heterosexual transmission (61.5%). In conclusion, HIV-positive patients were at high risk of becoming co-infected with HCV and several remained HCV-seronegative. Furthermore, there may exist differences in HCV seropositivity and subtypes between HIV-positive patients who acquired HCV sexually and those who acquired HCV parenterally.

The British HIV Association national audit on the management of subjects co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B/C

The aim of this work was to survey current service provision and adherence to the British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the management of HIV and hepatitis B/C co-infected patients in the UK. Sites were invited to complete a survey of local care arrangements for co-infected patients. A case-note audit of all co-infected attendees during a six-month period in 2009 was performed. Data including demographics, clinical parameters, hepatitis disease status, antiretroviral and hepatitis B/C therapy were collected. Using BHIVA guidelines as audit standards, the proportion of sites and subjects meeting each standard was calculated. One-hundred and forty sites (75%) responded and data from 973 eligible co-infected patients were submitted. Approximately a third of sites reported not re-checking hepatitis serology or vaccination titres annually. Of all co-infected patients, 122 (13%) were neither vaccinated nor immune to hepatitis A and 26 (5%) of patients with hepatitis C were neither vaccinated nor naturally immune to hepatitis B. Of HBsAg-positive subjects, 25 (6%) were receiving lamivudine as the sole drug with antihepatitis B activity. In the UK, the management of HIV and hepatitis B/C co-infection remains highly variable. Optimizing the care of this high-risk patient group is a priority.

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in HIV-positive individuals in the UK - trends in HCV testing and the impact of HCV on HIV treatment outcomes

We examined the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among HIV-positive individuals in the UK, trends in HCV testing and the impact of HCV on HIV treatment outcomes. Trends over time in HCV prevalence were calculated using each patient's most recent HCV status at the end of each calendar year. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having a HCV antibody test, and Cox regression was used to determine whether HCV status was associated with the time to experiencing an immunological response to highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART), time to virological response and viral rebound. Of the 31,765 HIV-positive individuals seen for care between January 1996 and September 2007, 20,365 (64.1%) individuals were tested for HCV, and 1807 (8.9%) had detectable HCV antibody. The proportion of patients in follow-up ever tested for HCV increased over time, from 782/8505 (9.2%) in 1996 to 14,280/17,872 (79.9%) in 2007. Nine thousand six hundred and sixty-nine individuals started HAART for the first time in or after January 2000, of whom, 396 (4.1%) were HCV positive. Presence of HCV infection did not affect initial virological response, virological rebound or immunological response. The cumulative prevalence of HCV in the UK CHIC Study is 8.9%. Despite UK guidelines, over 20% of HIV-positive individuals have not had their HCV status determined by 2007. HCV infection had no impact on HIV virological outcomes or immunological response to HIV treatment. The long-term impact on morbidity and mortality remain to be determined.

Use of simple noninvasive biomarkers to predict liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfection in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Simple noninvasive tests to predict fibrosis, as an alternative to liver biopsy (LB), are needed. Of these, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the Forns index (FI) have been validated in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. However, these indexes may have lower diagnostic value in situations other than the circumscribed conditions of validation studies. We therefore examined the value of the APRI and FI in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients for the detection of significant fibrosis in real-life conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who had participated in a multicentre cross-sectional retrospective study were selected if they had undergone an LB within 24 months before the last visit. The predictive accuracy of the APRI and FI was measured using the areas under receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUROCs). Diagnostic accuracy was determined using the positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values.

RESULTS

A total of 519 coinfected individuals were included in the study. The AUROC [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] of the APRI was 0.67 (0.66-0.71) and that of the FI was 0.67 (0.62-0.71). The PPV of the APRI was 79% and its NPV was 66%. The PPV of the FI was 74% and its NPV was 64%. LB length was available and was > or =15 mm in 120 individuals. In this group, the PPV of the APRI was 85%, and that of the FI was 81%. Using these indexes, 22% of patients could be spared LB. Applying both models sequentially, 30% of patients could be spared LB.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, the diagnostic accuracy of the APRI in real-life conditions was similar to that in the validation studies. The FI performed less well. However, combining the two indexes to make decisions on anti-HCV therapy may prevent a significant proportion of patients from having to undergo LB.

Treatment, care and support for people co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Providing care for people who are co-infected with both HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is becoming increasingly complex and requires integrated prevention, screening, support and programming efforts. We undertook a scoping review to provide a summary of the existing evidence base and to identify and assess the quality of treatment guidelines and systematic reviews related to 3 domains of interest: treatment; epidemiology; and care, support, programming and prevention.

METHODS

We searched 7 databases, hand-searched 8 journals and contacted key informants to identify relevant literature. We included all primary research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses) or treatment guidelines that assessed pegylated interferon and ribavirin for HCV or highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV treatment, or both. In the epidemiology domain, we included all primary research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Studies that included only people with hemophilia and those conducted in developing countries were excluded. In the care, support, programming and prevention domain, we included all studies and reports that focused on co-infection. Two reviewers independently applied coding criteria and assessed the quality of the treatment guidelines and systematic reviews using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Reviews instruments.

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 1633 unique references. Of these, 227 references met the final inclusion criteria: 114 addressed treatment, 52 epidemiology and 79 care, support, programming or prevention. The references included 9 treatment guidelines: 4 were assessed as "strongly recommend," 3 as "recommend (with provisos or alterations)" and 1 as "would not recommend" (1 could not be located). Of 10 systematic reviews that were located, 7 were assessed as being high quality, 2 as medium quality and 1 as low quality.

CONCLUSION

This quality-assessed inventory of treatment guidelines and systematic reviews can be used by physicians and service providers to rapidly locate research about HIV-HCV co-infection. However, many treatment guidelines and reviews often indicate that treatment of current injection drug users and/or people with mental health issues should proceed on a "case-by-case basis." Therefore, much of the evidence (particularly in the treatment literature) is limited in its scope and applicability to important populations that are vulnerable to HIV or HCV infection or co-infection.

Policies and practices for the clinical management of HIV/HCV coinfected children in Europe: an epidemiological survey

The antenatal prevalence of HIV/HCV coinfection ranges from 12% to 28% with mother-to-child transmission rates ranging from 3.6% to 9.5%. There are no guidelines detailing the most appropriate clinical management and treatment of coinfected children. We used a semi-structured questionnaire to investigate current European practices for the management and follow-up of HIV/HCV coinfected children among clinical centres contributing to the European Collaborative Study or the European Paediatric HCV Network. Clinicians from 16 out of 24 clinical centres responded and were caring for a total of 44 HIV/HCV coinfected children. We found that, although there was a high level of concordance regarding testing for HIV and/or HCV infection, monitoring practices in these European centres varied widely. Few clinicians stated they would administer HIV and HCV treatment concurrently. Limited experience in the clinical management of this group and the lack of an evidence base to guide policy may be a barrier to achieving optimal care and treatment.

Noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with HIV infection and HCV/HBV co-infection

The measurement of fibrosis stage critically affects the identification of the progression of liver disease, the establishment of a prognosis and therapeutic decision making. Liver biopsy has been the single, most useful method to determine the degree of liver fibrosis (LF), but with recognized limitations, mainly associated with its invasiveness. In recent years, alternative noninvasive methods have been developed, including imaging methods, such as transient elastometry, and assays based on serum biomarkers. This article reviews the available studies evaluating the value of various noninvasive methods for the assessment of LF in patients with HIV-infection and HBV/HCV co-infection, and makes recommendations on how to best use and combine them in clinical practice.

Delayed anti-HCV antibody response in HIV-positive men acutely infected with HCV

OBJECTIVE

An epidemic of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among HIV-positive men who have sex with men is occurring in urban centers in Western Europe and the United States. Early diagnosis and treatment of HCV results in improved sustained virological response rates. This study compared the sensitivity of reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) versus antibody screening for the diagnosis of early HCV infection in HIV-positive patients and estimated the length of time from HCV infection to the development of anti-HCV antibodies.

DESIGN

Patients from the St Mary's Acute Hepatitis C Cohort (SMACC) were recruited retrospectively and prospectively between 2004 and 2008.

METHODS

Archived plasma samples, obtained at 1-3 monthly intervals for routine monitoring of HIV viral load were assayed retrospectively for HCV in order to assess the sensitivity of RT-PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

: Forty-three HIV-positive patients with early HCV infection were identified. The median CD4 cell count was 570 cells/microl. The median alanine transaminase at the time of the first positive HCV PCR was 65 IU/ml. At this time, 75% of patients had a negative HCV antibody test. Three months later, 37% of patients still had a negative result. After 9 months, 10% of patients had a negative test and 5% remained negative after 1 year.

CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION

Delayed seroconversion in HIV-positive individuals with acute HCV may result in delayed diagnosis and treatment. Where there is a clinical suspicion of recent HCV infection, for example, elevated alanine transaminase levels, HIV-infected patients should be screened for HCV RNA by RT-PCR.

Application of transient elastometry to differentiate mild from moderate to severe liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Transient elastometry (TE) is accurate for detecting cirrhosis (F=4) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients. However, this procedure is less precise to differentiate mild (F < or = 1) from moderate to severe (F > or = 2) fibrosis using the cut-off value of 7.2kPa, a level previously proposed by some authors. Because of this, we elaborated and validated cut-off values of liver stiffness (LS) to better discriminate F < or = 1 from F > or = 2 in HIV/HCV co-infected subjects to aid therapy decisions.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-seven co-infected patients with liver biopsy and TE measurement, without prior therapy against HCV infection, were included.

RESULTS

To diagnose F < or = 2, a cut-off of 9.0kPa showed a positive predictive value of 87%. To discard F > or = 2, a cut-off of 6.0kPa showed a negative predictive value of 90%. Considering all the patients, 61 (31%) patients yielded LS values < or = 6.0kPa and 81 (41%) patients showed LS values > or = 9.0kPa. There were no severe classification errors as the NPV of L < or = S6.0kPa for F > or = 3 was 100% and the NPV LS > or = 9.0kPa for F=0 was also 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The usefulness of TE can be enhanced using two different cut-off values to identify patients with F < or = 1 and F > or = 2.

Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy: the current best way to reduce liver-related deaths in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients

Approximately 25% to 35% of HIV-infected persons in developed countries are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV liver disease is accelerated by HIV coinfection, especially at low CD4 cell counts. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) dramatically reduces HIV-related mortality, and liver disease has emerged as a major cause of death in HIV/HCV-coinfected persons. Anti-HCV therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin can cure HCV infection in up to 40% of coinfected patients; however, only approximately 10% of coinfected patients are considered candidates. Hence, HCV therapy cures approximately 4% of coinfected patients. Eleven cohort studies have shown that HAART is associated with a reduced rate of progression of HCV liver disease, and 4 of these studies have demonstrated a reduction in liver-related mortality. Although offering HCV therapy to the few eligible HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is important, early initiation of HAART in coinfected patients has a greater public health impact in reducing liver-related mortality than in curing HCV infection in approximately 4% of these patients.

Efavirenz: a review

Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that in most treatment guidelines is recommended to be taken combined with two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as a preferred first-line regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The antiretroviral efficacy of efavirenz-based combination regimens is good, as has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Efavirenz has a long plasma half-life, which allows for once-daily dosing, but, as a consequence of this and the low genetic barrier, it is also prone to select for viral resistance when adherence to therapy is suboptimal. The most frequently encountered side effects are neuropsychiatric symptoms. These side effects are usually transient, but have been shown to persist for up to 2 years after initiation of therapy in some patients. This review outlines important and recent pharmacological and clinical data, which explain why efavirenz became a component of preferred treatment regimens today.

New therapeutic options for hepatitis C

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is an urgent need for new anti-hepatitis C virus therapies and recently a number of agents have reached clinical trials with yet more in preclinical stages of development. New technologies for the in-vitro study of drugs have accelerated progress markedly, previously hampered by the lack of cell-culture systems or animal models for hepatitis C.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of agents have demonstrated potent antiviral activity and synergism with existing therapies. A better understanding of managing adverse events and tailoring treatment dose and duration have yielded improved treatment response rates. We review the mechanisms of both new and existing anti-hepatitis C virus drugs and the data for some promising new agents and strategies.

SUMMARY

Although many of the agents reviewed are in the early stages of development they show great promise and the ever-increasing understanding of hepatitis C virus will undoubtedly lead to exploration of new targets. Much progress has been made in terms of maximizing success with currently licensed agents and lessons learned from the field of HIV can guide the careful use of new agents to minimize resistance in the future.

Role of individualization of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy duration in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals*

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of pegylated interferon and ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients, prescribed for the same duration and at the same dosage as that used in HCV monoinfection studies.

DESIGN

It was an open-label, single-centre, prospective study.

METHODS

Forty-five patients coinfected with HIV and HCV with CD4 counts >200 cells/microL were treated with pegylated interferon-alpha2b 1.5 microg/kg/week and ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day for 24-48 weeks depending on HCV genotype. Safety and tolerability were assessed weekly for the first month and monthly thereafter. Virological response was assessed at weeks 4, 12 and 24 and at the end of treatment and 12 and 24 weeks post completion of treatment. The primary endpoint was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks post completion of treatment [sustained virological response (SVR)].

RESULTS

The majority of patients were male and had been injecting drug users. Sixty per cent were on antiretroviral therapy. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 53% had an SVR (genotype 1, 19% and genotype 2/3, 75%). All patients who had undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 of HCV treatment [very early virological response (VEVR)] had a SVR. On multivariate analysis only HCV genotype predicted SVR. Adverse events occurred frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that 24 weeks of HCV treatment may be adequate for HIV-infected individuals coinfected with HCV genotype 2 or 3. VEVR can predict SVR in this group and may be used to guide the subgroup of genotype 2/3 individuals who will respond to 24 weeks of treatment.

Vertically acquired paediatric coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C virus

Both HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be transmitted from mother to child during pregnancy and delivery. Vertical transmission of HIV and HCV separately is most likely from HIV/HCV-coinfected mothers; however, transmission of both infections is less frequent. The effect of HCV coinfection on HIV-related disease remains unclear; whereas most studies indicate no effect, recent results suggest HCV in adults accelerates HIV progression. Little is known about how HIV coinfection affects HCV progression in children and the information available is based on small numbers of patients. Paediatric HIV treatment is extremely successful and it is vital to determine if HCV coinfection alters the effectiveness of this treatment. The hepatotoxicity of many HIV therapies and the possible negative impact of HCV on this treatment, alongside the interactions and contraindications of many HIV and HCV therapies, further limits the choice of paediatric treatments for coinfected children. Future research must therefore focus on vertically acquired HIV/HCV coinfection to inform treatment trials addressing coinfection management.