Epilepsy - success in clinical practice: translating trials to practice

[A retrospective analysis of using zonisamide and retention in monotherapy among patients with epilepsy in routine clinical practice]

INTRODUCTION

Zonisamide is one of the first antiepileptic drugs of new generation with a wide spectrum of action. It is successfully used in treatment of epilepsy for 30 years. The study aims at analyzing the results of the multicenter Russian trial on the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide and retention in monotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The analysis included 92 patients with focal epilepsy, aged 18-78 years, from 20 epileptology centers in different regions of Russia. The patients were treated with zonisamide in initial and subsequent treatment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The efficacy (the reduction of seizure frequency by >50%) was achieved in 81 (91%) out of 89 patients (95% CI 83.6-95.7%). Fifty-two patients received zonisamide for more than one year. The efficacy was achieved in 50 (96.2%) (95% CI 88.2-99.2%), including 39 (79.6%) patients with remission out of 49 patients with assessment of seizure free periods (95% CI was 66.8-89% for the frequency of remissions). The adverse effects were recorded in 27 (29.3%) patients. Seven (7.6%) patients were withdrawn due to these effects. The maximal duration of observation period was 50 month. Mean time of retention in treatment was 42.4 month (95% CI 38.7-46.2 month). The total frequency of retention in treatment was 82.1% (95% CI 73.1-91%) during the whole observation period.

Health-related quality of life in adolescents with epilepsy in Montenegro

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to establish potential risk factors for poor health-related quality of life among adolescents with epilepsy in Montenegro.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A sample of 104 adolescents with epilepsy (age: 11-19years) at a tertiary referral center in Podgorica, Montenegro, completed the validated Serbian version of the QOLIE-AD-48 questionnaire. They were divided into two groups: a group with active epilepsy (60 adolescents) and a group with inactive epilepsy (44 adolescents). Demographic and clinical data were collected.

RESULTS

Adolescents with active epilepsy had low quality of life and felt the negative impact of the disease. They also had more cognitive impairments, felt more stigmatized, and had considerably more distorted perception of their health than adolescents with inactive epilepsy (p<0.05). Females reported better social support than males (p<0.05). Older males had lower grades at school (p<0.05) than the younger ones. As expected, adolescents with the highest number of seizures in the past two years had the lowest quality of life (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our study, the quality of life in adolescents with epilepsy was determined by severity of the disease, age, and gender.

Which outcomes should we measure in adult epilepsy trials? The views of people with epilepsy and informal carers

OBJECTIVE

So that informed treatment decisions can be made, clinical trials need to evaluate treatments against domains that are important to people with epilepsy (PWE), their carers, and clinicians. Health professionals have identified domains of importance to them via the International League Against Epilepsy's Commission on Outcome Measurement (COME). However, patients and carers have not been systematically asked.

METHODS

Via the membership of the British Epilepsy Association, we recruited and surveyed 352 PWE and 263 of their informal carers. They were presented with 10 outcome domains (including the 5 identified by COME) and asked to rate their importance using a 9-point Likert scale. They were also asked to identify any additional domains of importance.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 49years, the median number of years since diagnosis was 20, and 65% had experienced seizures in the prior 12months. Most carers were the spouse or parent. Patients' and carers' mean ratings indicated that their outcome priorities were similar, as were those of patients who had and had not experienced recent seizures. There was consensus among patients that 6 domains were of critical importance. These included the 5 identified by COME (namely, and in order of importance, the effects of the treatment on "Seizure severity", "Seizure frequency", "Quality of life", "Cognitive function", and "Adverse events"), as well as one additional domain ("Independence/need for support"). There was consensus among carers that the 5 COME domains were also critically important. They, however, identified 3 further domains as critically important. These were the effects of the treatment on patient "Depression", "Anxiety", and "Independence/need for support".

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found some overlap between the priorities of PWE, carers, and health professionals. They, however, highlight additional areas of importance to patients and carers. Our results could inform a core outcome set for epilepsy that represents the domains that should be reported as a minimum by all trials. This could promote trials which produce meaningful results and consistency in measurement and reporting.

Systematic Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring of Patients Under Newer Antiepileptic Drugs Using Routine Clinical Data of Inpatients

BACKGROUND

Based on data of clinical trials, new agents are receiving approval to the pharmaceutical market, for which information concerning safety issues under real-life conditions is not yet available.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), such as topiramate, levetiracetam, zonisamide, pregabalin, extended-release oxcarbazepine, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine, under real-life conditions by means of an assessment of routine clinical data of inpatients.

METHOD

Over 2.75 years data of all inpatients receiving one of the newer AEDs were documented. Occurring adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were classified according to the WHO-UMC Causality Assessment concerning their likely relationship to the prescribed AEDs. For each AED, the total number of patients without and with ADRs, assessed as at least possibly related to the particular drug, was calculated and corresponding incidences compared with reference data provided in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). For statistical evaluation Spearman correlation (rs), estimated relative risk and logistic regression analysis were used.

RESULTS

In total, the data of 562 patients were assessed, of which 90 % received up to six different AEDs. The proportion of off-label use with regard to dosage varied between 6.4 and 64.7 %. Levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine as an extended-release formulation were most commonly used, and levetiracetam showed the best tolerance. By using logistic regression, the occurrence of ADRs was significantly associated with the number of AEDs (p < 0.001) as well as the defined daily doses (p = 0.003). In total, ADRs of AEDs were documented for 318 patients (56.6 %). The most common referred to electrolyte imbalance, e.g., low sodium (n = 79, 14.1 %) and potassium (n = 25, 4.4 %) levels, the central nervous system, including dizziness (n = 61, 10.9 %), disturbed vision (n = 47, 8.4 %), fatigue (n = 40, 7.1 %), nystagmus (n = 36, 6.4 %) and ataxia (n = 29, 5.2 %), or cognitive deficits, especially disturbance of speech (n = 37, 6.6 %), memory impairment (n = 36, 6.4 %) and mental slowing (n = 32, 5.7 %). By comparing the assessed ADR incidences with specification data, for some ADRs, a probable underestimation by the SmPC of respective risk could be assumed.

CONCLUSION

During inpatient treatment, valuable data are generated, which are currently rarely utilized for pharmacoepidemiologic or pharmacovigilance purposes. A systematic evaluation of these data can increase the probability of detecting ADRs and can promote real-life-related drug surveillance.

Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes of add-on antiepileptic drugs: a conjoint analysis

To understand the relative importance of the outcomes of add-on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the willingness of patients with epilepsy to accept therapeutic trade-offs between seizure control and tolerability, we administered a Web-enabled, choice-format conjoint survey to patients with a self-reported physician diagnosis of epilepsy and symptoms of partial seizures. Patients answered nine choice questions to evaluate treatment outcomes of two different hypothetical add-on AEDs. Patients were first asked to choose the better of the two medicines and then asked a follow-up question about whether or not they would add the selected AED to their current treatment regimen. Our study demonstrated that patients with epilepsy consider seizure reduction to be the top priority when ranking it against the reduction or elimination of side effects. This study aids in better understanding of patients' AED treatment preferences and may aid in management of epilepsy.

Anticonvulsant activity of DNS II fraction in the acute seizure models

AIM OF THE STUDY

Delphinium nordhagenii belongs to family Ranunculaceae, it is widely found in tropical areas of Pakistan. Other species of Delphinium are reported as anticonvulsant and are traditionally used in the treatment of epilepsy. Delphinium nordhagenii is used by local healer in Pakistan but never used for scientific investigation as anticonvulsant. Thus, Delphinium nordhagenii was subjected to bioassay-guided fractionation and the most active fraction, i.e. DNS II acetone was chosen for further testing in the acute seizure models of epilepsy to study the antiepileptic potential in male mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Different doses (60, 65 and 70mg/kg, i.p.) of DNS II acetone fraction of Delphinium nordhagenii was administered 30min prior the chemoconvulsant's injection in the male mice. Convulsive doses of chemoconvulsants (pentylenetetrazole 90mg/kg, s.c. and picrotoxin 3.15mg/kg, s.c.) were used. The mice were observed 45-90min for the presence of seizures. Moreover, four different doses of DNS II (60, 65, 70 and 100mg/kg, i.p.) were tested in the MES test.

RESULTS

The DNS II acetone fraction of Delphinium nordhagenii has exhibited the anticonvulsant actions by preventing the seizures against PTZ- and picrotoxin-induced seizure as well as 100% seizure protection in MES test. The results are comparable with standard AEDs (diazepam 7.5mg/kg, i.p. and phenytoin 20mg/kg, i.p.).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the Delphinium nordhagenii possesses the anticonvulsant activity. Further analysis is needed to confirm the structure and target the extended activity profile.

Concerns with AED conversion: comparison of patient and physician perspectives

When discussing AED conversion in the clinic, both the patient and physician perspectives on the goals and risks of this change are important to consider. To identify patient-reported and clinician-perceived concerns, a panel of epilepsy specialists was questioned about the topics discussed with patients and the clinician’s perspective of patient concerns. Findings of a literature review of articles that report patient-expressed concerns regarding their epilepsy and treatment were also reviewed. Results showed that the specialist panel appropriately identified patient-reported concerns of driving ability, medication cost, seizure control, and medication side effects. Additionally, patient-reported concerns of independence, employment issues, social stigma, medication dependence, and undesirable cognitive effects are important to address when considering and initiating AED conversion.

[Psychiatric assessment]

Psychiatric disorders and behavioral disturbances may complicate the postsurgical outcome in patients and de novo psychiatric symptoms have been reported. In numerous, but not all epilepsy surgical centers, a psychiatric assessment is included as part of the presurgical evaluation of potential candidates for surgery. Affective disorders and psychosis are the most frequently reported postsurgical psychiatric disorders. There are no absolute psychiatric contraindications to surgery. Specific preexisting psychiatric conditions may need cautious consideration because there may be a risk of postsurgical psychiatric complications. Routine pre- and postsurgical psychiatric evaluations in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery are urgently needed. Clinicians involved in the care of surgical candidates should be aware of the possible psychiatric complications following surgery.

Ultimate success in epilepsy - the patient's perspective

Most people with epilepsy can live outwardly normal lives, but fear about impending seizures, driving restrictions, lack of independence, employment and social problems, medication-related adverse effects and the presence of cognitive or psychiatric complications are all concerns readily identified by affected individuals. While seizure control is the overriding goal of treatment, it is essential to realize the importance that patients place on other aspects of daily functioning. While many of the concerns identified by patients can only be managed by improved social support, others (e.g. neuropsychological impairment, medication-related adverse events, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbance) may be amenable to therapy (if available) or to the selection of a more appropriate antiepileptic drug. Each antiepileptic drug has a unique pharmacodynamic and tolerability profile. Awareness by the treating clinician of the pharmacological profile of each drug may help to minimize unwanted treatment-related effects and possibly improve the outcome of treatment from an epilepsy patient's perspective. Therefore, in order to achieve true treatment success, clinicians need to understand how individuals perceive their disorder and, where possible, address those factors that adversely affect patient quality of life. For the person with epilepsy, successful treatment involves beneficial effects on social, vocational and psychological function. This extends beyond seizure control to freedom from the fear associated with seizures, confidence in pharmacological therapy and improvements in health-related quality of life.