Effect of prothrombin 19911 A>G polymorphism on the risk of cerebral sinus-venous thrombosis

The association of the prothrombin A19911G single-nucleotide polymorphism and the risk of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The study employed meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the association between the prothrombin A19911G polymorphism and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHOD

The databases were searched to identify studies investigating the association between the prothrombin A19911G polymorphism and the risk of VTE. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of five literature studies were included, involving 14,001 participants. Meta-analysis demonstrated that prothrombin A19911G polymorphism increased the risk of VTE (G vs A: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.11-1.22, p < .00001; GG + AG vs AA: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.13-1.31, p < .00001; GG vs AG + AA: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.14-1.33, p < .00001; AG vs AA: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06-1.25, p = .0006; GG vs AA: OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.22-1.48, p < .00001).

CONCLUSION

The polymorphism of prothrombin A19911G enhances the susceptibility to VTE.

Prevalence and geographical variation of Factor V Leiden in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: A meta-analysis

Background

Previous results regarding the prevalence of Factor V Leiden (FVL) in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) varied remarkably. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the potential association between FVL and CVT.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched for relevant case-control studies. The data were pooled for analysis of the association between FVL and CVT with a random-effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and the Egger’s test.

Results

A total of 39 case-control studies including 1807 cases of CVT and 7699 control cases were included. FVL was more common in patients with CVT (195/1822) than in controls(369/7795), [odds ratio(OR) = 2.70, 95% confidence interval(CI) 2.16–3.38, P < 0.00001]. Results of subgroup analyses indicated that the association between FVL and CVT varied according to geographic regions. The associations between FVL and CVT were significant in studies from Germany (OR = 2.42, 95%CI 1.70–3.45, P < 0.00001), Brazil(OR = 2.82, 95%CI 1.24–6.42, P = 0.01), France (OR = 5.44, 95%CI 1.35–21.92, P = 0.02), Iran (OR = 6.61, 95%CI 1.83–23.93, P = 0.004), and Tunisia (OR = 6.54, 95%CI 2.89–14.82, P < 0.00001), but not in those from Italy (OR = 1.49, 95%CI 0.59–3.78, P = 0.40) or the US (OR = 2.37, 95%CI 0.59–9.42, P = 0.22).

Conclusion

FVL may be more common in patients with CVT. However, the association between FVL and CVT varied depending on the geographic origin of the studies.

The 3'end prothrombin gene variants in patients with different thrombotic events

BACKGROUND

Prothrombin (FII) A19911G and C20221T gene variants are associated with increased prothrombin levels and potentially represent thrombotic risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of A19911G and C20221T FII gene variants in patients with thrombotic disorders and in women who have experienced pregnancy loss (PL).

METHODS

We determined the frequency of these variants in 133 patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), 80 patients with isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), 101 patients with idiopathic PL, and 180 control individuals.

RESULTS

The FII A19911G variant was more prevalent in patients with DVT and with PL compared with controls; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The 19911GG genotype was associated with increased risk of PE (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.51). We did not detect carriers of the FII C20221T gene variant in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study, to our knowledge, that demonstrates the FII 19911GG genotype may represent a risk factor for isolated PE. Also, our results show that the FII C20221T is a rare variant in this population and therefore, routine thrombophilia screening should not include screening for this genotype.