Occurrence and characterization of Pain in immune-mediated neuropathies: a multicentre prospective study

Small Fibre Involvement in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy Explored with Sudoscan: A Single-Centre Experience

Objective: Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare inflammatory neuropathy, clinically characterized by exclusive motor involvement. We wished to evaluate the possible presence of sensory dysfunction, including the evaluation of small fibres, after a long-term disease course. Patients and methods: seven MMN patients, regularly followed in our Neurology Department, underwent clinical evaluation, neurophysiological examination by nerve conduction studies (NCSs), and Sudoscan. We compared neurophysiological data with a group of patients with other disorders of the peripheral nervous system. Results: NCSs showed a reduction of sensory nerve action potential amplitude in 2/7 MMN patients. Sudoscan showed borderline electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) values in 3/7 MMN patients (two of them with abnormal sensory NCSs). Conclusions: Our results confirm that sensory involvement may be found in some MMN after a long-term disease course, and it could also involve the small fibres.

Limitations in daily activities and general perception of quality of life: Long term follow-up in patients with anti-myelin-glycoprotein antibody polyneuropathy

In this study, we assessed the modifications over time of daily activities and quality of life (QoL) in 32 subjects with anti-myelin-glycoprotein (MAG) antibody neuropathy. A widespread panel including clinical scores and patient-reported questionnaires, in compliance of the terms by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) of the World Health Organization (WHO), was employed at enrollment (T0) and at follow-up evaluation (T1) after a mean interval of 15.4 ± 5.7 months. The Sensory Modality Sum score (SMS) at four limbs showed a significant worsening over time (mean score 27.2 ± 3.9 at T0 vs 25.7 ± 3 at T1 at upper limbs, P = .03; 20.5 ± 4.8 at T0 vs 18.6 ± 5.9 at T1 at lower limbs, P = .04). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain significantly worsened at upper limbs at T1 (mean values 0.84 ± 1.95 at T0 vs 1.78 ± 2.6 at T1, P = .03). All the other tests did not show significant differences between T0 and T1. In the subgroup who underwent rituximab (15/32 treated before T0, 3/32 patients treated between T0 and T1 with median interval of 1 year), no significant differences were observed between T0 and T1. Despite the quite long follow-up, statistical significance was not achieved either for the limited number of patients or for the lack of sensitive outcome measures. In our cohort, the significant worsening of the SMS and VAS after a median of 14 months can be considered as a reliable expression of the natural history of the disease, and suggest that these scales might represent possible outcome measures in anti-MAG antibody neuropathy.

One-year follow-up study of neuropathic pain in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

We sought to gather information about frequency and features of neuropathic pain (NeP) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients and to investigate course of NeP during 1-year follow-up. Study included 105 patients diagnosed with CIDP. Patients with diabetes (N = 26) were excluded. NeP was diagnosed by the official guidelines and painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q). Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRC-SS), INCAT disability and sensory scores, and Beck Depression Inventory were also measured. PD-Q showed presence of NeP in 16 (20%) of 79 CIDP patients and their mean pain was moderate (5.1 ± 3.0 of 10). Diagnostic delay in CIDP patients with NeP was prolonged compared to CIDP patients without NeP (21 ± 28 vs 9 ± 12 months, P < .05). Slowly progressive course of the disease was more frequent in patients with NeP (81% vs 52%, P < .05). Patients with NeP had worse INCAT sensory score (P < .01), INCAT disability score (P < .05), MRC-SS, as well as worse disease outcome at time of testing (P < .05). Depression was more common in patients with NeP (69% vs 17%, P < .01). During 1-year follow-up, majority of our CIDP patients had good control of NeP with gabapentinoids or amitriptyline. NeP was common in our cohort of non-diabetic CIDP patients. It was associated with worse functional disability, worse sensory deficit, and depression. Special attention should be paid to CIDP patients with NeP because they request additional symptomatic therapy that appeared efficacious in our cohort.

Outcome measures in MMN revisited: further improvement needed

The objectives of this study were to provide an overview of the outcome measures (OMs) applied in clinical trials in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and to determine the responsiveness of a core set of selected OMs as part of the peripheral neuropathy outcome measures standardization (PeriNomS) study. The following OMs were serially applied in 26 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing MMN, receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (assessments: T0/T3/T12 months): 14 muscle pairs MRC (Medical Research Council) scale, the Neuropathy Impairment Scale motor-subset, a self-evaluation scale, grip strength, and MMN-RODS© (Rasch-built overall disability scale). All data, except the grip strength, were subjected to Rasch analyses before determining responsiveness. For grip strength, responsiveness was examined using a combined anchor- (SF-36 question-2) and distribution-based (½ × SD) minimum clinically important difference (MCID) techniques, determining the proportion of patients exceeding both the identified cut-offs. For the remaining scales, the magnitude of change for each patient on each scale was determined using the MCID related to the individual SE (responder definition: MCID-SE ≥ 1.96). Overall, a great assortment of measures has been used in MMN trials with different responsiveness definitions. For the selected OMs, responsiveness was poor and only seen in one fourth to one third of the patients, the grip strength being more responsive. Despite the efforts taken to standardize outcome assessment, further clinimetric responsiveness studies are needed in MMN.

Pain severity and neuropathic pain symptoms in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a comparison study of seropositive and seronegative Sjögren's syndrome patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes in seropositive versus seronegative primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) patients and to investigate the effect of serologic status on the prevalence of chronic pain, comorbidity, and health quality.

METHODS

Pain severity and neuropathic pain symptoms, comorbidity, and health status were assessed in 108 primary SS patients. Differences between patient groups were assessed by t-test and chi-square test, as well as adjusted pain-affect associations. The effect of predictor variables on pain severity was examined with multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Pain severity was greater (P = 0.003) and physical function (P = 0.023) was reduced in the seronegative patients. Prevalence of neuropathic pain, depression, anxiety, and disability was similar between groups. Chronic pain, defined as daily pain for >3 months, was reported by 65% of seropositive (n = 65) and 75% of seronegative (n = 40) patients. After adjustment for age, sleep quality, and psychological distress, the difference in pain severity between seropositive and seronegative patients remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Chronic pain is pervasive in both seropositive and seronegative primary SS patients, while pain severity and functional impairment are greater in seronegative patients. Neuropathic pain is equally prevalent and is the predominant pain phenotype in patients with moderate to severe pain. Accurate assessment of pain phenotypes is needed for more effective management of chronic pain in primary SS. The focus of future research should be to standardize assessment of pain and to identify the factors contributing to more severe pain in seronegative patients.