IgM monoclonal gammopathy-associated neuropathies with different IgM specificity

Paraproteinemia and neuropathy

Paraproteinemia is associated with different peripheral neuropathies. The major causes of neuropathy correlated with paraproteinemia are the deposition of immunoglobulin in the myelin, represented by anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy; deposition of immunoglobulin or its fragment in the interstitium, represented by immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis); and paraneoplastic mechanisms that cannot be solely attributed to the deposition of immunoglobulin or its fragment, represented by polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin change (POEMS) syndrome. Patients with anti-MAG neuropathy and POEMS syndrome present with slowing of nerve conduction parameters. This characteristic fulfills the electrodiagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) defined by the European Academy of Neurology and Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS). Although direct damage caused by the deposition of amyloid can induce axonal damage in AL amyloidosis, some patients with this condition have features fulfilling the EAN/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP. Conventional immunotherapies for CIDP, such as steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange, offer no or only minimal-to-modest benefit. Although rituximab can reduce the level of circulating autoantibodies, it may only be effective in some patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. Drugs including melphalan, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib for POEMS syndrome and those including melphalan, thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, bortezomib, ixazomib, and daratumumab for AL amyloidosis are considered. Since there will be more therapeutic options in the future, thereby enabling appropriate treatments for individual neuropathies, there is an increasing need for early diagnosis.

Polyneuropathy and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); update of a clinical experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Polyneuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) encompass a group of phenotypically and immunologically heterogeneous neuropathies. While the best characterized is that associated with anti-myelin glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies, there are phenotypical and immunological neuropathy variants that still lack a clear classification. We analyzed a significant number of patients, in order to better evaluate the distribution of neuropathy phenotypes and to look for some common characteristics.

METHODS

Clinical, neurophysiological, and laboratory data from 87 consecutive MGUS patients with peripheral neuropathy were analyzed and compared among patient groups with different MGUS classes and autoantibody reactivity.

RESULTS

Anti-MAG neuropathy cases account for the most homogeneous group with regard to clinical and neurophysiological findings. Patients with anti-gangliosides or sulfatide (GS) antibodies, despite a marked phenotype heterogeneity, still share several common features, including a younger age at diagnosis, a more severe disease, and a prompt and sustained response to both immunoglobulin and rituximab therapies, mostly requiring chronic administration of immune treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although heterogeneous, MGUS-associated, anti-GS antibody positive neuropathies have important similar features possibly resulting from a similar biological background.

Clinical phenotype of patients with neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy: a comparative study and a review of the literature

The objective of this study was to investigate if the clinical and electrophysiological phenotype of patients with polyneuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy (IgM-PNP) is related to the presence of antibodies against gangliosides or myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). We compared clinical and nerve conduction study (NCS) characteristics of 11 IgM-PNP patients with antibodies against asialo-GM1 or gangliosides (GM1, GD1a, GD1b, GM2 or GQ1b) to 11 consecutive IgM-PNP patients with anti-MAG neuropathy and to 9 IgM-PNP patients without antibodies against either MAG or gangliosides. Patients with anti-ganglioside antibodies could not be differentiated from those with anti-MAG antibodies based on clinical characteristics. However, within the group of anti-ganglioside antibody positive patients, antibodies against GD1b and GQ1b were associated with a purely sensory neuropathy (p = 0.002), while asymmetric weakness with symmetric sensory loss was associated with anti-asialo-GM1 antibodies. In conclusion, polyneuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and anti-ganglioside antibodies clinically resembles anti-MAG neuropathy. Pure sensory neuropathy and marked asymmetry may suggest the presence of anti-ganglioside rather than anti-MAG antibodies.

Prevalence, specificity and functionality of anti-ganglioside antibodies in neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy

IgM antibodies against gangliosides and their complexes were studied in sera from 54 patients with polyneuropathy and IgM monoclonal gammopathy (IgM-PNP) without anti-MAG antibodies. Anti-ganglioside antibodies were found in 19 (35%) patients. Five (9%) patients had antibodies against ganglioside complexes. IgM antibodies against gangliosides activated complement in vitro. Light chain usage was restricted to kappa or lambda in most, but not all patients. In conclusion, anti-ganglioside antibodies in IgM-PNP are common, display pathogenic properties and do not always arise from a monoclonal B cell proliferation.

Autoantibodies in immune-mediated neuropathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past 25 years, many autoantibodies directed against peripheral nerve glycan and protein antigens have been described. Principally through this area of research, significant advances have been achieved in the understanding of the pathophysiology of inflammatory neuropathies. More evidence constantly continues to emerge supporting the role of antibodies in pathogenesis. This review reports the recent studies highlighting the complex association between autoantibodies directed against various peripheral nerve antigens and immune polyneuropathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The discovery of serum antibodies directed against ganglioside and glycolipid complexes has generated huge interest in this area of research. The expectation that nodal proteins are important targets continues to be pursued in line with the improvements in detection methodology. Basic studies continue to support a direct role for autoantibodies in neuropathy pathogenesis.

SUMMARY

Discovery of new target epitopes has not only raised hopes for further improvement in our understanding of pathophysiology and availability of new diagnostic markers, but also for future targeted therapies. Further studies are required to elucidate the precise pathological and clinical significance of these new antibodies.

Clinical, electrophysiological and immunological study of peripheral nerves in Egyptian patients with monoclonal gammopathies

Monoclonal antibodies are found in approximately 10% of patients with peripheral neuropathy (PN) of unknown etiology. Several autoantibodies, including anti-MAG (myelin-associated glycoprotein) antibodies, have been reported to induce neuropathy. It has been suggested that over 50% of patients with PN and IgM monoclonal gammopathy (MG) have anti-MAG IgM antibodies in their sera. This work aimed at studying the frequency and characteristics of PN in a group of Egyptian patients with MGs and to estimate the serum level of anti-MAG antibodies and its relationship to peripheral nerve dysfunction. Forty patients with MGs were enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 56.65 ± 8.55 years. There were 17 males and 23 females. Patients were subjected to complete general and neurological examination, laboratory investigations including serum LDH, β2 microglobulin, serum protein electrophoresis, urinary Bence-Jones protein, bone marrow aspiration and/or trephine biopsy, quantitative estimation of serum IgM and IgG by nephelometry, detection of anti-MAG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence, radiological assessment and nerve conduction study of both upper and lower limbs. Clinical and electrophysiological evidences of PN were found in 32 (80%) out of the 40 patients with MG. Twenty-five patients (62.5%) had distal symmetrical polyneuropathy and seven (17.5%) had mononeuritis or mononeuritis multiplex. The majority of patients (65%) had sensory or predominantly sensorimotor polyneuropathy. The neuropathy was mainly demyelinating in 22 patients (55%) and axonal in the other 10 (25%) patients. Anti-MAG antibodies were positive in nine patients (22.5%) and six of them (66.6%) had PN. The latter was predominantly demyelinating motor neuropathy in 4 and axonal in the remaining 2. However, the relationship between the presence of anti-MAG antibodies and the development and type of PN was not statistically significant. Anti-MAG showed significant association with IgM level (P = 0.003**) and the MG subtypes: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) (P = 0.004**). The present study showed high frequency (>60%) of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy in Egyptian patients with MG. The neuropathy was predominantly sensory and demyelinating. Anti-MAG antibodies were detected only in 22.5% of the patients, especially those with WM and MGUS and were associated with more motor and demyelinating neuropathy. We recommend that patients with chronic polyneuropathies should be evaluated for underlying plasma cell dyscrasia.