Perforating dermatosis in a patient receiving bevacizumab

Acquired Perforating Dermatosis: Clinical and Histopathological Analysis of 95 Patients From One Center

INTRODUCTION

Acquired perforating dermatosis (APD) is a disease group characterized by transepidermal elimination of dermal connective tissue materials such as collagen, elastic fibers, and keratin through the epidermis and observed with pruritic skin lesions.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aim to clarify the clinical, histopathological, and dermoscopic characteristics of APD, identify the associated systemic disease, and figure out treatment options.

METHODS

This study was designed as a single-center retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. We evaluated all accessible APD cases between January 2004 and June 2022 in a tertiary care hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients with confirmed APD were included in the study. Sixty percent of the patients were women and 40% were men. The median age at diagnosis was 63.1 years (35-85 years). The most common site of lesions was the lower extremities which were detected in 86.31% of the patients. The concomitant systemic disease was identified in 84.21% of the patients. The most common systemic disease was type 2 diabetes mellitus (65.26%). Antihistamines and topical corticosteroids were the most commonly prescribed treatment agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Transepidermal elimination of dermal connective tissue components is a feature of APD and the disease usually presents with pruritic papules and nodules with central keratotic crust or plug. The diagnosis of APD requires a clinical examination and histological investigation. APD is usually accompanied by systemic comorbidities. There are several topical and systemic medications available for APD, however, sometimes the therapy might be challenging.

The diverse landscape of dermatologic toxicities of non-immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody-based cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Since their first approval 25 years ago, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become important targeted cancer therapeutics. However, dermatologic toxicities associated with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor (non-ICI) mAbs may complicate the course of cancer treatment. Data on the incidence and types of these reactions are limited.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted on dermatologic toxicities associated with different classes of non-ICI mAbs approved for treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The review included prospective Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials; retrospective literature reviews; systematic reviews/meta-analyses; and case series/reports.

RESULTS

Dermatologic toxicities were associated with several types of non-ICI mAbs. Inflammatory reactions were the most common dermatologic toxicities, manifesting as maculopapular, urticarial, papulopustular/acneiform, and lichenoid/interface cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) with non-ICI mAbs. Immunobullous reactions were rare and a subset of non-ICI mAbs were associated with the development of vitiligo cAEs.

CONCLUSION

Dermatologic toxicities of non-ICI mAbs are diverse and mostly limited to inflammatory reactions. Awareness of the spectrum of the histopathologic patterns of cAE from non-ICI mAbs therapy is critical in the era of oncodermatology and oncodermatopathology.

[Nodulocystic eruption induced by sorafenib]

INTRODUCTION

Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cutaneous adverse events are numerous and occur frequently.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present two cases of nodulocystic lesions associated with comedones in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma. In the first patient, a 64-year-old man, lesions appeared on the trunk one year after beginning sorafenib. Histopathological examination revealed a non-granulomatous, perivascular and perisudoral polymorphic cellular infiltrate associated with comedones and microcysts. These lesions progressed via inflammatory episodes interrupted by long periods of spontaneous remission without any specific treatment. In the second patient, a 53-year-old woman, a rash appeared on the buttocks three months after starting sorafenib and then spread to the lumbar region and thighs. Histopathological examination was consistent with granulomatous acne lesions. The initial treatment (oral tetracycline and zinc) given for 3 months proved ineffective. Patient follow-up over 3 years showed gradual regression without the appearance of any further lesions.

DISCUSSION

In the literature, several reports discuss acneiform rashes in patients treated with targeted therapy. In most cases, these lesions were papulopustular without retentional lesions. There are few reports of nodulocystic eruptions associated with comedones following sorafenib therapy. The mechanisms of emergence of these lesions seem to involve inhibition of the RAF pathway, C-KIT, and the PDGF signaling pathway.

Acquired perforating dermatosis: clinicopathological study of 31 cases, emphasizing pathogenesis and treatment

BACKGROUND

Acquired perforating dermatosis (APD) is a rare group of skin disorders of unknown aetiology and pathogenesis and is associated with several systemic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

We review the clinicopathological features, associated systemic diseases and treatment response in a series of APD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of all patients histologically diagnosed with APD in Hospital San Jorge (Huesca, Spain) between 2002 and 2014. Demographic and clinical features were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software (version 20.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 31 patients (19 women and 12 men), with a mean age of 54 years. Reactive perforating collagenosis (n = 15, 45%) was the most common histopathologic type. The most frequently affected area was the lower limbs (66.6%, n = 22), and pruritus was present in 19 patients (61.3%, P = 0.005). Arterial hypertension (30.3%) was the most common associated condition. Five patients were receiving treatment with infliximab when diagnosed with APD. Most patients responded to topical steroids and oral antihistamines (n = 15).

LIMITATIONS

This study is retrospective, and the sample size is limited.

CONCLUSION

Acquired perforating dermatosis is an underdiagnosed dermatosis frequently associated with systemic disorders. Its pathogenesis may involve vascular damage, not only in patients with diabetes, but also in those with arterial hypertension and chronic venous insufficiency. Control of pruritus and underlying extracutaneous disorders, as well as discontinuation of the treatment with biologics, are important aspects of the management of this dermatosis.

Perforating dermatosis in a patient receiving azathioprine

Azathioprine (AZA) is an imidazole derivative of mercaptopurine. It antagonizes purine metabolism, and it may inhibit synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins. The 6-thioguanine nucleotides appear to mediate the majority of AZAs immunosuppressive and toxic effects. While cutaneous adverse side-effects are not uncommon, perforating dermatosis has not been reported in association to AZA. We speculate that immunological disorders induced by AZA in susceptible individuals could be related to perforating dermatosis.

Acute and severe acne in a patient treated with bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

  Bevacizumab is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that inhibits angiogenesis. Bevacizumab is typically well tolerated; its major side effects include hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, and arterial thrombotic events, among others. Cutaneous side effects associated with the use of bevacizumab are rare and involve mainly itching and exfoliative dermatitis. Nonspecific skin rash and acneiform eruptions have recently been described in patients following infusion of bevacizumab.

METHODS

  Findings in a 52-year-old patient with stage IV lung cancer with brain metastasis, who developed severe, acute, and persistent acne after intravenous (IV) infusion of bevacizumab, are examined.

RESULTS

  The cutaneous eruption was classified as true acne rather than as an acneiform eruption because all cutaneous lesions of acne, namely comedones, inflammatory papules, and pustules, were present.

CONCLUSIONS

  To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of an association between acne and IV administration of bevacizumab.

Transepidermal elimination in cutaneous leishmaniasis: a multiregional study

BACKGROUND

Transepidermal elimination has been documented in a myriad of infectious diseases; however, its occurrence in cutaneous leishmaniasis has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Skin biopsies (n = 212) with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Lebanon (n = 46), Syria (n = 53), Saudi Arabia (n = 45) and Pakistan (n = 68) were evaluated. Clinical data collected included age, gender, eruption type (papule, nodule, verrucous or scar), duration and anatomic location. Histopathologically, multiple parameters were recorded including Ridley's parasitic index and pattern, transepidermal elimination, interface changes, ulceration and necrosis. Transepidermal elimination was defined as the presence of amastigotes in the epidermis in all layers, limited to the basal layer or present in a perforating plug. All cases were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for molecular subspeciation.

RESULTS

Leishmania tropica was identified in 88.2% and Leishmania major in 11.8% of all cases. Transepidermal elimination was observed in 28.3% of cases (29 perforating plug, 19 all layers and 12 basal layer) with a significant prevalence of L. major in this group (35 vs. 2%, p < 0.001). Cases with transepidermal elimination were associated with interface changes and higher parasitic index (p < 0.001) but not with an increased ulceration rate (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that transepidermal elimination was independently predicted by L. major [OR (95% confidence interval) = 80 (9-712); p < 0.001], parasitic index [OR = 3.4 (2.1-5.3); p < 0.001], interface changes [OR = 6.24 (2.2-17.8); p < 0.001] and necrosis [OR = 0.2 (0.1-0.8);p = 0.026].

CONCLUSIONS

We report the largest multiregional cutaneous leishmaniasis series with a 28.3% documented transepidermal elimination incidence of which 48% were perforating plug; a significant prevalence of L. major was also identified in the transepidermal elimination group. The association of transepidermal elimination with interface changes and a higher parasitic index, without an increased ulceration rate, may reflect a unique biologic alteration in the epidermis, serving to facilitate the extrusion of the parasites through the skin.