Treatment with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist before endometrial resection: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical practice guidelines of the French National College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)

OBJECTIVE

To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding (i.e. pharmaceutical or medical device companies). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.

METHODS

The last guidelines from the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français on the management of women with AUB were published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescents; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; type 0-2 fibroids; type 3 or higher fibroids; and adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and evidence profiles were compiled. The GRADE® methodology was applied to the literature review and the formulation of recommendations.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 are strong and 17 weak. No response was found in the literature for 14 questions. We chose to abstain from recommendations rather than providing advice based solely on expert clinical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The 36 recommendations make it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for various clinical situations practitioners encounter, from the simplest to the most complex.

Pharmacologic Interventions to Minimize Fluid Absorption at the Time of Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess which interventions are effective in reducing fluid absorption at the time of hysteroscopy.

DATA SOURCE

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PubMed (non-MEDLINE records only), EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov , and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 2022 without restriction on language or geographic origin.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, all English-language, full-text articles reporting fluid balance, with an intervention and comparator arm, were included. Title and abstract screening and full-text review were completed independently by two authors. Conflicts were resolved through discussion and consensus. Studies' risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The search identified 906 studies, 28 of which were eligible for inclusion, examining the following interventions: gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist; ulipristal acetate; vasopressin; danazol; oxytocin; and local, general, and regional anesthesia. A significant reduction in mean fluid absorption was seen in patients preoperatively treated with danazol (-175.7 mL, 95% CI -325.4 to -26.0) and a GnRH agonist (-139.68 mL, 95% CI -203.2, -76.2) compared with patients in a control group. Ulipristal acetate and type of anesthesia showed no difference. Data on type of anesthesia and vasopressin use were not amenable to meta-analysis; however, four studies favored vasopressin over control regarding fluid absorption. Mean operative time was reduced after preoperative treatment with ulipristal acetate (-7.1 min, 95% CI -11.31 to -2.9), danazol (-7.5 min, 95% CI -8.7 to -6.3), and a GnRH agonist (-3.3 min, 95% CI -5.6 to -0.98).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative treatment with a GnRH agonist and danazol were both found to be effective in reducing fluid absorption and operative time across a range of hysteroscopic procedures. High-quality research aimed at evaluating other interventions, such as combined hormonal contraception, progestin therapy, and vasopressin, are still lacking in the literature.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021233804.

[Management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical practice guidelines of the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)]

OBJECTIVE

To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, or medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.

METHODS

The last guidelines from the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) on the management of women with AUB was published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescent; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; fibroids type 0 to 2; fibroids type 3 and more; adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 present a strong agreement and 17 a weak agreement. Fourteen questions did not find any response in the literature. We preferred to abstain from recommending instead of providing expert advice.

CONCLUSIONS

The 36 recommendations made it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of various clinical situations managed by the practitioner, from the simplest to the most complex.

Comparative study of vaginal danazol vs diphereline (a synthetic GnRH agonist) in the control of bleeding during hysteroscopic myomectomy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the usefulness of vaginal danazol and diphereline in the management of intra-operative bleeding during hysteroscopy.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred and ninety participants of reproductive age were enrolled for operative hysteroscopy. Thirty women were excluded from the study.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred and sixty participants with submucous myomas were allocated at random to receive either vaginal danazol (200mg BID, 30 days before surgery) or intramuscular diphereline (twice with a 28-day interval).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Severity of intra-operative bleeding, clarity of the visual field, volume of media, operative time, success rate for completion of operation and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 145 patients completed the study. In the danazol group, 78.1% of patients experienced no intra-operative uterine bleeding, and 21.9% experienced mild bleeding. In the diphereline group, 19.4% of patients experienced no intra-operative uterine bleeding, but mild, moderate and severe bleeding was observed in 31.9%, 45.8% and 2.8% of patients, respectively. The difference between the groups was significant (p<0.001). A clear visual field was reported more frequently in the danazol group compared with the diphereline group (98.6% vs 29.2%, p<0.001). The mean operative time was 10.9 min and 10.6 min in the danazol and diphereline groups, respectively (p=0.79). The mean volume of infused media was 2.0L in both groups (p=0.99). The success rate was 100% for both groups with no intra-operative complications.

CONCLUSION

Both vaginal danazol and diphereline were effective in controlling uterine bleeding during operative hysteroscopy. However, vaginal danazol provided a clearer visual field.

Desogestrel versus danazol as preoperative treatment for hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized evaluation

The aim of this single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study was to compare desogestrel and danazol as preoperative endometrial preparation for hysteroscopic surgery. We enrolled 200 consecutive eligible patients, in reproductive age, with endouterine diseases. Pre- and post-treatment characterization of endometrium was performed by hysteroscopic visual observation and histologic confirmation. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 100 were treated with 75 μg of desogestrel/die, 100 with 100 mg of danazol/die, both orally for 5 weeks, starting on Day 1 of menstruation. We recorded intraoperative data (cervical dilatation time, operative time, infusion volume and severity of bleeding) and drugs' side effects. Post-treatment comparison of endometrial patterns showed a significant more marked effect of desogestrel, respect to danazol, in atrophying endometrium ("normotrophic non-responders" versus "hypotrophic"-"atrophic", p = 0.031). Intraoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups for cervical dilatation time (p = 0.160), while in the desogestrel group we found a significant reduction of operative time (p = 0.020), infusion volume (p = 0.012), and severity of bleeding (p = 0.004). Moreover, desogestrel caused less side effects (p = 0.031). According to our data analysis, desogestrel showed most marked effect in inducing endometrial atrophy, allowed a better intraoperative management and caused less side effects during treatment.

WITHDRAWN: Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding

This review has been replaced by a new full review with the same title 'Pre‐operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding' published in issue 11 of The Cochrane Library 2013; authors are Yu Hwee Tan and Anne Lethaby.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding is one of the most common reasons for referral of premenopausal women to a gynaecologist. Although medical therapy is generally first line, many women eventually will require further treatment. Endometrial ablation by hysteroscopic and more recent "second-generation" devices such as balloon, radiofrequency or microwave ablation offers a day-case surgical alternative to hysterectomy. Complete endometrial destruction is one of the main determinants of treatment success. Surgery is most effective if undertaken when endometrial thickness is less than four millimeters. One option is to perform the surgery in the immediate postmenstrual phase, which is not always practical. The other option is to use hormonal agents that induce endometrial thinning pre-operatively. The most commonly evaluated agents are goserelin (a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue, or GnRHa) and danazol. Other GnRH analogues and progestogens have also been studied, although fewer data are available. It has been suggested that these agents will reduce operating time, improve the intrauterine operating environment and reduce absorption of fluid used for intraoperative uterine cavity distension. They may also improve long-term outcomes, including menstrual loss and dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of pre-operative endometrial thinning agents (GnRH agonists, danazol, estrogen-progestins and progestogens) versus another agent or placebo when given before endometrial destruction in premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

SEARCH METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched to April 2013 for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria: the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register of controlled trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO.Other electronic sources of trials included trial registers for ongoing and registered trials; citation indexes; conference abstracts in the Web of Knowledge; the LILACS database for trials from the Portuguese- and Spanish-speaking world; PubMed; and the OpenSIGLE database and Google for grey literature.All searches were performed in consultation with the MDSG Trials Search Co-ordinator.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared the effects of these agents with one other, or with placebo or no treatment, on relevant intraoperative and postoperative treatment outcomes. Selection of trials was carried out independently by two review authors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for risk of bias and extracted data on surgical outcomes, effectiveness outcomes, proportion of women requiring further surgical therapy during follow-up, endometrial outcome measures, acceptability of use outcomes and quality of life. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Dichotomous data were combined for meta-analysis with RevMan software using the Mantel-Haenszel method to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs). Continuous data were combined for meta-analysis with RevMan software using an inverse variance method to estimate the pooled mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The overall quality of evidence for the main findings was assessed with the use of GRADE working group methods.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies with 1969 women were included in this review. These studies compared GnRHa, danazol and progestogens versus placebo or no treatment; GnRHa versus danazol, progestogens, GnRH antagonists or dilatation & curettage; and danazol versus progestogens. Four studies performed more than one comparison.When compared with no treatment, GnRHa used before hysteroscopic resection were associated with a higher rate of postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0, 7 RCTs, 605 women, moderate heterogeneity; I(2) = 40%) and at 24 months (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.52, 2 RCTs, 357 women, no heterogeneity; I(2) = 0%), a slightly shorter duration of surgery (-3.5 minutes, 95% CI -4.7 to -2.3, 5 RCTs, 156 women, substantial heterogeneity; I(2) = 72%) and greater ease of surgery (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.46, 2 RCTs, 415 women, low heterogeneity; I(2) = 4%). Postoperative dysmenorrhoea was reduced (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.87, 2 RCTs, 133 women, no heterogeneity; I(2) = 0%). The use of GnRHa had no effect on intraoperative complication rates (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.35 to 6.06, 5 RCTs, 592 women, no heterogeneity; I(2) = 0%), and participant satisfaction with this surgery was high irrespective of the use of pre-operative endometrial thinning agents (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05, 6 RCTs, 599 women, low heterogeneity; I(2) = 11%). GnRHa produced more consistent endometrial atrophy than was produced by danazol (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.75, 2 RCTs, 142 women, no heterogeneity; I(2) = 0%). For other intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, any differences were minimal, and no benefits of GnRHa pretreatment were noted in studies in which women underwent second-generation ablation techniques. Both GnRHa and danazol produced side effects in a significant proportion of women, although few studies reported these in detail. Few randomised data were available to allow assessment of the effectiveness of progestogens as endometrial thinning agents. When reported, the long-term effects of endometrial thinning agents on benefits such as postoperative amenorrhoea were reduced with time.The main study weaknesses were that most participants received no follow-up beyond 24 months and that the studies used a small sample size. Heterogeneity for outcomes reported ranged from none to substantial. More than half the trials had no blinding of participants or outcome assessment. Most of the trials were determined to have uncertain selection and reporting bias, as they did not report allocation concealment and evidence of selective reporting was noted. The quality of reporting of adverse events was generally poor, but, when described in the studies, they included menopausal symptoms such as hot flushes, vaginal dryness, hirsutism, decreased libido and voice changes, as well as other side effects such as headache and weight gain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence suggests that endometrial thinning with GnRHa and danazol before hysteroscopic surgery improves operating conditions and short-term postoperative outcomes. GnRHa produced slightly more consistent endometrial thinning than was produced by danazol, although both achieved satisfactory results. The effect of these agents on longer-term postoperative outcomes was reduced with time. No benefits of GnRHa pretreatment were apparent with second-generation ablation techniques. Also, side effects were more common when these agents were used.

Endometrial preparation with desogestrel before Essure hysteroscopic sterilization: preliminary study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of desogestrel on endometrial preparation for transcervical sterilization using the Essure device.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized clinical study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

Acute-care university-affiliated hospital in Barcelona, Spain.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing sterilization using the Essure device between January 2010 and January 2011.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were offered desogestrel, 75 μg/d, for 6 weeks before the procedure. Sixteen who accepted were included in the desogestrel group, and 18 who refused were allocated to the no-treatment group. Endometrial biopsy samples were also obtained.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In women who received desogestrel, decidual transformation was observed in eight, glandular atrophy in three, and proliferative endometrium in five. In the no-treatment group, two women had menstruation, nine had proliferative endometrium, and seven had secretory endometrium. In the desogestrel group, the procedure was successful in all women. In the no-treatment group, the procedure was cancelled in two women because of menstruation and in four women with secretory endometrium in whom the tubal ostia were difficult to visualize because of endometrial thickness and bleeding. The median (interquartile range, 25th-75th percentile) duration of the procedure was shorter in the desogestrel group than in the no-treatment group (7 [6-7] minutes vs 8 [7-12] minutes; p = .002).

CONCLUSION

Desogestrel, 75 μg/d, could be an alternative to combined hormonal contraception before placement of Essure inserts, facilitating the procedure and serving as a contraceptive method during the following 12 weeks until occlusion of the tubes.

The practicability and surgeons' subjective experiences with vaginal danazol before an operative hysteroscopy

This randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study compared the usefulness of danazol 400mg vaginally versus 600mg orally in women as a preoperative preparation for hysteroscopic surgery. Ninety-one fertile women were randomly allocated to Group A (46 patients received 400mg of danazol placed into the posterior vaginal fornix and three oral tablets of commercially available folic acid as a placebo), and Group B [45 women treated with 600mg of danazol orally (200mg three times daily) and two vaginal tablets of Lactobacillus rhamnosus as a placebo]. The patients underwent an operative hysteroscopy, transvaginal sonography, blood tests, and a histological assay. A visual analog scale (VAS) score to compute the degree of the surgeon's satisfaction was used. The outcome measures were as follows: an evaluation of the changes in the endometrial thickness, the prevalence of endometrial atrophy, changes in the blood tests, any collateral effects, the degree of difficulty and view, the duration of the surgical procedure, any complications during the operative hysteroscopy and associated side effects, and the surgeon's satisfaction with the endometrial preparation. The vaginal administration route was associated with a more pronounced effect on the endometrial thickness. Significantly more patients receiving vaginal danazol (45/46) had a hypotrophic endometrium than those receiving oral danazol (37/45, P<0.01). In addition, the patients receiving danazol vaginally had a shorter operating time, lower infusion volume, fewer side effects, and a higher surgeon satisfaction. Vaginal danazol adequately prepares the endometrium for an operative hysteroscopy by thinning the endometrium effectively with few side effects and little impact on the metabolic parameters.

Long-term outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the three-step hysteroscopic endometrial ablation (EA) technique without endometrial preparation, and its long-term outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Four hundred and thirty-eight premenopausal women with menorrhagia or menometrorrhagia underwent three-step hysteroscopic EA, which consists of rollerball ablation of the fundus and cornual regions, a cutting loop endomyometrial resection of the rest of the cavity, and rollerball redessication of the whole pre-ablated uterine cavity. The main outcome measures were menstrual status, level of satisfaction with the procedure, and the need for repeat ablation or hysterectomy. Questionnaires were completed for 385 women (87.9%) with a mean follow-up of 48.2 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-four responders (47.8%) reported amenorrhea; 177 (46%) had light to normal flow. One patient (0.3%) underwent repeat ablation and 20 (5.2%) underwent hysterectomy: 15 (3.9%) because of endometrial ablation failure and 5 (1.3%) because of indications unrelated to the ablation (three cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and two cases of fibroids). Two hundred and ninety-two patients (75.8%) were very satisfied, and 78 (20.3%) satisfied with the results. No major complications occurred and three women (0.8%) became pregnant during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

EA is safe and effective means of treating of menorrhagia and menometrorrhagia in premenopausal women, and helps avoid hysterectomy in 95% of patients suffering from heavy bleeding, with or without uterine fibroids. Women should be informed that the procedure is not contraceptive and that pregnancy is possible after treatment.

Gestrinone versus danazol as preoperative treatment for hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To compare danazol and gestrinone treatment as preoperative endometrial preparation for operative hysteroscopy.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical study.

SETTING

University department of gynecological, obstetrical sciences and reproductive medicine.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred thirty-five patients with endouterine pathologies (endometrial polyps, submucous myoma, septate uterus).

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients pretreated with gestrinone (n = 68) and with danazol (n = 67) underwent operative hysteroscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Endometrial response to the medical pretreatment, side effects, procedure time, intraoperative bleeding, infusion volume, patient satisfaction.

RESULT(S)

Side effects were infrequent in both groups, though the patients' personal satisfaction was in favor of gestrinone. The rate of endometrial response was higher for the gestrinone group (97.1% vs. 83.6%). Operative time (mean +/- SD) was 12 +/- 1.8 and 15.2 +/- 1.9 minutes for the gestrinone and danazol groups, respectively. The gestrinone group showed a lower incidence of moderate bleeding (3% vs. 22.4%) and a lower infusion volume (2,100 +/- 200 mL vs. 2,400 +/- 250 mL). Regarding cervical dilatation time, no significant difference was found between the two groups (1.6 +/- 0.3 minutes vs. 1.5 +/- 0.4 minutes).

CONCLUSION(S)

Both treatments are good ways to prepare the endometrium for operative hysteroscopy. However, the data suggest that gestrinone pretreatment is preferable to danazol.

Transcervical endometrial resection in women with menorrhagia: Long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Hysteroscopic endometrial resection is an innovative and conservative surgical technique considered, very often, as an alternative to hysterectomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate long-term efficacy of endometrial resection performed in women with menorrhagia.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of 111 premenopausal women with menorrhagia, unresponsive to medical treatment, who underwent endometrial resection by resectohysteroscope (electrocautery technique supplied with a fundus rollerball electrode, with corneal areas, and with a 90 degrees loop for intrauterine walls and used with glycine 1% as distending fluid) between 1994 and 1999.

RESULTS

Long-term follow-up questionnaires were completed in 106 cases, while 5 cases dropped-out (4.5%). The mean-age at menopause in our subjects was 52.8 years (17.6+/-18.4 months after operation). After 53.2+/-16.4 months, 82 patients (77.4%) showed a normal menstrual pattern or amenorrhea, while failure was recorded in 24 patients (22.6%) and 12/24 patients underwent hysterectomy. Percentage of success in the older population (>49 years) (94%) was significantly higher than in the younger population (70%). The histologic finding of only fibrosis (41.7%) correlated with failure of the technique.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that endometrial resection by resectohysteroscope is an innovative and conservative but not exclusive surgical technique in selected younger women, while in older women endometrial resection nearly always resolves long-term menorrhagia.

New developments in ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery

In the last decade, advancements have been made in hysteroscopic techniques, instrumentation and indications. Vaginoscopic hysteroscopy is performed without medication, cervical dilation and use of vaginal speculum or cervical tenaculum. To prevent complications during uterine access, both misoprostol and laminaria are equally effective for cervical priming. The use of normal saline to distend the uterus prevents hyponatraemia, but hypervolaemia may still be a major problem. Irrigant fluid deficit is best monitored by automated devices. Bipolar electrosurgical systems do not require dispersive return electrodes and do not generate stray currents, thus minimizing the risk of electrical burns. Tissue debulking and extraction are facilitated by vaporizing electrodes or morcellators. Hysteroscopic indications have expanded to include diagnosis and treatment of missed abortion, and cervical and interstitial pregnancies. The most important advancement of hysteroscopy has been proximal tubal access for sterilization.

Endometrial resection and preoperative LH-RH agonists: a prospective 5-year trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefits of systematic preoperative treatment with LH-RH agonists prior to endometrial resection (ER).

STUDY DESIGN

The study population was made up of 98 premenopausal women who underwent resectoscopic treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) between January 1996 and December 1997. Only patients with endometrial polyps or dysfunctional bleeding were included. The population was divided into two groups: patients who had (group B) and those who had not (group A) received LH-RH before the surgical intervention.

RESULTS

ER was carried out as a single procedure in 66 (67.5%) of the patients. ER plus polypectomy was necessary in 32 (32.5%) patients. There were no differences between the two groups as far as the operating time and total volume of distension medium were concerned. No intraoperative complications were seen in either group. A higher negative balance of distension medium was achieved in group A (320 +/- 23 mL versus 187 +/- 16 mL; P < 0.001), and this difference was not modified when cases with polyps were excluded. The failure rate was similar in both groups both at 12 months [group A 6 (14.8%) versus group B 7 (14.9%) patients] and at 60 months [group A, 11 (21.6%) versus group B 10 (21.2%) patients]. Likewise, the amenorrhea and hypomenorrhea rates at 12 months and at 60 months were also shown to be the same in both groups. When two doses of LH-RH are used and the failure rate is taken into account the cost of an acceptable outcome increases from 843.37 Euro to 1373.49 Euro per patient, while the total cost of a hysterectomy is 1355.42 Euro.

CONCLUSIONS

Endometrial suppression with LH-RH agonists did not guarantee better results of ER, but they are strongly recommended during the learning curve to achieve a safer procedure.

Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding

BACKGROUND

Menorrhagia is one of the most common reasons for pre-menopausal women to be referred to a gynaecologist. Although medical therapy is generally the first approach, many women will eventually require or request a hysterectomy. Hysterectomy is associated with a significant in-patient hospital stay and a period of convalescence that makes it an unattractive and unnecessarily invasive option for many women. Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation or resection, and more recently "second generation" devices such as balloon or microwave ablation offer a day-case surgical alternative to hysterectomy for these women. They are also cheaper procedures than hysterectomy. Complete endometrial removal or destruction is one of the most important determinants of treatment success. Therefore surgery will be most effective if undertaken when endometrial thickness is less than four mm, in the immediate post-menstrual phase, however there are often difficulties in reliably arranging surgery for this time. The other option is the use of hormonal agents which induce endometrial thinning or atrophy prior to surgery. The most commonly evaluated agents have been goserelin (a GnRH analogue) and danazol. Progestogens and other GnRH analogues have also been studied although less data are available. It has been suggested that the use of these agents, particularly GnRH analogues, will reduce operating time, improve the intra-uterine operating environment, and reduce distension medium absorption (this is the fluid used to distend the uterine cavity during surgery). They may also result in a greater improvement in long term outcomes such as menstrual loss and dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, danazol, and progestogens, when used for endometrial thinning prior to endometrial destruction for menorrhagia, in improving the intra-uterine operating environment and treatment outcome after surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group search strategy (see Review Group details) was used to identify randomised trials that had compared the use of these drugs with either each other, or placebo, or no pre-operative treatment. An updated search was performed in 2001-2002 to identify new trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were included if they compared the effects of these agents with each other, or with placebo or no treatment on relevant intra-operative and post-operative treatment outcomes. Only randomised studies were included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Five studies compared goserelin (a GnRH analogue) with no treatment or placebo and one study compared decapeptyl (a GnRH analogue) with no treatment. Three studies compared goserelin with danazol. Two studies compared progestogens, danazol and triptorelin or nasal spray nafarelin (both GnRH analogues) with no treatment. Only one study comparing triptorelin with no treatment assessed outcomes after balloon ablation and no studies assessing endometrial thinning agents prior to other second generation ablation techniques were identified. One study assessed the effects of progestogens compared to no treatment. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. A third reviewer checked data extraction for accuracy and wrote to authors where relevant data was missing or unclear. Intra-operative parameters included endometrial thickness, duration of surgery, ease of surgery, distension medium absorption and complication rate. Post-operative outcomes included the proportion of women with amenorrhoea, post-operative menstrual loss and dysmenorrhoea, and the need for further surgery. Data on side-effects were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

When compared with no treatment, GnRH analogues are associated with a shorter duration of surgery, greater ease of surgery and a higher rate of post-operative amenorrhoea at 12 months with hysteroscopic resection or ablation. Post-operative dysmenorrhoea also appears to be reduced. The use of GnRH analogues has no effect on intra-operative complication rates and patient satisfaction with this surgery is high irrespective of the use of any pre-operative endometrial thinning agent. GnRH analogues produce more consistent endometrial atrophy than danazol. For other intra-operative and post-operative outcomes, any differences are minimal and there were no benefits of GnRHa pre-treatment in the one small study where women had balloon (second generation ablation). Both GnRH analogues and danazol produce side-effects in a significant proportion of women, though few studies have reported these in detail. Few randomised data are available to assess the effectiveness of progestogens as endometrial thinning agents. The effect of any thinning agent on longer-term results is less certain but where reported the effect of endometrial thinning agents on benefits such as post-operative amenorrhoea appears to reduce with time.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Endometrial thinning prior to hysteroscopic surgery in the early proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle for menorrhagia improves both the operating conditions for the surgeon and short term post-operative outcome. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues produce slightly more consistent endometrial thinning than danazol, though both agents produce satisfactory results. The effect of these agents on longer term post-operative outcomes such as amenorrhoea and the need for further surgical intervention reduces with time.

Is endometrial pre-treatment of value in improving the outcome of transcervical resection of the endometrium?

The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the use of medical pre-treatment of the endometrium improves the outcome of transcervical resection of the endometrium with regards to long-term operative outcome, histological findings and patient satisfaction. A prospective randomized trial comparing three endometrial pre-treatment agents (danazol, medroxyprogesterone acetate or nafarelin) with no pre-treatment was conducted. The main outcome measures were: (i) thickness of the endometrium and myometrium resected; (ii) histological stage of the endometrium at the time of operation; (iii) the presence or absence of menses and (iv) patient satisfaction 1 year post-operatively. Of the three pre-treatments studied, danazol produced a lower median endometrial thickness than the control, showed the greatest ability to induce atrophy of the endometrial glands and stroma (not statistically significant) and produced the highest rate of amenorrhoea (not different to the control). Danazol and nafarelin produced significantly lower median endometrial thickness than no pre-treatment. There were, however, no significant differences in the rates of amenorrhoea in any of the pre-treatment groups compared with that in the control group. No improvement in clinical outcome or patient satisfaction is conferred by the use of medical pre-treatments if transcervical resection of the endometrium is performed in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle.

Comparison of microwave endometrial ablation and transcervical resection of the endometrium for treatment of heavy menstrual loss: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Various new endometrial ablation techniques have emerged for the treatment of menorrhagia. We undertook a randomised controlled trial comparing one new technique, microwave endometrial ablation (MEA), with a proven procedure, transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE), for women with heavy menstrual loss.

METHODS

263 eligible and consenting women, referred for endometrial ablative surgery, were randomly assigned MEA (Microsulis plc, Waterlooville, Hampshire, UK; n=129) or TCRE (n=134). 230 participants were needed to give 80% power of demonstrating a 15% difference in satisfaction with treatment. All procedures were done under general anaesthesia 5 weeks after endometrial thinning with goserelin 3.6 mg. Questionnaires were completed at recruitment and at 12 months' follow-up. The primary outcome measures were patients' satisfaction with and the acceptability of treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat among women followed up to 12 months (n=116 MEA, n=124 TCRE).

FINDINGS

At 12 months, 89 (77%) women in the MEA group and 93 (75%) in the TCRE group were totally or generally satisfied with their treatment (95% CI for difference -12 to 17) and 109 (94%) versus 112 (90%) found it acceptable (-11 to 35). Mean operating times were shorter for MEA than for TCRE (11.4 vs 15.0 min, p=0.001) and the postoperative stay slightly but not significantly shorter. One blunt perforation occurred in each study group resulting in one immediate hysterectomy (TCRE group). Of eight health-related quality of life dimensions, all were improved after MEA (six significantly) and seven were improved after TCRE (all significantly).

INTERPRETATION

Both techniques achieved high rates of satisfaction and acceptability and both improved quality of life after 1 year. However, we cannot exclude a difference in satisfaction between the groups of less than 15%. MEA seems a suitable alternative to TCRE.

Modern treatments of menorrhagia attributable to dysfunctional uterine bleeding

Menorrhagia (excessive uterine bleeding) affects some 20 percent of the women of reproductive age worldwide. The following review describes known and theorized etiologies of the disorder, followed by a discussion of treatment options that are currently in use as well as those on the horizon. There is much interest internationally in decreasing hysterectomy rates, particularly for those women with abnormal bleeding and anatomically normal uteri. It is these women who are the focus of this paper. Pharmacotherapy and surgery are the mainstay treatments for such patients with menorrhagia secondary to dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Most commonly, hormonal and nonhormonal medications are followed by dilatation and curettage, and ultimately, in many cases, hysterectomy. Endometrial ablation techniques have been evolving since the 1980s in response to the need for an efficacious, safer, and more cost-effective alternatives to hysterectomy. Hysteroscopic ablation achieves these goals but is difficult technically and requires significant additional training even for otherwise skilled and experienced gynecologists. The current decade has seen the development of many innovative approaches to performing endometrial ablation. These methods are intended to be much simpler to perform with less risk than electrosurgical or laser endometrial ablation. The final section of this article presents the published data to date on these new technologies, which should (in their refined state) revolutionize the treatment of menorrhagia secondary to dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Does preoperative treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist improve the outcome of endometrial resection?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To verify if more favorable long-term results of endometrial resection can be obtained with preoperative gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist treatment.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

Tertiary care academic department.

PATIENTS

Sixty-three premenopausal women with established menorrhagia.

INTERVENTION

Eight weeks of goserelin depot treatment before endometrial resection or immediate surgery in the early proliferative phase of the cycle.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Variations in menstrual patterns and bleeding scores as well as overall degree of satisfaction with treatment were determined 1 year after endometrial resection. Mean +/- SD monthly pictorial blood loss-assessment chart scores in the second 6-month follow-up period were 26.9 +/- 31.6 in the goserelin group and 44.0 +/- 45.7 in the immediate surgery group (mean difference 17.1 points, 95% CI -3.0 to +37.2, p = 0.09, unpaired t test). Respective amenorrhea rates were 34% (11/32) and 20% (6/20, p = 0.26, Fisher's exact test, 95% CI of difference -8% to +37%). Overall satisfaction with treatment was 91% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Administration of a GnRH agonist before endometrial resection is advantageous for surgery, but has a limited effect in terms of postoperative bleeding pattern and appears not to offer clear-cut long-term clinical benefit.

Ultrasonographic prediction of the efficacy of GnRH agonist therapy before laparoscopic myomectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess ultrasonographic prediction of the efficacy of administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog before laparoscopic myomectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study of women treated consecutively from September 1994 to July 1996 (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

Endogyn Service, Private Endoscopic Associates, Naples, and Department of Gynecologic and Pediatric Sciences, Reggio Calabria University, Catanzaro, Italy.

PATIENTS

Sixty-seven infertile women with symptomatic uterine myomata, mainly intramural, undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were prospectively randomized in two groups. Group A received preoperative administration of two injections of a depot formulation of leuprolide acetate 28 days apart, and group B underwent direct surgery. In each group we studied the number, diameter, and echogenicity of larger fibroids; resistance index of uterine arteries and myoma vessels; operating time; and blood loss.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The two groups did not significantly differ in baseline ultrasonographic parameters. Both blood loss (p <0.01) and operating time (p <0.05) were significantly lower in group A. However, operating time was significantly longer when the main myoma was markedly hypoechoic.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the therapeutic efficacy of administration of a GnRH analog before laparoscopic myomectomy in reducing blood loss and decreasing operating time in all cases except those with markedly hypoechoic fibroids.