Randomised trial of immediate versus deferred treatment strategies for the management of minor cervical cytological abnormalities

Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test

BACKGROUND

A significant number of women are diagnosed with minor cytological abnormalities on cervical screening. Many authorities recommend surveillance as spontaneous regression might occur. However, attendance for cytological follow-up decreases with time and might put some women at risk of developing invasive disease.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the optimum management strategy for women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance - ASCUS or low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions - LSIL) at primary screening in the absence of HPV (human papillomavirus) DNA test.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 4, 2016), MEDLINE (1946 to April week 2 2016) and Embase (1980 to 2016 week 16).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate colposcopy to cytological surveillance in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS/borderline) or low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSIL/mild dyskaryosis).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure studied was the occurrence of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN). The secondary outcome measures studied included default rate, clinically significant anxiety and depression, and other self-reported adverse effects.We classified studies according to period of surveillance, at 6, 12, 24 or 36 months, as well as at 18 months, excluding a possible exit-examination. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five RCTs with 11,466 participants that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There were 18 cases of invasive cervical cancer, seven in the immediate colposcopy and 11 in the cytological surveillance groups, respectively. Although immediate colposcopy detects CIN2+ and CIN3+ earlier than cytology, the differences were no longer observed at 24 months (CIN2+: 3 studies, 4331 women; 17.9% versus 18.3%, RR 1.14, CI 0.66 to 1.97; CIN3+: 3 studies, 4331 women; 10.3% versus 11.9%, RR 1.02, CI 0.53 to 1.97). The inter-study heterogeneity was considerable (I² greater than 90%). Furthermore, the inclusion of the results of the exit examinations at 24 months, which could inflate the CIN detection rate of cytological surveillance, may have led to study design-derived bias; we therefore considered the evidence to be of low quality.When we excluded the exit examination, the detection rate of high-grade lesions at the 18-month follow-up was higher after immediate colposcopy (CIN2+: 2 studies, 4028 women; 14.3% versus 10.1%, RR 1.50, CI 1.12 to 2.01; CIN3+: 2 studies, 4028 women, 7.8% versus 6.9%, RR 1.24, CI 0.77 to 1.98) both had substantial inter-study heterogeneity (I² greater than 60%) and we considered the evidence to be of moderate quality).The meta-analysis revealed that immediate referral to colposcopy significantly increased the detection of clinically insignificant cervical abnormalities, as opposed to repeat cytology after 24 months of surveillance (occurrence of koilocytosis: 2 studies, 656 women; 32% versus 21%, RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.90; moderate-quality evidence) incidence of any CIN: 2 studies, 656 women; 64% versus 32%, RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.08, low-quality evidence; incidence of CIN1: 2 studies, 656 women; 21% versus 8%, RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.94, moderate-quality evidence).Due to differences in trial designs and settings, there was large variation in default rates between the included studies. The risk for default was higher for the repeat cytology group, with a four-fold increase at 6 months, a six-fold at 12 and a 19-fold at 24 months (6 months: 3 studies, 5117 women; 6.3% versus 13.3%, RR 3.85, 95% CI 1.27 to 11.63, moderate-quality evidence; 12 months: 3 studies, 5115 women; 6.3% versus 14.8%, RR 6.39, 95% CI 1.49 to 29.29, moderate-quality evidence; 24 months: 3 studies, 4331 women; 0.9% versus 16.1%, RR 19.1, 95% CI 9.02 to 40.43, moderate-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on low- or moderate-quality evidence using the GRADE approach and generally low risk of bias, the detection rate of CIN2+ or CIN3+ after two years does not appear to differ between immediate colposcopy and cytological surveillance in the absence of HPV testing, although women may default from follow-up. Immediate colposcopy probably leads to earlier detection of high-grade lesions, but also detects more clinically insignificant low-grade lesions. Colposcopy may therefore be the first choice when good compliance is not assured. These results emphasize the need for an accurate reflex HPV triage test to distinguish women who need diagnostic follow-up from those who can return safely to routine recall.

Cytologic surveillance versus immediate colposcopy for women with a cervical smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in a poor setting in Nigeria

Background

Ideally, all patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smear cytology results should undergo colposcopic examination of the cervix, but low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) can also be followed up with further Papanicolaou smear surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of cytologic surveillance versus immediate colposcopy in women with a cervical smear diagnosis of LSIL.

Methods

This was a prospective comparative study of 240 eligible consenting women consecutively grouped into cervical surveillance for 6 months versus immediate colposcopy at a ratio of 1:1. Free cervical smear cytology, colposcopy, and biopsy, as well as histology, were provided for all study participants.

Results

The regression, persistence, and progression rates with 6 months of cytologic surveillance of LSIL were 46.1%, 43.4%, and 3.9%, respectively. The difference between the proportions of women who had an eventual histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ in both groups was not statistically significant (4.9% versus 8.7%; P=0.68). The default rates among women on cytologic surveillance and immediate colposcopy were 37% and 12.5%, respectively (P=0.0002).

Conclusion

Although the progression rate of LSIL is low, a high persistence rate and higher default rate from cytologic surveillance highlight the need to consider immediate referral for colposcopy, where available, for all women with a Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of LSIL in this environment.

Ten-year outcomes of a one-stop colposcopy clinic: a unique service for low grade cytology

OBJECTIVE

To determine patient acceptance of treatment, and treatment default rate, at a one-stop clinic, and to establish the concordance of punch and loop histology for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) by date of excisional treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of computerised data and clinic files of 2090 women with low grade cytology undergoing cervical punch biopsies between 2001 and 2011 at the colposcopy clinic, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK. Punch biopsies were micro-wave processed and reported within 2h, and women were offered immediate loop biopsy if high grade CIN was confirmed. Data were collected regarding patients' choice for immediate or deferred treatment and default rate. Histological outcomes were compared between those undergoing immediate and deferred loop biopsies.

RESULTS

Of the 360 women (17%) with high grade CIN on punch biopsy, 259 (72%) opted to have immediate loop treatment at the first visit. Of these women, 190 (73%) had high grade CIN on loop histology. Of 97 women (27%) who had deferred loop biopsy after a median of 28 days (range 7-112), 65 (67%) had high grade CIN on loop histology. The default rate at return for treatment appointments was 0% amongst all patients.

CONCLUSION

This one-stop colposcopy clinic reduces defaulting from treatment. It has proven to be a sustainable service and the majority of women, when given the choice, opt for immediate loop treatment at their first visit.

Identification of women for referral to colposcopy by neural networks: a preliminary study based on LBC and molecular biomarkers

Objective of this study is to investigate the potential of the learning vector quantizer neural network (LVQ-NN) classifier on various diagnostic variables used in the modern cytopathology laboratory and to build an algorithm that may facilitate the classification of individual cases. From all women included in the study, a liquid-based cytology sample was obtained; this was tested via HPV DNA test, E6/E7 HPV mRNA test, and p16 immunostaining. The data were classified by the LVQ-NN into two groups: CIN-2 or worse and CIN-1 or less. Half of the cases were used to train the LVQ-NN; the remaining cases (test set) were used for validation. Out of the 1258 cases, cytology identified correctly 72.90% of the CIN-2 or worst cases and 97.37% of the CIN-1 or less cases, with overall accuracy 94.36%. The application of the LVQ-NN on the test set allowed correct classification for 84.62% of the cases with CIN-2 or worse and 97.64% of the cases with CIN-1 or less, with overall accuracy of 96.03%. The use of the LVQ-NN with cytology and the proposed biomarkers improves significantly the correct classification of cervical precancerous lesions and/or cancer and may facilitate diagnosis and patient management.

Which women default from follow-up cervical cytology tests? A cohort study within the TOMBOLA trial

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with default from follow-up cervical cytology tests.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted involving 2166 women, aged 20-59, with recent low-grade cervical cytology taken within the NHS Cervical Screening Programmes in Scotland and England, and managed by 6-monthly cytology in primary care. For the first (6-month) and second (12-month) surveillance cytology tests separately, women were categorized as 'on-time attendees' (attended ≤6 months of test being due), 'late attendees' (attended greater than 6 months after test was due) or 'non-attendees' (failed to attend). Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) were computed for factors associated with late and non-attendance.

RESULTS

For the first surveillance test, risk of non-attendance was significantly higher in younger women, those without post-secondary education, and non-users of prescribed contraception. Factors significantly associated with late attendance for the first test were the same as for non-attendance, plus current smoking and having children. The most important predictor of non-attendance for the second surveillance test was late attendance for the first test (OR = 9.65; 95% CI, 6.60-16.62). Non-attendance for the second test was also significantly higher among women who were younger, smokers and had negative cytology on the first surveillance test. Late attendance for the second surveillance test was higher in women who were younger, smokers, had children and attended late for the first test.

CONCLUSIONS

Women at highest risk of default from follow-up cytology tend to be young, smoke, lack post-secondary education, and have defaulted from a previous surveillance appointment. Tackling default will require development of targeted strategies to encourage attendance and research to better understand the reasons underpinning default.

A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is an important quality assurance measure in the delivery of health care. We conducted a prospective study to assess patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit.

AIMS

To assess current patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit and identify potential areas for improvement.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of patients attending a tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit. Patients were invited to participate and, if they agreed, were given a validated questionnaire to complete at the end of their consultation. Descriptive statistics were then used to analyze the data and identify potential areas of improvement.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-seven patients were recruited, and 96% of patients were satisfied with the overall level of care received. Significant positive features of the service included helpfulness of the staff, cleanliness of the facility, and measures implemented to respect patient privacy. Lack of patient parking, waiting times in the clinic, difficulties in contacting the service, and locating the building were identified as areas for improvement.

CONCLUSION

Patients attending our facility were largely satisfied with the overall level of care received. Nonclinical factors including parking, waiting times, and access to the service were identified as areas for improvement.

Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the management of women with abnormal cytology in terms of subsequent risk of invasive cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

The screening histories of all invasive cervical cancer cases diagnosed in Sweden 1999-2001 and of 5 population-based controls per case were reviewed. In all, 159 patients and 258 control subjects aged < 67 years had an abnormal smear result 0.5-6.5 years prior to cancer diagnosis. The cervical cancer risk was estimated in relation to management by calculating odds ratios.

RESULTS

Histologic assessment of low-grade squamous abnormalities strongly reduced the risk compared to repeated cytology (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.89). Delaying histologic assessment was also associated with a higher risk (odds ratio, 5.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-23.05). After high-grade squamous atypia, absence of any cytologic or histologic specimen was a major determinant of cancer risk (odds ratio, 12.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-infinitive).

CONCLUSION

For adequate protection against invasive cervical cancer, further assessment with histology must be recommended also for women with low-grade squamous abnormalities.

Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of cytological surveillance in primary care compared with immediate referral for colposcopic examination in women with low grade abnormal results on cervical cytology tests.

DESIGN

Multicentre individually randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

NHS cervical screening programmes in Grampian, Tayside, and Nottingham.

PARTICIPANTS

4439 women, aged 20-59, with a cytology result showing borderline nuclear abnormalities or mild dyskaryosis, October 1999-October 2002.

INTERVENTIONS

Cytological screening every six months in primary care (n=2223) or referral for colposcopy and related interventions (n=2216). All women were followed for three years, concluding with an exit appointment at which colposcopic examination was undertaken. Colposcopists assessing outcome at this appointment were blinded to randomisation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary end point: cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or more severe disease. Other end points: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III or worse, clinically significant anxiety and depression, other self reported after effects, and rates of non-attendance. Analysis was by intention to treat; all those randomised were included.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or worse was 79 per 1000 person years in the colposcopy arm and 58 per 1000 person years in the cytological surveillance arm (relative risk 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.57). This difference was less marked for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III or more severe disease, but the incidence was still higher in the colposcopy arm (relative risk 1.26, 1.04 to 1.53). Among women randomised to immediate colposcopy, 79% (74.9% to 82.5%) of cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or worse were diagnosed at the time of the immediate colposcopy, while among women randomised to cytological surveillance, 77% (72.1% to 81.2%) of cases were detected by surveillance cytology and related interventions. Similar proportions of women were anxious or depressed in the two arms. A higher proportion of women in the colposcopy arm reported after effects, and these were of longer duration and more severe. Non-attendance was low in both arms.

CONCLUSION

The more marked difference between the arms in the occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or worse than in the occurrence of grade III or worse can probably be accounted for by the spontaneous regression of some cases of grade II neoplasia. Compared with cytological surveillance, a policy of immediate colposcopy detects more cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or worse, and some more grade III or worse, but might lead to overtreatment. Such a policy is associated with a higher rate of reported after effects, which are more severe and of longer duration than those associated with cytological surveillance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 34841617.

Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 4-year outcome of patients after one smear showing mild dyskaryosis with respect to smear regression rate, prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and the effect of age.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with initial mildly dyskaryotic smear during the year 2000 with a follow-up period of 48 months. These women had not had any previous abnormal smears.

SETTINGS

Cytopathology Department and Colposcopy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

RESULTS

We identified 524 patients of whom 375 patients with complete follow-up data are included. The age range was 19-67 years with a median of 29 years. There were 207 patients aged 35 years or less (55%). At 6 months, 258 smears were performed and 47.8% of them were negative (95% CI: 41.6-54.0%). The total number of negative follow-up smears in the first year was 198 out of a total of 397 smears performed (50%). This proportion has significantly increased between 1 and 4 years' follow-up to 67.5% (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.14-1.35). Over the 4-year period, 791 smears were performed and 477 were negative (60.3%; 95% CI: 56.9-63.7%). Of the 477 negative smears there were only 61 smears (12.8%; 95% CI: 10-16%), in 54 patients (14%; 95% CI: 11-18%) that reverted back to low-grade cytological abnormality. In only one case the repeat smear showed high-grade abnormality after initial negative follow-up; however, on biopsy, histology showed CIN I. Out of the 375 patients, 70 required treatment with excisional biopsy (19%; 95% CI: 15.0-22.9%). Histology confirmed high-grade CIN in only 41 cases giving a prevalence of 11% (95% CI: 8.1-14.5%). There were no cases of microinvasive or invasive cancer detected. Age (< or =35 years versus >35 years) did not significantly affect either cytological or histological outcome.

CONCLUSION

Sixty per cent of follow-up smears after initial mild dyskaryosis subsequently became negative; of them 87.2% remained negative over the 4 year follow-up. Treatment was only required in 19% of patients, with 11% prevalence of high-grade CIN. Age did not affect the outcome. These results are reassuring and indicate that colposcopic referral may not be necessary after only one mildly dyskaryotic smear.

Management of minor cervical cytological abnormalities: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

A significant number of women are diagnosed with a low grade cytological abnormality on cervical screening. Many authorities recommend surveillance as spontaneous regression might occur. However, protracted attendance for cytological follow-up decreases with time and might put some women at risk of developing invasive disease. The aim of this review was to assess management options for women with minor cervical disease.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted. All randomised controlled studies comparing immediate colposcopy to cytological surveillance in women with cervical atypia/borderline nuclear changes or low-grade lesions were included. The main outcomes studied were the default rates from the colposcopy clinic and the histological status of biopsies within immediate management protocols compared to biopsies taken on completion of surveillance. Pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect model and inter-study heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's Q-test.

RESULTS

Three randomised controlled trials identified from the literature search with different surveillance periods were combined. The analysis revealed that compliance with follow-up declines over time and reaches significance at the end of 24 months of surveillance (RR: 74.10 [10.36, 529.79]). There was a significantly higher incidence of HPV and CIN 1 in those women referred to immediate colposcopy/treatment compared to those at the end of 24 months surveillance period (32% vs 21%) (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.17-1.90) and (21% vs 8%) (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.69-3.94), respectively, possibly explained by spontaneous regression of clinically non-important lesions. Finally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of CIN2 or worse at initial colposcopy compared with the observation group (24 months) (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.85-3.48).

CONCLUSION

Cytological surveillance puts women at risk as many show poor compliance and such women might have occult high grade abnormalities. A general policy should be immediate colposcopy for all women after a single low grade cervical smear.

Outcomes of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women

The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and complications in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical neoplasia. The medical record of 60 evaluable HIV-infected women who had abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and underwent LEEP following colposcopy at Chiang Mai University Hospital between May 1998 and June 2004 was reviewed. Thirty-one (51.7%) had associated genital infection at screening. Twenty-five (41.7%) had opportunistic infection, but only 18 (30.0%) were treated with antiretroviral therapy. The most common abnormal Pap smear was high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (46.7%), followed by low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (40.0%). Forty (66.7%) women had clear surgical margins after LEEP. Only one (1.7%) woman had severe intraoperative hemorrhage. Early and late postoperative hemorrhage were noted in three (5%) women of each period. Localized infection of the cervix was detected in seven (11.7%) women. Two (3.3%) women developed cervical stenosis at 6 months after LEEP. There was no significant difference in overall complications between HIV-infected women and the control group (P= 0.24). Among 60 HIV-infected women, no statistical difference in the rate of margins involvement (P= 1.00) and complications (P= 0.85) could be demonstrated between HIV-infected women who received antiretroviral therapy and those who did not. Disease-free rate at 6 and 12 months were 97.1% and 88%, respectively. These data demonstrated that LEEP appears to be safe and effective in HIV-infected women.

A long-term study of women with normal colposcopy after referral with low-grade cytological abnormalities

BACKGROUND

About 50,000 women are referred annually to colposcopy in England because of a low-grade smear. About 35% of these women have no colposcopic abnormality but are followed up in the colposcopy clinic because of uncertainty about the risk of significant pathology.

OBJECTIVE

This study determined the 5-year rate of disease when initial colposcopy was normal and smear was non-dyskaryotic.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Colposcopy clinic of an inner city postgraduate teaching hospital. Population Two thousand one hundred and fifty seven women referred between January 1990 and December 2001 with mild dyskaryosis (Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion [LSIL]) or borderline nuclear changes (Abnormal Squamous Changes of Uncertain Significance [ASCUS]).

METHODS

Information was obtained from the colposcopy clinic database and Open-Exeter. Time plots of the disease-free rates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical comparisons were performed using Cox regression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cumulative rates of cytological and histological abnormalities.

RESULTS

High-grade or invasive disease was diagnosed histologically in 12.8% of 805 women referred with borderline nuclear changes and in 35.8% of 1352 referred with mild dyskaryosis. Among 620 women with normal colposcopy and a negative or borderline repeat smear, high-grade disease was found after 5 years of follow up in 1.3% of women originally referred with a borderline smear and in 8.5% referred because of mild dyskaryosis.

CONCLUSION

Women referred to colposcopy with borderline nuclear changes or mild dyskaryosis whose colposcopy findings are normal and whose repeat smear in the clinic is non-dyskaryotic may be discharged for routine 3-yearly screening in the community because the risk of high-grade disease in the next 5 years is small.

Trial of management of borderline and other low-grade abnormal smears (TOMBOLA): Trial design

Cervical screening reduces the risk of cervical cancer by detecting and treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The management of women with low-grade cervical abnormalities is controversial. Two management policies exist: repeat smears in primary care and colposcopy examination. It is not clear which of these is the more effective and efficient. There is also uncertainty as to the most effective and efficient management of women at colposcopy when an area of abnormality is seen on the cervix - immediate treatment or biopsy and selective recall for treatment if the biopsy result suggests this is necessary. The result of a human papillomavirus (HPV) test might assist in deciding the appropriate management of women with low-grade abnormalities. TOMBOLA, a pragmatic randomised-controlled trial set within the cervical screening programmes in Scotland and England, addresses these three areas of uncertainty. Almost four and a half thousand women aged 20-59 with a low-grade cervical abnormality have been recruited and randomised to either repeat smears or colposcopy examination. Women in the colposcopy arm of the trial are further randomised to a policy of either immediate treatment or biopsy and selective recall for treatment if they have an abnormal transformation zone. Women are followed up to an exit examination at 3 years. HPV testing is undertaken at recruitment and at the exit examination. The primary endpoint is cumulative incidence of CIN2/3. A range of other clinical, psychosocial and economic outcomes is being considered. This paper describes the design of the trial, and discusses the rationale underlying aspects of the design and the challenges faced in designing and implementing the trial.

Women in a region with high incidence of cervical cancer warrant immediate colposcopy for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of high-grade histologic diagnoses in women who had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) on Pap smear in an area with high incidence of cervical cancer. We conducted a retrospective study of 220 women with LSIL cytology undergoing colposcopic examination in Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 1999 and July 2004. The histologic diagnoses, obtained from colposcopically directed biopsy or electrical loop excision after initial colposcopy, showed that 80 (36.4%) women had histologically confirmed high-grade lesions and 11 (5%) women had microinvasive (9) and frankly invasive (2) carcinomas. Overall, 41.5% of women with LSIL on Pap smear had significant underlying lesions, requiring appropriate treatment. In conclusion, in the region with high incidence of cervical cancer, women with LSIL cytology are at increased risk of having underlying high-grade lesions and invasive cancer. Immediate referral for colposcopy is warranted.

Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups

OBJECTIVE

The new guidelines of the British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology suggest that women should be offered colposcopy after only one mildly dyskaryotic smear. This is expected to generate increased workload for the colposcopy clinics, at least in the short term. The main objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears and investigate whether there is any variation in different age groups. The rationale was to determine whether we could reduce the burden on colposcopy services by prioritizing the mild dyskaryotic referrals by age, as we hypothesized that high-grade CIN is less frequent in younger women.

METHODS

The study sample included all women who were referred for colposcopy with a cervical smear suggesting mild dyskaryosis (with or without koilocytosis) from April 2000 to March 2003.

RESULTS

We studied 510 women. They were divided into three age groups (<20, 20-25 and >25 years). The overall prevalence of high-grade CIN (CIN II and III) was 28.7%. The positive predictive value of a mildly dyskaryotic smear for high-grade CIN was similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that we are not in a position to prioritize our referrals by age group and reduce the initial pressure for colposcopies. We are also concerned that with the implementation of the new guidelines, a significant number of women <25 years will be carrying high-grade CIN for more than 5 years before they are first screened.

Cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions of low-grade in HIV-infected women: recurrence, persistence, and progression, in treated and untreated women

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients are more predisposed than HIV-negative women to develop squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) of the uterine cervix, and cervical dysplasia may be of higher grade in HIV-positive women than in HIV-negative subjects, with more extensive and multi-centric involvement of the lower genital tract by human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated lesions. Moreover, recurrence and progression rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is particularly higher in immunocompromised women.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study of HIV-positive women and HIV-negative controls, all affected by low-grade SIL of the uterine cervix, treated by loop excision or followed-up without treatment. Correlation of progression and recurrence of SIL with HIV status and CD4+ count.

PATIENTS

From September 1990 to October 1997, 75 HIV-positive low-grade-SIL patients, 47 treated and 28 followed-up without treatment, and 75 HIV-negative low-grade-SIL controls, 45 treated and 30 followed-up.

RESULTS

Among treated patients, 17/47 (36.2%) HIV-positive and 5/45 (11.1%) controls had recurrence (P < 0.0101, O.R. = 4.53, 95% CI = 1.5-13.7), progression of untreated lesion was seen in 15/28 (53.6%) HIV-positive and 7/30 (23%) controls (P < 0.05, O.R. = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.23-11.69). The risk of recurrence or progression of low-grade SIL linked to HIV seropositivity is about 4-5 times higher in comparison with seronegative counterpart, matched for age, risk factors and lesion size. More significantly, considering the cut-off of 200 CD4+/mm(3) in HIV-positive women, 13/17 cases of recurrence (P < 0.05, O.R. = 4.88, 95% CI = 1.28-18.58) and 10/15 cases with progression (P < 0.05, O.R. = 6.67, 95% CI = 1.24-35.73) were immunocompromised (<200 CD4+/mm3), with a significant higher risk of recurrence or progression linked to immunodeficiency status. Considering time of progression or recurrence, during follow-up, Kaplan-Meier curves shows that HIV-positive status and immunodeficiency are correlated with more rapid evolution of cervical dysplasia and HPV-related lesions: comparison of recurrence in treated patients report P < 0.005 and progression in untreated P<0.05 (Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunological status seems to be a determinant factor in prognosis of cervical SIL, HIV-positive women affected by this lesion, even if low-grade, need more aggressive management than the immunocompetent counterpart. Strict cytologic and colposcopic screening is recommended and CD4+ count and HPV-DNA testing may be useful risk indicators. Excisional procedures are preferred, while ablative treatments or wait and see policy may expose to some risk this type of population with poor compliance to follow-up.

Outcome after a cervical cytology report of low-grade squamous abnormality in Australia

BACKGROUND

The current study was undertaken to assist with providing an evidence-based approach to the management of women with cervical cytology reports of low-grade squamous abnormality as used in the Australian organized screening program.

METHODS

Using the Pap Test Registers, an audit was performed of the outcome over 24 months of Australian women who received an index cervical cytology report of low-grade squamous abnormality in 1999.

RESULTS

Information was available for 76,709 of the 90,566 women whose first cytology report in 1999 was of a low-grade squamous abnormality. Forty-one cases of histologically confirmed cervical carcinoma were diagnosed during the subsequent 24 months (10 Stage IA, 31 Stage IB or worse). Five of the 10 women who were diagnosed with Stage IA carcinoma during the 24 months of follow-up had an intervening cervical biopsy of high-grade intraepithelial abnormality. The risk of cervical carcinoma diagnosis during the 24 months was 0.05% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.07%) for the women with nonspecific minor change index cytology, 0.03% (95% CI, 0.00-0.07%) for the women with human papillomavirus index cytology, and 0.07% (95% CI, 0.03-0.11%) for the women with Grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia index cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical carcinoma was a very rare outcome within 2 years of a cytology report of low-grade squamous abnormality in Australia. A simplified terminology for low-grade squamous cervical cytology reports should be considered by Australia, with uniform management for asymptomatic women.

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1

OBJECTIVE

This review article outlines the issues involved in (1) the cytologic diagnosis of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 1), (2) histologic diagnosis of CIN 1, (3) the advantages and disadvantages of various management strategies for CIN 1 confirmed by biopsy, and (4) the evolving technology that may be useful for predicting the course of the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted using the search terms cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, low-grade dysplasia, mild dysplasia, low-risk squamous intraepithelial lesion, mild dyskaryosis, HPV, colposcopy, histology, and cytology. RESULTS.: Using a loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cone biopsy assessment of the cervix as the gold standard, a cytologic assessment of CIN 1 alone results in a high false-positive rate (51.5%) and a false-negative rate (24%) for CIN 3. The appropriate second test after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 1) cytologic results includes repeat cervical cytologic analysis. Subsequent human papillomavirus testing provides no advantage and increases the cost of care. Immediate referral to colposcopy is costly but minimizes the percent of women lost to follow-up. Using a loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cone biopsy assessment of the cervix as the gold standard, the colposcopically directed biopsy may give a false-positive result (11.7%) or false-negative result (up to 31%) for CIN 3. One contributing issue is the moderate interobserver reliability of histologic analysis (kappa= 0.46). There are advantages and disadvantages to both the immediate and expectant management strategies. The most crucial concern for immediate treatment is overtreatment, and that for expectant management the high rate of patients lost to follow-up. Novel technologies, including MIB-1, p16(INK)4a, and genetic assessments, may be helpful in predicting those CIN 1 lesions destined to progress or to persist.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytologic and histologic diagnosis of CIN 1 is fraught with problems related to the subjectivity of the diagnosis. Both management options are also fraught with concerns. Any technique that can better predict disease course would be an advantage to the care of women with this abnormality.

A randomised controlled trial of cytological surveillance versus patient choice between surveillance and colposcopy in managing mildly abnormal cervical smears

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether choice of colposcopy or six month cytological surveillance would be beneficial to women with mildly abnormal smears when compared with the national policy of six months surveillance in terms of psychological morbidity.

DESIGN

A randomised trial based on the Zelen design.

SETTING

A hospital-based research clinic.

POPULATION

Four hundred and seventy-six women who had had a recurrent borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear on routine cervical screening in primary care.

METHODS

Women were randomised either to six months cytological surveillance or to make a choice between that or colposcopy and were followed up for 1 year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was caseness (score >or=4) on the General Health Questionnaire at 12 months follow up. Other measures were the Spielberger State and Trait scores, default rates and cytology/colposcopy outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the arms for General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) scores and Spielberger State and Trait at 12 months. There was a significant reduction in psychometric morbidity between baseline and 12 months in both arms. Overall rates of default from the protocol were the same in both arms, but default that led to uncertain ascertainment of cervical pathology was greater in the no-choice arm.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial indicates that having choice did not impact favourably or harmfully on anxiety or feelings of wellbeing. If a patient is anxious, allowing the patient to choose immediate colposcopy may be preferable because it will improve ascertainment of underlying disease in a group who are more likely to default.

2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

The study was undertaken to provide consensus guidelines for the management of women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) that can act as a precursor to invasive cervical cancer and represents one of the most common significant gynecologic diseases of women of reproductive age.

PARTICIPANTS

An independent panel of 121 experts in various aspects of the diagnosis and management of cervical cancer precursors, including representatives from 29 participating professional organizations, federal agencies, national and international health organizations, and others were invited by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP).

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Guidelines for the management of women with CIN were developed through a multistep process. Draft management guidelines were developed by working groups who performed formal literature reviews and obtained input from the professional community at large by way of an interactive internet-based bulletin board. At the ASCCP Consensus Conference, September 6 through 8, 2001, in Bethesda, Md, all guidelines were discussed, revised, and adopted by formal vote.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based guidelines have been developed for the management of women with biopsy-confirmed CIN.

2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To provide consensus guidelines for the management of women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which can act as a precursor to invasive cervical cancer and represents one of the most common significant gynecologic diseases of women of reproductive age.

PARTICIPANTS

An independent panel of 121 experts in various aspects of the diagnosis and management of cervical cancer precursors, including representatives from 29 participating professional organizations, federal agencies, national and international health organizations, and others invited by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP).

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Guidelines for the management of women with CIN were developed through a multistep process. Working groups, who performed formal literature reviews and obtained input from the professional community at large by way of an interactive Internet-based bulletin board, developed draft management guidelines. At the ASCCP Consensus Conference, September 6-8, 2001, in Bethesda, Maryland, all guidelines were discussed, revised, and adopted by formal vote.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines have been developed for the management of women with biopsy-confirmed CIN.

An audit of the positive predictive value of high-grade dyskaryosis in cervical smears: 2001-2002

The positive predictive value (PPV) of high-grade dyskaryosis for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or worse on histology is published annually for the laboratories in the UK National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). The PPV fell in 2001 compared with 2000 for four of the five consultants reporting cervical smears in our laboratory, the greatest fall being from 91.6% to 77.9%. Investigation of the possible reasons for the fall suggested the main cause lay outside the laboratory in the type of biopsy taken at colposcopy. We conclude that biopsy type affects accuracy of PPV calculations. There is variation in collection and submission of KC61 data including PPV across laboratories. This factor needs to be taken into account when publishing and comparing laboratory data for the NHSCSP.

Management of women with cervical cancer precursor lesions

An understanding of the natural history of HPV-induced precancer and cancer, and of the immune response to HPV and to these lesions, has significantly changed the management of lower genital tract neoplasia. New management guidelines incorporate this understanding, providing a more rational approach to diagnosis and treatment. Understanding that low-grade HPV-induced lesions are not true cervical cancer precursor has fostered expectant management of women with these lesions; however, management approaches are still hampered by the inability to better predict who is at risk for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer and who is not; this is particularly problematic in the expectant management of CIN 1. In addition, the decision whether or not to treat these low-grade lesions may depend on a number of complex factors that take into account the woman's preferences and reliability for follow-up, as well as a host of issues related to costs and the reliability of the original diagnosis and the tests used for follow-up. Management options for high-grade cervical cancer precursor lesions are much more definitive, because the option of expectant management is given except in pregnancy and for adolescents with CIN 2. New markers that better predict which women with high-risk HPV are at highest risk for subsequent development of a true cervical cancer precursor lesion appear to be on the horizon and may make the management of low-grade lesions as clear as present guide lines for their high-grade cousins. Until that time, understanding all the issues involved in expectant and in active management of cervical HPV-induced lesions will help provide women with the best care possible.

An alternative approach to the management dilemma of the mildly dyskaryotic smear based on audit of outcome

We describe a study which takes an alternative approach to the management dilemma of the mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear. Two hundred and fifty women with a smear showing mild dyskaryosis were studied by auditing the clinical outcome as well as the cost. The cost of providing the colposcopy services during the index year was approximately pounds sterling 70000 for an average size district general Hospital. The proportion of women managed by the current guidelines and avoiding colposcopy after a first mildly dyskaryotic smear was only 30%. The majority of patients will eventually have colposcopy despite a policy of cytological surveillance. The alternative approach, to offer colposcopy immediately after the first mildly dyskaryotic smear, would result in a small increase in cost for our unit, equivalent to one extra colposcopy patient per week.

Management guidelines for women with normal colposcopy after low grade cervical abnormalities: population study

OBJECTIVES

To develop an evidence based protocol for the follow up of women with low grade cervical abnormalities for whom treatment is not immediately indicated.

DESIGN

Population outcome study.

SETTING

Colposcopy clinic of an inner city teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

566 women with low grade cytological abnormalities who were not treated at a first visit to the colposcopy clinic, followed up for a total of 881 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resolution of abnormalities, persistence of disease, and treated disease.

RESULTS

Abnormalities resolved in 306 (54.1%) women, whereas 138 (24.4%) had persistent disease and 122 (21.5%) were subsequently treated. Colposcopic opinion, smear test results, age, smoking history, and number of pregnancies were all significantly related to outcome. Logistic regression analysis produced a model that correctly identified 70% of women whose abnormalities resolved. Only 23 of 295 women (7.8%) with a normal cervix on colposcopy and a smear without dyskaryosis at a first visit were treated by the end of the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Women referred with low grade cytological abnormalities who have a normal cervix on colposcopy and a negative or borderline repeat smear test result may be discharged from the colposcopy clinic. We propose a follow up protocol that could safely avoid unnecessary visits to a clinic.