Vaginal misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: is there an optimal evacuation time interval?

Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation)

First-trimester surgical abortion is a common, safe procedure with a major complication rate of less than 1%. Cervical dilation before suction abortion is usually accomplished using tapered mechanical dilators. Risk factors for major complications in the first trimester include increasing gestational age and provider inexperience. Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion has been studied using osmotic dilators and pharmacologic agents, most commonly misoprostol. Extensive data demonstrate that a variety of agents are safe and effective at causing preoperative cervical softening and dilation; however, given the small absolute risk of complications, the benefit of routine use of misoprostol or osmotic dilators in first-trimester surgical abortion is unclear. Although cervical priming results in reduced abortion time and improved provider ease, it requires a delay of at least 1 to 3 h and may confer side effects. The Society of Family Planning does not recommend routine cervical priming for first-trimester suction abortion but recommends limiting consideration of cervical priming for women at increased risk of complications from cervical dilation, including those late in the first trimester, adolescents and women in whom cervical dilation is expected to be challenging.

Role of sublingual misoprostol for cervical priming in first trimester medical termination of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol as facilitator in first trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) by surgical method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective open label study conducted at a tertiary center. A total 150 patients at 6-12 wks gestation requesting for MTP were randomized into two groups. Patients in study group (n=75) received sublingual misoprostol three hours before surgical abortion and in control group (n=75) directly underwent surgical abortion without prior cervical priming with misoprostol. The outcomes of both groups were recorded in terms of baseline cervical dilatation, need of additional cervical dilatation, intraoperative blood loss, operative time and procedure related complications. The results were statistically analyzed using student-t test and chi-square test. p-value of <0.05 and <0.001 were considered significant and highly significant respectively.

RESULTS

The mean baseline cervical dilatation was significantly more in study group compared to control group (8.6±1.3mm versus 5±2.3mm; p <0.001) and the operative time and intraoperative blood loss were also less (p<0.001). Higher incidence of side effects like nausea, vomiting and pyrexia were recorded in sublingual misoprostol group but were well tolerable to the patients.

CONCLUSION

Sublingual misoprostol is an effective and safe drug for cervical priming prior to surgical evacuation and has good patient acceptability.

Oral misoprostol is an effective and acceptable alternative to vaginal administration for cervical priming before first trimester pregnancy termination

BACKGROUND

Cervical priming agents mainly prostaglandins in different doses and routes are used during first trimester vaccum aspiration to prevent cervical injury and shorten the abortion procedure. This study was carried out to assess women's acceptability, the efficacy and side effects of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in facilitating cervical dilatation prior to first trimester vaccum aspiration.

METHODS

A randomised control study where 120 women were divided in oral (51) and vaginal (69) group. Each group received 400 mcg of misoprostol either orally or vaginally 04 h prior to first trimester pregnancy termination. Baseline cervical dilatation, women's acceptability and side effects and complications were noted in both the groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the oral and vaginal misoprostol groups with respect to mean cervical dilatation (5.53 mm vs 5.43 mm; p > 0.05). A total of 88% of women in the oral group expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration as compared to 74% in the vaginal route. The women in the vaginal group were experienced more preoperative vaginal bleeding (43% vs 25%).

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration in preinduction cervical ripening prior to first trimester pregnancy termination.

Sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of a T380A intrauterine device in women with no previous vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether sublingual misoprostol administered one hour before intrauterine device (IUD) insertion reduces failed insertions, insertion-related complications and pain in parous women delivered only by elective caesarean section (CS).

METHODS

Single-blind randomised controlled trial conducted in Ismailia, Egypt, between July 2010 and December 2011. Women who had never delivered otherwise than by elective CS and desirous of using an IUD were randomly allocated to receive sublingually 400 μg misoprostol and 100 mg diclofenac (misoprostol group) or 100 mg diclofenac alone (control group) one hour before IUD insertion. Outcome measures were failed insertion, ease of insertion judged by the investigators, insertion-related complications, and patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

In all, 255 women (130 and 125 in the study and control groups, respectively) had an IUD inserted. Seven insertions failed: five in the control group, and two in the study group. Ease of insertion and patients' satisfaction were comparable in both groups. Abdominal pain and nausea were the commonest side effects reported in the misoprostol group.

CONCLUSION

Sublingual administration of misoprostol one hour before IUD insertion in parous women with no previous vaginal delivery does not facilitate the procedure and may cause undesirable side effects. This approach is not recommended as a standard treatment.

Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives

BACKGROUND

Most intrauterine contraception (IUC) placements do not require pain relief. However, small proportions of nulliparous (∼17%) and parous (∼11%) women experience substantial pain that needs to be proactively managed. This review critically evaluates the evidence for pain management strategies, formulates evidence-based recommendations and identifies data gaps and areas for further research.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search was undertaken. Relevant articles on management of pain associated with IUC insertion, published in English between 1980 and November 2012, were identified using the following search terms: ‘intrauterine contraception’, ‘insertion’ and ‘pain’. RCTs were included; further relevant articles were also identified and included as appropriate.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified and included: 12 RCTs and one non-randomized study of pre-insertion oral analgesia, cervical priming and local anaesthesia; one systematic review and one RCT on post-insertion analgesia and two non-randomized studies on non-pharmacological interventions. There was no conclusive evidence that any prophylactic pharmacological intervention reduces pain associated with IUC insertion. However, most of the regimens studied were adopted from hysteroscopy or abortion and effectiveness in specific subsets of women has not been studied adequately. A systematic review found non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAID) to be effective in reactively treating post-insertion pain, but no benefit was found with prophylactic use.

CONCLUSIONS

No prophylactic pharmacological intervention has been adequately evaluated to support routine use for pain reduction during or after IUC insertion. Women's anxiety about the procedure may contribute to higher levels of perceived pain, which highlights the importance of counselling, and creating a trustworthy, unhurried and professional atmosphere in which the experience of the provider also has a major role; a situation frequently referred to as ‘verbal anaesthesia’.

Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion

BACKGROUND

Preparing the cervix prior to surgical abortion is intended to make the procedure both easier and safer. Options for cervical preparation include osmotic dilators and pharmacologic agents. Many formulations and regimens are available, and recommendations from professional organizations vary for the use of preparatory techniques in women of different ages, parity or gestational age of the pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether cervical preparation is necessary in the first trimester, and if so, which preparatory agent is preferred.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane, Popline, Embase, Medline and Lilacs databases for randomised controlled trials investigating the use of cervical preparatory techniques prior to first trimester surgical abortion. In addition, we hand-searched key references and contacted authors to locate unpublished studies or studies not identified in the database searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials investigating any pharmacologic or mechanical method of cervical preparation, with the exception of nitric oxide donors (the subject of another Cochrane review), administered prior to first trimester surgical abortion were included. Outcome measures must have included the amount of cervical dilation achieved, the procedure duration or difficulty, side-effects, patient satisfaction or adverse events to be included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials under consideration were evaluated by considering whether inclusion criteria were met as well as methodologic quality. Fifty-one studies were included, resulting in 24 different cervical preparation comparisons. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

When compared to placebo, misoprostol (400-600 microg given vaginally or sublingually), gemeprost, mifepristone (200 or 600 mg), prostaglandin E and F(2alpha) (2.5 mg administered intracervically) demonstrated larger cervical preparation effects. When misoprostol was compared to gemeprost, misoprostol was more effective in preparing the cervix and was associated with fewer gastrointestinal side-effects. For vaginal administration, administration 2 hours prior was less effective than administration 3 hours prior to the abortion. Compared to oral misoprostol administration, the vaginal route was associated with significantly greater initial cervical dilation and lower rates of side-effects; however, sublingual administration 2-3 hours prior to the procedure demonstrated cervical effects superior to vaginal administration.When misoprostol (600 microg oral or 800 microg vaginal) was compared to mifepristone (200 mg administered 24 hours prior to procedure), misoprostol had inferior cervical preparatory effects. Compared to day-prior laminaria tents, 200 or 400 microg vaginal misoprostol showed no differences in the need for further mechanical dilation or length of the procedure; similarly, the osmotic dilators Lamicel and Dilapan showed no differences in cervical ripening when compared to gemeprost, although gemeprost had cervical effects which were superior to laminaria tents. Older prostaglandin regimens (sulprostone, prostaglandin E(2) andF(2alpha)) were associated with high rates of gastrointestinal side-effects and unplanned pregnancy expulsions. Few studies reported women's satisfaction with cervical preparatory techniques.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Modern methods of cervical ripening are generally safe, although efficacy and side-effects between methods vary. Reports of adverse events such as cervical laceration or uterine perforation are uncommon overall in this body of evidence and no published study has investigated whether cervical preparation impacts these rare outcomes. Cervical preparation decreases the length of the abortion procedure; this may become increasingly important with increasing gestational age, as mechanical dilation at later gestational ages takes longer and becomes more difficult. These data do not suggest a gestational age where the benefits of cervical dilation outweigh the side-effects, including pain, that women experience with cervical ripening procedures or the prolongation of the time interval before procedure completion. Mifepristone 200 mg, osmotic dilators and misoprostol, 400microg administered either vaginally or sublingually, are the most effective methods of cervical preparation.

Pregnancy termination using vaginal misoprostol in women with more than one caesarean section

We set out to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the proposed misoprostol regimen in women with previous multiple caesarean sections. This was a retrospective cohort study of 21 women with more than one caesarean section who underwent termination of pregnancy (TOP) with 400 mug of vaginal misoprostol followed by 200 mug/6 h (max 800 mug). The complete abortion rate was 12/21 (57.14%) and six (28.57%) women had an incomplete abortion. Three TOPs (14.29%) failed. In the first trimester group, only 3/9 (33.34%) aborted completely, while (9/12) 75% second trimester patients aborted completely. There were no major complications. The proposed regimen is considered safe and reasonably effective in second trimester TOPs in women with previous multiple caesarean sections. In first trimester patients, the possibility of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) should be discussed during counselling, or a higher dose should be used as the effectiveness is low.

Cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of vaginal and oral misoprostol

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of oral and vaginal misoprostol for preoperative cervical ripening in premenopausal women before hysteroscopic surgery.

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled, double blind, randomized trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty-six premenopausal women eligible for operative hysteroscopy were recruited. Nine women were excluded from the study.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomly assigned to receive 400 microg of misoprostol orally (n = 39) or vaginally (n = 38), 10-12 hours before operative hysteroscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Extent of initial cervical width, percentage of patients requiring cervical dilatation, duration of cervical dilatation and surgical procedure, complications during procedure, and associated side effects.

RESULT(S)

Mean cervical widths in the vaginal and oral misoprostol groups after treatment were 7.3 +/- 1.6 mm and 6.0 +/- 1.5 mm, respectively, which was a statistically significant difference. Time required for cervical dilatation (98.6 +/- 88.7 s vs. 49.1 +/- 34.9 s) and duration of surgery (14.5 +/- 6 vs. 7.7 +/- 4.0 min) was statistically significantly shorter in the vaginal misoprostol group. The percentage of women with an initial cervical width of 9 mm was statistically significantly higher in the vaginal misoprostol group (36.8% vs. 5.1%). Uterine perforation occurred in two patients in the oral misoprostol group and in none in the vaginal misoprostol group. Side effects were comparable between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Vaginal administration of misoprostol is more effective than the oral route for preoperative cervical ripening in premenopausal women.

Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). SFP Guideline 20071

First-trimester surgical abortion is a common, safe procedure with a major complication rate of less than 1%. Cervical dilation before suction aspiration is usually accomplished using tapered mechanical dilators. Risk factors for major complications in the first trimester are increasing gestational age and provider inexperience. Use of laminaria for cervical priming reduces the risk of cervical laceration and, to a lesser extent, uterine perforation. While pharmacological priming agents may potentially have the same effects, no published studies to date have been large enough to assess these outcomes. Given an experienced provider, the risk of these injuries during suction aspiration is very small. Cervical priming can be achieved with osmotic dilators or pharmacological agents. The advantages of osmotic dilators such as laminaria, Dilapan-S and Lamicel are their ability to produce wide cervical dilation, and for the synthetic types, their advantages include predictable effects and rapid onset of action. A disadvantage of osmotic dilators is that they require a speculum examination and a trained clinician to perform the insertion. When cervical priming is performed, misoprostol is the prostaglandin analogue most commonly used worldwide. Compared to laminaria, vaginal misoprostol requires a shorter period of time to achieve the same dilatation, is associated with less discomfort and is preferred by women. The sublingual route appears as effective as vaginal administration and requires less time for priming (2 h), but it is associated with more side effects. Oral administration can produce equivalent dilation to vaginal or sublingual administration, but higher doses and longer treatment periods (8 to 12 h) are required. Buccal administration of misoprostol appears to have a pharmacokinetic and physiologic profile similar to vaginal administration; however, there are no published studies of buccal misoprostol prior to first-trimester suction abortion. While extensive data demonstrate that a variety of agents are safe and effective at causing cervical softening and dilation preoperatively, there are not enough data to conclude that routine cervical priming is necessary to reduce complications of first-trimester surgical abortion. Cervical priming increases preoperative cervical dilation, making the procedure easier and quicker for the physician. However, in order to preoperatively dilate the cervix, the woman must receive the agent at least 3 to 4 h prior to her procedure. Besides the additional waiting, the woman might experience bleeding and cramping prior to the procedure. There are insufficient data evaluating how cervical priming affects women's quality of life in relation to abortion. Based on existing evidence, the Society of Family Planning does not recommend routine cervical priming for suction aspiration procedures. The Society of Family Planning further recommends that providers consider cervical priming only for women who may be at increased risk of complications from cervical dilation, including those late in the first trimester, adolescents and women in whom cervical dilation is expected to be difficult due to either patient factors or provider experience.

Oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home before surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the impact of 400 mug oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home on pre-operative cervical priming in both primigravid and multigravid women prior to first trimester surgical abortion.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Norwegian University Teaching Hospital.

SAMPLE

Three hundred and thirty-eight women undergoing surgical abortion between 7 and 12 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

The women were randomised to either 400 microg of oral misoprostol the evening before or 400-microg of self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home the same day as vacuum aspiration. Main outcome measures Pre-operative cervical dilatation, complications and acceptability.

RESULTS

The median cervical dilatation was 6.2 mm (range 0-11 mm) for the women in the 400 mug oral misoprostol and 6.5 mm (range 0-11 mm) in the 400-microg vaginal misoprostol groups. The median pre-operative dilatation was larger in multigravidae (6.4 and 6.7 mm for the oral and vaginal routes, respectively) than in primigravidae (5.8 and 6.0 mm, respectively). In primigravidae, 19% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm, with no significant difference between oral and vaginal dosage. In multigravidae, 52% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm with vaginal dosage, compared with 36% with oral dosage (P = 0.03). There was no difference between non-immigrant versus immigrant women in pre-operative cervical dilatation. The 400-microg oral dosage group had a higher risk of bleeding, compared with the group receiving 400-microg vaginal misoprostol [odds ratio (OR) = 10.4; confidence interval (CI) 5.2-20.8]. There was no difference between non-immigrant and immigrant women in acceptability of self-administered vaginal misoprostol; almost all women found this administration route acceptable. Complications were minor and were distributed equally between the two dosage groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The vaginal route will result in a satisfactory dilatation in about half of multigravidae but is much less effective in primigravidae. The oral route does not lead to satisfactory dilatation in either group and is associated with a higher occurrence of pre-operative bleeding. Self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home is highly acceptable.

Misoprostol compared with laminaria before early second-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and acceptability of same-day misoprostol and overnight laminaria for cervical ripening before early second-trimester surgical abortion.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial comparing 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol, given 3-4 hours preoperatively, with overnight laminaria before early second-trimester surgical abortion among women at 13.0-16.0 weeks of gestation (n = 84). The primary outcome was procedure time, and the sample size was based on 95% power to detect a difference of 4.5 minutes between groups. Secondary outcomes included completion of the procedure on the first attempt, procedural difficulty, and patients' pain scores and preferences.

RESULTS

The average gestational duration was 14 weeks 6 days. Procedures performed after laminaria were significantly faster than those after misoprostol (median 3.4 versus 7.2 minutes, respectively, P = .01). Laminaria patients had significantly greater dilation than misoprostol patients at abortion (mean 43 versus 33 French, P < .001), and more misoprostol patients required additional dilation (85% versus 21%, P < .001). Physicians rated 27% of the misoprostol procedures as moderate-markedly difficult versus 5% of laminaria procedures (P = .01). Differences in efficacy were pronounced among nulliparous patients. There were no significant differences in ability to complete the procedure on the first attempt or patients' intraoperative pain scores. More women in the misoprostol group would choose their assigned method again (93% versus 62%, P < .01), and 82% of all subjects preferred a 1-day procedure.

CONCLUSION

Early second-trimester abortions take longer and are technically more challenging after cervical ripening with same-day misoprostol than with overnight laminaria, but patients prefer same-day misoprostol.

[Efficacy and safety of misoprostol in obstetrics]

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of misoprostol for indications not included in the prescription information given for the product, including abortion, labor induction, treatment and prevention of postpartum bleeding, and hysteroscopy preparation.

METHOD

Pubmed was searched for controlled, randomized, blinded clinical trials of misoprostol in obstetrics from 1999 through 2004.

RESULTS

Nineteen clinical trials were found. The efficacy for abortion in association with mifepristone at a dosage of 400 microg/6 h is superior versus both placebo and gemeprost, but misoprostol is more painful and less effective than dilation and subsequent evacuation. Regarding the administration route, trials show similar efficacy for the vaginal and oral approaches. In the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage, misoprostol was not any better than oxytocin. When used as a labor inducing agent, results are best with doses of 50 microg/3-8 h, but no controlled clinical trials were found. Although its use for hysteroscopy facilitates the procedure versus placebo, it entails a higher frequency of adverse events. No controlled clinical trials were found for other options.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of misoprostol for indications reviewed in this paper is controversial, and studies found are heterogeneous. Designing and conducting further clinical trials to investigate appropriate dosage and administration routes, as well as the drug s adverse effect profile under such circumstances is essential, and would potentially allow an application for approval to be filed with health authorities regarding its use in obstetric practice.

Oral versus vaginal misoprostol administered one hour before surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of oral and vaginal misoprostol as cervical priming agents administered 1 hour before first trimester surgical termination of pregnancy.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London.

POPULATION

Pregnant women of 10 weeks or less gestation attending the termination of pregnancy clinic.

METHODS

Ninety eligible women were recruited to the study during September 2001 and September 2002. Women were randomised to one of the three groups: misoprostol administered orally (400 microg), misoprostol administered vaginally (800 microg) and standard care (no cervical priming agent) administered prior to surgical termination of pregnancy. Under general anaesthesia, and prior to the operation, a cervical tonometer was used to determine the main outcome measures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline cervical dilatation and the cumulative force required to dilate the cervix from 3 to 9 mm.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean baseline cervical dilation (P= 0.16) or the cumulative force required to dilate the cervix (P= 0.12) between the three randomised groups.

CONCLUSION

No cervical priming effects were detectable with oral or vaginal misoprostol administered 1 hour before first trimester surgical termination of pregnancy.

Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol vs. 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha prior to surgical abortion

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of sublingual misoprostol with those of intramuscular 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha (15-M-PG F2alpha) for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration (VA) in first-trimester pregnancy termination.

METHODS

Sixty pregnant women requesting pregnancy termination between the 9th and 12th week were randomized to receive 400 microg of sublingual misoprostol or an intramuscular injection of 125 microg of 15-M-PG F2alpha 2 h prior to vacuum aspiration. Baseline cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration was measured using Hegar's dilators. Other variables assessed included procedure duration, intraoperative blood loss, and associated adverse effects. Patient acceptability was assessed by questionnaires completed at the time of discharge from the hospital.

RESULTS

Mean cervical dilation at vacuum aspiration was significantly greater in the misoprostol group than in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group (8.8 vs. 7.6 mm; P<0.01), and preoperative adverse effects were significantly less frequent in the sublingual misoprostol group (P<0.05). However, procedure duration and intraoperative blood loss were similar in both groups. The acceptability rates were 93.3% in the sublingual misoprostol group and 76.6% in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group, respectively; however, 6.6% patients in the sublingual misoprostol group thought that the tablets had an unpleasant taste.

CONCLUSION

Sublingual misoprostol appears to be an effective alternative to intramuscular 15-M-PG F2alpha for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy. In addition, misoprostol is inexpensive and convenient to use and has higher patient acceptability rates.

Medical versus surgical abortion efficacy, complications and leave of absence compared in a partly randomized study

To provide optimal information to women choosing between early medical and surgical abortion, rigorous comparisons of the two methods are warranted. We compared the outcome of 1135 consecutive women with gestational age (GA) < or = 63 days receiving either a medical (600 mg mifepristone and 1 mg gemeprost) or a surgical abortion (vacuum aspiration in general anesthesia). One hundred eleven of these women were randomized for abortion method. Surgical interventions and complications leading to readmission within the following 15 weeks were identified through a computer system. Information about antibiotic treatment, leave of absence and number of contacts to the health care system were obtained from mailed questionnaires. The number of complications was identical after the two methods, but surgical abortion was associated with a higher success rate [97.7% (708/725) vs. 94.1% (386/410), p < .01] and also with a higher risk of antibiotic treatment than medical abortion [7.8% (37/467) vs. 3.7% (13/356), p < .05]. The median leave of absence was shorter in women choosing a medical (1 day) than a surgical termination (2 days), p < .05. On average, one third of all the women requested at least one extra unscheduled consultation apart from a routine follow-up visit. We conclude that the chance of a primary successful termination at GA < or = 63 days is higher after a surgical abortion in general anesthesia compared to a medical abortion induced with 600 mg mifepristone and 1 mg gemeprost. A surgical abortion is associated with an increased risk of antibiotic treatment compared to medical abortion. The women's need for follow-up might be higher than we expect.

A randomized comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before suction termination of first-trimester pregnancy

This randomized trial compares the efficacy and side effects of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester pregnancy termination. One-hundred pregnant women between 6 and 12 weeks of gestation opting for termination of pregnancy by suction evacuation were included in this study. The women were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 received 400 microg of sublingual misoprostol and group 2 received 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol 2 h prior to suction evacuation. The abortion was carried out by suction evacuation using a Karman's cannula attached to an electrically operated suction machine under intravenous analgesia. Baseline cervical dilatation, duration of the procedure, operative blood loss, side effects and complications were noted in both groups. There was a significant difference between the sublingual and vaginal misoprostol groups with respect to mean cervical dilatation (8.6 mm vs. 6.8 mm, p < 0.05). However, the duration of the procedure (3.03 min vs. 3.16 min) and the amount of blood loss (29 mL vs. 31.2 mL) were not significantly different between the two groups. The women in the sublingual group experienced significantly more shivering and preoperative vaginal bleeding (68% vs. 56%, p < 0.05). None of the women in the two groups had either uterine perforation or excessive hemorrhage. In our study, sublingual misoprostol (400 microg) was significantly more effective in facilitating cervical dilation prior to surgical abortion than vaginal misoprostol.

The use of oral misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: a randomised controlled trial of 400 versus 200 microg in first trimester pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the impact of 200 and 400 microg oral misoprostol on pre-operative cervical priming in both primi- and multigravidae prior to first trimester termination of pregnancy. Pre-operative cervical dilatation and bleeding were assessed.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Norwegian university teaching hospital.

SAMPLE

Five hundred and fifty-one women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy between 7 and 12 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Patients were randomised to either 200 or 400 microg of oral misoprostol 10-16 hours before vacuum aspiration. The degree of cervical dilatation prior to abortion by vacuum aspiration was measured. Pre-operative bleeding and pain were recorded and vaginal bleeding was measured.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Degree of pre-operative cervical dilatation and pre-operative bleeding.

RESULTS

The mean cervical dilatation was 5.8 mm (SD 1.7) for the women who received 400 microg misoprostol and 5.4 mm (SD 1.4) for those who received 200 microg (P= 0.004). The pre-operative dilatation was larger in multigravidae than in primigravidae in both dosage groups. The odds ratio (OR) of pre-operative bleeding was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-5.0) in the 400 microg dosage group, as compared with the group receiving 200 microg misoprostol. The occurrence of bleeding was dose-dependent. Frequency of bleeding was similar in multigravidae compared with primigravidae in the 400 microg dosage group, whereas the occurrence of bleeding was less in primigravidae than multigravidae in the 200 microg dosage group. Only 89 out of 551 patients bled one or more grams. The volumes measured were not statistically significantly different. Complications were minor, and were distributed equally between the two dosage groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 200 microg oral misoprostol compared with the 400 microg oral misoprostol given 10-16 hours before first trimester surgical abortions results in less pre-operative vaginal bleeding and in a statistically, although not clinically significant reduction in cervical dilatation.

A randomized controlled comparison of sublingual and vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the sublingual and vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical priming before surgical termination of pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

In a randomized controlled trial, 74 primigravid women who were undergoing surgical abortion were assigned randomly to receive misoprostol (400 microg) sublingually or vaginally.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative force that was required to dilate the cervix to 9 mm, for baseline cervical dilatation, for priming to abortion interval, for operating time, or for intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. Women in the sublingual group had more nausea (P=.008), vomiting (P=.01), diarrhea (P=.01), and unpleasant mouth taste (P=.0001) compared with the women in the vaginal group. In the sublingual group, 65% of women were satisfied with the route of misoprostol administration compared with 78% in the vaginal group (P=.11). Most of the staff members (84%) said that they would recommend the sublingual administration of misoprostol (P=.0001).

CONCLUSION

The sublingual administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration for cervical priming before surgical abortion; despite a higher incidence of side effects, there was high patient and staff acceptability.

The pharmacokinetics of the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol in plasma and colostrum after postpartum oral administration

OBJECTIVE

To study pharmacokinetics of prostaglandin E1 analogue, misoprostol in plasma and colostrum after postpartum oral administration.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty women received 600 microg doses of misoprostol orally after delivery. Plasma levels of the principal metabolite, misoprostol acid, were measured at 2, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min (48 samples). Colostrum was expressed from the breasts to measure misoprostol acid at 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 min (24 samples). Assay was done using isotope dilution gas chromatography (GC)/negative ion chemical ionisation mass spectrometry (MS).

RESULTS

The plasma concentration of misoprostol acid rose quickly. Two minutes after oral administration its mean level was 91.5 pg/ml, peaked at 20 min (344 pg/ml), then fell steeply by 120 min (27.8 pg/ml) and remained low for the duration of the study. Misoprostol acid in colostrum reached maximum concentration of 20.9 pg/m within 1h after oral administration. It then declined gradually to 17.8 pg/ml at 2h, 2.8 pg/ml at 4h and to <1 pg/ml at 5h. Areas under misoprostol concentration versus time curves up to 5h were 290.1 pgh/ml in the plasma and 51.4 pgh/ml in colostrum, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol acid is secreted in colostrum within 1h of oral administration of 600 microg of misoprostol; the pharmacokinetics of misoprostol after oral administration during postpartum is similar to that of other pregnancy periods.

Role of sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to vacuum aspiration in first trimester interruption of pregnancy

This is a prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating, for the first time, the effectiveness of sublingual route of misoprostol for cervical priming prior to vacuum aspiration (VA). The trial included 100 women seeking first trimester abortion who were sequentially randomized into two groups of 50 each. Patients of study group received 400 microg sublingual misoprostol 3 h prior to VA while those of the control group did not receive any premedication for cervical ripening. For all periods of gestation between 6 and 12 weeks, misoprostol significantly reduced pain score, blood loss, time duration and rate of complications without increasing the side effects. Sublingual misoprostol is an effective alternative to mechanical cervical dilatation. It can be self-administered and has a good patient-acceptability rate. As no study has evaluated the role of sublingual route of misoprostol for cervical priming before VA, wider studies should be done to advocate its routine use.

Unsafe abortion: the silent scourge

An estimated 19 million unsafe abortions occur worldwide each year, resulting in the deaths of about 70,000 women. Legalization of abortion is a necessary but insufficient step toward improving women's health. Without skilled providers, adequate facilities and easy access, the promise of safe, legal abortion will remain unfulfilled, as in India and Zambia. Both suction curettage and pharmacological abortion are safe methods in early pregnancy; sharp curettage is inferior and should be abandoned. For later abortions, either dilation and evacuation or labour induction are appropriate. Hysterotomy should not be used. Timely and appropriate management of complications can reduce morbidity and prevent mortality. Treatment delays are dangerous, regardless of their origin. Misoprostol may reduce the risks of unsafe abortion by providing a safer alternative to traditional clandestine abortion methods. While the debate over abortion will continue, the public health record is settled: safe, legal, accessible abortion improves health.

WHO multicentre randomised trial of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour

BACKGROUND

Postpartum haemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Active management of the third stage of labour, including use of a uterotonic agent, has been shown to reduce blood loss. Misoprostol (a prostaglandin E1 analogue) has been suggested for this purpose because it has strong uterotonic effects, can be given orally, is inexpensive, and does not need refrigeration for storage. We did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial to determine whether oral misoprostol is as effective as oxytocin during the third stage of labour.

METHODS

In hospitals in Argentina, China, Egypt, Ireland, Nigeria, South Africa, Switzerland, Thailand, and Vietnam, we randomly assigned women about to deliver vaginally to receive 600 microg misoprostol orally or 10 IU oxytocin intravenously or intramuscularly, according to routine practice, plus corresponding identical placebos. The medications were administered immediately after delivery as part of the active management of the third stage of labour. The primary outcomes were measured postpartum blood loss of 1000 mL or more, and the use of additional uterotonics without an unacceptable level of side-effects. We chose an upper limit of a 35% increase in the risk of blood loss of 1000 mL or more as the margin of clinical equivalence, which was assessed by the confidence interval of the relative risk. Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

9264 women were assigned misoprostol and 9266 oxytocin. 37 women in the misoprostol group and 34 in the oxytocin group had emergency caesarean sections and were excluded. 366 (4%) of women on misoprostol had a measured blood loss of 1000 mL or more, compared with 263 (3%) of those on oxytocin (relative risk 1.39 [95% CI 1.19-1.63], p<0.0001). 1398 (15%) women in the misoprostol group and 1002 (11%) in the oxytocin group required additional uterotonics (1.40 [1.29-1.51], p<0.0001). Misoprostol use was also associated with a significantly higher incidence of shivering (3.48 [3.15-3.84]) and raised body temperature (7.17 [5.67-9.07]) in the first hour after delivery.

INTERPRETATION

10 IU oxytocin (intravenous or intramuscular) is preferable to 600 microg oral misoprostol in the active management of the third stage of labour in hospital settings where active management is the norm.