1
|
Keenan-Devlin LS, Borders AEB, Freedman A, Miller GE, Grobman W, Entringer S, Simhan H, Wadhwa P, Buss C. Maternal exposure to childhood maltreatment and adverse birth outcomes. Sci Rep 2023; 13:10380. [PMID: 37369688 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36831-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Exposure to traumatic events during pregnancy may influence pregnancy and birth outcomes. Growing evidence suggests that exposure to traumatic events well before pregnancy, such as childhood maltreatment (CM), also may influence the course of pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes. We aimed to estimate associations between maternal CM exposure and small-for-gestational-age birth (SGA) and preterm birth (PTB) in a diverse US sample, and to examine whether common CM-associated health and behavioral sequelae either moderate or mediate these associations. The Measurement of Maternal Stress (MOMS) Study was a prospective cohort study that enrolled 744 healthy English-speaking participants ≥ 18 years with a singleton pregnancy, who were < 21 weeks at enrollment, between 2013 and 2015. CM was measured via the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and participants above the moderate/severe cut-off for any of the five childhood abuse and neglect scales were assigned to the CM-exposed group. Common CM-associated health (obesity, depressive symptoms, hypertensive disorders) and behavioral (substance use) sequelae were obtained from standardized questionnaires and medical records. The main outcomes included PTB (gestational age < 37 weeks at birth) and SGA (birthweight < 10%ile for gestational age) abstracted from the medical record. Multivariable logisitic regression was used to test associations between CM, sequeale, and birth outcomes, and both moderation and mediation by CM-related sequelae were tested. Data were available for 657/744 participants. Any CM exposure was reported by 32% of participants. Risk for SGA birth was 61% higher among those in the CM group compared to the non-CM group (14.1% vs. 7.6%), and each subsequent form of CM that an individual was exposed to corresponded with a 27% increased risk for SGA (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05, 1.53). There was no significant association between CM and PTB (9.3% vs. 13.0%, aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.58, 1.97). Of these sequelae only hypertensive disorders were associated with both CM and SGA and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy did not mediate the association between CM and SGA. Our findings indicate that maternal CM exposure is associated with increased risk for SGA birth and highlight the importance of investigating the mechanisms whereby childhood adversity sets the trajectory for long-term and intergenerational health issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren S Keenan-Devlin
- , Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Ann E B Borders
- , Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Center for Healthcare Studies, Chicago, USA
| | - Alexa Freedman
- , Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, USA
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
- Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
| | - Gregory E Miller
- , Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
- Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
| | - William Grobman
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Center for Healthcare Studies, Chicago, USA
- , Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, USA
| | - Sonja Entringer
- , Berlin, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Development, Health and Disease Research Program, UC University of California Irvine, California, USA
| | - Hyagriv Simhan
- , Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Pathik Wadhwa
- Development, Health and Disease Research Program, UC University of California Irvine, California, USA
- , Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Claudia Buss
- , Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Medical Psychology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Development, Health and Disease Research Program, UC University of California Irvine, California, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Development, Health and Disease Research Program, University of California Irvine, 1001 Health Sciences Road, Irvine, CA, 92697-3950, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bi S, Zhang L, Huang L, Li Y, Liang Y, Huang M, Huang B, Liang J, Gu S, Chen J, Du L, Chen D, Wang Z. Long-term effects of preeclampsia on metabolic and biochemical outcomes in offspring: What can be expected from a meta-analysis? Obes Rev 2022; 23:e13411. [PMID: 34907632 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term effects of preeclampsia (PE) on metabolic and biochemical outcomes in offspring. We searched PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, and EMBASE from inception to June 2021 for randomized clinical trials, cohort, and case-control studies. Two researchers independently extracted data according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed possible bias. Rate ratios (RRs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) were estimated using fixed-effects model or random-effects model if the heterogeneity was high. PE increased offspring risk of obesity (RR 1.45, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.19-1.78) with a mean weighted age of 9.1 years, and a higher body mass index from 10 years of age (WMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.08-0.83). PE offspring were associated with a higher mean arterial pressure (WMD 1.33, 95% CI 0.42-2.24), systolic blood pressure (WMD 1.93, 95% CI 1.48-2.37), and diastolic blood pressure (WMD 1.13, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) in puberty. However, we uncovered no association between PE and offspring levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, glucose, and insulin in blood with puberty, nor was there an increase in the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus in PE offspring under 15 years of age (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88-1.32). However, PE might be associated with central obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus of offspring in later life. Offspring of mothers with PE exhibited an increased risk of obesity in childhood and a higher body mass index and blood pressure in puberty, but there were no differences in blood lipids or glucose metabolism in puberty compared to non-PE offspring. PE might be associated with a higher risk for central obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus of offspring in later life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilei Bi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lizi Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lijun Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulian Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingyu Liang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Minshan Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baoying Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingying Liang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shifeng Gu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingsi Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lili Du
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dunjin Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijian Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bruin C, Damhuis S, Gordijn S, Ganzevoort W. Evaluation and Management of Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2021; 48:371-385. [PMID: 33972072 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Impaired fetal growth owing to placental insufficiency is a major contributor to adverse perinatal outcomes. No intervention is available that improves outcomes by changing the pathophysiologic process. Monitoring in early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) focuses on optimizing the timing of iatrogenic preterm delivery using cardiotocography and Doppler ultrasound. In late-onset FGR, identifying the fetus at risk for immediate hypoxia and who benefits from expedited delivery is challenging. It is likely that studies in the next decade will provide evidence how to best integrate different monitoring variables and other prognosticators in risk models that are aimed to optimize individual treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claartje Bruin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Room H4-205, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
| | - Stefanie Damhuis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Room H4-205, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Huispostcode CB20, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Gordijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Huispostcode CB20, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands
| | - Wessel Ganzevoort
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Room H4-205, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goffin SM, Derraik JGB, Groom KM, Cutfield WS. Maternal pre-eclampsia and long-term offspring health: Is there a shadow cast? Pregnancy Hypertens 2018; 12:11-15. [PMID: 29674189 DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pre-eclampsia is a common pregnancy disorder with important short-term complications for mother and baby. Evidence suggests pre-eclampsia also has implications for the mother beyond pregnancy, as well as long-term effects on offspring health. Limited research has linked pre-eclampsia with changes in offspring blood pressure, BMI, and stroke risk. Underpinning mechanisms are poorly understood, but developmental programming may be involved. Research in this area has been hindered by difficulties in defining pre-eclampsia and problems with study design. Further targeted evaluation through to adulthood is required to determine the long-term impact of pre-eclampsia on offspring disease risk and how this develops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Goffin
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - José G B Derraik
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; A Better Start - National Science Challenge, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Katie M Groom
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; National Women's Health, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Wayne S Cutfield
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; A Better Start - National Science Challenge, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218:S855-S868. [PMID: 29422214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 255] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Small for gestational age is usually defined as an infant with a birthweight <10th centile for a population or customized standard. Fetal growth restriction refers to a fetus that has failed to reach its biological growth potential because of placental dysfunction. Small-for-gestational-age babies make up 28-45% of nonanomalous stillbirths, and have a higher chance of neurodevelopmental delay, childhood and adult obesity, and metabolic disease. The majority of small-for-gestational-age babies are not recognized before birth. Improved identification, accompanied by surveillance and timely delivery, is associated with reduction in small-for-gestational-age stillbirths. Internationally and regionally, detection of small for gestational age and management of fetal growth problems vary considerably. The aim of this review is to: summarize areas of consensus and controversy between recently published national guidelines on small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction; highlight any recent evidence that should be incorporated into existing guidelines; and identify future research priorities in this field. A search of MEDLINE, Google, and the International Guideline Library identified 6 national guidelines on management of pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction/small for gestational age published from 2010 onwards. There is general consensus between guidelines (at least 4 of 6 guidelines in agreement) in early pregnancy risk selection, and use of low-dose aspirin for women with major risk factors for placental insufficiency. All highlight the importance of smoking cessation to prevent small for gestational age. While there is consensus in recommending fundal height measurement in the third trimester, 3 specify the use of a customized growth chart, while 2 recommend McDonald rule. Routine third-trimester scanning is not recommended for small-for-gestational-age screening, while women with major risk factors should have serial scanning in the third trimester. Umbilical artery Doppler studies in suspected small-for-gestational-age pregnancies are universally advised, however there is inconsistency in the recommended frequency for growth scans after diagnosis of small for gestational age/fetal growth restriction (2-4 weekly). In late-onset fetal growth restriction (≥32 weeks) general consensus is to use cerebral Doppler studies to influence surveillance and/or delivery timing. Fetal surveillance methods (most recommend cardiotocography) and recommended timing of delivery vary. There is universal agreement on the use of corticosteroids before birth at <34 weeks, and general consensus on the use of magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection in early-onset fetal growth restriction (<32 weeks). Most guidelines advise using cardiotocography surveillance to plan delivery in fetal growth restriction <32 weeks. The recommended gestation at delivery for fetal growth restriction with absent and reversed end-diastolic velocity varies from 32 to ≥34 weeks and 30 to ≥34 weeks, respectively. Overall, where there is high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, eg, use of umbilical artery Doppler and corticosteroids for delivery <34 weeks, there is a high degree of consistency between national small-for-gestational-age guidelines. This review discusses areas where there is potential for convergence between small-for-gestational-age guidelines based on existing randomized controlled trials of management of small-for-gestational-age pregnancies, and areas of controversy. Research priorities include assessing the utility of late third-trimester scanning to prevent major morbidity and mortality and to investigate the optimum timing of delivery in fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction and abnormal Doppler parameters. Prospective studies are needed to compare new international population ultrasound standards with those in current use.
Collapse
|
6
|
Francis A, Hugh O, Gardosi J. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21 st standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218:S692-S699. [PMID: 29422208 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fetal growth abnormalities are linked to stillbirth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, and use of the correct birthweight standard is essential for accurate assessment of growth status and perinatal risk. OBJECTIVE Two competing, conceptually opposite birthweight standards are currently being implemented internationally: customized gestation-related optimal weight (GROW) and INTERGROWTH-21st. We wanted to compare their performance when applied to a multiethnic international cohort, and evaluate their usefulness in the assessment of stillbirth risk at term. STUDY DESIGN We analyzed routinely collected maternity data from 10 countries with a total of 1.25 million term pregnancies in their respective main ethnic groups. The 2 standards were applied to determine small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) rates, with associated relative risk and population-attributable risk of stillbirth. The customized standard (GROW) was based on the term optimal weight adjusted for maternal height, weight, parity, and ethnic origin, while INTERGROWTH-21st was a fixed standard derived from a multiethnic cohort of low-risk pregnancies. RESULTS The customized standard showed an average SGA rate of 10.5% (range 10.1-12.7) and LGA rate of 9.5% (range 7.3-9.9) for the set of cohorts. In contrast, there was a wide variation in SGA and LGA rates with INTERGROWTH-21st, with an average SGA rate of 4.4% (range 3.1-16.8) and LGA rate of 20.6% (range 5.1-27.5). This variation in INTERGROWTH-21st SGA and LGA rates was correlated closely (R = ±0.98) to the birthweights predicted for the 10 country cohorts by the customized method to derive term optimal weight, suggesting that they were mostly due to physiological variation in birthweight. Of the 10.5% of cases defined as SGA according to the customized standard, 4.3% were also SGA by INTERGROWTH-21st and had a relative risk of 3.5 (95% confidence interval, 3.1-4.1) for stillbirth. A further 6.3% (60% of the whole customized SGA) were not SGA by INTERGROWTH-21st, and had a relative risk of 1.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.1-4.1) for stillbirth. An additional 0.2% of cases were SGA by INTERGROWTH-21st only, and had no increased risk of stillbirth. At the other end, customized assessment classified 9.5% of births as large for gestational age, most of which (9.0%) were also LGA by the INTERGROWTH-21st standard. INTERGROWTH-21st identified a further 11.6% as LGA, which, however, had a reduced risk of stillbirth (relative risk, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.7). CONCLUSION Customized assessment resulted in increased identification of small for gestational age and stillbirth risk, while the wide variation in SGA rates using the INTERGROWTH-21st standard appeared to mostly reflect differences in physiological pregnancy characteristics in the 10 maternity populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oliver Hugh
- Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pohlabeln H, Rach S, De Henauw S, Eiben G, Gwozdz W, Hadjigeorgiou C, Molnár D, Moreno LA, Russo P, Veidebaum T, Pigeot I. Further evidence for the role of pregnancy-induced hypertension and other early life influences in the development of ADHD: results from the IDEFICS study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017; 26:957-967. [PMID: 28258320 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-017-0966-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate whether in addition to established early risk factors other, less studied pre-, peri-, and postnatal influences, like gestational hypertension or neonatal respiratory disorders and infections, may increase a child's risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders (ADHD). In the IDEFICS study more than 18,000 children, aged 2-11.9 years, underwent extensive medical examinations supplemented by parental questionnaires on pregnancy and early childhood. The present analyses are restricted to children whose parents also completed a supplementary medical questionnaire (n = 15,577), including the question whether or not the child was ever diagnosed with ADHD. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between early life influences and the risk of ADHD. Our study confirms the well-known association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and a child's risk of ADHD. In addition, our study showed that children born to mothers younger than 20 years old were 3-4 times more likely to develop ADHD as compared to children born to mothers aged 25 years and older. Moreover, we found that children whose mothers suffered from pregnancy-induced hypertension had an approximately twofold risk of ADHD (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.09-3.48). This also holds true for infections during the first 4 weeks after birth (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.05-4.04). In addition, although not statistically significant, we observed a noticeable elevated risk estimate for neonatal respiratory disorders (OR 1.76; 95% CI 0.91-3.41). Hence, we recommend that these less often studied pre-, peri, and postnatal influences should get more attention when considering early indicators or predictors for ADHD in children. However, special study designs such as genetically sensitive designs may be needed to derive causal conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Pohlabeln
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rach
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Stefaan De Henauw
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gabriele Eiben
- Section for Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Wencke Gwozdz
- Department of Intercultural Communication and Management, Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Dénes Molnár
- Department of Paediatrics, Medical Faculty, University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Luis A Moreno
- GENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) Research Group, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), University of Zaragoza, Saragossa, Spain
| | - Paola Russo
- Unit of Epidemiology & Population Genetics, Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy
| | | | - Iris Pigeot
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ray JG, Bartsch E, Park AL, Shah PS, Dzakpasu S. Estimated reductions in provider-initiated preterm births and hospital length of stay under a universal acetylsalicylic acid prophylaxis strategy: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open 2017; 5. [PMID: 28646095 PMCID: PMC5498311 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertensive disorders, especially preeclampsia, are the leading reason for provider-initiated preterm birth. We estimated how universal acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) prophylaxis might reduce rates of provider-initiated preterm birth associated with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction, which are related conditions. METHODS We performed a cohort study of singleton hospital births in 2013 in Canada, excluding Quebec. We estimated the proportion of term births and provider-initiated preterm births affected by preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction, and the corresponding mean maternal and newborn hospital length of stay. We projected the potential number of cases reduced and corresponding hospital length of stay if ASA prophylaxis lowered cases of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction by a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 10% (lowest) or 53% (highest), as suggested by randomized clinical trials. RESULTS Of the 269 303 singleton live births and stillbirths in our cohort, 4495 (1.7%) were provider-initiated preterm births. Of the 4495, 1512 (33.6%) had a diagnosis of preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction. The mean maternal length of stay was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-2.0) days among term births unaffected by either condition and 7.3 (95% CI 6.1-8.6) days among provider-initiated preterm births with both conditions. The corresponding values for mean newborn length of stay were 1.9 (95% CI 1.8-1.9) days and 21.8 (95% CI 17.4-26.2) days. If ASA conferred a 53% RRR against preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction, 3365 maternal and 11 591 newborn days in hospital would be averted. If ASA conferred a 10% RRR, 635 maternal and 2187 newborn days in hospital would be averted. INTERPRETATION A universal ASA prophylaxis strategy could substantially reduce the burden of long maternal and newborn hospital stays associated with provider-initiated preterm birth. However, until there is compelling evidence that administration of ASA to all, or most, pregnant women reduces the risk of preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction, clinicians should continue to follow current clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel G Ray
- Affiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Emily Bartsch
- Affiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Alison L Park
- Affiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Prakesh S Shah
- Affiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Susie Dzakpasu
- Affiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Infants in Healthy Nulliparous Women Using Clinical and Ultrasound Risk Factors Combined with Early Pregnancy Biomarkers. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0169311. [PMID: 28068394 PMCID: PMC5221822 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Most small for gestational age pregnancies are unrecognised before birth, resulting in substantial avoidable perinatal mortality and morbidity. Our objective was to develop multivariable prediction models for small for gestational age combining clinical risk factors and biomarkers at 15±1 weeks’ with ultrasound parameters at 20±1 weeks’ gestation. Methods Data from 5606 participants in the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) cohort study were divided into Training (n = 3735) and Validation datasets (n = 1871). The primary outcomes were All-SGA (small for gestational age with birthweight <10th customised centile), Normotensive-SGA (small for gestational age with a normotensive mother) and Hypertensive-SGA (small for gestational age with an hypertensive mother). The comparison group comprised women without the respective small for gestational age phenotype. Multivariable analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression beginning with clinical variables, and subsequent additions of biomarker and then ultrasound (biometry and Doppler) variables. Model performance was assessed in Training and Validation datasets by calculating area under the curve. Results 633 (11.2%) infants were All-SGA, 465(8.2%) Normotensive-SGA and 168 (3%) Hypertensive-SGA. Area under the curve (95% Confidence Intervals) for All-SGA using 15±1 weeks’ clinical variables, 15±1 weeks’ clinical+ biomarker variables and clinical + biomarkers + biometry /Doppler at 20±1 weeks’ were: 0.63 (0.59–0.67), 0.64 (0.60–0.68) and 0.69 (0.66–0.73) respectively in the Validation dataset; Normotensive-SGA results were similar: 0.61 (0.57–0.66), 0.61 (0.56–0.66) and 0.68 (0.64–0.73) with small increases in performance in the Training datasets. Area under the curve (95% Confidence Intervals) for Hypertensive-SGA were: 0.76 (0.70–0.82), 0.80 (0.75–0.86) and 0.84 (0.78–0.89) with minimal change in the Training datasets. Conclusion Models for prediction of small for gestational age, which combine biomarkers, clinical and ultrasound data from a cohort of low-risk nulliparous women achieved modest performance. Incorporation of biomarkers into the models resulted in no improvement in performance of prediction of All-SGA and Normotensive-SGA but a small improvement in prediction of Hypertensive-SGA. Our models currently have insufficient reliability for application in clinical practice however, they have potential utility in two-staged screening tests which include third trimester biomarkers and or fetal biometry.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gestational Weight Gain: Results from the Delta Healthy Sprouts Comparative Impact Trial. J Pregnancy 2016; 2016:5703607. [PMID: 27595023 PMCID: PMC4993958 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5703607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2016] [Revised: 06/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Delta Healthy Sprouts trial was designed to test the comparative impact of two home visiting programs on weight status, dietary intake, and health behaviors of Southern African American women and their infants. Results pertaining to the primary outcome, gestational weight gain, are reported. Methods. Participants (n = 82), enrolled early in their second trimester of pregnancy, were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. Gestational weight gain, measured at six monthly home visits, was calculated by subtracting measured weight at each visit from self-reported prepregnancy weight. Weight gain was classified as under, within, or exceeding the Institute of Medicine recommendations based on prepregnancy body mass index. Chi-square tests and generalized linear mixed models were used to test for significant differences in percentages of participants within recommended weight gain ranges. Results. Differences in percentages of participants within the gestational weight gain guidelines were not significant between treatment arms across all visits. Conclusions. Enhancing the gestational nutrition and physical activity components of an existing home visiting program is feasible in a high risk population of primarily low income African American women. The impact of these enhancements on appropriate gestational weight gain is questionable given the more basic living needs of such women. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01746394, registered 4 December 2012.
Collapse
|
11
|
Refined phenotyping identifies links between preeclampsia and related diseases in a Norwegian preeclampsia family cohort. J Hypertens 2016; 33:2294-302. [PMID: 26259119 PMCID: PMC4596487 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000000696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Preeclampsia is a complex genetic disease of pregnancy with a heterogenous presentation, unknown cause and potential severe outcomes for both mother and child. Preeclamptic women have increased risk for atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease. We aimed to identify heritabilities and phenotypic correlations of preeclampsia and related conditions in the Norwegian Preeclampsia Family Biobank. METHODS By applying a variance components model, a total of 493 individuals (from 138 families with increased occurrence of preeclampsia) were classified according to 30 disease-related phenotypes. RESULTS Of parous women, 75.7% (263/338) had experienced preeclampsia and 35.7% of women with and 22.4% without preeclampsia delivered children small for gestational age (SGA). We identified 11 phenotypes as heritable. The increased occurrence of preeclampsia was reflected by the presence [heritability (H2r) = 0.60)] and severity (H2r = 0.15) of preeclampsia and being born in a preeclamptic pregnancy (H2r = 0.25). Other heritable phenotypes identified included SGA (H2r = 0.40), chronic hypertension (H2r = 0.57), severity of atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease (H2r = 0.31), BMI (H2r = 0.60) and pulmonary disease (H2r = 0.91). The heritable phenotype preeclampsia overlapped with SGA (P = 0.03), whereas pulmonary disease was phenotypically correlated with atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease (P < 0.01), SGA (P = 0.02) and BMI (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION This is the first study identifying the H2r of a range of health-related conditions in preeclamptic families. Our study demonstrates how refinement of phenotypes leads to better H2r estimation and the identification of a biological relationship between preeclampsia and related traits.
Collapse
|
12
|
Blair EM, Nelson KB. Fetal growth restriction and risk of cerebral palsy in singletons born after at least 35 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:520.e1-7. [PMID: 25448521 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.1103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2014] [Revised: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 10/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to improve the understanding of etiological paths to cerebral palsy (CP) that include fetal growth restriction by examining factors associated with growth restriction that modify CP risk. STUDY DESIGN In a total population of singletons born at or after 35 weeks, there were 493 children with CP and 508 matched controls for whom appropriateness of fetal growth could be estimated. Fetal growth was considered markedly restricted if birthweight was more than 2 SD below optimal for gender, gestation, maternal height, and parity. We examined maternal blood pressure in pregnancy, smoking, birth asphyxia, and major birth defects recognized by age 6 years as potential modifiers of CP risk in growth-restricted births. RESULTS More than 80% of term and late preterm markedly growth-restricted singletons were born following a normotensive pregnancy and were at statistically significantly increased risk of CP (odds ratio, 4.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-8.5), whereas growth-restricted births following a hypertensive pregnancy were not. Neither a clinical diagnosis of birth asphyxia nor potentially asphyxiating birth events occurred more frequently among growth-restricted than among appropriately grown infants with CP. Major birth defects, particularly cerebral defects, occurred in an increasing proportion of CP with increasing growth deficit. The factor most predictive of CP in growth-restricted singletons was a major birth defect, present in 53% of markedly growth-restricted neonates with later CP. Defects observed in CP were similar whether growth restricted or not, except for an excess of isolated congenital microcephaly in those born growth restricted. The highest observed CP risk was in infants with both growth restriction and a major birth defect (8.9% of total CP in this gestational age group, 0.4% of controls: odds ratio, 30.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.0-136). CONCLUSION The risk of CP was increased in antenatally growth-restricted singletons born at or near term to normotensive mothers. In growth-restricted singletons, a major birth defect was the dominant predictor, associated with a 30-fold increase in odds of CP. Identification of birth defects in the growth-restricted fetus or neonate may provide significant prognostic information.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kenny LC, Black MA, Poston L, Taylor R, Myers JE, Baker PN, McCowan LM, Simpson NAB, Dekker GA, Roberts CT, Rodems K, Noland B, Raymundo M, Walker JJ, North RA. Early pregnancy prediction of preeclampsia in nulliparous women, combining clinical risk and biomarkers: the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) international cohort study. Hypertension 2014; 64:644-52. [PMID: 25122928 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.03578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
More than half of all cases of preeclampsia occur in healthy first-time pregnant women. Our aim was to develop a method to predict those at risk by combining clinical factors and measurements of biomarkers in women recruited to the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) study of low-risk nulliparous women. Forty-seven biomarkers identified on the basis of (1) association with preeclampsia, (2) a biological role in placentation, or (3) a role in cellular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia were measured in plasma sampled at 14 to 16 weeks' gestation from 5623 women. The cohort was randomly divided into training (n=3747) and validation (n=1876) cohorts. Preeclampsia developed in 278 (4.9%) women, of whom 28 (0.5%) developed early-onset preeclampsia. The final model for the prediction of preeclampsia included placental growth factor, mean arterial pressure, and body mass index at 14 to 16 weeks' gestation, the consumption of ≥3 pieces of fruit per day, and mean uterine artery resistance index. The area under the receiver operator curve (95% confidence interval) for this model in training and validation cohorts was 0.73 (0.70-0.77) and 0.68 (0.63-0.74), respectively. A predictive model of early-onset preeclampsia included angiogenin/placental growth factor as a ratio, mean arterial pressure, any pregnancy loss <10 weeks, and mean uterine artery resistance index (area under the receiver operator curve [95% confidence interval] in training and validation cohorts, 0.89 [0.78-1.0] and 0.78 [0.58-0.99], respectively). Neither model included pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, previously reported to predict preeclampsia in populations of mixed parity and risk. In nulliparous women, combining multiple biomarkers and clinical data provided modest prediction of preeclampsia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise C Kenny
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.).
| | - Michael A Black
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Lucilla Poston
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Rennae Taylor
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Jenny E Myers
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Philip N Baker
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Lesley M McCowan
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Nigel A B Simpson
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Gus A Dekker
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Claire T Roberts
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Kelline Rodems
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Brian Noland
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Michael Raymundo
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - James J Walker
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| | - Robyn A North
- From the Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (L.C.K.); Department of Biochemistry, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (M.A.B.); Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom (L.P., R.A.N.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (R.T., P.N.B., L.M.M.), National Centre for Growth and Development and Maternal and Fetal Health, Liggins Institute (P.N.B.), and South Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (L.M.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.M.); Auckland District Health Board and Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (P.N.B.); Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (N.A.B.S., J.J.W.); The Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital (G.A.D., C.T.R.) and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Institute (G.A.D., C.T.R.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and Alere Discovery, San Diego, CA (K.R., B.N., M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alves JGB, de Araújo CAFL, Pontes IEA, Guimarães AC, Ray JG. The BRAzil MAGnesium (BRAMAG) trial: a randomized clinical trial of oral magnesium supplementation in pregnancy for the prevention of preterm birth and perinatal and maternal morbidity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14:222. [PMID: 25005784 PMCID: PMC4096428 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/04/2014] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preterm birth is the leading cause of infant mortality globally, including Brazil. We will evaluate whether oral magnesium citrate reduces the risk of placental dysfunction and its negative consequences for both the fetus and mother, which, in turn, should reduce the need for indicated preterm delivery. METHODS/DESIGN We will complete a multicenter, randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing oral magnesium citrate 150 mg twice daily (n = 2000 women) to matched placebo (n = 1000 women), starting at 121/7 to 206/7 weeks gestation and continued until delivery. We will include women at higher risk for placental dysfunction, based on clinical factors from a prior pregnancy (e.g., prior preterm delivery, stillbirth or preeclampsia) or the current pregnancy (e.g., chronic hypertension, pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus, maternal age > 35 years or pre-pregnancy maternal body mass index > 30 kg/m2). The primary perinatal outcome is a composite of preterm birth < 37 weeks gestation, stillbirth > 20 weeks gestation, neonatal death < 28 days, or SGA birthweight < 3rd percentile. The primary composite maternal outcome is preeclampsia arising < 37 weeks gestation, severe non-proteinuric hypertension arising < 37 weeks gestation, placental abruption, maternal stroke during pregnancy or ≤ 7 days after delivery, or maternal death during pregnancy or ≤ 7 days after delivery. DISCUSSION The results of this randomized clinical trial may be especially relevant in low and middle income countries that have high rates of prematurity and limited resources for acute newborn and maternal care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02032186, registered December 19, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Joel G Ray
- Departments of Medicine, Obstetrics and Health Policy Management Evaluation, University of Toronto, St, Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON M5B 1 W8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gardosi J, Giddings S, Clifford S, Wood L, Francis A. Association between reduced stillbirth rates in England and regional uptake of accreditation training in customised fetal growth assessment. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e003942. [PMID: 24345900 PMCID: PMC3884620 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect that accreditation training in fetal growth surveillance and evidence-based protocols had on stillbirth rates in England and Wales. DESIGN Analysis of mortality data from Office of National Statistics. SETTING England and Wales, including three National Health Service (NHS) regions (West Midlands, North East and Yorkshire and the Humber) which between 2008 and 2011 implemented training programmes in customised fetal growth assessment. POPULATION Live births and stillbirths in England and Wales between 2007 and 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Stillbirth. RESULTS There was a significant downward trend (p=0.03) in stillbirth rates between 2007 and 2012 in England to 4.81/1000, the lowest rate recorded since adoption of the current stillbirth definition in 1992. This drop was due to downward trends in each of the three English regions with high uptake of accreditation training, and led in turn to the lowest stillbirth rates on record in each of these regions. In contrast, there was no significant change in stillbirth rates in the remaining English regions and Wales, where uptake of training had been low. The three regions responsible for the record drop in national stillbirth rates made up less than a quarter (24.7%) of all births in England. The fall in stillbirth rate was most pronounced in the West Midlands, which had the most intensive training programme, from the preceding average baseline of 5.73/1000 in 2000-2007 to 4.47/1000 in 2012, a 22% drop which is equivalent to 92 fewer deaths a year. Extrapolated to the whole of the UK, this would amount to over 1000 fewer stillbirths each year. CONCLUSIONS A training and accreditation programme in customised fetal growth assessment with evidence-based protocols was associated with a reduction in stillbirths in high-uptake areas and resulted in a national drop in stillbirth rates to their lowest level in 20 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Gardosi
- Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK
- University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
McCowan LME, Thompson JMD, Taylor RS, North RA, Poston L, Baker PN, Myers J, Roberts CT, Dekker GA, Simpson NAB, Walker JJ, Kenny LC. Clinical prediction in early pregnancy of infants small for gestational age by customised birthweight centiles: findings from a healthy nulliparous cohort. PLoS One 2013; 8:e70917. [PMID: 23940665 PMCID: PMC3733741 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 06/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Small for gestational age (SGA) infants comprise up to 50% of all stillbirths and a minority are detected before birth. We aimed to develop and validate early pregnancy predictive models for SGA infants. Methods 5628 participants from SCOPE, a prospective study of nulliparous pregnant women, were interviewed at 15±1 weeks’ gestation. Fetal anthropometry, uterine and umbilical Doppler studies were performed at 20±1 weeks’. The cohort was divided into training (n = 3735) and validation datasets (n = 1871). All-SGA (birthweight <10th customised centile), Normotensive-SGA (SGA with normotensive mother) and Hypertensive-SGA (SGA with mother who developed hypertension) were the primary outcomes. Multivariable analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression firstly using clinical variables and then with clinical and ultrasound variables. Receiver operator curves were constructed and areas under the curve (AUC) calculated. Results 633 infants (11.3%) in the whole cohort were SGA; 465 (8.3%) Normotensive-SGA and 165 (3.0%) Hypertensive-SGA. In the training dataset risk factors for All-SGA at 15±1 weeks’ included: family history of coronary heart disease, maternal birthweight <3000 g and 3000 g to 3499 g compared with ≥3500 g, >12 months to conceive, university student, cigarette smoking, proteinuria, daily vigorous exercise and diastolic blood pressure ≥80. Recreational walking ≥4 times weekly, rhesus negative blood group and increasing random glucose were protective. AUC for clinical risk factors was 0.63. Fetal abdominal or head circumference z scores <10th centile and increasing uterine artery Doppler resistance at 20±1 weeks’ were associated with increased risk. Addition of these parameters increased the AUC to 0.69. Clinical predictors of Normotensive and Hypertensive-SGA were sub-groups of All-SGA predictors and were quite different. The combined clinical and ultrasound AUC for Normotensive and Hypertensive-SGA were 0.69 and 0.82 respectively. Conclusion Predictors for SGA of relevance to clinical practice were identified. The identity and predictive potential differed in normotensive women and those who developed hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley M E McCowan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Anderson NH, Sadler LC, Stewart AW, Fyfe EM, McCowan LME. Independent risk factors for infants who are small for gestational age by customised birthweight centiles in a multi-ethnic New Zealand population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 53:136-42. [PMID: 23130970 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants born small for gestational age (SGA) by customised birthweight centiles are at increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with those SGA by population centiles. Risk factors for customised SGA have not previously been described in a general obstetric population. AIM To determine independent risk factors for customised SGA in a multi-ethnic New Zealand population. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively recorded maternity data from 2006 to 2009 at National Women's Health, Auckland, New Zealand. After exclusion of infants with congenital anomalies and missing data, our final study population was 26,254 singleton pregnancies. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for ethnicity, body mass index, maternal age, parity, smoking status, social deprivation, hypertensive disease, antepartum haemorrhage (APH), diabetes and relevant pre-existing medical conditions. RESULTS Independent risk factors for SGA included obesity (adjusted odds ratio 1.24 [95% CI 1.11-1.39] relative to normal weight), maternal age ≥ 35 years (1.16 [1.05-1.30] relative to 20-29 years), nulliparity (1.13 [1.04-1.24] relative to parity 1), cigarette smoking (2.01 [1.79-2.27]), gestational hypertension (1.46 [1.21-1.75]), pre-eclampsia (2.94 [2.49-3.48]), chronic hypertension (1.68 [1.34-2.09]), placental abruption (2.57 [1.74-3.78]) and APH of unknown origin (1.71 [1.45-2.00]). Gestational diabetes (0.80 [0.67-0.96]) and type 1 diabetes (0.26 [0.11-0.64]) were associated with reduced risk. CONCLUSIONS We report independent pregnancy risk factors for customised SGA in a general obstetric population. In contrast to population SGA, obesity is associated with increased risk. Our findings may help identify pregnancies that require increased fetal growth surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngaire H Anderson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Andraweera PH, Dekker GA, Roberts CT. The vascular endothelial growth factor family in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18:436-57. [PMID: 22495259 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-eclampsia, small-for-gestational-age infants, preterm birth and recurrent miscarriage complicate a significant number of pregnancies. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family of angiogenic growth factors is implicated in the pathophysiology of these complications. We aimed to elucidate the role of these angiogenic factors in placentation and to evaluate the predictive value of their protein concentrations and genetic variations in pregnancy complications. METHODS We performed a systematic search of PubMed, and retrieved original articles. The search included a combination of terms such as VEGF-A, placental growth factor (PlGF), kinase insert domain receptor, fms-like-tyrosine-kinase receptor 1, soluble fms-like-tyrosine-kinase receptor 1, pre-eclampsia, small-for-gestational-age infants, preterm birth, recurrent miscarriage, placenta, prediction and polymorphisms. RESULTS This review summarizes the current knowledge of the roles of the VEGF family in early placentation and of the abnormalities in maternal plasma and placental expression of angiogenic proteins in adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with normal pregnancy. PlGF and sFLT-1 in combination with other clinical and biochemical markers in late first or second trimester appear to predict early-onset pre-eclampsia with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, VEGF family proteins do not have sufficient power to accurately predict late-onset pre-eclampsia, small-for-gestational age pregnancies or preterm birth. Functional polymorphisms in these angiogenic genes are implicated in pregnancy complications, but their contribution appears to be minor. CONCLUSIONS Although the VEGF family has important roles in normal and complicated pregnancy, the current predictive value of the VEGF family as biomarkers appears to be limited to early-onset pre-eclampsia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Andraweera
- Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Anderson NH, Sadler LC, Stewart AW, McCowan LME. Maternal and pathological pregnancy characteristics in customised birthweight centiles and identification of at-risk small-for-gestational-age infants: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119:848-56. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03313.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
20
|
Blumenstein M, McCowan LME, Wu S, Cooper GJS, North RA. Plasma clusterin increased prior to small for gestational age (SGA) associated with preeclampsia and decreased prior to SGA in normotensive pregnancies. Reprod Sci 2012; 19:650-7. [PMID: 22378858 DOI: 10.1177/1933719111430999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
In our search for early biomarkers for the pregnancy complicationssmall for gestational age (SGA) and preeclampsia (PE) we analysed plasma from 19-21 weeks gestation in women recruited into the SCOPE study, a prospective cohort of nulliparous women, by differential in gel electrophoresis (DIGE). DIGE revealed the differential expression of clusterin levels and its isoforms in top6-depleted plasma of women who delivered an SGA infant but remained normotensive (SGA-NT; N = 8) compared to healthy women with an uncomplicated pregnancy outcome (Controls, N = 8). Immunosorbent enzyme-linked assay (ELISA) showed that compared to plasma clusterin levels from healthy controls [71.1 (SD 12.4) µg/mL, n = 39], clusterin was decreased in SGA-NT [58.3 (SD 11.7), N = 20, P < 0.0001], increased in women with SGA and PE [81.5 (SD 14.8), N = 20, P < 0.01], but similar in PE alone [71.2 (SD 9.4)g/ml, P = 1.0]. Screening for clusterin levels and/or its different isoformsmay be useful in mid-pregnancy to identify women who subsequently develop SGA but remain normotensive or who develop preeclampsia with SGA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Blumenstein
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Anderson NH, McCowan LME, Fyfe EM, Chan EHY, Taylor RS, Stewart AW, Dekker GA, North RA. The impact of maternal body mass index on the phenotype of pre-eclampsia: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119:589-95. [PMID: 22304412 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03278.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We hypothesised that among nulliparous women with pre-eclampsia, overweight or obese women would have a different phenotype of pre-eclampsia compared with normal weight women with pre-eclampsia. Specifically, they are more likely to develop term pre-eclampsia and less likely to have indicators of impaired placental perfusion, e.g. abnormal uterine artery Doppler or a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant. DESIGN Prospective, multicentre, cohort SCOPE study (n = 3170). SETTING New Zealand and Australia. POPULATION Nulliparous women who developed pre-eclampsia. METHODS Participants were interviewed at 14-16 weeks of gestation, uterine artery Doppler studies were performed at 19-21 weeks and pregnancy outcome was tracked prospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of abnormal uterine artery Doppler indices, term/preterm birth and SGA infants were compared between normal, overweight and obese women with pre-eclampsia. Multivariable analysis was performed to examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and term pre-eclampsia. RESULTS Of 178 women with pre-eclampsia, one underweight woman was excluded and 66 (37%) were normal weight, 52 (29%) were overweight and 59 (34%) were obese. Pre-eclampsia developed preterm in 26% of women and at term in 74% of women. There were no differences in the rates of term/preterm pre-eclampsia, abnormal uterine artery Doppler indices or SGA infants between BMI groups (P > 0.10). No independent association between BMI and term pre-eclampsia was found (P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS Among women with pre-eclampsia, those who are overweight or obese in early pregnancy are not more likely to have term pre-eclampsia compared with women with a normal BMI. Overweight and obese women require vigilant surveillance for the development of preterm as well as term pre-eclampsia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N H Anderson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee J, Romero R, Dong Z, Lee DC, Dong Y, Mittal P, Chaiworapongsa T, Hassan SS, Kim CJ. Glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB plasma concentration is elevated in pregnancy and preterm preeclampsia. Hypertension 2012; 59:274-82. [PMID: 22215716 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.177444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Glycogen phosphorylase is a key enzyme in glycogenolysis. Released with myocardial ischemia, blood concentration of glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB (GPBB) is a marker of acute coronary syndromes. Pregnancy imposes metabolic stress, and preeclampsia is associated with cardiac complications. However, plasma GPBB concentration during pregnancy is unknown. This study was conducted to determine maternal plasma GPBB concentration in normal pregnancy and in preeclampsia. Plasma samples from 6 groups (n=396) were studied: nonpregnant and pregnant women with normal term delivery, term and preterm preeclampsia, and term and preterm small-for-gestational-age neonates. GPBB concentration was measured with a specific immunoassay. Placental tissues (n=45) obtained from pregnant women with preterm and term preeclampsia, spontaneous preterm delivery, and normal term delivery were analyzed for potential GPBB expression by immunoblotting. Median plasma GPBB concentration was higher in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women (38.7 versus 9.2 ng/mL; P<0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for age, race, and parity. Maternal plasma GPBB concentrations did not change throughout gestation. Cases of preterm (but not term) preeclampsia had higher median plasma GPBB concentrations than gestational age-matched normal pregnancy cases (72.6 versus 26.0 ng/mL; P=0.001). Small-for-gestational-age neonates did not affect plasma GPBB concentration. GPBB was detected in the placenta and was less abundant in preterm preeclampsia than in preterm delivery cases (P<0.01). There is physiological elevation of plasma GPBB concentration during pregnancy; an increase in maternal plasma GPBB is a novel phenotype of preterm preeclampsia. It is strongly suggested that these changes are attributed to GPBB of placental origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JoonHo Lee
- Perinatology Research Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/National Institutes of Health/US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:288-300. [PMID: 21215383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 278] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2010] [Revised: 08/10/2010] [Accepted: 08/27/2010] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) remains one of the main challenges in maternity care. Improvements have to start from a better definition of IUGR, applying the concept of the fetal growth potential. Customized standards for fetal growth and birthweight improve the detection of IUGR by better distinction between physiological and pathological smallness and have led to internationally applicable norms. Such developments have resulted in new insights in the assessment of risk and surveillance during pregnancy. Serial fundal height measurement plotted on customized charts is a useful screening tool, whereas fetal biometry and Doppler flow are the mainstay for investigation and diagnosis of IUGR. Appropriate protocols based on available evidence as well as individualized clinical assessment are essential to ensure good management and timely delivery.
Collapse
|
24
|
McCowan LME, Roberts CT, Dekker GA, Taylor RS, Chan EHY, Kenny LC, Baker PN, Moss-Morris R, Chappell LC, North RA. Risk factors for small-for-gestational-age infants by customised birthweight centiles: data from an international prospective cohort study. BJOG 2010; 117:1599-607. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02737.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Kenneth L, Hall DR, Gebhardt S, Grové D. Late Onset Preeclampsia is not an Innocuous Condition. Hypertens Pregnancy 2010; 29:262-70. [DOI: 10.3109/10641950902777697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
26
|
A critical view on the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Hypertens 2010. [DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e328338b978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
27
|
Risk factors for small for gestational age infants. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 23:779-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2009] [Accepted: 06/06/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
28
|
Yazbeck C, Thiebaugeorges O, Moreau T, Goua V, Debotte G, Sahuquillo J, Forhan A, Foliguet B, Magnin G, Slama R, Charles MA, Huel G. Maternal blood lead levels and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension: the EDEN cohort study. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2009; 117:1526-30. [PMID: 20019901 PMCID: PMC2790505 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0800488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2008] [Accepted: 06/26/2009] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies revealed associations of environmental lead exposure with risks of hypertension and elevated blood pressure. OBJECTIVE We examined the effect of blood lead levels on blood pressure and the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. METHODS One thousand seventeen pregnant women were enrolled in two French municipalities between 2003 and 2005 for the EDEN (Etude des Déterminants pré et post natals du développement et de la santé de l' Enfant) cohort study. Blood lead concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry in mothers between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. RESULTS PIH was diagnosed in 106 subjects (10.9%). Age, parity, weight gain, alcohol, smoking habits, and calcium supplementation were comparable between hypertensive and nonhypertensive women. Lead levels were significantly higher in PIH cases (mean +/- SD, 2.2 +/- 1.4 microg/dL) than in normotensive patients (1.9 +/- 1.2 microg/dL; p = 0.02). Adjustment for potential confounder effects slightly attenuated but did not eliminate the significant association between blood lead levels and the risk of PIH (adjusted odds ratio of PIH = 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-9.7). We also observed geographic differences in lead exposure and in the incidence of PIH and found significant correlations between blood lead levels and unadjusted as well as adjusted systolic and diastolic blood pressures after 24 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS These findings confirm the relationship between blood lead levels at mid-pregnancy and blood pressure and suggest that environmental lead exposure may play an etiologic role in PIH.
Collapse
|
29
|
Maternal educational level and risk of gestational hypertension: the Generation R Study. J Hum Hypertens 2008; 22:483-92. [PMID: 18418401 DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
We examined whether maternal educational level as an indicator of socioeconomic status is associated with gestational hypertension. We also examined the extent to which the effect of education is mediated by maternal substance use (that is smoking, alcohol consumption and illegal drug use), pre-existing diabetes, anthropometrics (that is height and body mass index (BMI)) and blood pressure at enrollment. This was studied in 3262 Dutch pregnant women participating in the Generation R Study, a population-based cohort study. Level of maternal education was established by questionnaire at enrollment, and categorized into high, mid-high, mid-low and low. Diagnosis of gestational hypertension was retrieved from medical records using standard criteria. Odds ratios (OR) of gestational hypertension for educational levels were calculated, adjusted for potential confounders and additionally adjusted for potential mediators. Adjusted for age and gravidity, women with mid-low (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.27) and low education (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.12) had a higher risk of gestational hypertension than women with high education. Additional adjustment for substance use, pre-existing diabetes, anthropometrics and blood pressure at enrollment attenuated these ORs to 1.09 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.69) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.58), respectively. These attenuations were largely due to the effects of BMI and blood pressure at enrollment. Women with relatively low educational levels have a higher risk of gestational hypertension, which is largely due to higher BMI and blood pressure levels from early pregnancy. The higher risk of gestational hypertension in these women is probably caused by pre-existing hypertensive tendencies that manifested themselves during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
30
|
Groom KM, Poppe KK, North RA, McCowan LME. Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:239.e1-5. [PMID: 17826403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2007] [Revised: 03/11/2007] [Accepted: 06/22/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evidence of placental disease and poor perinatal outcome is more common in infants who are small by customized centiles, compared with population centiles. Because preterm births are more likely to be associated with placental pathology, a greater proportion of preterm births are likely to be small for gestational age (SGA) by customized centiles, compared with population centiles. Our objective was to compare the proportion of infants classified as SGA by customized and population birthweight centiles at different gestational ages at delivery. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective observational study of 17,855 nulliparous women delivering between 1992 and 1999 at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. The proportion of SGA infants (birthweight less than the 10th centile) classified by customized and population birthweight centiles delivering at less than 34 weeks, 34-36(+6) weeks, and 37 weeks or longer were compared. RESULTS A total of 1847 infants (10.3%) were customized SGA, compared with 2111 (11.8%) who were population SGA (relative risk [RR] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 0.9). Of preterm deliveries less than 34 weeks (n = 392), 29.1% were customized SGA and 17.1% were population SGA (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.2). Of deliveries at 34-36(+6) weeks (n = 946), 18.0% were customized SGA and 13.7% were population SGA (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6). The converse was observed at term (n = 16,517), 9.5% classified as customized SGA and 11.5% as population SGA (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.87). Of all early preterm perinatal deaths (less than 34 weeks) 31 of 72 infants (43%) were customized SGA and 23 of 72 infants (32%) were population SGA. There were no perinatal deaths or deliveries less than 34 weeks in infants who were classified as SGA by population criteria only. CONCLUSION Customized centiles classified more infants as SGA, compared with population centiles, in preterm births but not for term births in nulliparous women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie M Groom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|