The effect of hyoscine butyl bromide on the first stage of labour in term pregnancies

The Effect of Hyoscine N-Butyl Bromide Rectal on the Duration of Labour and Rate of Cervical Dilatation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The current meta-analysis was designed to investigate the impact of Hyoscine N-butyl bromide (HBB) rectal on labour duration and the rate of cervical dilatation by consolidating the available data.

METHODS

The search of Medline through the PubMed interface, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed for original articles concerning the effects of HBB rectal on the duration of labour published prior to 26 June 2023. Search terms were based on Medical Subject Headings without time and language restrictions. They included: Hyoscine, Scopolamine, HBB, Buscopan, Buscolysin, Buscapine, rectal, suppository, childbirth, delivery, active phase, second stage, cervical dilatation, labour, labour, and duration of labour. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3 software was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Five randomized control trials and 1 non-randomized study involving 1310 women were included in the systematic review. Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis because of heterogeneous interventions and a lack of mean and SD results. The results determined that HBB rectal administration significantly decreased the duration of the active phase (pooled mean difference -193.893; 95% CI -229.173 to -158.613, P < 0.001; I2 squares = 90.097%) and second stage of labour (pooled mean difference -2.911; 95% CI -5.486 to -0.336, P = 0.027; I2 squares = 90.097%). Also, the cervical dilatation rate in the active phase of labour was 0.981 cm/h higher than in the control group (I2 = 0.0%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that HBB rectal administration shortened the active labour phase and second stage and increased the rate of cervix dilatation; consequently, it can be used as a cost-effective intervention for low-risk pregnant women during labour. However, our findings also suggest that more robust clinical trials are required to generate evidence and confirm the use of HBB during labour for clinical practice guidelines.

The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review

Background

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of hyoscine n-butylbromide in labor progress.

Methods

The databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to December 2019. Articles that published as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and full-text articles published in English or other languages were included and participants were primi or multigravida women who were in active phase of labor. The intervention included HBB compared to placebo (normal saline) that was used during active phase of labor. Pooled estimates were measured using the fixed or random effect model, while the overall effect was reported in a mean difference (MD). All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Twenty studies involving 3108 women were included in meta-analysis. Based on subgroup analysis by parity, use of HBB significantly reduced the duration of the first stage of labor in primigravida women (MD = − 57.73; 95% CI: [− 61.48, − 53.60]) and in multigravida women (MD = − 90.74; 95% CI: [− 97.24, − 84.24]). Administering HBB could reduce the second stages of labor in primigravidas and multigravidas about 6 min and 4 min respectively. Also, HBB reduced the duration of the third stage of labor in multigravidas about 3 min. APGAR score at one and 5 min after birth was not affected. The main maternal adverse effect was tachycardia and dry mouth. Labor duration in studies in which the participants were primi-and multigravida was not presented based on separate parities except for four papers, and the route of HBB administration was not the same across all studies.

Conclusions

Although, the effect of HBB was minimal when multigravidas and primigravidas women were considered together, the HBB was clinically effective in primigravida and multigravida women for shortening the first and the second stages of labor. Also, HBB could reduce the length of the third stage of labor in multigravidas.

Antispasmodics for labour

BACKGROUND

Prolonged labour can lead to increased maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity due to increased risks of maternal exhaustion, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis, fetal distress and asphyxia and requires early detection and appropriate clinical response. The risks for complications of prolonged labour are much greater in poor resource settings. Active management of labour versus physiological, expectant management, has shown to decrease the occurrence of prolonged labour. Administering antispasmodics during labour could also lead to faster and more effective dilatation of the cervix. Interventions to shorten labour, such as antispasmodics, can be used as a preventative or a treatment strategy in order to decrease the incidence of prolonged labour. As the evidence to support this is still largely anecdotal around the world, there is a need to systematically review the available evidence to obtain a valid answer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antispasmodics on labour in term pregnancies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (28 February 2013), the ProQuest dissertation and thesis database, the dissertation database of the University of Stellenbosch and Google Scholar (28 February 2013) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and experts in the field. We did not apply language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing antispasmodics with placebo or no medication in women with term pregnancies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened abstracts and selected studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy. We contacted trial authors when data were missing.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-one trials (n = 3286) were included in the review. Seventeen trials (n = 2617) were included in the meta-analysis. Antispasmodics used included valethamate bromide, hyoscine butyl-bromide, drotaverine hydrochloride, rociverine and camylofin dihydrochloride. Most studies included antispasmodics as part of their package of active management of labour. Overall, the quality of studies was poor, as only four trials were assessed as low risk of bias. Thirteen trials (n = 1995) reported on the duration of first stage of labour, which was significantly reduced by an average of 74.34 minutes when antispasmodics were administered (mean difference (MD) -74.34 minutes; 95% confidence Interval (CI) -98.76 to -49.93). Seven studies (n = 797) reported on the total duration of labour, which was significantly reduced by an average of 85.51 minutes (MD -85.51 minutes; 95% CI -121.81 to -49.20). Six studies (n = 820) had data for the outcome: rate of cervical dilatation. Administration of antispasmodics significantly increased the rate of cervical dilatation by an average of 0.61 cm/hour (MD 0.61 cm/hour; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88). Antispasmodics did not affect the duration of second and third stage of labour. The rate of normal vertex deliveries was not affected either. Only one study explored pain relief following administration of antispasmodics and no conclusions can be drawn on this outcome. There was significant heterogeneity for most outcomes and therefore, we undertook random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was undertaken to explore heterogeneity, but remained largely unexplained. Maternal and neonatal adverse events were reported inconsistently. The main maternal adverse event reported was tachycardia. No serious neonatal adverse events were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low quality evidence that antispasmodics reduce the duration of first stage of labour and increase the cervical dilatation rate. There is very low quality evidence that antispasmodics reduce the total duration of labour. There is moderate quality evidence that antispasmodics do not affect the rate of normal vertex deliveries. There is insufficient evidence to make any conclusions regarding the safety of these drugs for both mother and baby. Large, rigorous randomised controlled trials are needed to evaluate the effect of antispasmodics on prolonged labour and to evaluate their effect on labour in a context of expectant management of labour.