Utility of peritoneal lavage cytology during laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: a retrospective analysis

Efficacy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1-2 variants and clinical outcomes of follow-up in patients with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC)

OBJECTIVE

Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is currently considered the precursor lesion of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma. The management of STIC diagnosed after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with BRCA1-2 variants remains unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of STIC, serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STIL) and occult invasive cancer (OC) and to determine the long-term outcomes of these patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with BRCA 1-2 variants who underwent RRSO between January-2010 and Dicember-2020 at the Clinic of Gynaecology of University of Padova.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

women with a negative pelvic examination at the last screening prior to RRSO, patients with fallopian tubes analysed using the SEE-FIM protocol.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

patients with a positive gynaecologic screening or with ovarian/tubal cancer prior to RRSO.

RESULTS

We included 153 patients. STICs were diagnosed in 4 patients (2.6%) and STILs in 6 patients (3.9%). None of the patients with STIC underwent restaging surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy; all patients were followed closely every 6 months. None of the patients developed primary peritoneal carcinomas (PPCs) with a median FUP of 54.5 months (15-106). OC was diagnosed in 3 patients (2%). All patients with OC underwent staging surgery, and one patient developed a peritoneal carcinoma (PC) after 18 months by staging surgery.

CONCLUSION(S)

The incidence of STIC, STIL and OC after RRSO in BRCA1-2 variants was low. Our results demonstrated that long-term close surveillance in patients diagnosed with STIC should be considered a possible management strategy.

Outcome and Prognostic Impact of Surgical Staging in Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review

The optimal management of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)1/2 carriers with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) found at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is unclear. The prevalence of occult carcinoma and STIC in a consecutive series of BRCA1/2 carriers undergoing RRSO is reported. The outcome of staging procedures in BRCA1/2 carriers with isolated STIC at RRSO as well as the relationship between staging, chemotherapy treatment and risk of recurrence was assessed via a systematic review of the literature. Our series included 235 BRCA1/2 carriers who underwent RRSO. Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage IA carcinoma or STIC was found at RRSO in three (1.3%) and two (0.9%) patients, respectively. A systematic review of the literature included 82 BRCA1/2 carriers with isolated STIC found at RRSO. In 13/82 (16%) cases with STIC, staging was reported. In none of these cases staging revealed more advanced disease. Recurrent disease was found in four of 36 patients with reported follow-up. The estimated risk of recurrence in patients with isolated STIC at RRSO was about 11% (95% confidence interval 3-26%) after a median follow-up of 42 months (range 7-138). No recurrences were reported in those patients with STIC at RRSO who underwent staging or received chemotherapy. We found 1.3% occult carcinoma and 0.9% STIC at RRSO in our cohort of BRCA1/2 carriers. A systematic review of the literature suggests that additional treatment after RRSO, i.e. staging and/or chemotherapy, is associated with a lower risk of recurrence. However, data on staging and follow-up are limited.

The lack of clinical value of peritoneal washing cytology in high risk patients undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a retrospective study and review

BACKGROUND

To assess the clinical value of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and women from a family with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in detecting primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) or occult ovarian/fallopian tube cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation or HBOC who underwent RRSO at the Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands between January 2000-2014. Patients with an elevated risk of malignancy prior to the procedure were excluded from primary analysis (elevated CA-125, an ovarian mass, abdominal pain or another gynecological malignancy). A review of the literature was conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 471 patients who underwent RRSO, a total of 267 cytology samples were available for analysis. Four samples showed malignant cells, all four patients were diagnosed with ovarian and/or fallopian tube cancer at histologic examination. A fifth patient, of whom no cytology sample was obtained during RRSO, developed primary peritoneal cancer 80 months post RRSO.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to show that cytology is of value during RRSO in detecting primary peritoneal cancer, however 36% of patients with concomitant ovarian or fallopian tube cancer had positive cytology. Therefore, the routine sampling of peritoneal washings during RRSO is not found to be useful to detect subsequent PPC.

Peritoneal washing cytology in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies: a 10-year experience and reappraisal of its clinical utility

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) for detecting occult primary peritoneal carcinoma in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, we reviewed PWCs obtained during risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) from 117 patients at our institution and correlated the results with surgical pathology findings.

METHODS

Records of 128 PWCs from 125 patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations undergoing RRSO at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2000 and 2010 were obtained. Slides were available for review for 119 PWCs from 117 patients (2 patients had 2 PWCs each). Cytopathologists, blinded to the RRSO histopathologic diagnoses, categorized the PWCs as benign, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, or malignant. These results were correlated with the RRSO histopathologic diagnoses.

RESULTS

PWCs from 113 patients were benign. Of the remaining 4 patients, 2 had PWCs classified as atypical, 1 as suspicious for malignancy, and 1 as malignant. The corresponding RRSO histopathologic findings of the 2 atypical PWCs showed endosalpingiosis and cystadenofibroma in one case and showed no abnormalities in the other case. Both patients with suspicious or malignant PWCs, indicating the possibility of occult peritoneal carcinoma, had RRSO histopathologic diagnoses of endometriosis and endosalpingiosis. Nine patients had abnormal tubal or ovarian histologic findings, but all 9 of these patients had benign PWCs.

CONCLUSION

PWC has the potential to detect occult peritoneal carcinoma in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. The clinical significance of a positive PWC without abnormal RRSO histology remains unclear and will require long-term follow-up for determination.

Laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy for ovarian ablation in women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate institutional experiences regarding laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy in breast cancer patients and to compare the technique with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs among premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2009, 103 women with breast cancer underwent laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. All relevant medical records-including reasons for salpingo-oophorectomy, peri-operative events, and subsequent follow-up-were reviewed.

RESULTS

In the study period, 3 (2.9%) women experienced a recurrence of breast cancer but none had primary peritoneal/ovarian cancer within a median follow-up interval of 34 months (range, 0-70 months). No operative complications were noted among these women and all of them went home on the day of their operation.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy seems to be a safe, permanent, and cost-effective method of ovarian ablation compared with the use of GnRH analogs. Salpingo-oophorectomy also considerably reduces the risk of subsequent ovarian/fallopian tube malignancy in this high-risk population.