AT1 angiotensin receptors mobilize intracellular calcium in a subclone of NG108-15 neuroblastoma cells

A systematic comparison of the properties of clinically used angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) have become an important drug class in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure and the protection from diabetic nephropathy. Eight ARBs are clinically available [azilsartan, candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, valsartan]. Azilsartan (in some countries), candesartan, and olmesartan are orally administered as prodrugs, whereas the blocking action of some is mediated through active metabolites. On the basis of their chemical structures, ARBs use different binding pockets in the receptor, which are associated with differences in dissociation times and, in most cases, apparently insurmountable antagonism. The physicochemical differences between ARBs also manifest in different tissue penetration, including passage through the blood-brain barrier. Differences in binding mode and tissue penetration are also associated with differences in pharmacokinetic profile, particularly duration of action. Although generally highly specific for angiotensin II type 1 receptors, some ARBs, particularly telmisartan, are partial agonists at peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. All of these properties are comprehensively reviewed in this article. Although there is general consensus that a continuous receptor blockade over a 24-hour period is desirable, the clinical relevance of other pharmacological differences between individual ARBs remains to be assessed.

Involvement of insulin-regulated aminopeptidase and/or aminopeptidase N in the angiotensin IV-induced effect on dopamine release in the striatum of the rat

Locally administered angiotensin IV causes a dose-dependent increase of the dopamine levels in the striatum of the rat. The aminopeptidases insulin-regulated aminopeptidase (IRAP) and/or aminopeptidase N (AP-N) are proposed to be involved in this effect since both enzymes are inhibited by angiotensin IV. In agreement with this hypothesis we demonstrate that by using the AP-N selective inhibitor 7B, about 60% of the aminopeptidase activity in striatal membranes could be attributed to AP-N (pK(i)=9.20). Higher concentrations of 7B are capable of inhibiting IRAP as well (pK(i)=7.26). Interestingly, in vivo, inhibition of IRAP or AP-N activity does not appear to be involved in the angiotensin IV-mediated effect in the striatum since 7B itself is not capable to induce dopamine release such as observed with angiotensin IV. However, 7B at a concentration selective for inhibition of AP-N (100 nM) potentiates the angiotensin IV-mediated increase of dopamine, suggesting that inhibition of AP-N lengthens the half-life of angiotensin IV. On the other hand, inhibition of both AP-N and IRAP by perfusion of 500 nM 7B completely abolishes the effect of angiotensin IV. We therefore hypothesize that the effect of angiotensin IV on dopamine release in the striatum is mediated via activation of IRAP and/or AP-N, possibly acting as receptors for angiotensin IV.

Angiotensin IV induces tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and paxillin in proximal tubule cells

Angiotensin IV (ANG IV), the COOH-terminal hexapeptide fragment of angiotensin II (ANG II), binds to specific sites in the kidney, distinct from type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)) receptors and designated type 4 (AT(4)) receptors. We determined signaling pathways for ANG IV in a proximal tubular cell line, LLC-PK(1)/Cl(4). In these cells, we found no specific binding of [(125)I]-ANG II. In contrast, ANG IV dose dependently competed for [(125)I]-labeled ANG IV binding, with no displacement by either ANG II, the AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan, or the AT(2) antagonist PD-123319. Saturation binding indicated the presence of AT(4) receptors of high affinity [dissociation constant (K(d)) = 1.4 nM]. ANG IV did not affect cAMP or cGMP production and did not increase cytosolic calcium concentration in these cells. In contrast, immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting studies revealed that ANG IV caused dose-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of p125-focal adhesion kinase (p125-FAK) and p68-paxillin within 2 min, with maximal stimulation at 30 min. ANG IV-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of p125-FAK and paxillin was not affected by pretreatment with either losartan or PD-123319, and ANG II (10(-7) M) did not induce protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Our results indicate that LLC-PK(1)/Cl(4) cells express ANG IV receptors, which we demonstrate for the first time are linked to tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion-associated proteins. This suggests that ANG IV, a product of ANG II metabolism, may regulate function of the focal adhesion complex in proximal tubule cells.

Role of angiotensin II and AT1 receptors in hippocampal LTP

Results of a previous study showed that angiotensin II (AII) inhibited the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampal granule cells in response to dorsomedial perforant path stimulation in urethane-anesthetized rats. The results of present experiments demonstrate a dose-dependent inhibition of LTP induction under the same conditions due to ethanol (EtOH) administered by stomach tube and diazepam (DZ) injected IP. The inhibition of LTP induction by EtOH and DZ can be blocked by saralasin (SAR) applied directly to the dorsal hippocampus and by lorsartan (DuP 753) administered IP. Lorsartan or a metabolite crosses the blood-brain barrier because it also blocks the inhibition of LTP induction due to AII administration directly into the dorsal hippocampus. Lorsartan is a competitive antagonist of the AT1 subtype AII receptor. Therefore, the AII and the EtOH and DZ inhibition of LTP induction are mediated by the AII subtype receptor AT1. AIII and the AT2 antagonist PD123319 did not produce any significant effects. These in vivo effects can be reproduced in brain slices and therefore cannot be attributed to other factors, such as the urethane. In addition, electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus (LH) inhibits LTP induction, and the inhibition can be blocked by SAR. These data on LH stimulation indicate that LH AII-containing neurons send axons into the hippocampus that inhibit the induction of LTP. These results not only provide new information on a neurotransmitter involved in the amnesic effects of benzodiazepines and ethanol-induced memory blackouts, but also testable hypotheses concerning recent observations that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors elevate mood and improve certain cognitive processes in the elderly.

Ethanol and diazepam inhibition of hippocampal LTP is mediated by angiotensin II and AT1 receptors

Angiotensin II (AII) inhibits the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), a frequency-dependent model of learning and memory. These results demonstrate that the dose-dependent inhibition of LTP due to ethanol (EtOH) and diazepam (DZ) involves AII. Inhibition of LTP induction by AII, EtOH, and DZ can be blocked by AII receptor antagonists saralasin and lorsartan (DuP 753). Lorsartan is a competitive antagonist of the AT1 subtype AII receptor. Therefore, the EtOH and DZ inhibition of LTP induction is mediated by AT1 receptors. These results indicate a new role for AII in the brain in the possible mediation of memory deficits associated with alcohol and the benzodiazepines.

Signal transduction mediated by angiotensin II receptor subtypes expressed in rat renal mesangial cells

Recent evidence suggests that there are two classes of receptors for angiotensin II (AngII), AT1 which is sensitive to losartan (DuP753) and is G-protein coupled, and AT2 which is sensitive to both PD123319 and CGP42112A, and is non-G-protein coupled. In rat mesangial cells two subtypes of AT1 receptor could be distinguished, AT1A subtype is more sensitive to losartan whereas AT1B subtype is more sensitive to PD123319, but insensitive to CGP42112A. The present studies were designed to ascertain which receptor subtype mediates three AngII-induced physiologic functions in rat mesangial cells namely intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, adenylyl cyclase inhibition and protein synthesis as monitored via [3H]leucine incorporation. The rank order of potency for inhibition of AngII-induced [Ca(2+)]i mobilization and adenylyl cyclase regulation was PD123319 > or = losartan > CGP42112A. By contrast, losartan was quite effective at inhibiting protein synthesis (IC50 = 8 nM) while PD123319 was without effect. These findings are consistent with AngII mediated signal transduction through AT1A and AT1B sites for phospholipase C mediated [Ca(2+)]i mobilization and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. On the other hand, AT1A receptors appear to exclusively mediate AngII-induced protein synthesis. These observations underscore the complexity of AngII mediated signal transduction in glomerular mesangium.