Covalent modification of GABAA receptor isoforms by a diazepam analogue provides evidence for a novel benzodiazepine binding site that prevents modulation by these drugs

Allosteric crosstalk in modular proteins: Function fine-tuning and drug design

Modular proteins are regulatory proteins that carry out more than one function. These proteins upregulate or downregulate a biochemical cascade to establish homeostasis in cells. To switch the function or alter the efficiency (based on cellular needs), these proteins require different facilitators that bind to a site different from the catalytic (active/orthosteric) site, aka 'allosteric site', and fine-tune their function. These facilitators (or effectors) are allosteric modulators. In this Review, we have discussed the allostery, characterized them based on their mechanisms, and discussed how allostery plays an important role in the activity modulation and function fine-tuning of proteins. Recently there is an emergence in the discovery of allosteric drugs. We have also emphasized the role, significance, and future of allostery in therapeutic applications.

Benzodiazepine Modulation of GABAA Receptors: A Mechanistic Perspective

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are a class of widely prescribed psychotropic drugs that target GABAA receptors (GABAARs) to tune inhibitory synaptic signaling throughout the central nervous system. Despite knowing their molecular target for over 40 years, we still do not fully understand the mechanism of modulation at the level of the channel protein. Nonetheless, functional studies, together with recent cryo-EM structures of GABAA(α1)2(βX)2(γ2)1 receptors in complex with BZDs, provide a wealth of information to aid in addressing this gap in knowledge. Here, mechanistic interpretations of functional and structural evidence for the action of BZDs at GABAA(α1)2(βX)2(γ2)1 receptors are reviewed. The goal is not to describe each of the many studies that are relevant to this discussion nor to dissect in detail all the effects of individual mutations or perturbations but rather to highlight general mechanistic principles in the context of recent structural information.

High-Dose Benzodiazepines Positively Modulate GABAA Receptors via a Flumazenil-Insensitive Mechanism

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) produce versatile pharmacological actions through positive modulation of GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs). A previous study has demonstrated that high concentrations of diazepam potentiate GABA currents on the α₁β₂γ₂ and α₁β₂ GABA_ARs in a flumazenil-insensitive manner. In this study, the high-concentration effects of BZDs and their sensitivity to flumazenil were determined on synaptic (α₁β₂γ₂, α₂β₂γ₂, α₅β₂γ₂) and extra-synaptic (α₄β₂δ) GABA_ARs using the voltage-clamp electrophysiology technique. The in vivo evaluation of flumazenil-insensitive BZD effects was conducted in mice via the loss of righting reflex (LORR) test. Diazepam induced biphasic potentiation on the α₁β₂γ₂, α₂β₂γ₂ and α₅β₂γ₂ GABA_ARs, but did not affect the α₄β₂δ receptor. In contrast to the nanomolar component of potentiation, the second potentiation elicited by micromolar diazepam was insensitive to flumazenil. Midazolam, clonazepam, and lorazepam at 200 µM exhibited similar flumazenil-insensitive effects on the α₁β₂γ₂, α₂β₂γ₂ and α₅β₂γ₂ receptors, whereas the potentiation induced by 200 µM zolpidem or triazolam was abolished by flumazenil. Both the GABA_AR antagonist pentylenetetrazol and Fa173, a proposed transmembrane site antagonist, abolished the potentiation induced by 200 µM diazepam. Consistent with the in vitro results, flumazenil antagonized the zolpidem-induced LORR, but not that induced by diazepam or midazolam. Pentylenetetrazol and Fa173 antagonized the diazepam-induced LORR. These findings support the existence of non-classical BZD binding sites on certain GABA_AR subtypes and indicate that the flumazenil-insensitive effects depend on the chemical structures of BZD ligands.

Selective actions of benzodiazepines at the transmembrane anaesthetic binding sites of the GABAA receptor: In vitro and in vivo studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In addition to binding to the classical high-affinity extracellular benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA receptor, some benzodiazepines occupy transmembrane inter-subunit anaesthetic sites that bind etomidate (β+ /α- sites) or the barbiturate derivative R-mTFD-MPAB (α+ /β- and γ+ /β- sites). We aimed to define the functional effects of these interactions on GABAA receptor activity and animal behaviour.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

With flumazenil blocking classical high-affinity extracellular benzodiazepine site effects, modulation of GABA-activated currents by diazepam, midazolam and flurazepam was measured electrophysiologically in wildtype and M2-15' mutant α1 β3 γ2L GABAA receptors. Zebrafish locomotive activity was also assessed in the presence of each benzodiazepine plus flumazenil.

KEY RESULTS

In the presence of flumazenil, micromolar concentrations of diazepam and midazolam both potentiated and inhibited wildtype GABAA receptor currents. β3 N265M (M2-15' in the β+ /α- sites) and α1 S270I (M2-15' in the α+ /β- site) mutations reduced or abolished potentiation by these drugs. In contrast, the γ2 S280W mutation (M2-15' in the γ+ /β- site) abolished inhibition. Flurazepam plus flumazenil only inhibited wildtype receptor currents, an effect unaltered by M2-15' mutations. In the presence of flumazenil, zebrafish locomotion was enhanced by diazepam at concentrations up to 30 μM and suppressed at 100 μM, suppressed by midazolam and enhanced by flurazepam.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Benzodiazepine binding to transmembrane anaesthetic binding sites of the GABAA receptor can produce positive or negative modulation manifesting as decreases or increases in locomotion, respectively. Selectivity for these sites may contribute to the distinct GABAA receptor and behavioural actions of different benzodiazepines, particularly at high (i.e. anaesthetic) concentrations.

Looking for Novelty in an "Old" Receptor: Recent Advances Toward Our Understanding of GABAARs and Their Implications in Receptor Pharmacology

Diverse populations of GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) throughout the brain mediate fast inhibitory transmission and are modulated by various endogenous ligands and therapeutic drugs. Deficits in GABA_AR signaling underlie the pathophysiology behind neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders such as epilepsy, anxiety, and depression. Pharmacological intervention for these disorders relies on several drug classes that target GABA_ARs, such as benzodiazepines and more recently neurosteroids. It has been widely demonstrated that subunit composition and receptor stoichiometry impact the biophysical and pharmacological properties of GABA_ARs. However, current GABA_AR-targeting drugs have limited subunit selectivity and produce their therapeutic effects concomitantly with undesired side effects. Therefore, there is still a need to develop more selective GABA_AR pharmaceuticals, as well as evaluate the potential for developing next-generation drugs that can target accessory proteins associated with native GABA_ARs. In this review, we briefly discuss the effects of benzodiazepines and neurosteroids on GABA_ARs, their use as therapeutics, and some of the pitfalls associated with their adverse side effects. We also discuss recent advances toward understanding the structure, function, and pharmacology of GABA_ARs with a focus on benzodiazepines and neurosteroids, as well as newly identified transmembrane proteins that modulate GABA_ARs.

Shisa7 is a GABAA receptor auxiliary subunit controlling benzodiazepine actions

The function and pharmacology of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs) are of great physiological and clinical importance and have long been thought to be determined by the channel pore-forming subunits. We discovered that Shisa7, a single-passing transmembrane protein, localizes at GABAergic inhibitory synapses and interacts with GABA_ARs. Shisa7 controls receptor abundance at synapses and speeds up the channel deactivation kinetics. Shisa7 also potently enhances the action of diazepam, a classic benzodiazepine, on GABA_ARs. Genetic deletion of Shisa7 selectively impairs GABAergic transmission and diminishes the effects of diazepam in mice. Our data indicate that Shisa7 regulates GABA_AR trafficking, function, and pharmacology and reveal a previously unknown molecular interaction that modulates benzodiazepine action in the brain.

Allosteric GABAA Receptor Modulators-A Review on the Most Recent Heterocyclic Chemotypes and Their Synthetic Accessibility

GABAA receptor modulators are structurally almost as diverse as their target protein. A plethora of heterocyclic scaffolds has been described as modulating this extremely important receptor family. Some made it into clinical trials and, even on the market, some were dismissed. This review focuses on the synthetic accessibility and potential for library synthesis of GABAA receptor modulators containing at least one heterocyclic scaffold, which were disclosed within the last 10 years.

Synthesis of New GABAA Receptor Modulator with Pyrazolo[1,5-a]quinazoline (PQ) Scaffold

We previously published a series of 8-methoxypirazolo[1,5-a]quinazolines (PQs) and their 4,5-dihydro derivatives (4,5(H)PQ) bearing the (hetero)arylalkylester group at position 3 as ligands at the γ-aminobutyric type A (GABA_A) subtype receptor. Continuing the study in this field, we report here the design and synthesis of 3-(hetero)arylpyrazolo[1,5-a]quinazoline and 3-(hetero)aroylpyrazolo[1,5-a]quinazoline 8-methoxy substituted as interesting analogs of the above (hetero)arylalkylester, in which the shortening or the removal of the linker between the 3-(hetero)aryl ring and the PQ was performed. Only compounds that are able to inhibit radioligand binding by more than 80% at 10 μM have been selected for electrophysiological studies on recombinant α1β2γ2L GABA_A receptors. Some compounds show a promising profile. For example, compounds 6a and 6b are able to modulate the GABA_AR in an opposite manner, since 6b enhances and 6a reduces the variation of the chlorine current, suggesting that they act as a partial agonist and an inverse partial agonist, respectively. The most potent derivative was 3-(4-methoxyphenylcarbonyl)-8-methoxy-4,5-dihydropyrazolo[1,5-a] quinazoline 11d, which reaches a maximal activity at 1 μM (+54%), and it enhances the chlorine current at ≥0.01 μM. Finally, compound 6g, acting as a null modulator at α1β2γ2L, shows the ability to antagonize the full agonist diazepam and the potentiation of CGS 9895 on the new α+/β− ‘non-traditional’ benzodiazepine site.

Engineered Flumazenil Recognition Site Provides Mechanistic Insight Governing Benzodiazepine Modulation in GABAA Receptors

The anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, muscle-relaxant, and sedative-hypnotic effects of benzodiazepine site ligands are mainly elicited by allosteric modulation of GABA_A receptors via their extracellular αx+/γ2- ( x = 1, 2, 3, 5) interfaces. In addition, a low affinity binding site at the homologous α+/β- interfaces was reported for some benzodiazepine site ligands. Classical benzodiazepines and pyrazoloquinolinones have been used as molecular probes to develop structure-activity relationship models for benzodiazepine site activity. Considering all possible α+/β- and α+/γ- interfaces, such ligands potentially interact with as many as 36 interfaces, giving rise to undesired side effects. Understanding the binding modes at their binding sites will enable rational strategies to design ligands with desired selectivity profiles. Here, we compared benzodiazepine site ligand interactions in the high affinity α1+/γ2- site with the homologous α1+/β3- site using a successive mutational approach. We incorporated key amino acids known to contribute to high affinity benzodiazepine binding of the γ2- subunit into the β3- subunit, resulting in a quadruple mutant β3(4mut) with high affinity flumazenil (Ro 15-1788) binding properties. Intriguingly, some benzodiazepine site ligands displayed positive allosteric modulation in the tested recombinant α1β3(4mut) constructs while diazepam remained inactive. Consequently, we performed in silico molecular docking in the wildtype receptor and the quadruple mutant. The results led to the conclusion that different benzodiazepine site ligands seem to use distinct binding modes, rather than a common binding mode. These findings provide structural hypotheses for the future optimization of both benzodiazepine site ligands, and ligands that interact with the homologous α+/β- sites.

GABAA receptor: Positive and negative allosteric modulators

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission and the gene products involved were discovered during the mid-twentieth century. Historically, myriad existing nervous system drugs act as positive and negative allosteric modulators of these proteins, making GABA a major component of modern neuropharmacology, and suggesting that many potential drugs will be found that share these targets. Although some of these drugs act on proteins involved in synthesis, degradation, and membrane transport of GABA, the GABA receptors Type A (GABAAR) and Type B (GABABR) are the targets of the great majority of GABAergic drugs. This discovery is due in no small part to Professor Norman Bowery. Whereas the topic of GABABR is appropriately emphasized in this special issue, Norman Bowery also made many insights into GABAAR pharmacology, the topic of this article. GABAAR are members of the ligand-gated ion channel receptor superfamily, a chloride channel family of a dozen or more heteropentameric subtypes containing 19 possible different subunits. These subtypes show different brain regional and subcellular localization, age-dependent expression, and potential for plastic changes with experience including drug exposure. Not only are GABAAR the targets of agonist depressants and antagonist convulsants, but most GABAAR drugs act at other (allosteric) binding sites on the GABAAR proteins. Some anxiolytic and sedative drugs, like benzodiazepine and related drugs, act on GABAAR subtype-dependent extracellular domain sites. General anesthetics including alcohols and neurosteroids act at GABAAR subunit-interface trans-membrane sites. Ethanol at high anesthetic doses acts on GABAAR subtype-dependent trans-membrane domain sites. Ethanol at low intoxicating doses acts at GABAAR subtype-dependent extracellular domain sites. Thus GABAAR subtypes possess pharmacologically specific receptor binding sites for a large group of different chemical classes of clinically important neuropharmacological agents. This article is part of the "Special Issue Dedicated to Norman G. Bowery".

Differential depression of neuronal network activity by midazolam and its main metabolite 1-hydroxymidazolam in cultured neocortical slices

The benzodiazepine midazolam is widely used in critical care medicine. Midazolam has a clinically active metabolite, 1-hydroxymidazolam. The contribution of 1-hydroxymidazolam to the effects of midazolam is controversial. The aim of the current study was to compare the actions of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam on network activity of cortical neurons. Midazolam depressed neuronal activity at a low concentration of 5 nM. When midazolam concentration was increased, it depressed neuronal discharge rates in a biphasic manner. In comparison, 1-hydroxymidazolam did not depress the cortical network activity at low nanomolar concentrations. Higher concentrations of 1-hydroxymidazolam consistently inhibited neuronal activity. Moreover, midazolam shortened cortical up states at low, but not at high concentrations, while the opposite effect was observed with 1-hydroxymidazolam. The network depressant action of midazolam at low concentrations was absent in slices from GABA_A receptor α₁(H101R)mutant mice. The α₁(H101R)mutation renders α₁-subunit containing GABA_A receptors insensitive towards benzodiazepines. This GABA_A receptor subtype is thought to mediate sedation. As midazolam is more potent than its metabolite 1-hydroxymidazolam, the major clinical effects are thus likely caused by midazolam itself. However, 1-hydroxymidazolam could add to the effects of midazolam, especially after the application of high doses of midazolam, and in case of impaired drug metabolism.

Zolpidem is a potent stoichiometry-selective modulator of α1β3 GABAA receptors: evidence of a novel benzodiazepine site in the α1-α1 interface

Zolpidem is not a typical GABA_A receptor hypnotic. Unlike benzodiazepines, zolpidem modulates tonic GABA currents in the rat dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, exhibits residual effects in mice lacking the benzodiazepine binding site, and improves speech, cognitive and motor function in human patients with severe brain injury. The receptor by which zolpidem mediates these effects is not known. In this study we evaluated binary α1β3 GABA_A receptors in either the 3α1:2β3 or 2α1:3β3 subunit stoichiometry, which differ by the existence of either an α1-α1 interface, or a β3-β3 interface, respectively. Both receptor stoichiometries are readily expressed in Xenopus oocytes, distinguished from each other by using GABA, zolpidem, diazepam and Zn²⁺. At the 3α1:2β3 receptor, clinically relevant concentrations of zolpidem enhanced GABA in a flumazenil-sensitive manner. The efficacy of diazepam was significantly lower compared to zolpidem. No modulation by either zolpidem or diazepam was detected at the 2α1:3β3 receptor, indicating that the binding site for zolpidem is at the α1-α1 interface, a site mimicking the classical α1-γ2 benzodiazepine site. Activating α1β3 (3α1:2β3) receptors may, in part, mediate the physiological effects of zolpidem observed under distinct physiological and clinical conditions, constituting a potentially attractive drug target.

Structural Studies of GABAA Receptor Binding Sites: Which Experimental Structure Tells us What?

Atomic resolution structures of cys-loop receptors, including one of a γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAA receptor) subtype, allow amazing insights into the structural features and conformational changes that these pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) display. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of more than 30 cys-loop receptor structures of homologous proteins that revealed several allosteric binding sites not previously described in GABAA receptors. These novel binding sites were examined in GABAA receptor homology models and assessed as putative candidate sites for allosteric ligands. Four so far undescribed putative ligand binding sites were proposed for follow up studies based on their presence in the GABAA receptor homology models. A comprehensive analysis of conserved structural features in GABAA and glycine receptors (GlyRs), the glutamate gated ion channel, the bacterial homologs Erwinia chrysanthemi (ELIC) and Gloeobacter violaceus GLIC, and the serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor was performed. The conserved features were integrated into a master alignment that led to improved homology models. The large fragment of the intracellular domain that is present in the structure of the 5-HT3 receptor was utilized to generate GABAA receptor models with a corresponding intracellular domain fragment. Results of mutational and photoaffinity ligand studies in GABAA receptors were analyzed in the light of the model structures. This led to an assignment of candidate ligands to two proposed novel pockets, candidate binding sites for furosemide and neurosteroids in the trans-membrane domain were identified. The homology models can serve as hypotheses generators, and some previously controversial structural interpretations of biochemical data can be resolved in the light of the presented multi-template approach to comparative modeling. Crystal and cryo-EM microscopic structures of the closest homologs that were solved in different conformational states provided important insights into structural rearrangements of binding sites during conformational transitions. The impact of structural variation and conformational motion on the shape of the investigated binding sites was analyzed. Rules for best template and alignment choice were obtained and can generally be applied to modeling of cys-loop receptors. Overall, we provide an updated structure based view of ligand binding sites present in GABAA receptors.

Novel positive allosteric modulators of GABAA receptors with anesthetic activity

GABA_A receptors are the main inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain and are targets for numerous clinically important drugs such as benzodiazepines, anxiolytics and anesthetics. We previously identified novel ligands of the classical benzodiazepine binding pocket in α₁β₂γ₂ GABA_A receptors using an experiment-guided virtual screening (EGVS) method. This screen also identified novel ligands for intramembrane low affinity diazepam site(s). In the current study we have further characterized compounds 31 and 132 identified with EGVS as well as 4-O-methylhonokiol. We investigated the site of action of these compounds in α₁β₂γ₂ GABA_A receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes using voltage-clamp electrophysiology combined with a benzodiazepine site antagonist and transmembrane domain mutations. All three compounds act mainly through the two β+/α− subunit transmembrane interfaces of the GABA_A receptors. We then used concatenated receptors to dissect the involvement of individual β+/α− interfaces. We further demonstrated that these compounds have anesthetic activity in a small aquatic animal model, Xenopus laevis tadpoles. The newly identified compounds may serve as scaffolds for the development of novel anesthetics.

Functional characterization of the 1,5-benzodiazepine clobazam and its major active metabolite N-desmethylclobazam at human GABA(A) receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes

The 1,5-benzodiazepine clobazam is indicated for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in patients 2 years of age or older in the United States, and for treatment of anxiety and various forms of epilepsy elsewhere. Clobazam has been reported to exhibit different in vivo adverse effects and addiction liability profile than the classic 1,4-benzodiazepines. In this study, it was investigated whether the in vitro pharmacological properties of clobazam and its major active metabolite N-desmethylclobazam could explain some of these clinical differences. The functional properties of the two 1,5-benzodiazepines were characterized at the human γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA_AR) subtypes α₁β₂γ_2S, α₂β₂γ_2S, α₃β₂γ_2S, α₅β₂γ_2S and α₆β₂δ expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes by use of two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology and compared to those exhibited by the 1,4-benzodiazepine clonazepam. All three compounds potentiated GABA EC₂₀-evoked responses through the α_1,2,3,5β₂γ_2S GABA_ARs in a reversible and concentration-dependent manner, with each displaying similar EC₅₀ values at the four subtypes. Furthermore, the degrees of potentiation of the GABA EC₂₀ currents through the four receptors mediated by saturating modulator concentrations did not differ substantially for any of the three benzodiazepines. The three compounds were substantially less potent (200-3900 fold) as positive allosteric modulators at the α₆β₂δ GABA_AR than at the α_1,2,3,5β₂γ_2S receptors. Interestingly, however, clobazam and especially N-desmethylclobazam were highly efficacious potentiators of α₆β₂δ receptor signaling. Although this activity component is unlikely to contribute to the in vivo effects of clobazam/N-desmethylclobazam, the 1,5-benzodiazepine could constitute an interesting lead for novel modulators targeting this low-affinity binding site in GABA_ARs. In conclusion, the non-selective modulation exerted by clobazam, N-desmethylclobazam and clonazepam at the α₁β₂γ_2S, α₂β₂γ_2S, α₃β₂γ_2S and α₅β₂γ_2S GABA_ARs indicate that the observed clinical differences between clobazam and 1,4-benzodiazepines are likely to arise from factors other than their respective pharmacological properties at the GABA_ARs as investigated here.

Allosteric modulation of GABAA receptors via multiple drug-binding sites

GABAA receptors are ligand-gated ion channels composed of five subunits that can be opened by GABA and be modulated by multiple pharmacologically and clinically important drugs. Over the time, hundreds of compounds from different structural classes have been demonstrated to modulate, directly activate, or inhibit GABAA receptors, and most of these compounds interact with more than one binding site at these receptors. Crystal structures of proteins and receptors homologous to GABAA receptors as well as homology modeling studies have provided insights into the possible location of ligand interaction sites. Some of these sites have been identified by mutagenesis, photolabeling, and docking studies. For most of these ligands, however, binding sites are not known. Due to the high flexibility of GABAA receptors and the existence of multiple drug-binding sites, the unequivocal identification of interaction sites for individual drugs is extremely difficult. The existence of multiple GABAA receptor subtypes with distinct subunit composition, the contribution of distinct subunit sequences to binding sites of different receptor subtypes, as well as the observation that even subunits not directly contributing to a binding site are able to influence affinity and efficacy of drugs, contribute to a unique pharmacology of each GABAA receptor subtype. Thus, each receptor subtype has to be investigated to identify a possible subtype selectivity of a compound. Although multiple binding sites make GABAA receptor pharmacology even more complicated, the exploitation of ligand interaction with novel-binding sites also offers additional possibilities for a subtype-selective modulation of GABAA receptors.

Identification of novel positive allosteric modulators and null modulators at the GABAA receptor α+β- interface

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

GABAA receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the mammalian brain and the target of many clinically important drugs interacting with different binding sites. Recently, we demonstrated that CGS 9895 (2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinolin-3(5H)-one) acts as a null modulator (antagonist) at the high affinity benzodiazepine binding site, but in addition elicits a strong enhancement of GABA-induced currents via a novel drug binding site at the extracellular α+β- interface. Here, we investigated 32 structural analogues of CGS 9895 for their ability to mediate their effects via the α1+β3- interface of GABAA receptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

GABAA receptors were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and investigated by the two-electrode voltage clamp method.

KEY RESULTS

We not only identified compounds with higher efficacy/potency than CGS 9895 for stimulating GABA-induced currents via the α1+β3-binding site, but also discovered compounds acting as null modulators at this site. Most of the compounds also acted as null modulators via the benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA receptors. But some of the positive allosteric modulators or null modulators exclusively exerted their action via the α+β- binding site.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Pyrazoloquinolinones and pyrazolopyridinones represent the first prototype of drug candidates mediating benzodiazepine like modulatory effects via the α+β-interface of GABAA receptors. The discovery of null modulators acting as inhibitors of the plus modulators provides a highly useful tool for the discovery of additional classes of compounds that can modulate GABAA receptors via this site, which may lead to novel therapeutic principles.

Benzodiazepine modulation of homomeric GABAAρ1 receptors: differential effects of diazepam and 4'-chlorodiazepam

GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) are ligand-gated ion channels that mediate inhibitory neurotransmission in the central nervous system (CNS). They are members of the Cys-loop receptor family and display marked structural and functional heterogeneity. Many GABA(A)Rs receptor subtypes are allosterically modulated by benzodiazepines (BDZs), which are drugs extensively used as anxiolytics, sedative-hypnotics and anticonvulsants. One high-affinity site and at least three additional low-affinity sites for BDZ recognition have been identified in several heteromeric and homomeric variants of the GABA(A)Rs (e.g.: α1β2γ2, α1β2/3, β3, etc.). However, the modulation of homomeric GABA(A)ρRs by BDZs was not previously revealed, and these receptors, for a long a time, were assumed to be fully insensitive to the actions of these drugs. In the present study, human homomeric GABA(A)ρ1 receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and GABA-evoked responses electrophysiologically recorded in the presence or absence of BDZs. GABA(A)ρ1 receptor-mediated responses were modulated by diazepam and 4'-chlorodiazepam in the micromolar range, in a concentration-dependent, voltage-independent and reversible manner. Diazepam produced potentiating effects on GABA-evoked Cl(-) currents and 4'-Cl diazepam induced biphasic effects depending on the GABA concentration, whereas Ro15-4513 and alprazolam were negative modulators. BDZ actions were insensitive to flumazenil. Other BDZs showed negligible activity at equivalent experimental conditions. Our results suggest that GABA(A)ρ1 receptor function can be selectively and differentially modulated by BDZs.

Accelerated discovery of novel benzodiazepine ligands by experiment-guided virtual screening

High throughput discovery of ligand scaffolds for target proteins can accelerate development of leads and drug candidates enormously. Here we describe an innovative workflow for the discovery of high affinity ligands for the benzodiazepine-binding site on the so far not crystallized mammalian GABAA receptors. The procedure includes chemical biology techniques that may be generally applied to other proteins. Prerequisites are a ligand that can be chemically modified with cysteine-reactive groups, knowledge of amino acid residues contributing to the drug-binding pocket, and crystal structures either of proteins homologous to the target protein or, better, of the target itself. Part of the protocol is virtual screening that without additional rounds of optimization in many cases results only in low affinity ligands, even when a target protein has been crystallized. Here we show how the integration of functional data into structure-based screening dramatically improves the performance of the virtual screening. Thus, lead compounds with 14 different scaffolds were identified on the basis of an updated structural model of the diazepam-bound state of the GABAA receptor. Some of these compounds show considerable preference for the α3β2γ2 GABAA receptor subtype.

Relative positioning of classical benzodiazepines to the γ2-subunit of GABAA receptors

GABAA receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. Benzodiazepine exert their action via a high affinity-binding site at the α/γ subunit interface on some of these receptors. Diazepam has sedative, hypnotic, anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, and anticonvulsant effects. It acts by potentiating the current evoked by the agonist GABA. Understanding specific interaction of benzodiazepines in the binding pocket of different GABAA receptor isoforms might help to separate these divergent effects. As a first step, we characterized the interaction between diazepam and the major GABAA receptor isoform α1β2γ2. We mutated several amino acid residues on the γ2-subunit assumed to be located near or in the benzodiazepine binding pocket individually to cysteine and studied the interaction with three ligands that are modified with a cysteine-reactive isothiocyanate group (-NCS). When the reactive NCS group is in apposition to the cysteine residue this leads to a covalent reaction. In this way, three amino acid residues, γ2Tyr58, γ2Asn60, and γ2Val190 were located relative to classical benzodiazepines in their binding pocket on GABAA receptors.

Differential modulation of GABA(A) receptor function by aryl pyrazoles

Several aryl pyrazoles characterized by a different molecular structure (flexible vs constrained), but chemically related to rimonabant and AM251, were tested for their ability to modulate the function of recombinant α1β2γ2L GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The effects of 6Bio-R, 14Bio-R, NESS 0327, GP1a and GP2a (0.3-30 μM) were evaluated using a two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. 6Bio-R and 14Bio-R potentiated GABA-evoked Cl(-) currents. NESS 0327, GP1a and GP2a did not affect the GABAA receptor function, but they acted as antagonists of 6Bio-R. Moreover, NESS 0327 inhibited the potentiation of the GABAA receptor function induced by rimonabant. The benzodiazepine site seems to participate in the action of these compounds. In fact, flumazenil antagonized the potentiation of the GABAA receptor induced by 6Bio-R, and NESS 0327 reduced the action of lorazepam and zolpidem. On the contrary, NESS 0327 did not antagonize the action of "classic" GABAergic modulators (propanol, anesthetics, barbiturates or steroids). In α1β2 receptors 6Bio-R potentiated the GABAergic function, but flumazenil was still able to antagonize the potentiation induced by 6Bio-R. Aryl pyrazole derivatives activity at the GABAA receptor depends on their molecular structure. These compounds bind to both an αβγ binding site, and to an α/β site which do not require the γ subunit and that may provide structural leads for drugs with potential anticonvulsant effects.

Alcohol selectivity of β3-containing GABAA receptors: evidence for a unique extracellular alcohol/imidazobenzodiazepine Ro15-4513 binding site at the α+β- subunit interface in αβ3δ GABAA receptors

GABAA receptors (GABARs) have long been the focus for acute alcohol actions with evidence for behaviorally relevant low millimolar alcohol actions on tonic GABA currents and extrasynaptic α4/6, δ, and β3 subunit-containing GABARs. Using recombinant expression in oocytes combined with two electrode voltage clamp, we show with chimeric β2/β3 subunits that differences in alcohol sensitivity among β subunits are determined by the extracellular N-terminal part of the protein. Furthermore, by using point mutations, we show that the β3 alcohol selectivity is determined by a single amino acid residue in the N-terminus that differs between GABAR β subunits (β3Y66, β2A66, β1S66). The β3Y66 residue is located in a region called "loop D" which in γ subunits contributes to the imidazobenzodiazepine (iBZ) binding site at the classical α+γ2- subunit interface. In structural homology models β3Y66 is the equivalent of γ2T81 which is one of three critical residues lining the benzodiazepine binding site in the γ2 subunit loop D, opposite to the "100H/R-site" benzodiazepine binding residue in GABAR α subunits. We have shown that the α6R100Q mutation at this site leads to increased alcohol-induced motor in-coordination in alcohol non-tolerant rats carrying the α6R100Q mutated allele. Based on the identification of these two amino acid residues α6R100 and β66 we propose a model in which β3 and δ containing GABA receptors contain a unique ethanol site at the α4/6+β3- subunit interface. This site is homologous to the classical benzodiazepine binding site and we propose that it not only binds ethanol at relevant concentrations (EC50-17 mM), but also has high affinity for a few selected benzodiazepine site ligands including alcohol antagonistic iBZs (Ro15-4513, RY023, RY024, RY80) which have in common a large moiety at the C7 position of the benzodiazepine ring. We suggest that large moieties at the C7-BZ ring compete with alcohol for its binding pocket at a α4/6+β3- EtOH/Ro15-4513 site. This model reconciles many years of alcohol research on GABARs and provides a plausible explanation for the competitive relationship between ethanol and iBZ alcohol antagonists in which bulky moieties at the C7 position compete with ethanol for its binding site. We conclude with a critical discussion to suggest that much of the controversy surrounding this issue might be due to fundamental species differences in alcohol and alcohol antagonist responses in rats and mice.

Enhancing the function of alpha5-subunit-containing GABAA receptors promotes action potential firing of neocortical neurons during up-states

Neocortical neurons mediate the sedative and anticonvulsant properties of benzodiazepines. These agents enhance synaptic inhibition via positive modulation of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptors harboring α1-, α2-, α3- or α5-protein subunits. Benzodiazepine-sensitive GABAA receptors containing the α5-subunit are abundant in the neocortex, but their impact in controlling neuronal firing patterns is unknown. Here we studied how the discharge rates of cortical neurons are modified by a positive (SH-053-2'F-R-CH3) and a negative (L 655,708) α5-subunit-preferring allosteric modulator in comparison to diazepam, the classical non-selective benzodiazepine. Drug actions were characterized in slice cultures from wild-type and α5(H105R) knock-in mice by performing extracellular multi-unit-recordings. In knock-in mice, receptors containing the α5 subunit are insensitive to benzodiazepines. The non-selective positive allosteric modulator diazepam decreased the discharge rates of neocortical neurons during episodes of ongoing neuronal activity (up states). In contrast to diazepam, the α5-preferring positive modulator SH-053-2'F-R-CH3 accelerated action potential firing during up states. This promoting action was absent in slices from α5(H105R) mice, confirming that it is mediated by the α5-subunit. Consistent with these observations, the negative α5-selective modulator L 655,708 inhibited up state action potential activity in slices from wild-type mice. The opposing actions of diazepam and SH-053-2'F-R-CH3, which both enhance GABAA receptor function but differ in subtype-selectivity, uncovers contrasting roles of GABAA receptor subtypes in controlling the firing rates of cortical neurons. These findings may have important implications for the design of novel anaesthetic and anticonvulsant benzodiazepines displaying an improved efficacy and fewer side effects.

Structure, function, and modulation of GABA(A) receptors

The GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in mammalian brain. Each isoform consists of five homologous or identical subunits surrounding a central chloride ion-selective channel gated by GABA. How many isoforms of the receptor exist is far from clear. GABA(A) receptors located in the postsynaptic membrane mediate neuronal inhibition that occurs in the millisecond time range; those located in the extrasynaptic membrane respond to ambient GABA and confer long-term inhibition. GABA(A) receptors are responsive to a wide variety of drugs, e.g. benzodiazepines, which are often used for their sedative/hypnotic and anxiolytic effects.

Pentameric ligand-gated ion channel ELIC is activated by GABA and modulated by benzodiazepines

GABA(A) receptors are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels involved in fast inhibitory neurotransmission and are allosterically modulated by the anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, and sedative-hypnotic benzodiazepines. Here we show that the prokaryotic homolog ELIC also is activated by GABA and is modulated by benzodiazepines with effects comparable to those at GABA(A) receptors. Crystal structures reveal important features of GABA recognition and indicate that benzodiazepines, depending on their concentration, occupy two possible sites in ELIC. An intrasubunit site is adjacent to the GABA-recognition site but faces the channel vestibule. A second intersubunit site partially overlaps with the GABA site and likely corresponds to a low-affinity benzodiazepine-binding site in GABA(A) receptors that mediates inhibitory effects of the benzodiazepine flurazepam. Our study offers a structural view how GABA and benzodiazepines are recognized at a GABA-activated ion channel.

A novel GABA(A) receptor pharmacology: drugs interacting with the α(+) β(-) interface

GABA(A) receptors are ligand-gated chloride channels composed of five subunits that can belong to different subunit classes. The existence of 19 different subunits gives rise to a multiplicity of GABA(A) receptor subtypes with distinct subunit composition; regional, cellular and subcellular distribution; and pharmacology. Most of these receptors are composed of two α, two β and one γ2 subunits. GABA(A) receptors are the site of action of a variety of pharmacologically and clinically important drugs, such as benzodiazepines, barbiturates, neuroactive steroids, anaesthetics and convulsants. Whereas GABA acts at the two extracellular β(+) α(-) interfaces of GABA(A) receptors, the allosteric modulatory benzodiazepines interact with the extracellular α(+) γ2(-) interface. In contrast, barbiturates, neuroactive steroids and anaesthetics seem to interact with solvent accessible pockets in the transmembrane domain. Several benzodiazepine site ligands have been identified that selectively interact with GABA(A) receptor subtypes containing α2βγ2, α3βγ2 or α5βγ2 subunits. This indicates that the different α subunit types present in these receptors convey sufficient structural differences to the benzodiazepine binding site to allow specific interaction with certain benzodiazepine site ligands. Recently, a novel drug binding site was identified at the α(+) β(-) interface. This binding site is homologous to the benzodiazepine binding site at the α(+) γ2(-) interface and is thus also strongly influenced by the type of α subunit present in the receptor. Drugs interacting with this binding site cannot directly activate but only allosterically modulate GABA(A) receptors. The possible importance of such drugs addressing a spectrum of receptor subtypes completely different from that of benzodiazepines is discussed.

Influence of GABA(A) receptor α subunit isoforms on the benzodiazepine binding site

Classical benzodiazepines, such as diazepam, interact with α_xβ₂γ₂ GABA_A receptors, x = 1, 2, 3, 5 and modulate their function. Modulation of different receptor isoforms probably results in selective behavioural effects as sedation and anxiolysis. Knowledge of differences in the structure of the binding pocket in different receptor isoforms is of interest for the generation of isoform-specific ligands. We studied here the interaction of the covalently reacting diazepam analogue 3-NCS with α₁S204Cβ₂γ₂, α₁S205Cβ₂γ₂ and α₁T206Cβ₂γ₂ and with receptors containing the homologous mutations in α₂β₂γ₂, α₃β₂γ₂, α₅β_1/2γ₂ and α₆β₂γ₂. The interaction was studied using radioactive ligand binding and at the functional level using electrophysiological techniques. Both strategies gave overlapping results. Our data allow conclusions about the relative apposition of α₁S204Cβ₂γ₂, α₁S205Cβ₂γ₂ and α₁T206Cβ₂γ₂ and homologous positions in α₂, α₃, α₅ and α₆ with C-atom adjacent to the keto-group in diazepam. Together with similar data on the C-atom carrying Cl in diazepam, they indicate that the architecture of the binding site for benzodiazepines differs in each GABA_A receptor isoform α₁β₂γ₂, α₂β₂γ₂, α₃β₂γ₂, α₅β_1/2γ₂ and α₆β₂γ₂.

Agonist trapped in ATP-binding sites of the P2X2 receptor

ATP-gated P2X receptors are trimeric ion channels, as recently confirmed by X-ray crystallography. However, the structure was solved without ATP and even though extracellular intersubunit cavities surrounded by conserved amino acid residues previously shown to be important for ATP function were proposed to house ATP, the localization of the ATP sites remains elusive. Here we localize the ATP-binding sites by creating, through a proximity-dependent "tethering" reaction, covalent bonds between a synthesized ATP-derived thiol-reactive P2X2 agonist (NCS-ATP) and single cysteine mutants engineered in the putative binding cavities of the P2X2 receptor. By combining whole-cell and single-channel recordings, we report that NCS-ATP covalently and specifically labels two previously unidentified positions N140 and L186 from two adjacent subunits separated by about 18 Å in a P2X2 closed state homology model, suggesting the existence of at least two binding modes. Tethering reaction at both positions primes subsequent agonist binding, yet with distinct functional consequences. Labeling of one position impedes subsequent ATP function, which results in inefficient gating, whereas tethering of the other position, although failing to produce gating by itself, enhances subsequent ATP function. Our results thus define a large and dynamic intersubunit ATP-binding pocket and suggest that receptors trapped in covalently agonist-bound states differ in their ability to gate the ion channel.

The GABAA receptor alpha+beta- interface: a novel target for subtype selective drugs

GABA(A) receptors mediate the action of many clinically important drugs interacting with different binding sites. For some potential binding sites, no interacting drugs have yet been identified. Here, we established a steric hindrance procedure for the identification of drugs acting at the extracellular α1+β3- interface, which is homologous to the benzodiazepine binding site at the α1+γ2- interface. On screening of >100 benzodiazepine site ligands, the anxiolytic pyrazoloquinoline 2-p-methoxyphenylpyrazolo[4,3-c]quinolin-3(5H)-one (CGS 9895) was able to enhance GABA-induced currents at α1β3 receptors from rat. CGS 9895 acts as an antagonist at the benzodiazepine binding site at nanomolar concentrations, but enhances GABA-induced currents via a different site present at α1β3γ2 and α1β3 receptors. By mutating pocket-forming amino acid residues at the α1+ and the β3- side to cysteines, we demonstrated that covalent labeling of these cysteines by the methanethiosulfonate ethylamine reagent MTSEA-biotin was able to inhibit the effect of CGS 9895. The inhibition was not caused by a general inactivation of GABA(A) receptors, because the GABA-enhancing effect of ROD 188 or the steroid α-tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone was not influenced by MTSEA-biotin. Other experiments indicated that the CGS 9895 effect was dependent on the α and β subunit types forming the interface. CGS 9895 thus represents the first prototype of drugs mediating benzodiazepine-like modulatory effects via the α+β- interface of GABA(A) receptors. Since such binding sites are present at αβ, αβγ, and αβδ receptors, such drugs will have a much broader action than benzodiazepines and might become clinical important for the treatment of epilepsy.

Use of concatamers to study GABAA receptor architecture and function: application to delta-subunit-containing receptors and possible pitfalls

Many membrane proteins, including the GABA(A) [GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) type A] receptors, are oligomers often built from different subunits. As an example, the major adult isoform of the GABA(A) receptor is a pentamer built from three different subunits. Theoretically, co-expression of three subunits may result in many different receptor pentamers. Subunit concatenation allows us to pre-define the relative arrangement of the subunits. This method may thus be used to study receptor architecture, but also the nature of binding sites. Indeed, it made possible the discovery of a novel benzodiazepine site. We use here subunit concatenation to study delta-subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors. We provide evidence for the formation of different functional subunit arrangements in recombinant alpha(1)beta(3)delta and alpha(6)beta(3)delta receptors. As with all valuable techniques, subunit concatenation has also some pitfalls. Most of these can be avoided by carefully titrating and minimizing the length of the linker sequences joining the two linked subunits and avoiding inclusion of the signal sequence of all but the N-terminal subunit of a multi-subunit construct. Maybe the most common error found in the literature is that low expression can be overcome by simply overloading the expression system with genetic information. As some concatenated constructs result by themselves in a low level of expression, this erroneous assembly leading to receptor function may be promoted by overloading the expression system and leads to wrong conclusions.

An epilepsy-related region in the GABA(A) receptor mediates long-distance effects on GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites

The GABA(A) receptor mutation gamma(2)R43Q causes absence epilepsy in humans. Homology modeling suggests that gamma(2)Arg43, gamma(2)Glu178, and beta(2)Arg117 participate in a salt-bridge network linking the gamma(2) and beta(2) subunits. Here we show that several mutations at these locations exert similar long-distance effects on other intersubunit interfaces involved in GABA and benzodiazepine binding. These mutations alter GABA-evoked receptor kinetics by slowing deactivation, enhancing desensitization, or both. Kinetic modeling and nonstationary noise analysis for gamma(2)R43Q reveal that these effects are due to slowed GABA unbinding and slowed recovery from desensitization. Both gamma(2)R43Q and beta(2)R117K also speed diazepam dissociation from the receptor's benzodiazepine binding interface, as assayed by the rate of decay of diazepam-induced potentiation of GABA-evoked currents. These data demonstrate that gamma(2)Arg43 and beta(2)Arg117 similarly regulate the stability of both the GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites at the distant beta/alpha and alpha/gamma intersubunit interfaces, respectively. A simple explanation for these results is that gamma(2)Arg43 and beta(2)Arg117 participate in interactions between the gamma(2) and beta(2) subunits, disruptions of which alter the neighboring intersubunit binding sites in a similar fashion. In addition, gamma(2)Arg43 and gamma(2)Glu178 regulate desensitization, probably mediated within the transmembrane domains near the pore. Therefore, mutations at the gamma/beta intersubunit interface have specific long-distance effects that are propagated widely throughout the GABA(A) receptor protein.

Relative positioning of diazepam in the benzodiazepine-binding-pocket of GABA receptors

GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. Some of them are targets of benzodiazepines that are widely used in clinical practice for their sedative/hypnotic, anxiolytic, muscle relaxant and anticonvulsant effects. In order to rationally separate these different drug actions, we need to understand the interaction of such compounds with the benzodiazepine-binding pocket. With this aim, we mutated residues located in the benzodiazepine-binding site individually to cysteine. These mutated receptors were combined with benzodiazepine site ligands carrying a cysteine reactive group in a defined position. Proximal apposition of reaction partners will lead to a covalent reaction. We describe here such proximity-accelerated chemical coupling reactions of alpha(1)S205C and alpha(1)T206C with a diazepam derivative modified at the C-3 position with a reactive isothiocyanate group (-NCS). We also provide new data that identify alpha(1)H101C and alpha(1)N102C as exclusive sites of the reaction of a diazepam derivative where the -Cl atom is replaced by a -NCS group. Based on these observations we propose a relative positioning of diazepam within the benzodiazepine-binding site of alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2) receptors.