1
|
Chan YC, Chan DTC, Tibbitts TL, Hassell CJ, Piersma T. Site fidelity of migratory shorebirds facing habitat deterioration: insights from satellite tracking and mark-resighting. MOVEMENT ECOLOGY 2023; 11:79. [PMID: 38129912 PMCID: PMC10740345 DOI: 10.1186/s40462-023-00443-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Site fidelity, the tendency to return to a previously visited site, is commonly observed in migratory birds. This behaviour would be advantageous if birds returning to the same site, benefit from their previous knowledge about local resources. However, when habitat quality declines at a site over time, birds with lower site fidelity might benefit from a tendency to move to sites with better habitats. As a first step towards understanding the influence of site fidelity on how animals cope with habitat deterioration, here we describe site fidelity variation in two species of sympatric migratory shorebirds (Bar-tailed Godwits Limosa lapponica and Great Knots Calidris tenuirostris). Both species are being impacted by the rapid loss and deterioration of intertidal habitats in the Yellow Sea where they fuel up during their annual long-distance migrations. METHODS Using satellite tracking and mark-resighting data, we measured site fidelity in the non-breeding (austral summer) and migration periods, during which both species live and co-occur in Northwest Australia and the Yellow Sea, respectively. RESULTS Site fidelity was generally high in both species, with the majority of individuals using only one site during the non-breeding season and revisiting the same sites during migration. Nevertheless, Great Knots did exhibit lower site fidelity than Bar-tailed Godwits in both Northwest Australia and the Yellow Sea across data types. CONCLUSIONS Great Knots encountered substantial habitat deterioration just before and during our study period but show the same rate of decline in population size and individual survival as the less habitat-impacted Bar-tailed Godwits. This suggests that the lower site fidelity of Great Knots might have helped them to cope with the habitat changes. Future studies on movement patterns and their consequences under different environmental conditions by individuals with different degrees of site fidelity could help broaden our understanding of how species might react to, and recover from, local habitat deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Chi Chan
- Department of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB, Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands.
- Rudi Drent Chair in Global Flyway Ecology, Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - David Tsz Chung Chan
- Department of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB, Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands
| | - T Lee Tibbitts
- Alaska Science Center, U. S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA
| | - Chris J Hassell
- Global Flyway Network, PO Box 3089, Broome, WA, 6725, Australia
- Australasian Wader Studies Group, PO Box 3089, Broome, WA, 6725, Australia
| | - Theunis Piersma
- Department of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB, Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands
- Rudi Drent Chair in Global Flyway Ecology, Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Global Flyway Network, PO Box 3089, Broome, WA, 6725, Australia
- BirdEyes, Centre for Global Ecological Change at the Faculties of Science and Engineering and Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, Zaailand 110, 8911 BN, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- Center for East Asian-Australasian Flyway Studies, School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eco-hydrology as a driver for tidal restoration: Observations from a Ramsar wetland in eastern Australia. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254701. [PMID: 34351914 PMCID: PMC8341630 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Land reclamation projects and the installation of drainage infrastructure has impacted coastal wetlands worldwide. By altering water levels and inundation extent, these activities have changed the viable ecosystems onsite and resulted in the proliferation of freshwater species. As more than 50% of tidal wetlands have been degraded globally over the last 100 years, the importance of this issue is increasingly being recognised and tidal wetland restoration projects are underway worldwide. However, there are currently limited sites where large-scale reintroduction of tidal flushing has been implemented with the explicit aim to foster the growth of a threatened ecosystem. In this study, the tidal restoration of an internationally recognised Ramsar listed wetland in eastern Australia is described to highlight how coastal saltmarsh can be targeted by mimicking inundation depths and hydroperiod across the 410-ha site. Coastal saltmarsh is particularly important to this site as it is part of the east Australasian flyway for migratory birds and the minimum saltmarsh extent, as listed within the Ramsar's limits of acceptable change, have been breached. To recreate coastal saltmarsh habitat onsite, water level and hydroperiod criteria were established based on similar vegetation patterns within the adjacent estuary. A calibrated 2D hydrodynamic model of the site was then used to test how the preferred inundation criteria could be applied to the largest possible restored wetland area. Once optimised, a synthetic tidal signal was implemented onsite via automated hydraulic controls. The onsite vegetation response over an 8-year period was assessed to highlight the ecosystem response to controlled tidal inundation and denoted substantial saltmarsh expansion during the period. The techniques applied onsite have successfully met the restoration targets and can be applied at similar sites worldwide, offsetting sea level rise impacts to natural inundation hydroperiod.
Collapse
|
3
|
Maslo B, Zeigler SL, Drake EC, Pover T, Plant NG. A pragmatic approach for comparing species distribution models to increasing confidence in managing piping plover habitat. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Maslo
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
| | - Sara L. Zeigler
- U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center St. Petersburg Florida
| | - Evan C. Drake
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
| | - Todd Pover
- Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey Trenton New Jersey
| | - Nathaniel G. Plant
- U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center St. Petersburg Florida
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chan Y, Tibbitts TL, Lok T, Hassell CJ, Peng H, Ma Z, Zhang Z, Piersma T. Filling knowledge gaps in a threatened shorebird flyway through satellite tracking. J Appl Ecol 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ying‐Chi Chan
- Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
- Department of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Utrecht University Den Burg the Netherlands
| | | | - Tamar Lok
- Department of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Utrecht University Den Burg the Netherlands
| | | | - He‐Bo Peng
- Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
- Department of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Utrecht University Den Burg the Netherlands
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Fudan University Shanghai China
| | - Zhijun Ma
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Fudan University Shanghai China
| | - Zhengwang Zhang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering Beijing Normal University Beijing China
| | - Theunis Piersma
- Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
- Department of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Utrecht University Den Burg the Netherlands
- Global Flyway Network Broome WA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maslo B, Leu K, Pover T, Weston MA, Schlacher TA. Managing birds of conservation concern on sandy shores: How much room for future conservation actions is there? Ecol Evol 2018; 8:10976-10988. [PMID: 30519421 PMCID: PMC6262725 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Resource limitations often prevent the active management required to maintain habitat quality in protected areas. Because restrictions in access or allowable public activities are the sole conservation measure in these locations, an important question to consider is whether species of conservation concern truly benefit from parcels that are shielded from human disturbance. Here, we assess the conservation benefit of protecting birds from human recreation on over 204 km of sandy beaches by (a) estimating the total area of beach-nesting bird habitat that has been created by conservation protections; (b) quantifying the change in nesting habitat extent should further conservation protections be implemented; and (c) providing data to inform future protected area expansion. We use a maximum entropy species distribution modeling approach to estimate the extent and quality of suitable habitat for four beach-nesting bird species of conservation concern under the existing management regime and compare it to scenarios in which the entire study area is either unprotected of fully protected from human disturbance. Managing humans has dramatic conservation returns for least terns and piping plovers, creating extensive nesting habitat that otherwise would not exist. There is considerable scope for conservation gains, potentially tripling the extent of nesting areas. Expanding conservation footprints for American oystercatchers and black skimmers is predicted to enhance the quality of existing nesting areas. The work demonstrates the utility of modeling changes in habitat suitability to inform protected area expansion on ocean beaches and coastal dunes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Maslo
- Ecology, Evolution, and Natural ResourcesRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew Jersey
- Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment StationRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew Jersey
| | - Karen Leu
- Ecology, Evolution, and Natural ResourcesRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew Jersey
| | - Todd Pover
- Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New JerseyTrentonNew Jersey
| | - Michael A. Weston
- Centre for Integrative EcologySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin UniversityBurwoodVictoriaAustralia
| | - Thomas A. Schlacher
- The ANIMAL Research Centre: Health + Ecology + ConservationUniversity of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydoreQueenslandAustralia
- School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydoreQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|