Precision and accuracy of a point of care glucometer for detection of hypoglycaemia in horses

Point-of-care (POC) glucometry is commonly used in horses; however, measurement error with this method when analysing hypoglycaemic samples (<4 mmol/L) is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the precision and accuracy of glucometry in hypoglycaemic horses in comparison to a laboratory method of glucose measurement (LAB). Repeatability coefficients were 0.47 mmol/L for POC and 0.09 mmol/L for LAB, and coefficients of variation were 10 % and 2.11 %, for the POC and LAB methods, respectively. Systemic bias with the POC method was present, with a mean bias of -0.26 mmol/L (95 % limits of agreement: -0.88 - 0.37) in comparison to LAB, and <70% of measurements were within 20 % of paired LAB results. Prior to use of glucometers, assessment of the diagnostic performance of the equipment is necessary, including determination of acceptable criteria and reference ranges for hypoglycaemic samples.

Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system in neonatal foals

Background

Monitoring blood glucose concentrations is common in critically ill neonatal foals, especially septic foals and those receiving naso‐esophageal feedings or IV parenteral nutrition. Glucose typically is measured using a point‐of‐care (POC) glucometer but requires repeated restraint and blood collections, which may cause irritation at venipuncture sites and increased demands on nursing staff. Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) may provide an accurate alternative for monitoring blood glucose concentration.

Objectives

To determine the correlation and accuracy of a CGMS to monitor neonatal foals' blood glucose concentrations as compared to a POC glucometer and laboratory chemistry analysis (CHEM).

Animals

Samples from 4 healthy and 4 ill neonatal foals.

Methods

A CGMS was placed on each foal, and glucose measurements acquired from this device were compared to simultaneous measurements of blood glucose concentration using a POC glucometer and CHEM.

Results

Two‐hundred matched glucose measurements were collected from 8 neonatal foals. The mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between CGMS and CHEM, CGMS and POC glucometer, and POC glucometer and CHEM was 3.97 mg/dL (−32.5 to 40.4), 18.2 mg/dL (−28.8 to 65.2), and 22.18 mg/dL (−9.3 to 53.67), respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was significantly correlated among all devices: GCMS and CHEM (r = 0.81), CGMS and POC glucometer (r = 0.77) and POC glucometer‐CHEM (r = 0.92).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Within the blood glucose concentration ranges in this study (78‐212 mg/dL), CGMS measurements were significantly correlated with CHEM, suggesting that it is an acceptable method to provide meaningful, immediate, and continuous glucose concentration measurements in neonatal foals while eliminating the need for repeated restraint and blood collection.

Evaluation of the Freestyle Optium Neo H point-of-care device for measuring blood glucose concentrations in sick calves

Background

Data on the performance of a glucometer in calves with different diseases are currently lacking.

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a point of care glucometer in calves affected by different diseases relative to a traditional bench‐top autoanalyzer.

Animals

One hundred ninety‐six calves with different disorders in a referral hospital.

Methods

Prospective study. Venous blood samples were used for the determination of glucose concentrations in blood and plasma using the Freestyle Optium Neo H and autoanalyzer, respectively. Data were subjected to Passing‐Bablok regression and Bland‐Altman plots. The Freestyle Optium Neo H was the test method and the autoanalyzer was the reference method. The diagnostic performance of the glucometer relative to the autoanalyzer was assessed using 3 different plasma glucose concentrations.

Results

The Passing‐Bablok regression for the glucometer against the reference method revealed the presence of both proportional bias (1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07‐1.18) and constant bias (−11.25; 95% CI, −16.0 to −7.70). The glucometer yielded 92.2%‐100% sensitivity and 86.4%‐96% specificity for the assessing glucose concentration based on different concentration thresholds.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

The Freestyle Optium Neo H showed proportional and constant biases relative to the reference method. The glucometer showed poor performance according to criteria recommended by the International Standards Organization and the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology. However, the glucometer determined hypoglycemia with high sensitivity and specificity therefore it might be used to diagnose hypoglycemia in calves with different diseases until calf‐specific POC glucometers are developed.

Precision and accuracy of a point-of-care glucometer in horses and the effects of sample type

Point-of-care glucometry is used commonly in clinical and research settings; however, accuracy and precision of this method are concerns. The objectives of this study were to determine the accuracy of glucometry in adult horses and the precision of duplicate measurements. Blood samples were collected from 62 horses into one plain syringe, one EDTA tube and three fluoride oxalate (FO) tubes. Immediately after collection, glucose concentrations in whole blood were determined, in duplicate, by glucometry from the syringe (plain whole blood [WB] group), EDTA tube (EDTA group) and one FO tube (FO group). One FO sample was used to measure plasma glucose concentration by a laboratory chemistry analyser (LAB group) ≤1 h after collection. The third FO tube was used to measure plasma glucose concentration by glucometry after 3 h storage (FO3hr group). Adequate precision was present for all groups (coefficient of variation: 0.7-3.5%) except WB (5.5-9.4%). Between groups, correlations were significant (P < 0.05; except for WB-EDTA), varied with group comparison, and tended to be lowest for comparisons involving WB. Mean bias was lowest for WB-LAB and greatest for FO-LAB and FO3hr-LAB; however, the limits of agreement were ≥4.65 mmol/L for WB-LAB and ≤2.75 mmol/L for most other comparisons. For the glucometer used, performance was influenced by sample type: WB was unsuitable, while FO or EDTA samples resulted in adequate precision and accuracy, provided under-estimation of glucose concentrations is accounted for by using method-specific reference ranges. Glucometer performance and optimal sample type(s) should be determined prior to use in horses.

The clinical value of whole blood point-of-care biomarkers in large animal emergency and critical care medicine

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current medical literature and provide a clinical perspective of whole blood point-of-care (POC) biomarkers in large animal emergency and critical care practice.

DATA SOURCES

Original studies, reviews, and textbook chapters in the human and veterinary medical fields.

SUMMARY

POC biomarkers are tests used to monitor normal or disease processes at or near the patient. In both human and veterinary medicine these tools are playing an increasingly important role in the management of critical diseases. The most important whole blood POC biomarkers available for veterinary practitioners include l-lactate, cardiac troponin I, serum amyloid A, triglyceride, creatinine, and glucose, although many other tests are available or on the horizon.

CONCLUSION

Whole blood POC biomarkers enable clinicians to provide improved management of critical diseases in large animals. These tools are especially useful for establishing a diagnosis, guiding therapy, and estimating disease risk and prognosis.

The equine neonatal intensive care laboratory: point-of-care testing

Rapid evaluation and intervention is a requirement and a characteristic of patient management in neonatal intensive care units, and this applies for equine neonates also. Appropriate interventions are based on solid knowledge of age, maturity, and species-specific differences in reference ranges. Point-of-care (POC) testing devices speedup decision making regarding treatments and interventions. However, there are potential limitations of these devices when applied to age groups and species beyond those they were specifically developed for. This article discusses the age-specific differences in the reference ranges and the potential limitations of POC devices currently used, which may affect delivery of care.

Evaluation of a veterinary glucometer for use in horses

BACKGROUND

Glucose assessment and regulation are important factors in the treatment of hospitalized horses and foals.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare glucose measurement by a veterinary glucometer, adjusted by code for use in horses and foals, to a reference chemistry analyzer. It was hypothesized that the veterinary glucometer and reference analyzer would yield similar results and that interpretation of glucose values obtained from a veterinary glucometer would result in clinically appropriate decisions.

ANIMALS

Fifty blood samples from adult horses and 50 blood samples from neonatal foals admitted to the Colorado State University Veterinary Hospital or Equine Reproduction Laboratory for evaluation.

METHODS

Glucose concentrations from fresh whole blood samples were evaluated in duplicate with a veterinary glucometer and these values were compared with those obtained with a reference plasma chemistry analyzer. The accuracy of glucometer measurement was evaluated with a Clarke error grid.

RESULTS

The veterinary glucometer accurately measured whole blood glucose concentrations in both horses and foals when compared with a reference plasma chemistry analyzer. Nearly 97% of the glucometer values obtained in this study would have resulted in appropriate clinical decisions based on the Clarke error grid analysis.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

The veterinary glucometer evaluated has potential utility for point-of-care whole blood glucose evaluation in both horses and foals.

Blood glucose concentrations in critically ill neonatal foals

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY

Critical illness is associated with hyperglycemia in humans, and a greater degree and duration of hyperglycemia is associated with nonsurvival. Hypoglycemia is also seen in critically ill humans, and is associated with nonsurvival. This might also be true in the critically ill foal.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of blood glucose concentrations with survival, sepsis, and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

METHODS

Blood glucose concentrations at admission (515 foals) and 24 hours (159 foals), 36 hours (95), 48 hours (82), and 60 hours (45) after admission were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of glucose concentrations with survival, sepsis, a positive blood culture, or SIRS.

RESULTS

29.1% of foals had blood glucose concentrations within the reference range (76-131 mg/dL) at admission, 36.5% were hyperglycemic, and 34.4% were hypoglycaemic. Foals that did not survive to hospital discharge had lower mean blood glucose concentrations at admission, as well as higher maximum and lower minimum blood glucose concentrations in the 1st 24 hours of hospitalization, and higher blood glucose at 24 and 36 hours. Foals with blood glucose concentrations <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or >10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) at admission were less likely to survive. Hypoglycemia at admission was associated with sepsis, a positive blood culture, and SIRS.

CONCLUSIONS AND POTENTIAL RELEVANCE

Derangements of blood glucose concentration are common in critically ill foals. Controlling blood glucose concentrations may therefore be beneficial in the critically ill neonatal foal, and this warrants further investigation.

Comparison of the Accu-Chek Aviva point-of-care glucometer with blood gas and laboratory methods of analysis of glucose measurement in equine emergency patients

BACKGROUND

More information is needed regarding accuracy of commonly used methods of glucose measurement in the critically ill horse.

HYPOTHESIS

Glucometry will have good agreement with a laboratory standard. Glucometry with plasma will have better agreement than when performed with whole blood.

ANIMALS

Fifty sequentially admitted equine emergency patients, aged >1year.

METHODS

Venous blood was collected at admission and immediately analyzed by point-of-care glucometry on both whole blood (POC/WB) and plasma (POC/PL), a multielectrode blood gas analyzer with whole blood (BLG), and a standard laboratory method with plasma (CHEM). Paired data were compared using Lin's concordance correlation, Pearson's correlation, and robust regression. Bias and limits of agreement were tested by the Bland-Altman technique. Bivariate regression analysis was used to explore confounding factors.

RESULTS

Concordance was significant for all comparisons, and was strongest for CHEM-POC/PL (0.977) and weakest for POC/WB-POC/PL (0.668). Pearson's correlation was excellent for all comparisons except those with POC/WB. All comparisons had excellent robust regression coefficients except those with POC/WB.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

POC glucometry with plasma had excellent agreement with a laboratory standard, as did blood gas analysis. POC glucometry with whole blood correlated poorly with a laboratory standard. These differences may be clinically important, and could affect decisions based on glucose concentrations.