MARS preconditioning for living donor liver transplantation: panacea or placebo?

Prevention of hepatitis C virus infection and spread in human liver chimeric mice by an anti-CD81 monoclonal antibody

CD81 is a required receptor for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of human hepatocytes in vitro. We generated several high-affinity anti-human CD81 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that demonstrated potent, specific, and cross-genotype inhibition of HCV entry. One of these mAbs, K04, was administered to human liver chimeric mice before or after HCV infection to determine its ability to prevent HCV infection or spread of HCV infection, respectively. All vehicle control mice established HCV infection, reaching steady-state levels of serum HCV RNA by day 21. Pretreatment of mice with K04 prevented HCV infection in all mice (n = 5). Treatment of mice with mAb K04 every 3 days for 21 days, starting at 6 hours postinfection, resulted in effective inhibition of virus spread. In 3 mice that were sacrificed on day 24, serum HCV levels remained detectable, below the limit of quantification (LOQ), indicating that infection was established, but virus spread was blocked, by the anti-CD81 mAb. In 5 additional mice that were followed for a longer time, virus remained detectable, below LOQ, until days 24 and 30 in 4 of 5 mice. In the fifth mouse, viral load was quantifiable, but reduced to 64-fold below the mean viral load in vehicle control at day 24. In addition, 2 of 5 mice cleared the infection by day 30 and 1 mouse had undetectable virus load from day 6 onward.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that CD81 is required for HCV infection and virus spread in vivo, and that anti-CD81 antibodies such as K04 may have potential as broad-spectrum antiviral agents for prevention and treatment of HCV infection.

MARS: a futile tool in centres without active liver transplant support

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Studies on Molecular Adsorbent Recycling Systems (MARS) showed inconclusive survival benefits.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We evaluated the efficacy of MARS for patients with either acute liver failure (ALF) or acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF) at our centre, from February 2002 till April 2006 retrospectively.

RESULTS

Fifty ALF patients underwent median (range) three (1-10) sessions of MARS. Acute exacerbations of chronic hepatitis B (n=26) and drug-induced liver injury (n=12) were the commonest causes. Living donors were available in 6, 2 paediatric patients underwent left lobe and four adults underwent right lobe living donor liver transplant. Among the 44 ALF patients without a suitable living donor, one underwent deceased donor liver transplant and survived, another 19-year-old male with acute exacerbations of chronic hepatitis B recovered without transplant, and the rest died. Twenty-six had AoCLF and underwent four (1-10) MARS sessions. Sepsis (n=16) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n=4) were the commonest precipitating factors. None had a suitable living or deceased donor, suitable for transplantation during their hospitalization. Only one of 26 AoCLF patients survived the hospitalization, but the survivor died of sepsis 1 month later.

CONCLUSION

In this non-randomized study, survival after MARS was related to the availability of transplant, and in patients where living or deceased donor transplant was unavailable, MARS was of little benefit. Randomized-controlled trials on MARS((R)) are urgently needed to clarify its clinical utility.