Rabeprazole- versus esomeprazole-based eradication regimens for H. pylori infection

Comparison of Efficacy on First-Line Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Between Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB)-Based Therapies Versus Proton-Pump Inhibitor (PPI)-Based Therapies: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a gram-negative bacterium that infects over half of the world population, accountable for 89% of all gastric cancer cases. The efficacy of the proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) based-triple therapy is declining, while the novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) based therapy gets new attention. However, it remains unclear regarding the optimal duration and number of comedication(s) for P-CAB-based regimens, which P-CAB is the best-in-class, and whether P-CABs perform better than all PPIs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy on first-line H. pylori eradication between P-CAB-based therapies versus PPI-based therapies.

METHODS

A systematic review on randomized controlled trials, with network meta-analysis conducted under the Frequentist approach. The P-score method was used to rank the probability of being the best intervention.

RESULTS

For the first-line treatment eradicating H. pylori infection, the 7-day vonoprazan-based triple therapy (VAC7) has the highest P-score for the probability of being the best intervention (0.96). VAC7 has a significantly higher eradication rate of H. pylori than most PPI-based therapies, including esomeprazole-based, lansoprazole-based, pantoprazole-based, and omeprazole-based regimens, as well as the other P-CAB based regimens, such as tegroprazan-based triple regimen (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.13-5.15).

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan-based triple therapy has a higher eradication rate than PPI-based triple therapies, as well as other P-CABs based regimens. It remains unclear whether VAC7 is superior over vonoprazan-based dual therapy (VA7). Overall, VAC7 should be recommended for clinical and public health interventions, with VA7 as a possible alternative considering the local antimicrobial resistance profiles.

Brief communication: global temporal trends in the efficacy of clarithromycin-based regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates achieved with clarithromycin-based triple therapies are declining due to antibiotic resistance, but data regarding temporal changes in efficacy with these eradication therapies are scarce.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of clarithromycin-based triple eradication regimens over time.

Design

A comprehensive literature review and time-trend analysis.

Data sources and methods

Bibliographies of recently published systematic literature reviews were searched and supplemented with a targeted literature review conducted using Medline and Embase databases and ProQuest from conception to May 2021. Studies reporting H. pylori eradication rates of clarithromycin-based triple therapies were included and temporal trends were estimated using a random-effects model.

Results

Eradication rates for triple therapies containing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin showed a significant decline over the past 23 years (p = 0.0315). However, this decline was not significant when eradication rates achieved with vonoprazan-based triple therapy were included (p = 0.3910).

Conclusion

Vonoprazan-based triple therapy partially mitigated the decline in eradication rates seen with PPI-based triple therapy, likely due to more powerful acid suppression of vonoprazan.

Network meta-analysis of different dosages of esomeprazole and rabeprazole for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosage of new generation proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in increasing cure rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection remains unclear. This network meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of different dosages of esomeprazole and rabeprazole in treating H. pylori infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Registry for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving esomeprazole and rabeprazole with different dosages from their inception through 31 March, 2022. After data extraction and risk of bias assessment, network meta-analyses were conducted using STATA 14.0. We calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) to rank all regimens.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies including 14 reports were included. Six dosages including rabeprazole 10 mg (R10bid), 20 mg (R20bid), and 40 mg (R40bid) twice daily and esomeprazole 20 mg (E20bid) and 40 mg (E40bid) twice daily as well as 40 mg once daily (E40qd) were identified. Network meta-analysis suggested that R40bid ranked highest in the cure rate (83.8%), followed by E40bid (82.6%), E20bid (54.5%), R20bid (34.2%), R10bid (22.8%), and E40qd (22.0%); however, E40qd ranked highest in adverse events (91.1%), followed by R20bid (57.8), R10bid (57.6%), E20bid (38.9%), E40bid (34.2%), and R40bid (20.4%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, R40bid and E40bid might be the optimum dosage to increase the cure rate; however, E40qd was superior for adverse events. Nevertheless, future studies should validate the results from this network meta-analysis.

Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker and Proton Pump Inhibitor-Based Regimens for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims

Effective acid suppression is a crucial component of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens. Approved treatments include dual, triple, and quadruple therapies composed of certain antibiotics in combination with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, provides more potent and durable acid suppression than PPIs. We compared the efficacy of vonoprazan-based therapies vs approved standard regimens using new evidence from the phase 3 pHalconHP trial in North America and Europe.

Methods

Studies reporting first-line H. pylori eradication rates from empiric treatment with Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies and vonoprazan-containing therapies were identified via bibliographic searches of systematic literature reviews and a subsequent MEDLINE/Embase search using index terms for H. pylori and eradication. Randomized controlled trials comparing 2 or more relevant comparators were included in Bayesian network meta-analyses for grouped and distinct therapies.

Results

Twenty-three distinct regimens from 42 trials including 12,773 patients were identified. Vonoprazan-based triple therapy showed the highest relative efficacy (odds ratio: 2.73, 95% credible interval 2.11, 3.54) and 72.1% probability of being the best. North American, Western, and global scenarios were largely consistent. Vonoprazan-based therapies demonstrated higher odds of H. pylori eradication than each PPI-based triple therapy. Furthermore, vonoprazan-based triple therapy was superior to bismuth subcitrate quadruple therapy (odds ratio: 1.60, 95% credible interval: 1.07, 2.38).

Conclusion

Vonoprazan-based eradication regimens represent novel treatments for H. pylori infection on a global scale, offering efficacy that, in this analysis, is superior to PPI-based triple therapy and comparable or better than bismuth quadruple therapy.

Two Different 1-Week Quadruple Therapies Given Back-to-Back Consecutive Therapy for Difficult-to-Treat Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

We aim to evaluate the efficacy of 2 different 1-week quadruple therapies given back-to-back consecutive therapy in patients with difficult-to-treat Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Patients with proven H. pylori infection were recruited after >3 failed standard quadruple eradication. They received consecutive therapy consisting of esomeprazole 40 mg or rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1,000 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times daily, and furazolidone 100 mg 3 times daily for the first 7 days, followed by colloidal bismuth pectin 200 mg twice daily in place of furazolidone 100 mg for another 7 days. Eradication rates, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and compliance were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled. The mean number of previous eradications was 3.6 (range: 3-7). The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 90.8% (59/65) and 95.1% (58/61). In total, 23.4% (15/64) of patients experienced drug-related TEAEs. No serious adverse events were observed. None of the patients required treatment for TEAEs, and 95.3% (61/64) showed good compliance. Overall, 51 patients (78.5%) were with the available antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. The resistance rates to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin were 60.8% (31/51), 100% (51/51), 70.6% (36/51), and 2.0% (1/51), respectively. No resistance was detected to either furazolidone or tetracycline. However, in 54.9% of patients (28/51), H. pylori was resistant to 3 antibiotics (metronidazole, levofloxacin, and clarithromycin).

DISCUSSION

Consecutive therapy, including amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone, achieved a good eradication rate (>90%), with desirable compliance and tolerability in difficult-to-treat H. pylori infection.

Randomized Trial Comparing Esomeprazole and Rabeprazole in First-line Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection based on the Serum Levels of Pepsinogens

Objective CYP2C19 metabolic activity influences the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies comprising PPIs. Rabeprazole (RPZ) and esomeprazole (EPZ) are PPIs not extensively metabolized by CYP2C19. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether or not first-line triple therapies using RPZ or EPZ are equally effective in Japanese patients with different CYP2C19 genotypes. Methods Two-hundred patients infected with H. pylori were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: amoxicillin (750 mg), clarithromycin (200 mg), and either esomeprazole (20 mg) (EAC group) or rabeprazole (10 mg) (RAC group), twice a day for one week. The CYP2C19 polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction and the serum level of pepsinogens was measured. Results The eradication rates of the EAC and RAC regimens were 79.8% (95% confidential interval: 71.7-89.0%) and 74.7% (66.0-83.4%), respectively, in a per protocol (PP) analysis (p=0.488). The eradication rates of the EAC and RAC regimens were not significantly different between patients with the homo EM genotype (p=0.999) or hetero IM or PM genotypes (p=0.286). A lower PG I/II ratio was associated with lower eradication rates (p=0.025). Conclusion Although the eradication rate was less than 80%, the EAC and RAC regimens were equally effective in each CYP2C19 genotype group. The PG I/II ratio was associated with the results of EAC and RAC therapy in this series of patients.

Esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-based triple therapy eradicated Helicobacter pylori comparably regardless of clarithromycin susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotypes

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of esomeprazole-based triple therapy compared with rabeprazole-based triple therapy according to CYP2C19 genotype and clarithromycin susceptibility status for first-line eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in Japan. We enrolled 219 H. pylori-infected patients, and randomly allocated patients to the EAC group (esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 200 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg for one week, with all drugs given twice daily) or RAC group (rabeprazole 10 mg, clarithromycin 200 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg for one week, with all drugs given twice daily). The H. pylori eradication rate according to the PP analyses was 75.0% (95% CI: 65.2–82.8%) in the EAC group and 71.4% (95% CI: 61.4–79.1%) in the RAC group. There were no statistically significant differences. The eradication rates of the clarithromycin-resistant/-sensitive strains were, respectively, 45.0% (95% CI: 30.7–60.2%)/98.0% (95% CI: 88.7–100%) in the EAC group and 39.5% (95% CI: 25.6–55.3%)/93.5% (95% CI: 81.9–98.4%) in the RAC group. The eradication rate of the clarithromycin-sensitive strains was significantly higher than that of the resistant strains in both groups. In conclusion, EAC and RAC therapies show a comparable efficacy regardless of the CYP2C19 genotype and clarithromycin susceptibility status in Japan.

Hybrid vs sequential therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Taiwan: A prospective randomized trial

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of sequential vs hybrid therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS: From March 2013 to May 2014, one hundred and seventy-five H. pylori infected patients who had not been treated for H. pylori before were randomized to receive either sequential therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for 5 d, followed by rabeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 5 d) or hybrid therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for 7 d, followed by rabeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 7 d). H. pylori status was confirmed by positive results of both rapid urease test and histology examination or a positive result of culture. Eradication efficacy was assessed by follow-up endoscopy with rapid urease test and histological examination 8 wk after the end of anti-H. pylori therapy, or ¹³C-urea breath test at least 4 wk after completion of treatment. The primary outcome was H. pylori eradication by intension-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients (83 patients in the sequential group and 84 patients in the hybrid group) completed the study. The compliance rates were 97.6% and 97.7% for the two groups, respectively. The eradication rate was 78.2% for the sequential group and 92% for the hybrid group by ITT analysis (P = 0.01). The eradication rate was 81.9% for the sequential group and 96.4% for the hybrid group by PP analysis (P = 0.01). Univariate analysis for the clinical and bacterial factors did not identify any risk factors associated with treatment failure. Severe adverse events were observed in 2.3% of patients in the sequential group and 2.4% of those in the hybrid group.

CONCLUSION: Due to a grade A (> 95%) success rate for H. pylori eradication by PP analysis, similar compliance and adverse events, hybrid therapy seems to be an appropriate eradication regimen in Taiwan.

Factors affecting first-line triple therapy of Helicobacter pylori including CYP2C19 genotype and antibiotic resistance

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence shows that the eradication rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has decreased.

AIMS

To clarify the trend of eradication rate of PPI-based triple therapy and to assess the related factors in Korea during the past decade.

METHODS

We prospectively prescribed the triple regimen for seven days (PPI + amoxicillin 1.0 g + clarithromycin 500 mg, twice a day) from March 2003 to May 2013 in 2,202 H. pylori-positive patients. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed by the agar dilution method, and the CYP2C19 genotype was determined by the PCR method.

RESULTS

In the past decade, the annual eradication rate showed a decreasing trend in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (P = 0.001, both). The antibiotic resistance was increased to amoxicillin (7.2-17.2%, P = 0.003) and clarithromycin (23.2-37.3%, P = 0.010) during the study period. The poor metabolizer genotype of CYP2C19 showed a high eradication rate compared to the extensive metabolizer (86.8 vs. 78.2%, P = 0.035). In addition, age ≥ 50 years, female gender, BMI < 25 kg/m(2), amoxicillin and/or clarithromycin resistance were associated with treatment failure on univariate analysis. However, on multivariate analysis, clarithromycin resistance was the only significant factor for treatment failure (OR, 12.76; 95% CI, 5.58-29.18; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in clarithromycin resistance has led to decreased eradication rate of first-line triple therapy, and; hence, a new strategy is needed to improve the eradication rate of H. pylori.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Is Associated with the Progression of Dementia: A Population-Based Study

Objective. To evaluate the effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) on the progression of dementia in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with peptic ulcer. Methods. Participants with the diagnosis of AD and peptic ulcer were recruited between 2001 and 2008. We examined the association between eradication of H. pylori and the progression of AD using the multiple regression models. Medication shift from Donepezil, Rivastgmine, and Galantamine to Mematine is defined as progression of dementia according to the insurance of National Health Insurance (NHI) under expert review. Results. Among the 30142 AD patients with peptic ulcers, the ratio of medication shift in AD patients with peptic ulcers is 79.95%. There were significant lower incidence comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure and hyperlipidemia) in patients with H. pylori eradication as compared with no H. pylori eradication. Eradication of H. pylori was associated with a decreased risk of AD progression (odds ratio [OR] 0.35 [0.23–0.52]) as compared with no H. pylori eradication, which was not modified by comorbidities. Conclusions. Eradication of H. pylori was associated with a decreased progression of dementia as compared to no eradication of H. pylori in AD patients with peptic ulcers.

Randomized trial comparing rabeprazole- versus lansoprazole-based Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens

Different types of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies could result in different Helicobacter pylori eradication rates. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole- and lansoprazole-based triple therapies in primary treatment of H. pylori infection. From September 2005 to July 2008, 426 H. pylori-infected patients were randomly assigned to receive a 7-day eradication therapy with either rabeprazole 20mgbid (RAC group, n=222) or lansoprazole 30mgbid (LAC group, n=228) in combination with amoxicillin 1gbid and clarithromycin 500mgbid. The patients received follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and/or (13)C-urea breath test 12-16 weeks later to define H. pylori status. Their personal and medical history, compliance and side effects were obtained by using a standardized questionnaire. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the eradication rate was 87.84% in the RAC group and 85.96% in the LAC group (p=0.56). All patients returned for assessment of compliance (100% in the LAC group vs. 99.50% in the RAC group; p=0.32) and adverse events (7.20% in the RAC group vs. 5.70% in the LAC group, p=0.51). Univariate analysis suggested that patients with nonsteroid anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID) use had lower eradication rates than those without (76.71% vs. 88.74%; p=0.006). Our results showed that efficacy and safety were similar in rabeprazole- and lansoprazole-based primary therapies. The influence of NSAID usage on H. pylori eradication needs to be further investigated.

Meta-analysis: esomeprazole or rabeprazole vs. first-generation pump inhibitors in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

The decreasing efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatments over time makes the search for better regimens and adjuvant medications a priority.

AIM

To conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing rabeprazole or esomeprazole with other proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or with each other in H. pylori eradication treatment.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

Randomised clinical trials comparing esomeprazole or rabeprazole with first-generation PPIs (omeprazole-lansoprazole-pantoprazole) or with each other.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis (35 studies, 5998 patients) showed higher eradication rates for esomeprazole than for first-generation PPIs: 82.3% vs. 77.6%; OR = 1.32(1.01-1.73); NNT = 21. Rabeprazole also showed better results than first-generation PPIs: 80.5% vs. 76.2%; OR = 1.21(1.02-1.42); NNT = 23. PPI dosage sub-analysis: only esomeprazole 40 mg b.d. improved results [83.5% esomeprazole vs. 72.4% first generation; OR = 2.27(1.07-4.82); NNT = 9]. Whereas rabeprazole 10 and 20 mg b.d. maintained results, esomeprazole 20 mg b.d. obtained lower efficacy. Esomeprazole vs. rabeprazole sub-analysis (five studies): no significant differences were found: 78.7% vs. 76.7%; OR = 0.90(0.70-1.17). CYP2C19 sub-analysis: Genotype did not significantly affect eradication either in first [OR = 1.76(0.99-3.12)] or new generation [OR = 1.19(0.73-1.95)] PPIs. However, sub-analysis considering only extensive metaboliser patients showed higher eradication with new-generation PPIs [OR = 1.37(1.02-1.84)].

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole and rabeprazole show better overall H. pylori eradication rates than first-generation PPIs. This clinical benefit is more pronounced in esomeprazole 40 mg b.d. regimens. In CYP2C19 extensive metabolisers, new-generation PPIs are more effective than first-generation PPIs for H. pylori eradication. However, a general recommendation of using new-generation PPIs in all scenarios remains unclear.

Comparison between Single-Dose Esomeprazole- and Pantoprazole-Based Triple Therapy on the Effectiveness for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Taiwanese Population

Background and Study Aims. To compare the effectiveness of two regimens, single-dose esomeprazole- and pantoprazole-based triple therapy, for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. Patients and Methods. A total of 453 patients were enrolled for H. pylori eradication. They were randomly assigned to either EAC group (Esomeprazole 40 mg once daily, Amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, Clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days) or PAC group (Pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily, Amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, Clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Follow-up endoscopy or urea breath test was scheduled 12–16 weeks after the eradication to evaluate the therapeutic response. Results. Higher eradication rate in EAC group than PAC group was shown by intention-to-treat analysis (EAC 72% versus PAC 55%, P < 0.05) and per-protocol analysis (EAC 91% versus PAC 72%, P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects (EAC 19% versus PAC 17%, P = 0.712) and the compliance (EAC 87% versus PAC 91%, P = 0.083) were comparable between these 2 groups. Conclusions. Single-dose esomeprazole-based triple therapy is effective for H. pylori eradication.

Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomized, controlled study comparing 2 rescue therapies after failure of standard triple therapies

Antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin in second-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is much less frequent than resistance to metronidazole. We conducted a randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacies of standard quadruple rescue therapy and a new therapy with amoxicillin replacing metronidazole for patients failing first-line eradication treatment. We randomly assigned 120 patients who failed H. pylori eradication using a proton pump inhibitor plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin to undergo a 1-week rescue therapy with esomeprazole, bismuth subcitrate, and tetracycline plus either metronidazole (EBTM group, n = 62) or amoxicillin (EBTA group, n = 58). We used follow-up endoscopy 8 weeks after the end of treatment to assess the treatment response. We also examined and analyzed antibiotic resistances and CYP2C19 genotypes. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the EBTA group had a significantly lower eradication rate than the EBTM group (62% vs. 81%, respectively, p = 0.02). Per-protocol analysis showed similar results (64% vs. 83%, p = 0.01). However, the EBTA group had less frequency of adverse events than the EBTM group (19% vs. 44%, p < 0.01). Both groups had good drug compliance (both 97%). Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed that the frequency of amoxicillin-resistant strains was much less than that of metronidazole-resistant strains (0% vs. 54%, respectively), and there were no significant differences between H. pylori eradication rates and antibiotic resistances. In conclusion, EBTA quadruple therapy demonstrated a lower eradication rate than standard EBTM therapy in second-line rescue treatment. The discrepancy between in vitro antibiotic susceptibility and in vivo eradication response is probably due to drug interactions between combined antibiotics or some unknown causes, and should not be neglected in H. pylori therapy.

The pharmacology of esomeprazole and its role in gastric acid related diseases

Esomeprazole (S-isomer of omeprazole) demonstrates a better pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile than the racemic product omeprazole. Esomeprazole's pharmacological activity of gastric acid secretion is through proton pump inhibition. The pharmacokinetic properties provide for an enhanced pharmacological effect. Esomeprazole is rapidly absorbed and the extent of absorption is higher resulting in higher systemic absorption of esomeprazole (bioavailability), which coupled with reduced clearance results in greater systemic exposure. This pharmacodynamic profile then provides for a prolongation of inhibition of gastric acid output and correlates well with its more beneficial therapeutic efficacy over omeprazole and some of the other proton-pump inhibitors. It has been well proven as an effective agent in the treatment of gastro-esophagitis reflux disease, (reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease), NSAID-induced gastric-intestinal symptoms and ulcers, Helicobacter pylori infection and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Esomeprazole has a good tolerability profile and a low potential for drug interaction.

Rabeprazole: a review of its use in the management of gastric acid-related diseases in adults

Rabeprazole (Aciphex, Alfence, Pariet) is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) used for the treatment of adults with conditions requiring a reduction of gastric acid secretion such as erosive or ulcerative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), duodenal and gastric ulcers, and pathological hypersecretory conditions including Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). It is also used as part of combination therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, a pathogen frequently implicated in the development of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Rabeprazole has a well established efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of gastric acid-related diseases. Rabeprazole is a useful, well tolerated and cost-effective option for the treatment of GORD, NERD, peptic ulcer and other gastric acid-related diseases (including ZES), and provides an appropriate alternative to other currently available PPIs, with the added benefits of having a consistent efficacy profile and low drug interaction potential due to its predominantly nonenzymatic metabolism.

Meta-analysis: high-dose proton pump inhibitors vs. standard dose in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

The evidence on whether high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increase cure rates of Helicobacter pylori treatment has not been previously assessed.

AIM

To evaluate the evidence on the usefulness of high-dose PPI in standard triple therapy by performing a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in multiple databases and in the abstracts submitted to the Digestive Diseases Week, the European Helicobacter Study Group congress and the United European Gastroenterology Week. Randomized trials comparing a standard dose of a PPI with high-dose PPI both twice a day in triple therapy combining a PPI plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole were selected. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for all comparisons were calculated using Review Manager.

RESULTS

Six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All used triple therapy for 7 days. A mean intention-to-treat cure rate of 82% was achieved with high-dose PPI and one of 74% with standard dose (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17). Subgroup analysis showed that the maximum increase was observed when the PPI compared were omeprazole 20 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg vs. esomeprazole 40 mg.

CONCLUSION

High-dose PPI seems more effective than standard-dose for curing H. pylori infection in 7-day triple therapy.

Rabeprazole: a second-generation proton pump inhibitor in the treatment of acid-related disease

Rabeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) presenting a very advantageous pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile over older PPIs. In particular, this drug has a very fast onset of action, due to a short activation time and a very high pKa, and may therefore be defined as a 'second generation' PPI. The aim of this article is to provide an update on the pharmacology and clinical profile of rabeprazole and its use in acid-related disorders, with a particular focus on its role in gastroesophageal reflux disease; in the treatment and prevention of duodenal and gastric ulcers and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; in the therapy of the extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (in particular the respiratory and ear, nose and throat ones); and in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.