The importance of prompt blood pressure control

Prunus yedoensis Bark Downregulates the Expression of Cell Adhesion Molecules in Human Endothelial Cell Lines and Relaxes Blood Vessels in Rat Aortic Rings

The incidence of cardiovascular diseases, such as high blood pressure, is increasing worldwide, owing to population aging and irregular lifestyle habits. Previous studies have reported the vasorelaxant effects of Prunus yedoensis bark methanol extract. However, various solvent extracts of P. yedoensis bark and their vascular relaxation mechanisms have not been sufficiently studied. We prepared extracts of P. yedoensis bark using various solvents (water, 30% ethanol, and 70% ethanol). P. yedoensis bark 30% ethanol extract (PYB-30E) decreased the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and E-selectin in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) activated with 200 ng/mL TNF-α. Additionally, PYB-30E showed vasodilatory effects on isolated rat aortic rings. This was confirmed to be the result of the activation of the NO/cGMP pathway, regulation of non-selective calcium-activated K+ channels, and calcium channel blockade. Additionally, PYB-30E significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Taken together, our results indicated that PYB-30E is a candidate functional material with preventive and therapeutic effects against hypertension.

How can resistant hypertension be identified and prevented?

Resistant hypertension is highly prevalent, and is the form of arterial hypertension that is most difficult to treat. Many patients diagnosed with this disease do not have resistant hypertension, but rather have mismanaged primary hypertension. In many cases blood pressure can be controlled by directly addressing underlying causes such as primary aldosteronism, obstructive sleep apnoea, or excessive neurogenic stimulation. Clinicians should ensure that appropriate blood-pressure measurements are used to diagnose resistant hypertension, explore a variety of drug combinations, and battle clinical inertia. Patients should comply with medication schedules and dietary modifications. Correction of these factors will greatly diminish the prevalence of 'resistant' hypertension and avoid the consequences of a persistently elevated blood pressure in these patients.

Are there new threshold and goals in the treatment of arterial hypertension?

BACKGROUND

About half of the global burden of cardiovascular disease has been attributed to high blood pressure (BP). Worldwide, 7·6 million premature deaths (about 13·5% of the global total), 54% of strokes, and 47% of cases of ischemic heart disease were caused by high BP in 2001.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All guidelines agree that pharmacological treatment of patients with hypertension should be initiated as soon as BP rises >140/90 mmHg. Available data support the reduction of BP to values to <140/90 mmHg, but do not favor a reduction to <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes or a history of cardiovascular disease because of the absence of evidence obtained in prospective studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review updates the controversies and challenges involved in the treatment of patients with established arterial hypertension, such as the progression of high-normal BP to overt hypertension, the choice of appropriate threshold and goal BP levels, the adequate number of drugs to be used since the early stages of hypertension, and which type of combination therapy offers most advantages to the patient.

Current challenges in the clinical management of hypertension

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is probably the most-important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). BP influences the development of CVD, even if levels of BP are well below the usual cut-off point that defines the presence of arterial hypertension. Adequate measurement of BP is the most-important requirement for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected hypertension. The use of methodologies such as ambulatory and home BP monitoring have become powerful tools for defining the 'real' BP of patients, discarding the white-coat effect, and discovering masked hypertension. Early intervention with life-style changes and antihypertensive drugs is required to obtain the best outcome for the patient. In this sense, early use of combination antihypertensive drug therapy is recommended. The treatment of resistant hypertension-the type of elevated BP that is most difficult to control-has clearly improved over the past decade. Further studies are required to define how antihypertensive therapy should be used in the earliest stages of hypertension and for the treatment of patients with a mild-to-moderate increase in global cardiovascular risk.

Using impedance cardiography with postural change to stratify patients with hypertension

Background: Early detection of cardiovascular disease in patients with hypertension could initiate appropriate treatment to control blood pressure and prevent the progression of cardiovascular disease.

Objective: The goal of this study was to show how impedance cardiography waveform analysis with postural change can be used to detect subclinical cardiovascular disease in patients with high blood pressure.

Methods: Patients with high blood pressure had impedance cardiography data obtained in two positions, standing upright and supine.

Results: In 50 adults, impedance cardiography indicated that all patients had abnormal data, with 44 (88%) having multiple abnormalities. Impedance cardiography showed 32 (64%) had ventricular dysfunction, 48 (96%) had vascular load abnormalities, 34 (68%) had hemodynamic abnormalities, 2 (4%) had hypovolemia, and 3 (6%) had hypervolemia.

Conclusions: Hypertensive patients have diverse cardiovascular abnormalities that can be quantified by impedance cardiography. By stratifying patients with ventricular, vascular, and hemodynamic abnormalities, treatment could be customized based on the abnormal underlying mechanisms with the potential to rapidly control blood pressure, prevent progression of cardiovascular disease, and possibly reverse remodeling.

Time to achieve blood pressure goal with a combination versus a conventional monotherapy approach in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome

The time to achieve a blood pressure (BP) goal < or =130/85 mmHg with a combination versus a conventional monotherapy approach was evaluated in 308 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. They were randomized to valsartan (V) 8 mg/amlodipine (A) 5 mg combination or to V 160 mg monotherapy for 12 weeks and every 2 weeks, there was a titration in nonresponder patients: in the combination group V/A was progressively increased to V 160/A 5 mg; V160/A 7.5 mg; V160/A 10 mg; V 240/A 10 mg, and V 320/A 10 mg. In the monotherapy group, the regimen was progressively modified as following: V 240 mg; V 320 mg; V 320/A 5 mg; V 320/A 7.5 mg, and V 320/A 10 mg. The mean time to achieve the BP goal was shorter in patients randomized to combination therapy compared to those randomized to conventional monotherapy (4.7 +/- 2.7 weeks vs. 7.1 +/- 3.9 weeks, respectively, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients who achieved target BP in the combination approach group statistically exceeded that of the monotherapy treated one already after 2 weeks of treatment (30.5 vs. 14.9%, p < 0.01) and again after 4, 6, 8, and 10 weeks of treatment. Only at 12 weeks the percentage of normalized patients was similar in the two treatment groups (78.8% vs. 75.3%, ns). These results suggest that initial therapy with a V/A combination approach may be more quickly effective than a conventional sequential monotherapy approach in achieving target BP in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome.